pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.16506 · v1 · pith:UJO2TGHVnew · submitted 2025-11-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Two-beam Multiparticle Many-body simulations of Inhomogeneous FFI

Zoha Laraib , Sherwood Richers This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino flavor evolutionmany-body simulationfast flavor instabilitytensor networkinhomogeneouscore-collapse supernovaneutron star merger
0
0 comments X

The pith

Many-body neutrino flavor simulations equilibrate earlier than mean-field models but reach similar final states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents a unified tensor-network framework for simulating many-body neutrino flavor evolution in inhomogeneous and anisotropic conditions relevant to supernovae and mergers. It finds that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. The work examines how inhomogeneity, boundary conditions, and initial beam setups affect dynamics, showing that larger interaction regions let open boundaries mimic closed systems when beams start together. Initially separated beams develop entanglement more slowly and reach different flavor content.

Core claim

Within a unified tensor-network framework for inhomogeneous and anisotropic flavor evolution, many-body systems equilibrate earlier than their mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. Enlarging the interaction region allows open boundaries to reproduce closed-system behavior when beams begin superimposed and interact continuously, but initially separated configurations develop entanglement more slowly and equilibrate to different flavor content.

What carries the argument

Unified tensor-network framework enabling simulations of inhomogeneous neutrino flavor evolution.

If this is right

  • Many-body systems reach equilibrium on shorter timescales than mean-field approximations.
  • Open boundary conditions reproduce closed-system results when the interaction region is enlarged and beams start superimposed.
  • Initially separated beam configurations interact over longer times and end at different flavor states.
  • Resolution convergence can be directly compared across multiple neutrino distributions in one consistent setup.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the framework to three spatial dimensions could expose additional effects from realistic supernova inhomogeneities.
  • Faster many-body equilibration might shift the predicted timing of flavor conversion in observable neutrino signals from mergers.
  • Applying similar tensor-network methods to other dense quantum systems could test whether the equilibration speedup is general.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor-network truncation and chosen system sizes sufficiently capture the full many-body entanglement dynamics without introducing artifacts that alter the reported equilibration times or final states.

What would settle it

A comparison run with substantially larger system sizes or smaller truncation error that yields markedly different equilibration times or final flavor states would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16506 by Sherwood Richers, Zoha Laraib.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Homogeneous two-flavor two-beam fast flavor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Inhomogeneous two-flavor, two-beam 20-particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Time evolution of the polarization vector components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Evolution of the polarization vector components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Time evolution for a 20-particle system under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Time evolution of the average flavor coherence for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Time evolution of a flavor-symmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Vacuum oscillation test. Plotted here is the evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Exponential growth of average single-site flavor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Mean-field inhomogeneous FFI growth rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Once again, our method is able to reproduce the pat￾terns resulting from the relative size of the vacuum and self￾interaction potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutrino flavor evolution in dense astrophysical environments is inherently nonlinear and sensitive to many-body (MB) quantum effects beyond the mean-field (MF) approximation. Existing MB studies are constrained by small system sizes, closed boundaries, and highly idealized symmetry assumptions. We present a unified tensor-network framework that enables simulations of inhomogeneous and anisotropic flavor evolution under conditions relevant to core-collapse supernovae and neutron-star mergers. Within this framework, we examine the effects of inhomogeneity, boundary conditions, and convergence with resolution for multiple neutrino distributions, allowing direct comparison of these setups under one consistent formulation. In our simulations, many-body systems equilibrate earlier than their mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. Enlarging the interaction region allows open boundaries to reproduce closed-system behavior, but only when the beams begin superimposed and interact continuously. By contrast, initially separated configurations develop entanglement more slowly, interact over longer times, and equilibrate to a flavor content that differs from that obtained from initially superimposed calculations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a unified tensor-network framework for many-body simulations of inhomogeneous and anisotropic neutrino flavor evolution in two-beam setups relevant to core-collapse supernovae and neutron-star mergers. It enables larger systems with open boundaries and direct comparisons to mean-field results, reporting that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. The work also examines effects of initial beam configurations (superimposed vs. separated), boundary conditions, and resolution convergence on entanglement growth and equilibration.

