Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

EliGen: Entity-Level Controlled Image Generation with Regional Attention

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read EliGen claims entity-level image control comes from attention masks alone: each entity prompt attends only to its own region, no extra parameters, and LoRA fine-tuning makes layouts accurate.

desk verdict Solid engineering contribution with a clean attention-masking mechanism for FLUX and a useful released dataset, but the abstract's spatial-precision claim is contradicted by the paper's own mIoU table and the quality comparisons are confounded by the stronger base model. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01097 v3 pith:UOXHIICW submitted 2025-01-02 cs.CV

Hong Zhang , Zhongjie Duan , Xingjun Wang , Yingda Chen , Yu Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords entity-levelimagegenerationregionalattentiondiffusiontransformersarbitrary-shapedmaskslayoutcontrolinpaintingLoRAfine-tuningtext-to-image
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Text-to-image diffusion models take a global prompt, so users cannot specify where each object is or what each object looks like individually. EliGen's proposal is to get entity-level control for free from the attention mask: in a diffusion transformer, the global prompt and each entity's local prompt are concatenated with the latent tokens, and a binary mask restricts every local prompt to attend only to its own spatial region while hiding entities from one another. Because the mask is soft-coded spatial localization rather than a hard-coded bounding box, no new network parameters are introduced; training with LoRA on a 500K-image dataset generated by FLUX and annotated by Qwen2-VL activates layout control. On COCO, EliGen reports the highest entity success rate among GLIGEN, MIGC, InstanceDiffusion, and Multi-Diffusion, with the best image-quality scores, and supports arbitrary-shaped masks where the tested baselines largely do not. The framework also extends to multi-entity inpainting through a noise-fusion pipeline, so the same mechanism covers generation, editing, and inpainting.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is regional attention, defined inside the double- and single-stream transformer blocks of FLUX: the global prompt, all local prompts, and latent tokens form a single attention sequence, and a composed binary attention mask sets M(p_i, z) = patchify(m_i), M(p_i, p_j)=0 for i≠j, M(p_i,p_i)=1, and M(z,z)=1, with attention computed as softmax(QK^T/√d + log M)V. This changes only the mask, so no parameters are added. The other machinery is the training setup: LoRA fine-tuning with rank 64 on a constructed dataset, and the inpainting fusion pipeline that replaces foreground noise with regional-attention output while keeping background noise from the input image.

What would settle it

Evaluate the released EliGen on a benchmark of clearly non-rectangular masks—curved, diagonal, ring-shaped, silhouette-shaped—and compare it against a variant trained with polygon masks at the same LoRA budget; if the rectangle-trained model's entity success rate and mIoU collapse on free-form masks, the transfer assumption is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

EliGen's central claim is that precise entity-level control can be achieved by reusing the attention mask of a DiT model instead of adding a spatial encoder. Regional attention concatenates the T5 embeddings of a global prompt and L local prompts with the latent-patch tokens, then applies a composed binary mask: each local prompt sees only the latent patches inside its own mask (patchify of the entity mask), entities are mutually invisible, and each token sees itself. After LoRA fine-tuning on a dataset whose images come from FLUX.1-dev and whose annotations come from Qwen2-VL, the attention maps concentrate in the target region early in denoising and the model generates each entity in its specified shape and place. The paper reports entity success rate 88.41% and aesthetic score 5.60 on COCO, ahead of InstanceDiffusion's 82.43% and 4.89, with mIoU 73.93% versus 76.17%. EliGen further uses an inpainting fusion algorithm that blends regional-attention foreground noise with input-image background noise, preserving non-inpainted areas while placing new entities.

