Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 59 references

Spin-dependent transport through edge states in 2D semi-Dirac materials with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and band inversion

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In band-inverted type-I semi-Dirac materials, Rashba spin-orbit coupling produces spin-split edge states and drives tunable spin-flip conductance oscillations.

desk verdict Rashba extension of the semi-Dirac edge-state model is sound and the spin-transport results are new, but the finite-kx Zak-phase claim is stronger than the invariant actually supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24745 v1 pith:UNCL23D3 submitted 2025-05-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Marta García-Olmos , Yuriko Baba , Alexander López , Mario Amado , Rafael A. Molina This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords semi-DiracmaterialsRashbaspin-orbitcouplingbandinversionedgestatesZakphasespinprecessionspin-resolvedconductancetopologicalinsulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that adding Rashba spin-orbit coupling to a band-inverted type-I semi-Dirac material, where the dispersion is linear in one momentum direction and quadratic in the other, converts its edge modes into spin-split channels whose transport can be controllably spin-polarized. The authors establish that the system's topology can be captured by a Zak phase along the quadratically dispersing direction, treating the other momentum as a fixed parameter; this yields momentum-dependent edge states that are symmetry-protected at zero momentum and spin-dependent at finite momentum. They then show numerically that spin-resolved conductance through these channels displays robust oscillations in system length and Rashba strength, interpreted as spin precession in an effective magnetic field. If correct, the result points toward a spintronic platform in anisotropic materials that do not possess a full two-dimensional Chern invariant.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a dimensional-reduction procedure: the momentum along the quadratically dispersing direction is fixed as a parameter, reducing the two-dimensional problem to a one-dimensional chain in the linear direction, and the single-band Zak phase along that direction serves as the topological invariant. The Rashba term is treated by degenerate perturbation theory on the spin-degenerate edge states, yielding the effective $2\times2$ matrix with off-diagonal element $\chi_\sigma = \sigma i V_x\,\mathrm{sgn}(M_{1y}V_y)\alpha k_x$ and the spin-split dispersion. At $k_x=0$ the model maps onto two independent SSH-like chains coupled by spin-flip hoppings, and a unitary rotation into symmetric and antisymmetric spin combinations restores two decoupled chiral chains, explaining the symmetry-protected zero-energy edge states. The transport predictions come from tight-binding Landauer–Büttiker simulations of a ribbon with current-carrying leads that conserve spin, isolating the spin dynamics induced by the Rashba coupling.