Significance. If converged, the framework represents a technical advance over prior many-body studies limited to small closed systems or high symmetry, allowing more astrophysically relevant inhomogeneous configurations. The direct MB-MF comparison under consistent numerics and the reported earlier MB equilibration could inform neutrino transport modeling if the tensor-network results prove robust to truncation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Convergence and Methods] The convergence section reports tests with spatial resolution but does not include explicit bond-dimension scaling studies for the equilibration time and final flavor content metrics, especially in initially-separated beam configurations where the abstract notes slower entanglement development. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as insufficient bond dimension can suppress long-range correlations and artificially accelerate relaxation toward mean-field-like states.
  2. [Results on Equilibration] The headline result that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field while reaching similar final states (abstract and results section) assumes the tensor-network ansatz faithfully captures the full entanglement dynamics under inhomogeneity and open boundaries. Without bond-dimension convergence data tied to these observables, it remains unclear whether the reported time difference is physical or truncation-induced.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Clarify in the abstract and methods whether 'convergence with resolution' encompasses tensor bond dimension or refers only to spatial discretization.
  2. [Figures] Ensure figure captions explicitly label MB versus MF curves, initial beam separations, and boundary conditions for all panels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments on convergence are well taken and highlight an important aspect for validating the tensor-network results. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Convergence and Methods] The convergence section reports tests with spatial resolution but does not include explicit bond-dimension scaling studies for the equilibration time and final flavor content metrics, especially in initially-separated beam configurations where the abstract notes slower entanglement development. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as insufficient bond dimension can suppress long-range correlations and artificially accelerate relaxation toward mean-field-like states.

    Authors: We agree that explicit bond-dimension scaling studies are necessary to confirm robustness, particularly for the separated-beam case with slower entanglement growth. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated convergence subsection (or appendix) that presents bond-dimension scaling for both equilibration timescales and final flavor content. These studies will be performed for the bond dimensions employed in the main results and will demonstrate that the reported differences remain stable under increased bond dimension. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on Equilibration] The headline result that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field while reaching similar final states (abstract and results section) assumes the tensor-network ansatz faithfully captures the full entanglement dynamics under inhomogeneity and open boundaries. Without bond-dimension convergence data tied to these observables, it remains unclear whether the reported time difference is physical or truncation-induced.

    Authors: We acknowledge that directly linking bond-dimension convergence to the key observables strengthens the central claim. The revised manuscript will include bond-dimension scaling plots specifically for the many-body versus mean-field equilibration time difference and final states. These additional data will show that the earlier equilibration observed in the many-body simulations persists across a range of bond dimensions, indicating that the effect is not an artifact of truncation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct numerical evolution

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes of tensor-network simulations comparing many-body and mean-field neutrino flavor evolution under inhomogeneous conditions. The central claims (earlier MB equilibration, similar final states) are direct numerical results from evolving the system under the stated ansatz, initial conditions, and boundaries. No step fits parameters to a data subset then renames the output as a prediction, defines quantities in terms of each other, or relies on a self-citation chain for the load-bearing result. The derivation chain is the simulation procedure itself, which is independent of the reported observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework assumes the tensor-network representation faithfully encodes the relevant many-body correlations for the neutrino distributions studied; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Tensor-network ansatz captures essential entanglement structure of the inhomogeneous neutrino system.
    Invoked to justify the simulation method for many-body flavor evolution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1083 out tokens · 34540 ms · 2026-05-22T12:48:04.960290+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Collective neutrino-antineutrino pair oscillations

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In anisotropic neutrino gases, νν-bar pairing instabilities emerge when the excessive pair-occupation number distribution changes sign, producing pair conversions at growth rates comparable to fast flavor instabilities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The Role of Inhomogeneity It is well understood that inhomogeneity allows modes of nonzero wavenumber to grow in the mean-field limit, but since the many-body depolarization is not a fast flavor insta- bility, it is natural to wonder what role inhomogeneity has in many-body depolarization. We ran a modified version of the inhomogeneous Symmetric simulatio...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We further explore the effect of flavor asymmetry in a two-beam model (Fig

    Flavor Asymmetry So far, all of our simulations have explored the special case of a Symmetric FFI when there are equal initial numbers of electron and muon neutrinos. We further explore the effect of flavor asymmetry in a two-beam model (Fig. 4), where the number of electron neutrinos and similarly the number of electron neutrino sites is twice that of mu...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Finite Bond Dimension The infinite bond dimension calculations contain numerical errors associated with the spatial discretization and the size of the timestep, but retained all entanglement information in the quantum state. We investigate the convergence of many-body neutrino evolution simulations with respect tobond dimension (BD) in a 20-particle syste...

