Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 70 references

Bosonic transfer between two modes reduces to parity synthesis on their antisymmetric bright normal mode.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 07:04 UTC pith:UJ5QH5LP

load-bearing objection The paper reduces bosonic transfer to exact bright-mode parity synthesis under opposite-sign couplings and supplies closed-form formulas plus a detuned JC route for the parity step.

arxiv 2606.29624 v1 pith:UJ5QH5LP submitted 2026-06-28 quant-ph

Bright-mode parity synthesis for bosonic state transfer through a single ancilla

Pradip Laha , Peter van Loock This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords bosonic state transferancilla-mediated transfernormal modesparity synthesisJaynes-Cummings evolutiondark bright modesFock states
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When two oscillators couple with opposite signs to one two-level ancilla, a normal-mode transformation isolates a dark symmetric mode that stays uncoupled. Transfer of states between the original physical modes then becomes exactly equivalent to synthesizing a parity operation on the remaining antisymmetric bright mode. This equivalence supplies closed finite-sum formulas that realize the transfer for Fock states, Fock-state qubits, and finite superpositions. The same reduction accounts for the recurrence limitation of resonant driving once more than one photon is involved and supplies a detuned Jaynes-Cummings route that achieves high-fidelity parity synthesis at finite cutoff.

Core claim

In the normal-mode basis the symmetric collective mode is dark while transfer between the physical oscillators is equivalent to synthesizing parity on the antisymmetric bright mode; this reduction yields exact finite-sum transfer formulas for Fock states and their superpositions and shows why resonant single-ancilla transfer is recurrence-limited beyond the single-photon sector.

What carries the argument

Normal-mode decomposition that isolates a dark symmetric mode and reduces physical-mode transfer to parity synthesis on the bright antisymmetric mode.

Load-bearing premise

The two oscillators must couple to the ancilla with opposite signs so that the normal-mode transformation produces an exactly dark symmetric mode.

What would settle it

Prepare a two-photon Fock state in one oscillator, apply the detuned Jaynes-Cummings drive for the predicted duration, and check whether the final state in the target oscillator matches the exact finite-sum formula; any systematic deviation beyond calibration error would falsify the claimed reduction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Exact finite-sum formulas exist for transferring any Fock state or finite superposition through the ancilla.
  • Resonant driving cannot achieve perfect transfer beyond the single-photon sector because of recurrence in the bright-mode dynamics.
  • Detuned Jaynes-Cummings evolution supplies a two-parameter control that reaches high-fidelity finite-cutoff parity synthesis.
  • Transfer fidelity for bosonic codes is limited by the photon-number support and residual bright-mode phase errors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dark-bright decomposition may serve as an organizing principle for designing ancilla interfaces in larger bosonic registers whenever direct exchange is unavailable.
  • Parity synthesis on a single bright mode could be tested as a modular primitive for composing more complex bosonic gates under the same coupling constraint.
  • The residual ancilla excitation and Markovian noise estimates already quantified in the work could be used to set hardware-specific fidelity budgets before experimental implementation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that two bosonic oscillators coupled with opposite signs to a single two-level ancilla admit an exact normal-mode decomposition in which the symmetric mode is dark; transfer between the physical modes then reduces exactly to parity synthesis on the antisymmetric bright mode. This reduction supplies closed-form finite-sum transfer maps for Fock states, Fock-state qubits, and finite-support superpositions, explains the recurrence limitation of resonant single-ancilla transfer beyond the single-photon sector, and yields a two-parameter detuned Jaynes-Cummings protocol whose residual ancilla excitation, calibration sensitivity, and minimal Markovian noise are quantified separately. Bosonic-code examples illustrate sensitivity to photon-number support and bright-mode phase errors.

