REVIEW 1 cited by
Interlock-Free Multi-Aspect Rationalization for Text Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Explanation is important for text classification tasks. One prevalent type of explanation is rationales, which are text snippets of input text that suffice to yield the prediction and are meaningful to humans. A lot of research on rationalization has been based on the selective rationalization framework, which has recently been shown to be problematic due to the interlocking dynamics. In this paper, we show that we address the interlocking problem in the multi-aspect setting, where we aim to generate multiple rationales for multiple outputs. More specifically, we propose a multi-stage training method incorporating an additional self-supervised contrastive loss that helps to generate more semantically diverse rationales. Empirical results on the beer review dataset show that our method improves significantly the rationalization performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Interlocking-free Selective Rationalization Through Genetic-based Learning
GenSPP uses genetic search to train the generator separately from the predictor, reporting higher rationale F1 than FR, MGR, MCD, and G-RAT while classification accuracy is roughly maintained.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.