    work page

  4. [4]

    To probe how these simplifications influence the dynamics, we system- atically relax each of these assumptions, beginning with the role of boundary conditions

    Open vs Closed systems Existing many-body (MB) studies of collective neutrino oscillations are typically constrained by closed (periodic) boundaries and idealized symmetry assumptions. To probe how these simplifications influence the dynamics, we system- atically relax each of these assumptions, beginning with the role of boundary conditions. Our first qu...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Superimposed vs. Separated Initial Conditions The above simulations of the MB system with open bound- ary conditions assumed that neutrinos begin superimposed with no flavor coherence or many-body entanglement. How- ever, it is not clear that this assumption is a good represen- tation of the behavior of neutrinos in astrophysical environ- ments, since neu...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Super- novae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science62, 407 (2012)

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Super- novae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science62, 407 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Mezzacappa, P

    A. Mezzacappa, P. Marronetti, R. E. Landfield, E. J. Lentz, R. D. Murphy, W. Raphael Hix, J. A. Harris, S. W. Bruenn, J. M. Blondin, O. Bronson Messer, J. Casanova, and L. L. Kro- nzer, Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25 Solar Masses, Physical Review D 107, 043008 (2023), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Foucart, Neutrino transport in general relativistic neutron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics9, 1 (2023)

    F. Foucart, Neutrino transport in general relativistic neutron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics9, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Burrows and D

    A. Burrows and D. Vartanyan, Core-collapse supernova explo- sion theory, Nature589, 29 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Qian and S

    Y .-Z. Qian and S. E. Woosley, Nucleosynthesis in neutrino- driven winds. i. the physical conditions, Astrophys. J.471, 331 (1996)

    work page 1996

  11. [11]

    Wang and R

    X. Wang and R. Surman, Neutrinos and heavy element nucle- osynthesis, inHandbook of Nuclear Physics(Springer, 2022) pp. 1–19

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, Y .- Z. Qian, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrinos and nucleosynthesis of el- ements, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , 104107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, inSolar neutri- nos(CRC Press, 2018) pp

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, inSolar neutri- nos(CRC Press, 2018) pp. 294–299

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Mikheyev and A

    S. Mikheyev and A. Y . Smirnov, Resonant neutrino oscilla- tions in matter, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics23, 41 (1989)

    work page 1989

  15. [15]

    Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations at high densities, Physics Letters B287, 128 (1992)

    J. Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations at high densities, Physics Letters B287, 128 (1992)

    work page 1992

  16. [16]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y .-Z. Qian, Collective neutrino os- cillations, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science60, 569 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, New developments in flavor evo- lution of a dense neutrino gas, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science71, 165 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Capozzi and N

    F. Capozzi and N. Saviano, Neutrino flavor conversions in high- density astrophysical and cosmological environments, Universe 8, 94 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Richers and M

    S. Richers and M. Sen, Fast Flavor Transformations, inHand- book of Nuclear Physics(Springer, Singapore, 2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Johns, S

    L. Johns, S. Richers, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrino oscillations in core-collapse supernovae and neutron star mergers, Annual Re- view of Nuclear and Particle Science75(2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    M. C. V olpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mech- anisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new direc- tions, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 025004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    R. F. Sawyer, Speed-up of neutrino transformations in a super- nova environment, Physical Review D72, 045003 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Dighe, and G. Raffelt, Linearized flavor- stability analysis of dense neutrino streams, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology84, 053013 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Dasgupta, A

    B. Dasgupta, A. Mirizzi, and M. Sen, Fast neutrino flavor con- versions near the supernova core with realistic flavor-dependent angular distributions, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2017(02), 019

    work page

  25. [25]

    D. F. Fiorillo, G. G. Raffelt, and G. Sigl, Inhomogeneous ki- netic equation for mixed neutrinos: tracing the missing energy, Physical Review Letters133, 021002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Breaking the symmetries in self- interacting neutrino systems: Fast conversions and directional crossings, Phys. Rev. D103, 063002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    A. V . Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, E. Rrapaj, P. Siwach, and A. B. Balantekin, Many-body collective neutrino oscillations: Recent developments, Handbook of nuclear physics , 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Balantekin, M