Significance. If the central reduction holds, the work supplies an exact, parameter-free organizing principle and benchmark for ancilla-mediated bosonic transfer under a restricted interface. The finite-sum expressions, the explicit noise estimates, and the demonstration that the dark-mode decoupling follows identically from the bilinear Hamiltonian are concrete strengths that can be checked directly and used as reference points for hardware implementations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'finite-cutoff parity synthesis' is used without indicating the photon-number cutoff; a parenthetical reference to the support of the Fock-space truncation would improve immediate readability.
  2. The transition from the normal-mode Hamiltonian to the parity-synthesis map is stated to be exact, but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the Fock-space dimension at which the finite-sum formulas are truncated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The recognition of the exact normal-mode reduction, the closed-form transfer maps, and the utility of the detuned Jaynes-Cummings protocol as a benchmark is appreciated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing step is the normal-mode decomposition arising from opposite-sign ancilla couplings in the bilinear interaction Hamiltonian. This directly yields a dark symmetric mode and reduces physical-mode transfer to parity synthesis on the bright antisymmetric mode, producing exact finite-sum formulas. The abstract and skeptic analysis confirm this reduction is identical to the input Hamiltonian with no additional assumptions, fitting, or self-referential definitions required. No self-citations, ansatze, or renamed empirical patterns are invoked as load-bearing elements. The result is externally falsifiable via the stated Hamiltonian and holds for any finite Fock support without circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1224 out tokens · 38455 ms · 2026-06-30T07:04:21.567695+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Bosonic modes provide hardware-efficient quantum memories and logical registers, including highly non-Gaussian encoded states, but transferring finite-dimensional bosonic states through a restricted ancilla interface requires identifying which collective mode is actually controlled. We study a restricted setting in which two oscillators couple with opposite signs to a single two-level ancilla. In the normal-mode basis, the symmetric mode is dark, while transfer between the physical modes is equivalent to synthesizing parity on the antisymmetric bright mode. This reduction gives exact finite-sum transfer formulas for Fock states, Fock-state qubits, and finite Fock superpositions, and explains why resonant single-ancilla transfer is recurrence-limited beyond the single-photon sector. We then show that detuned Jaynes--Cummings evolution provides a native two-parameter route to high-fidelity finite-cutoff parity synthesis, with residual ancilla excitation, calibration sensitivity, and a minimal Markovian noise estimate quantified separately. Bosonic-code examples illustrate how transfer sensitivity is governed by photon-number support and residual bright-mode phase errors. The result provides a practical benchmark and organizing principle for constrained ancilla-mediated bosonic transfer when direct exchange is unavailable or undesirable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29624 by Peter van Loock, Pradip Laha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bright-mode parity as the transfer target. Two physical bosonic modes coupled with opposite signs to a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Finite-time transfer benchmarks over the window [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase residual spectrum for the best-found native [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Encoded state transfer benchmarks and residual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Finite-window dependence of the optimized average-process infidelity. All three panels use the same vertical scale, so [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Best-found native detuned optima over the main [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Calibration sensitivity of the best-found native [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Minimal open-system estimate for the best-found na [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Averaging the two logical basis states gives the leading logical leakage coefficientC leak = 1, consistent with Ta- ble II

    Projection back onto the logical zero gives Sbin 0 (ϵ) = 1+A(ϵ) 4 2 2 +O(ϵ 4) = 1− 3 2 ϵ2 +O(ϵ 4).(72) Equations (71) and (72) explain why even this compact code has a visible phase error penalty: the|0⟩–|4⟩coher- ence of|0 bin L ⟩is rotated partly out of the logical subspace. Averaging the two logical basis states gives the leading logical leakage coeffi...

  2. [2]

    Loss” denotesκ + =κ − =κ, “Relaxation

    ForN= 10, F nat 10,opt(50,20) = 0.996334913300, F nat 10,opt(50,100) = 0.999370508862, F nat 10,opt(50,200) = 0.999370508862.(D4) Thus,δ max = 20 is too narrow to reach the best-found main-window native solution, whereasδ max = 100 al- ready contains the relevant best-found optimum. Ex- tending toδ max = 200 does not change the best-found N= 10 solution a...

  3. [3]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum informa- tion with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables(CRC Press, 2017)

    A. Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables(CRC Press, 2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    V. V. Albertet al., Performance and structure of single- mode bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. A97, 032346 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Haroche and J.-M

    S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond,Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    S. Li, Z. Ni, L. Zhang, Y. Cai, J. Mai, S. Wen, P. Zheng, X. Deng, S. Liu, Y. Xu, and D. Yu, Autonomous stabi- lization of fock states in an oscillator against multiphoton losses, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 203602 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Macro- scopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping, Phys. Rev. A59, 2631 (1999)

    1999

  10. [10]

    Leghtas, G

    Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Hardware-efficient au- tonomous quantum memory protection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 120501 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Leghtaset al., Confining the state of light to a quan- tum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science 347, 853 (2015)

    Z. Leghtaset al., Confining the state of light to a quan- tum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science 347, 853 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynami- cally protected cat-qubits: A new paradigm for universal quantum computation, New J. Phys.16, 045014 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    M. H. Michael, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, V. V. Albert, J. Salmilehto, L. Jiang, and S. M. Girvin, New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode, Phys. Rev. X6, 031006 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, R. Stassi, X. Wang, and F. Nori, Fast binomial-code holonomic quantum computation with ultrastrong light-matter coupling, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033275 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Chang, High-rate extended binomial codes for mul- tiqubit encoding, Phys

    E.-J. Chang, High-rate extended binomial codes for mul- tiqubit encoding, Phys. Rev. A112, 032419 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    2001