What would settle it

Compute the bulk band structure of the tight-binding model along $k_y$ for every finite $k_x$ in the band-inverted regime and search for any band touching between the four bands, since a single crossing at some $k_x$ would make the single-band Zak phase ill-defined there. Alternatively, measure spin-flip conductance as a function of device length in a semi-Dirac ribbon with tunable Rashba coupling and check whether the oscillations follow the predicted precession length $L_R = 10.94/(\alpha+0.08)$ Å.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, in the band-inverted regime of a type-I semi-Dirac system, Rashba spin-orbit coupling splits each degenerate edge-state parabola into two spin branches with dispersion $E_\pm^{(s)} = \pm V_x \,\mathrm{sgn}(M_{1y}V_y)(k_x^2 \mp s\,\alpha k_x)$, where $s=\uparrow,\downarrow$ labels the spin. The Rashba term mixes opposite spin sectors through a purely imaginary off-diagonal matrix element, preserving the exponential edge localization while reversing the spin polarization across $k_x=0$ and assigning each branch to a specific edge according to its spin and particle-hole character. At $k_x=0$, the system decouples into two chiral SSH-like chains in a symmetric-antisymmetric spin basis, so the zero-energy edge states remain protected by particle-hole symmetry. The paper's transport result is that a two-terminal device shows oscillations in the spin-flip conductance, with a precession length $L_R = 10.94/(\alpha+0.08)$ Å for the chosen parameters, and that these oscillations persist under disorder that preserves particle-hole symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the four bulk bands remain isolated along $k_y$ at each finite $k_x$, so that a single-band Zak phase is well defined; the paper verifies this numerically at selected parameters but does not prove analytically that no degeneracies appear in the band-inverted regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the band-inverted regime, edge states exist at finite $k_x$ wherever the single-band Zak phase equals $\pi$, but they are topologically protected only at specific momenta rather than across the whole Brillouin zone.
  • At $k_x=0$, the Rashba coupling modifies the hopping amplitudes but does not destroy the chiral structure, so zero-energy edge states remain protected by particle-hole symmetry in the presence of spin-orbit coupling.
  • The spin-resolved conductance difference $G_{\uparrow\downarrow}-G_{\uparrow\uparrow}$ oscillates with device length and Rashba strength, with a precession length that scales as $L_R = 10.94/(\alpha+0.08)$ Å for the model parameters used.
  • Disorder that respects particle-hole symmetry requires larger strengths to randomize the spin channel, whereas generic symmetry-breaking disorder destroys spin coherence at smaller strengths.
  • Because the total Chern number is zero, the edge channels are not chiral; the observed transport is edge-controlled but not protected by a full two-dimensional bulk invariant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dimensional-reduction plus Zak-phase logic could be attempted for type-II or type-III semi-Dirac variants, but there the single-band assumption is more likely to fail and a non-Abelian multi-band Berry phase would be needed.
  • The predicted linear-in-$\alpha$ dispersion shift of the edge branches could be looked for in angle-resolved photoemission or scanning tunneling spectroscopy on candidate semi-Dirac materials with gated Rashba coupling, such as few-layer black phosphorus.
  • Adding Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling or an in-plane magnetic field would break the symmetry between the two spin channels, potentially converting the oscillatory spin-flip signal into a net spin current rather than alternating polarization.
  • Whether the precession oscillations survive finite temperature and phase-breaking scattering is not addressed by the paper and would be the natural next test for any proposed spin-transistor application.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a type-I semi-Dirac model with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and band inversion. It derives the edge-state dispersion via degenerate perturbation theory, uses the Zak phase along ky to characterize topological properties, and performs Landauer conductance simulations showing spin precession oscillations. The central claims are that at kx=0 the edge states are symmetry-protected via an SSH mapping, at finite kx the edge states are 'topologically protected only at specific momenta' with Zak phase pi at kx = +/- 0.408 Angstrom^-1, and that the spin-resolved conductance exhibits robust oscillations with Rashba strength and system length.

