REVIEW 4 cited by
A cosmic vector for dark energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this work we show that the presence of a vector field on cosmological scales could explain the present phase of accelerated expansion of the universe. The proposed theory contains no dimensional parameters nor potential terms and does not require unnatural initial conditions in the early universe, thus avoiding the so called cosmic coincidence problem. In addition, it fits the data from high-redshift supernovae with excellent precision, making definite predictions for cosmological parameters. Upcoming observations will be able to clearly discriminate this model from standard cosmology with cosmological constant.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Shapes and orientations of massive halos in the statistically anisotropic universe
Quadrupolar statistical anisotropy in initial conditions leaves cluster shapes unchanged but aligns the major axes of massive halos, more strongly for higher mass.
-
Observational constraints on vector-like dark energy
Pantheon and H(z) data force the cosmic triad vector dark energy model to sit very close to the LambdaCDM limit.
-
New generalization of the Barboza-Alcaniz parametrization of Dark energy
A generalized Barboza-Alcaniz dark-energy parametrization with a free exponent n is fit to cosmological data, but the model analyzed does not actually resolve the future-time problem it was designed to fix.
-
Cosmological implications of Bumblebee theory on an FLRW background
Bumblebee theory on an FLRW background yields a cosmological model whose single free parameter is fitted to supernovae observations, producing deceleration and dark energy behaviors that are compared to Lambda-CDM.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.