    A. Balantekin, M. J. Cervia, A. V . Patwardhan, E. Rrapaj, and P. Siwach, Quantum information and quantum simulation of neutrino physics, The European Physical Journal A59, 186 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. d. S. Seixas, Neutrino flavor pendulum in both mass hierarchies, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravi- tation, and Cosmology88, 045031 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    R. S. Hansen and S. Hannestad, Chaotic flavor evolution in an interacting neutrino gas, Physical Review D90, 025009 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. S. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. Raffelt, Self-induced flavor conversion of supernova neutrinos on small scales, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016 (01), 028

    work page

  32. [32]

    Duan and S

    H. Duan and S. Shalgar, Flavor instabilities in the neutrino line model, Physics Letters B747, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Abbar, H

    S. Abbar, H. Duan, S. Shalgar,et al., Flavor instabilities in the multiangle neutrino line model, Physical Review D92, 065019 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Mangano, A

    G. Mangano, A. Mirizzi, and N. Saviano, Damping the neutrino flavor pendulum by breaking homogeneity, Physical Review D 89, 073017 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Mirizzi, G

    A. Mirizzi, G. Mangano, and N. Saviano, Self-induced flavor instabilities of a dense neutrino stream in a two-dimensional model, Physical Review D92, 021702 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    N. F. Bell, A. A. Rawlinson, and R. Sawyer, Speed-up through entanglement—many-body effects in neutrino pro- cesses, Physics Letters B573, 86 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Friedland and C

    A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, Do many-particle neutrino inter- actions cause a novel coherent effect?, Journal of High Energy Physics2003, 043 (2003)

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    Balantekin and Y

    A. Balantekin and Y . Pehlivan, Neutrino–neutrino interactions and flavour mixing in dense matter, Journal of Physics G: Nu- clear and Particle Physics34, 47 (2006)

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    A. V . Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, E. Rrapaj, P. Siwach, and A. B. Balantekin, Many-body collective neutrino oscillations: recent developments, inHandbook of Nuclear Physics(Springer, Sin- gapore, 2023) pp. 1–16, 10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_126-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_126-1 2023

  40. [40]

    Roggero, Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 103016 (2021)

    A. Roggero, Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 103016 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Roggero, Dynamical phase transitions in models of col- lective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 123023 (2021)

    A. Roggero, Dynamical phase transitions in models of col- lective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 123023 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Roggero, E

    A. Roggero, E. Rrapaj, and Z. Xiong, Entanglement and cor- relations in fast collective neutrino flavor oscillations, Physical Review D106, 043022 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    J. D. Martin, D. Neill, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, Equilibration of quantum many-body fast neutrino flavor oscil- 12 lations, Physical Review D108, 123010 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Illa and M

    M. Illa and M. J. Savage, Multi-neutrino entanglement and cor- relations in dense neutrino systems, Physical Review Letters 130, 221003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Bhaskar, A

    R. Bhaskar, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Timescales in many- body fast-neutrino-flavor conversion, Physical Review C110, 045801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    M. J. Cervia, P. Siwach, A. V . Patwardhan, A. Balantekin, S. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Collective neutrino oscil- lations with tensor networks using a time-dependent variational principle, Physical Review D105, 123025 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Do we have enough evidence to invalidate the mean-field approximation adopted to model col- lective neutrino oscillations?, Physical Review D107, 123004 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Once-in-a-lifetime encounter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscillations to flavor equilibration, Physical Review D109, 103037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04916 (2023)

    L. Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04916 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Cirigliano, S

    V . Cirigliano, S. Sen, and Y . Yamauchi, Neutrino many-body flavor evolution: The full hamiltonian, Physical Review D110, 123028 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Goimil-García, S

    M. Goimil-García, S. Shalgar, and I. Tamborra, Pauli blocking: Probing beyond-mean-field effects in neutrino flavor evolution, Physical Review D111, 083054 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    V olpe, D

    C. V olpe, D. Väänänen, and C. Espinoza, Extended evolution equations for neutrino propagation<? format?> in astrophysical and cosmological environments, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology87, 113010 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    M. J. Cervia, P. Siwach, A. V . Patwardhan, A. Balantekin, S. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Collective neutrino os- cillations with tensor networks using a time-dependent vari- ational principle, Physical Review D105, 10.1103/phys- revd.105.123025 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

  54. [54]

    Siwach, A

    P. Siwach, A. M. Suliga, and A. B. Balantekin, Entanglement in three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D107, 10.1103/physrevd.107.023019 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.023019 2023

  55. [55]

    Many-Body Simulations of the Fast Flavor Instability

    Z. Laraib and S. Richers, Many-body simulations of the fast flavor instability, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02040 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The itensor soft- ware library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Codebase re- lease 0.3 for itensor, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Physical review letters91, 147902 (2003)