Significance. If the topological claim holds, the paper would provide a concrete example of momentum-dependent topological protection in anisotropic semi-Dirac materials and a spintronic platform. The analytical dispersion Eq. (11) agrees with the numerical nanoribbon spectra (Fig. 1), and the SSH mapping at kx=0 is a clean symmetry-based argument. The transport simulations are well posed, and the precession-length fit gives a compact summary of the numerics. However, the finite-kx Zak phase claim lacks a protecting symmetry, which substantially weakens the topological part of the paper's central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IIC1, Eq. (12)] The finite-kx Zak phase is presented as a topological invariant that certifies 'topologically protected' edge states at kx = +/-0.408 Angstrom^-1, but no symmetry of H(kx, ky) at fixed kx != 0 is exhibited that would quantize the Zak phase to 0 or pi. For a 1D slice without chiral or inversion symmetry, the Zak phase is gauge-invariant modulo 2pi but takes a continuum of values, so a numerical value pi at one kx is not by itself a protected invariant. To support the abstract's claim, the authors should either identify a protecting symmetry, demonstrate robustness of the pi value under gap-preserving perturbations, or replace the single-band Zak phase by a multi-band (Wilson-loop) quantity. As written, the topological-protection statement for finite kx is not established.
  2. [Sec. II (after Eq. (1)) and Sec. IIC1] The manuscript contradicts itself on the sign of the band-inverted regime. It first states that sgn(M0/M1y) > 0 corresponds to the band-inverted regime that hosts edge states, and Table I declares the parameters to be in the 'topological non-trivial regime since sgn(M0/M1y) > 0'. In Sec. IIC1, however, panel (a) is described as the 'non-trivial (sgn(M0/M1y) < 0)' regime and panel (b) as the 'trivial (sgn(M0/M1y) > 0)' regime. With M0 = 0.09, M1y = 0.23, the two assignments cannot both be correct; this must be corrected and the figures relabeled accordingly.
  3. [Sec. IIC1] The statement that for kx != 0 the four projected bands along ky are isolated is only verified numerically at the selected parameters (Fig. 3). The single-band Zak phase is ill-defined whenever a degeneracy occurs between bands 2 and 3 at some kx. The manuscript should either prove that no such degeneracy exists for kx != 0 in the band-inverted regime, or restrict the claim to the specific parameter sets where isolation is checked. Without this, the bulk-boundary correspondence at finite kx is conditional on an unverified assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (23) and Fig. 5] The text describes the plotted quantity as G_up-down minus G_up-up, but Eq. (23) writes G_up-down minus G_down-up; the subscript inconsistency should be fixed.
  2. [Sec. I (Introduction)] The paragraph describing the structure of Section II contains a placeholder 'sec. ??' for the topological analysis subsection; this should be replaced with the actual section number.
  3. [Sec. IIC1] The location of the band crossing is given twice with different formulas: sqrt(M0 M1x/(M1x^2 + Vx^2)) and sqrt(M0 M1y/(M1x^2 + Vx^2)); although they coincide for the chosen parameters because M1x = M1y = 0.23, the general expression should be stated consistently.
  4. [Sec. IIC1] The sentence 'In the model under consideration, the topological properties can be explored from a single-band perspective across all values of kx, including the bulk band crossing at (kx, ky) = (0, 0)' is inaccurate: at (0,0) with M0 != 0 the spectrum is gapped and there is no crossing for the parameters used. This should be corrected to refer to the M0 = 0 critical point or rephrased.
  5. [Table I] The units for alpha in Table I are listed as eV*s*Angstrom^-1, but earlier in Sec. IIA and in Fig. 1 the Rashba strength is given as Angstrom^-1; the table entry should be corrected to the proper units used in the Hamiltonian.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central derivations are self-contained and benchmarked numerically, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's main analytical result, the Rashba-split edge dispersion E±(s)=±Vx sgn(M1y Vy)(kx^2 ∓ s α kx) (Eq. 11), is obtained by degenerate perturbation theory: the off-diagonal matrix element χσ=σ i Vx sgn(M1y Vy) α kx is computed from the spinless edge wavefunctions (Eq. 2) and the Rashba operator (Eq. 6c), then compared with direct nanoribbon diagonalization in Fig. 1 rather than fitted to it. The topological analysis is also non-circular: at kx=0 the SSH-like decoupling is derived explicitly in Sec. IIC2 via lattice regularization and the unitary transformation U, and the Zak phases at finite kx are computed numerically from bulk Bloch states (Eqs. 12-13) while edge states are obtained independently from ribbon diagonalization and Landauer transport simulations. The self-citation to the authors' prior work [41] for the SSH mapping and momentum-dependent Zak-phase framework is present but not load-bearing, because the needed mapping and invariant are rederived or recomputed in this paper. The precession length LR=10.94/(α+0.08) is explicitly obtained by fitting the numerical conductance oscillations to Eq. (23); it is a compact summary of the simulation, not an input disguised as a prediction. The main caveats—the finite-kx single-band Zak phase is not symmetry-quantized, and band isolation is only checked at selected parameters—are correctness or robustness concerns about the invariant's validity, not circularity: they do not make the computation equivalent to its inputs. A missing section-reference placeholder ('sec. ??') is an editorial defect, with no bearing on circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central topological and transport claims rest on the chosen semi-Dirac model and the derived Rashba coupling; no new physical entities are posited. The quantitative precession-length law is fitted to numerical transport data.

