Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ARIADNE: Measuring accurate and precise stellar parameters through SED fitting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.03769 v1 pith:UJCIU2AY submitted 2022-04-07 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords stellarariadnemodelsparametersradiusmethodsmodelprecise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Accurately measuring stellar parameters is a key goal to increase our understanding of the observable universe. However, current methods are limited by many factors, in particular, the biases and physical assumptions that are the basis for the underlying evolutionary or atmospheric models, those that these methods rely upon. Here we introduce our code spectrAl eneRgy dIstribution bAyesian moDel averagiNg fittEr (ARIADNE), which tackles this problem by using Bayesian Model Averaging to incorporate the information from all stellar models to arrive at accurate and precise values. This code uses spectral energy distribution fitting methods, combined with precise Gaia distances, to measure the temperature, log g, [Fe/H], A$_{\text V}$, and radius of a star. When compared with interferometrically measured radii ARIADNE produces values in excellent agreement across a wide range of stellar parameters, with a mean fractional difference of only 0.001 $\pm$ 0.070. We currently incorporate six different models, and in some cases we find significant offsets between them, reaching differences of up to 550 K and 0.6 R$_\odot$ in temperature and radius, respectively. For example, such offsets in stellar radius would give rise to a difference in planetary radius of 60%, negating homogeneity when combining results from different models. We also find a trend for stars smaller than 0.4-0.5 R$_\odot$, which shows more work needs to be done to better model these stars, even though the overall extent is within the uncertainties of the interferometric measurements. We advocate for the use of ARIADNE to provide improved bulk parameters of nearby A to M dwarfs for future studies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Companion Architectures of Sub-Saturns: Distinct Migration Pathways Across the Neptunian Landscape

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Desert/ridge sub-Saturns show ~10% nearby-companion rates like hot Jupiters; savanna ones show ~70% like warm Jupiters, supporting HEM versus quiescent migration.

Pith tools