  17. [17]

    B. Q. Baragiola, G. Pantaleoni, R. N. Alexander, A. Karanjai, and N. C. Menicucci, All-gaussian universal- ity and fault tolerance with the gottesman-kitaev-preskill code, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 200502 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    K. Noh, V. V. Albert, and L. Jiang, Quantum capac- ity bounds of gaussian thermal loss channels and achiev- able rates with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory65, 2563 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Campagne-Ibarcqet al., Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature 584, 368 (2020)

    P. Campagne-Ibarcqet al., Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature 584, 368 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Noh and C

    K. Noh and C. Chamberland, Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface–Gottesman- Kitaev-Preskill code, Phys. Rev. A101, 012316 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    K. Noh, C. Chamberland, and F. G. Brand˜ ao, Low- overhead fault-tolerant quantum error correction with the surface-GKP code, PRX Quantum3, 010315 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Concatenating Binomial Codes with the Planar Code

    J. Soule, A. C. Doherty, and A. L. Grimsmo, Con- catenating binomial codes with the planar code (2024), arXiv:2312.14390 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Conrad,The fabulous world of GKP codes, Disserta- tion (2024)

    J. Conrad,The fabulous world of GKP codes, Disserta- tion (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Eickbusch, V

    A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nat. Phys.18, 1464 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quan- tum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. X10, 011058 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Y. Xu, Y. Wang, C. Vuillot, and V. V. Albert, Letting the tiger out of its cage: Bosonic coding without concate- nation, Phys. Rev. X15, 041025 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quan- tum circuits, Fundam. Res.1, 50 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    W.-L. Ma, S. Puri, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Quantum control of bosonic modes with superconducting circuits, Sci. Bull.66, 1789 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Enrico Fermi

    V. V. Albert, Bosonic coding: Introduction and use cases, inQuantum Error Correction, Proceedings of the Inter- national School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Vol. 209 (IOS Press, 2025) pp. 1–46

    2025

  30. [30]

    Puttermanet al., Hardware-efficient quantum error 23 correction via concatenated bosonic qubits, Nature638, 927 (2025)

    H. Puttermanet al., Hardware-efficient quantum error 23 correction via concatenated bosonic qubits, Nature638, 927 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    C. T. Hann, K. Noh, H. Putterman, M. H. Matheny, J. K. Iverson, M. T. Fang, C. Chamberland, O. Painter, and F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, Hybrid cat-transmon architecture for scalable, hardware-efficient quantum error correction, PRX Quantum6, 030305 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Christandl, N

    M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, and A. J. Landahl, Perfect state transfer in quantum spin networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 187902 (2004)

    2004

  33. [33]

    C. J. Axlineet al., On-demand quantum state trans- fer and entanglement between remote microwave cavity memories, Nat. Phys.14, 705 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    Kurpierset al., Deterministic quantum state transfer and generation of remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature558, 264 (2018)

    P. Kurpierset al., Deterministic quantum state transfer and generation of remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature558, 264 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Campagne-Ibarcqet al., Deterministic remote entan- glement of superconducting circuits through microwave two-photon transitions, Phys

    P. Campagne-Ibarcqet al., Deterministic remote entan- glement of superconducting circuits through microwave two-photon transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 200501 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Y. Xu, D. Zhu, F.-X. Sun, Q. He, and W. Zhang, Fast quantum state transfer and entanglement preparation in strongly coupled bosonic systems, New J. Phys.25, 113015 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    He and Y.-X

    Y. He and Y.-X. Zhang, Quantum state transfer via a multimode resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 023602 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Xiang, J

    L. Xiang, J. Chen, Z. Zhu, Z. Song, Z. Bao, X. Zhu, F. Jin, K. Wang, S. Xu, Y. Zou, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, A. Yue, J. Partridge, Q. Guo, R. Mondaini, H. Wang, and R. T. Scalettar, Enhanced quantum state transfer by circumventing quantum chaotic behavior, Nat. Commun. 15, 4918 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    L. Tian, M. S. Allman, and R. W. Simmonds, Parametric coupling between macroscopic quantum resonators, New J. Phys.10, 115001 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Basilewitsch, Y

    D. Basilewitsch, Y. Zhang, S. M. Girvin, and C. P. Koch, Engineering strong beamsplitter interaction be- tween bosonic modes via quantum optimal control the- ory, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023054 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    B. J. Chapmanet al., High-on-off-ratio beam-splitter in- teraction for gates on bosonically encoded qubits, PRX Quantum4, 020355 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Y. Lu, A. Maiti, J. W. O. Garmon, S. Ganjam, Y. Zhang, J. Claes, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, High-fidelity parametric beamsplitting with a parity- protected converter, Nat. Commun.14, 5767 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Wang and A

    Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Using interference for high fidelity quantum state transfer in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 153603 (2012)

    2012

  44. [44]

    Lau and A

    H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, High-fidelity bosonic quan- tum state transfer using imperfect transducers and inter- ference, npj Quantum Inf.5, 31 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    L. D. Burkhartet al., Error-detected state transfer and entanglement in a superconducting quantum network, PRX Quantum2, 030321 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Zhouet al., Quantum state transfer between super- conducting cavities via exchange-free interactions, Phys

    J. Zhouet al., Quantum state transfer between super- conducting cavities via exchange-free interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 220801 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    A. Yue, R. Mondaini, Q. Guo, and R. T. Scalettar, Quan- tum state transfer in interacting multiple-excitation sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B110, 195410 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Bergmann, H

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1003 (1998)

    1998

  49. [49]

    Larson and E

    J. Larson and E. Andersson, Cavity-state preparation us- ing adiabatic transfer, Phys. Rev. A71, 053814 (2005)

    2005

  50. [50]

    K. S. Kumar, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, S. Danilin, and G. S. Paraoanu, Stimulated raman adiabatic passage in a three-level superconducting circuit, Nat. Commun.7, 10628 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    S. P. Premaratne, F. C. Wellstood, and B. S. Palmer, Microwave photon fock state generation by stimulated raman adiabatic passage, Nat. Commun.8, 14148 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, E. Holland, S. Krastanov, V. V. Albert, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity state manipulation using photon-number selective phase gates, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 137002 (2015)

    2015

  53. [53]

    Krastanov, V

    S. Krastanov, V. V. Albert, C. Shen, C.-L. Zou, R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, and L. Jiang, Uni- versal control of an oscillator with dispersive coupling to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A92, 040303(R) (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    Landgraf, C

    J. Landgraf, C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. F¨ osel, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Fast quantum control of cavities using an improved protocol without coherent errors, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 260802 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    J. P. Palao and R. Kosloff, Optimal control theory for unitary transformations, Phys. Rev. A68, 062308 (2003)

    2003

  56. [56]

    Khaneja, T

    N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, and S. J. Glaser, Optimal control of coupled spin dynam- ics: Design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms, J. Magn. Reson.172, 296 (2005)

    2005

  57. [57]

    Jin and J

    Z.-Y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quantum control over bosonic networks, Phys. Rev. A113, 012426 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    P. Laha, P. A. A. Yasir, and P. van Loock, Genuine non- gaussian entanglement of light and quantum coherence for an atom from noisy multiphoton spin-boson interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033302 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti, and H. Rabitz, Control of quan- tum phenomena: past, present and future, New J. Phys. 12, 075008 (2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    C. P. Koch, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, G. Dirr, S. Fil- ipp, S. J. Glaser, R. Kosloff, S. Montangero, T. Schulte- Herbr¨ uggen, D. Sugny, and F. K. Wilhelm, Quantum op- timal control in quantum technologies. strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in eu- rope, EPJ Quantum Technol.9, 19 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    R. A. Campos and C. C. Gerry, Permutation-parity ex- change at a beam splitter: Application to heisenberg- limited interferometry, Phys. Rev. A72, 065803 (2005)

    2005

  62. [62]

    Analytical Fock-State Generation and SWAP using a Rabi-Driven Transmon

    N. Karaev, E. Blumenthal, and S. Hacohen-Gourgy, Ana- lytical fock-state generation and swap using a rabi-driven transmon (2026), arXiv:2604.07235 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistilla- tion, Phys. Rev. A60, 1888 (1999)

    1999

  64. [64]

    M. A. Nielsen, A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation, Phys. Lett. A 303, 249 (2002)

    2002

  65. [65]

    Laha and P

    P. Laha and P. van Loock, Arbitrary high-fidelity bi- nomial codes from multiphoton spin-boson interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013237 (2026)

    2026

  66. [66]

    R. A. Campos, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Quantum-mechanical lossless beam splitter: SU(2) sym- metry and photon statistics, Phys. Rev. A40, 1371 (1989)

    1989

  67. [67]

    G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright,An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 6th ed. (Oxford University Press, 24 2008)

    2008

  68. [68]

    J. W. S. Cassels,An Introduction to Diophantine Approx- imation(Cambridge University Press, 1957)

    1957

  69. [69]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004)

    2004

  70. [70]

    D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, A. Wallraff, J. M. Gambetta, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, B. John- son, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Resolving photon number states in a superconducting cir- cuit, Nature445, 515 (2007)

    2007