free parameters (2)
  • Model parameters (M0, M1x, M1y, Vx, Vy, alpha) = M0=0.09 eV, M1x=0.23 eV·Å^2, M1y=0.23 eV·Å^2, Vx=-0.38 eV·Å^2, Vy=-0.5 eV·Å, alpha=0.2 (text says Å^-1, table says…
    Chosen by hand to realize the band-inverted regime (sgn(M0/M1y)>0) and to produce visible edge state dispersion; the qualitative topological claims do not depend on the specific values, but the quantitative spin-precession length does.
  • Spin precession length fit LR(alpha)=10.94/(alpha+0.08) = 10.94 Å and 0.08 Å^-1
    Fitted to the numerical spin-resolved conductance oscillations at three Rashba strengths (Fig. 5); a characterization of the numerics rather than a derived analytical formula.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Zak phase / bulk-boundary correspondence for one-dimensional slices of a 2D system
    Used to connect the computed Zak phase pi to the existence of zero-energy boundary modes at fixed kx (Sec. IIC, Eq. (12) and following).
  • domain assumption Type-I semi-Dirac low-energy Hamiltonian with band inversion mass terms
    The starting model, Eq. (1), follows ref. [41]; the specific form of the Rashba term, Eq. (6c), is derived from the velocity operator, a modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Single-band Zak phase is well-defined in the band-inverted regime
    Needed to apply the Zak phase calculation at finite kx; the paper asserts four isolated bands for kx≠0 (Sec. IIC1) but does not prove it analytically.
  • domain assumption Landauer-Büttiker formalism with leads without Rashba coupling
    The transport setup (Sec. III) assumes that the leads, being RSOC-free, do not introduce significant scattering beyond the intended spin dynamics; the paper states equal Fermi energies to minimize mismatch.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-dependent transport through edge states in 2D semi-Dirac materials with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and band inversion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UNCL23D3

@misc{pith2026250524745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-dependent transport through edge states in 2D semi-Dirac materials with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and band inversion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UNCL23D3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24745}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the bulk-boundary correspondence in two-dimensional type-I semi-Dirac materials with band inversion and Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Employing a dimensional reduction framework, we identify the Zak phase along the quadratically dispersing direction as a topological invariant that captures the presence of edge states. In the non-trivial topological regime, systems with finite width exhibit energy-dependent edge states that are topologically protected only at specific momenta. At kx equal to zero, symmetry-protected edge states emerge, analogous to the Rashba-free case. At finite kx, the interplay of spin-orbit coupling and band structure gives rise to spin-dependent edge states, localized on specific edges based on its spin and particle-hole character. We compute spin-resolved conductance through these edge channels and observe robust, tunable oscillations attributable to spin precession induced by the effective Rashba magnetic field. These results reveal how spin-orbit interactions enrich the edge physics of semi-Dirac systems and provide a platform for spintronic control in anisotropic topological materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24745 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Band structure for a nanoribbon of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Expected values of the spin operators for the band structure of a nanoribbon of a width of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Bulk band projections and corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Tight-binding model associated with the one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Panel (a) displays the difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Cut of Fig. 5 for lengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Mohanta, J

    N. Mohanta, J. M. Ok, J. Zhang, H. Miao, E. Dagotto, H. N. Lee, and S. Okamoto. Semi-dirac and weyl fermions in transition metal oxides.Phys. Rev. B, 104:235121, Dec 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    The results are shown in Fig

    Topological points at kx ̸= 0: Isolated bands and band inversion At kx ̸= 0 , the projection of the bulk bands along ky shows four isolated bands, allowing the use of the single-band Zak phase approach. The results are shown in Fig. 3. Panels (a) and (b) show the projected bulk bands alongkx at ky = 0, for the non-trivial (sgn(M0/M1y) < 0) and trivial (sg...

    work page

  3. [2]

    While one could approach them numerically using a multi-band Wilson loop, in this case the system decouples into two independent SSH-like chains under suitable basis transformation