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Physical review letters91, 147902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Physical review letters93, 040502 (2004)

    G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Physical review letters93, 040502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  60. [60]

    Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Physical review letters98, 070201 (2007)

    G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Physical review letters98, 070201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V . Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Advances in physics 57, 143 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Scholl- wöck, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix- product states, Annals of Physics411, 167998 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    M. J. Cervia, A. V . Patwardhan, A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Cop- persmith, and C. W. Johnson, Entanglement and collective fla- vor oscillations in a dense neutrino gas, Physical Review D100, 083001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    A. V . Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, and A. B. Balantekin, Spectral splits and entanglement entropy in collective neutrino oscilla- tions, Physical Review D104, 123035 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. S. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. G. Raffelt, Self-induced neutrino flavor conversion without flavor mixing, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(03), 042

    work page

  67. [67]

    Richers, D

    S. Richers, D. E. Willcox, N. M. Ford, and A. Myers, Particle- in-cell simulation of the neutrino fast flavor instability, Physical Review D103, 083013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, J. Carlson, and V . Cirigliano, Classical and quantum evolution in a simple coherent neutrino problem, Physical Review D105, 083020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, Many-body neutrino flavor entanglement in a simple dynamic model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07049 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Balantekin, Quantum entanglement and neutrino many-body systems, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, V ol

    A. Balantekin, Quantum entanglement and neutrino many-body systems, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, V ol. 2191 (IOP Publishing, 2022) p. 012004

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Rrapaj, Exact solution of multiangle quantum many-body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations, Physical Review C101, 065805 (2020)

    E. Rrapaj, Exact solution of multiangle quantum many-body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations, Physical Review C101, 065805 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Xiong, Many-body effects of collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D105, 103002 (2022)

    Z. Xiong, Many-body effects of collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D105, 103002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Bhattacharyya and B

    S. Bhattacharyya and B. Dasgupta, Fast flavor depolarization of supernova neutrinos, Physical Review Letters126, 061302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Izaguirre, G

    I. Izaguirre, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast pairwise conver- sion of supernova neutrinos: A dispersion relation approach, Physical review letters118, 021101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    R. F. Sawyer, Neutrino cloud instabilities just above the neu- trino sphere of a supernova, Physical Review Letters116, 081101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Padilla-Gay, H.-H

    I. Padilla-Gay, H.-H. Chen, S. Abbar, M.-R. Wu, and Z. Xiong, Flavor equilibration of supernova neutrinos: Exploring the dy- namics of slow modes, Physical Review D112, 043039 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    M. J. Cervia, Interactions of neutrino wave packets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.22005 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Hannestad, G

    S. Hannestad, G. G. Raffelt, G. Sigl, and Y . Y . Wong, Self- induced conversion in dense neutrino gases: Pendulum in flavor space, Physical Review D74, 105010 (2006). Appendix A: Mean field tests

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    We set 𝑁𝑖 =0for each site𝑖such that the self-interaction Hamiltonian is zero

    Vacuum Oscillations We evolve a collection of six neutrinos, half of which start in the|𝜈 𝜇⟩state and the other half of which start in the|𝜈 𝑒⟩ state, i.e.,|Ψ 0⟩= Ë(𝑁 sites/2) 𝑛=1 | ↓⟩ ⊗ Ë(𝑁 sites/2) 𝑚=1 | ↑⟩ . We set 𝑁𝑖 =0for each site𝑖such that the self-interaction Hamiltonian is zero. We set| ®𝑝𝑖 |=1 MeV,𝑚 1 =0 eV,𝑚 2 =8.60×10 −3 eV and𝜃=𝜋/4such that ®...

    work page

  80. [80]

    We use neutrino masses of𝑚 1 =8.50×10 −3 eVand 𝑚2 =0 eV, corresponding to the inverted mass ordering, and set the mixing angle to𝜃 12 =0.01

    Bipolar Oscillations We reproduce homogeneous and isotropic bipolar oscilla- tions introduced in [73] with parameters matching those of [62]. We use neutrino masses of𝑚 1 =8.50×10 −3 eVand 𝑚2 =0 eV, corresponding to the inverted mass ordering, and set the mixing angle to𝜃 12 =0.01. We choose particle weights to ensure the electron and muon neutrino number...

    work page

Showing first 80 references.