Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

BiLD: Bi-directional Logits Difference Loss for Large Language Model Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13555 v3 pith:UKYXJ75S submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords logitsdistillationlossbildllmslanguagelargemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional capabilities across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, such impressive performance often comes with the trade-off of an increased parameter size, posing significant challenges for widespread deployment. Knowledge distillation (KD) provides a solution by transferring knowledge from a large teacher model to a smaller student model. In this paper, we explore the task-specific distillation of LLMs at the logit level. Our investigation reveals that the logits of fine-tuned LLMs exhibit a more extreme long-tail distribution than those from vision models, with hidden "noise" in the long tail affecting distillation performance. Furthermore, existing logits distillation methods often struggle to effectively utilize the internal ranking information from the logits. To address these, we propose the Bi-directional Logits Difference (BiLD) loss. The BiLD loss filters out the long-tail noise by utilizing only top-$k$ teacher and student logits, and leverages the internal logits ranking information by constructing logits differences. To evaluate BiLD loss, we conduct comprehensive experiments on 13 datasets using two types of LLMs. Our results show that the BiLD loss, with only the top-8 logits, outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT), vanilla KL loss, and five other distillation methods from both NLP and CV fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cross-Tokenizer On-Policy Distillation via Byte-Prefix Marginalization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Byte-Prefix Marginalization maps a teacher's next-token distribution onto the student's vocabulary through shared byte prefixes plus an explicit residual, giving a mass-preserving target for on-policy distillation acr...

  2. Align Attention Heads Before Merging Them: An Effective Way for Converting MHA to GQA

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Applying Procrustes-based orthogonal alignment to attention heads before L0-pruned merging produces standard GQA models with up to 87.5% KV-head compression on LLaMA2-7B.

  3. TinyMusician: On-Device Music Generation with Knowledge Distillation and Mixed Precision Quantization

    cs.SD 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    TinyMusician distills MusicGen and applies hand-picked mixed-precision quantization to make a 1.04 GB on-device music generator, but the headline '93% quality, 55% smaller' claims conflict with the paper's own tables.

Pith tools