    Topological points at kx = 0: Symmetry-protected edge states At kx = 0 , the system exhibits a bulk band crossing between bands n = 1 , 2 and n = 3 , 4. While one could approach them numerically using a multi-band Wilson loop, in this case the system decouples into two independent SSH-like chains under suitable basis transformation. Before introducing the...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine. New perspectives for rashba spin– orbit coupling. Nature Materials, 14(9):871–882, Sep 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    Talento Program

    The hopping parameters are now given by v′ = iVyα , t = iM1yα. (18) Similar generalized SSH models have been studied in the literature [53, 54]. To recover a clear topological picture, we switch to a new basis involving symmetric and antisymmetric spin combinations, {|A+⟩, |B+⟩, |A−⟩, |B−⟩}, |A±⟩ = 1√ 2 (|A ↑⟩ ± |A ↓), (19) |B±⟩ = 1√ 2 (|B ↑⟩ ± |B ↓). (20...

    work page

  6. [5]

    E. C. Ahn. 2d materials for spintronic devices.npj 2D Materials and Applications, 4(1):17, Jun 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma. Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications.Rev. Mod. Phys., 76:323–410, Apr 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [7]

    Datta and B

    S. Datta and B. Das. Electronic analog of the electro-optic modulator. Applied Physics Letters, 56(7):665–667, February 1990

    work page 1990

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. Kurpas, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian. First-principles determination of spin–orbit coupling parameters in two-dimensional materials. Nature Reviews Physics, Mar 2025

    2025

  2. [9]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba. Properties of a 2d electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy.P. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 39:66, 1984

    1984

  3. [10]

    Dresselhaus

    G. Dresselhaus. Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures. Phys. Rev., 100:580, Oct 1955

    1955

  4. [11]

    Huang and R

    Y. Huang and R. Shen. The generation and detection of the spin-valley-polarization in semi- dirac materials. Physica Scripta, 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    Nitta, T

    J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, and T. Enoki. Gate control of spin-orbit interaction in an inverted in0.53ga0.47as/in0.52al0.48as heterostructure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78:1335–1338, Feb 1997

    1997

  6. [13]

    Schultz, F

    M. Schultz, F. Heinrichs, U. Merkt, T. Colin, T. Skauli, and S. Løvold. Rashba spin splitting in a gated hgte quantum well.Semicond. Sci. Technol., 11:1168, 01 1999

    1999

  7. [14]

    J. P. Carbotte, K. R. Bryenton, and E. J. Nicol. Opticalpropertiesofasemi-diracmaterial. Physical Review B, 2019

    2019

  8. [15]

    Dietl, F

    P. Dietl, F. Piéchon, and G. Montambaux. New magnetic field dependence of landau levels in a graphenelike structure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:236405, Jun 2008

    2008

  9. [16]

    J. M. Link, B. N. Narozhny, E. I. Kiselev, and J. Schmalian. Out-of-bounds hydrodynamics in anisotropic dirac fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:196801, May 2018

    2018

  10. [17]

    Xiong, J.-Y

    Q.-Y. Xiong, J.-Y. Ba, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, Y.- M. Wang, and R.-Q. Wang. Optical conductivity and polarization rotation of type-ii semi-dirac materials. Phys. Rev. B, 107:155150, Apr 2023

    2023

  11. [18]

    W. J. Chan, L. K. Ang, and Y. S. Ang. Quantum transport and shot noise in two-dimensional semi- dirac system. Applied Physics Letters, 2023

    2023

  12. [19]

    Pardo and W

    V. Pardo and W. E. Pickett. Half-metallic semi- dirac-point generated by quantum confinement in tio2/vo2 nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:166803, Apr 2009

    2009

  13. [20]

    Montambaux, F

    G. Montambaux, F. Piéchon, J.-N. Fuchs, and M. O. Goerbig. Merging of dirac points in a two- dimensional crystal. Phys. Rev. B, 80:153412, Oct 2009

    2009

  14. [21]

    Delplace and G

    P. Delplace and G. Montambaux. Semi-dirac point in the hofstadter spectrum. Phys. Rev. B, 82:035438, Jul 2010

    2010

  15. [22]

    M. O. Goerbig, J.-N. Fuchs, G. Montambaux, and F. Piéchon. Tilted anisotropic dirac cones in quinoid-type graphene andα−(BEDT-TTF)2i3. Phys. Rev. B, 78:045415, Jul 2008

    2008

  16. [23]

    Zhong, Y

    C. Zhong, Y. Chen, Y. Xie, Y.-Y. Sun, and S. Zhang. Semi-dirac semimetal in silicene oxide. Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 19 5:3820–3825, 2016

    2016

  17. [24]

    Banerjee, R

    S. Banerjee, R. R. P. Singh, V. Pardo, and W. E. Pickett. Tight-binding modeling and low-energy behavior of the semi-dirac point.Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:016402, Jul 2009

    2009

  18. [25]

    Huang, Z

    H. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Duan, and D. Vanderbilt. Emergence of a chern-insulating state from a semi-dirac dispersion. Phys. Rev. B, 92:161115, Oct 2015

    2015

  19. [26]

    Katayama, A

    S. Katayama, A. Kobayashi, and Y. Suzumura. Electric conductivity of the zero-gap semiconducting state in α-(BEDT-TTF)2I3 salt. J. Phys. Soc. Jap., 75:023708, 2006

    2006

  20. [27]

    F. Zhai, P. Mu, and K. Chang. Energy spectrum of dirac electrons on the surface of a topological insulator modulated by a spiral magnetization superlattice. Phys. Rev. B, 83:195402, May 2011

    2011

  21. [28]

    Castellanos-Gomez, L

    A. Castellanos-Gomez, L. Vicarelli, E. Prada, J. O. Island, K. L. Narasimha-Acharya, S. I. Blanter, D. J. Groenendijk, M. Buscema, G. A. Steele, J. V. Alvarez, H. W. Zandbergen, J. J. Palacios, and H. S. J. van der Zant. Isolation and characterization of few-layer black phosph...

    2014

  22. [29]

    A. S. Rodin, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto. Strain-induced gap modification in black phosphorus. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:176801, May 2014

    2014

  23. [30]

    Peralta, D

    M. Peralta, D. A. Freire, R. González-Hernández, and F. Mireles. Spin-orbit coupling effects in single- layer phosphorene. Phys. Rev. B, 110:085404, Aug 2024

    2024

  24. [31]

    Milićević, G

    M. Milićević, G. Montambaux, T. Ozawa, O. Jamadi, B. Real, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaître, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, J. Bloch, and A. Amo. Type-iii and tilted dirac cones emerging from flat bands in photonic orbital graphene.Phys. Rev. X, 9:031010, Jul 2019

    2019

  25. [32]

    Q. Li, P. Ghosh, J. D. Sau, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma. Anisotropic surface transport in topological insulators in proximity to a helical spin density wave.Phys. Rev. B, 83:085110, Feb 2011

    2011

  26. [33]

    Smith, Victor L

    M. Smith, Victor L. Quito, A. A. Burkov, P. P. Orth, and I. Martin. Theory forcd3as2 thin films in the presence of magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B, 109:155136, Apr 2024

    2024

  27. [34]

    Y. Wu. A semi-dirac point and an electromagnetic topological transition in a dielectric photonic crystal. Opt. Express, 22(2):1906–1917, Jan 2014

    1906

  28. [35]

    V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, and O. P. Sushkov. Coulomb interactions and renormalization of semi- dirac fermions near a topological lifshitz transition. Phys. Rev. B, 103:045403, Jan 2021

    2021

  29. [36]

    Bellec, U

    M. Bellec, U. Kuhl, G. Montambaux, and F. Mortessagne. Topological transition of dirac points in a microwave experiment.Phys.Rev.Lett., 110:033902, Jan 2013

    2013

  30. [37]

    B. Real, O. Jamadi, M. Milićević, N. Pernet, P. St-Jean, T. Ozawa, G. Montambaux, I. Sagnes, 11 A. Lemaître, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, S. Ravets, J. Bloch, and A. Amo. Semi-dirac transport and anisotropic localization in polariton honeycomb lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:186...

    2020

  31. [38]

    M. D. Uryszek, E. Christou, A. Jaefari, F. Krüger, and B. Uchoa. Quantum criticality of semi-dirac fermions in 2 + 1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. B, 100:155101, Oct 2019

    2019

  32. [39]

    Y. Shao, S. Moon, A. N. Rudenko, J. Wang, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Ozerov, D. Graf, Z. Sun, R. Queiroz, S. H. Lee, Y. Zhu, Z. Mao, M. I. Katsnelson, B. A. Bernevig, D. Smirnov, A. J. Millis, and D. N. Basov. Semi-dirac fermions in a topological metal. Phys. Rev. X, 14:041057, Dec 2024

    2024

  33. [40]

    and have been realized in photonic lattices under synthetic strain that exhibit a non-trivial topological charge [31]. Despite the extensive literature, most of the existing studies have focused on bulk properties, leaving the behavior of edge states, especially under the infl...

  34. [42]

    Mondal and S

    S. Mondal and S. Basu. Vanishing of the quantum spin hall phase in a semi-dirac kane-mele model. Phys. Rev. B, 105:235409, Jun 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    K. Saha. Photoinduced chern insulating states in semi-dirac materials.Phys. Rev. B, 94:081103, Aug 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Xie, Z. Zhang, C. Zhong, Y. Li, Z. Chen, and Y. Chen. Dirac nodal lines and tilted semi-dirac cones coexisting in a striped boron sheet. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 8(8):1707–1713, Apr 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    García Olmos, Y

    M. García Olmos, Y. Baba, M. Amado, and R. A. Molina. Zero momentum topological insulator in 2d semi-dirac materials.Journal of Physics: Materials, 7(4):045008, oct 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Vanderbilt

    D. Vanderbilt. Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Maciejko, T

    J. Maciejko, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang. The quantum spin hall effect. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 2(1):31–53, 2011

    2011

  40. [48]

    R. Winkler. Spin-orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003

    2003

  41. [49]

    Groth, M

    C. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. Akhmerov, and X.Waintal. Kwant: asoftwarepackageforquantum transport. New Journal of Physics, 16, 2013

    2013

  42. [50]

    J. Zak. Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 62:2747–2750, Jun 1989

    1989

  43. [51]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki. Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 74(6):1674–1677, 2005

    2005

  44. [52]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt. Computing topological invariants without inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B, 83:235401, Jun 2011

    2011

  45. [53]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt. Smooth gauge for topological insulators.Phys. Rev. B, 85:115415, Mar 2012

    2012

  46. [54]

    R. Yu, X. L. Qi, B. A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai. Equivalent expression of z2 topological invariant for band insulators using the non-abelian berry connection. Phys. Rev. B, 84:075119, Aug 2011

    2011

  47. [55]

    S.-Q. Shen. Topological Insulators, volume 174 of Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences. Springer, Berlin, 2012

    2012

  48. [56]

    Shan, H.-Z

    W.-Y. Shan, H.-Z. Lu, and S.-Q. Shen. Effective continuous model for surface states and thin films of three-dimensional topological insulators.New J. Phys., 12(4):043048, apr 2010

    2010

  49. [57]

    C. Li, S. Lin, G. Zhang, and Z. Song. Topological nodal points in two coupled su-schrieffer-heeger chains. Phys. Rev. B, 96:125418, Sep 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Ahmadi, J

    N. Ahmadi, J. Abouie, and D. Baeriswyl. Topological and nontopological features of generalized su-schrieffer-heeger models. Phys. Rev. B, 101:195117, May 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Büttiker

    M. Büttiker. Four-terminal phase-coherent conductance. Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:1761–1764, Oct 1986

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.