Load-bearing premise

All the arbitrary-mask capability rests on the assumption that training with rectangular masks teaches the model to handle arbitrary-shaped masks, because the dataset annotations are rectangular.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can specify any number of entities with arbitrary-shaped masks and get each entity's attributes, position, and shape respected in the final image.
  • EliGen extends the same entity control to image inpainting, allowing multi-entity additions or replacements in a single forward pass while preserving the background.
  • Because regional attention adds no parameters, the recipe can be transferred to future diffusion-transformer architectures by copying the mask-construction logic.
  • Integrating EliGen with IP-Adapter, In-Context LoRA, and MLLMs enables styled entity control, entity transfer, and dialogue-based image design and editing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the mask-only mechanism should transplant to any DiT-based text-to-image model, so the main barrier to adoption is producing entity-annotated training data, not changing the architecture.
  • Beyond the paper: the rectangular-to-arbitrary transfer assumption can be stress-tested by training with a small fraction of polygon masks; if transfer is poor, the released pipeline is a natural place to add shape diversity.
  • Beyond the paper: hard-zeroing inter-entity attention may limit interactions such as 'a person holding a racket'; the paper's adaptive coherence suggests the model compensates, but an explicit interaction channel would be a testable extension.
  • Beyond the paper: the released dataset of 1.27M open-set entity annotations is reusable for other grounded-generation tasks, for evaluating MLLM grounding quality, and for layout-to-image benchmarks beyond EliGen itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces EliGen, an entity-level controlled image generation framework built on the FLUX.1-dev diffusion transformer. The core proposal is a parameter-free regional attention mechanism that injects local prompts and arbitrary-shaped masks into the attention computation by constructing binary attention masks. The authors also construct a 500K-sample dataset of FLUX-generated images annotated with Qwen2-VL, fine-tune the model with LoRA, and propose an inpainting fusion algorithm. The paper claims that EliGen surpasses prior entity-control methods (GLIGEN, MIGC, InstanceDiffusion, Multi-Diffusion) in both spatial precision and image quality, and demonstrates creative extensions with IP-Adapter, In-Context LoRA, and MLLMs.

Significance. If the claims hold, EliGen would be a valuable contribution: it introduces a parameter-free regional attention mechanism applicable to modern DiT backbones, releases a large-scale fine-grained entity-annotation dataset, and provides a complete inpainting pipeline. The method is clearly specified and the supplementary material contains useful ablations, attention visualizations, and additional qualitative results. The human preference study and the inclusion of multiple automatic metrics are strengths. However, the central claim of superiority over existing methods is not convincingly established: the quantitative benchmark (Table 1) shows a lower mIoU than InstanceDiffusion, and all baselines use Stable Diffusion/SDXL backbones while EliGen uses FLUX.1-dev, confounding the comparison. The assumption that training with rectangular masks generalizes to arbitrary-shaped masks is only qualitatively demonstrated. These issues materially affect the paper's main conclusion, though they are addressable with additional experiments and more careful claims.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Table 1] The abstract and conclusion state that EliGen surpasses existing methods in spatial precision, but Table 1 reports EliGen's mIoU as 73.93, below InstanceDiffusion's 76.17. Section 5.2 attributes the gap to region expansion for image coherence, but no quantitative evidence is provided that this expansion improves perceived spatial correctness. Either provide a metric that captures the intended soft-coding behavior and shows an advantage, or revise the claim to reflect the reported numbers.
  2. [Section 5.1 and Section 3.2] All baselines are built on Stable Diffusion/SDXL, while EliGen uses FLUX.1-dev, a much stronger base model. The large margins in CLIP, Aesthetic, and entity success rate could be due to the base model rather than the regional attention mechanism. The paper lacks a controlled comparison, such as training regional attention on an SD-based model or adapting baselines to FLUX. Without such an ablation, the attribution of the reported improvements to the proposed mechanism is unsupported.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Figure 5] The assumption that 'training with rectangular masks is sufficient to enable the model to generalize to arbitrary-shaped masks' is stated without quantitative validation. The COCO evaluation uses rectangular boxes (converted to masks), and arbitrary-mask capability is only shown qualitatively in Figure 5. Provide a quantitative evaluation on free-form masks, e.g., using masks derived from segmentation, to support this load-bearing generalization claim.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Table 1] The entity success rate is evaluated with Qwen2-VL, which is also used to annotate the training set. This introduces a circularity: the model is likely tuned to satisfy Qwen2-VL's judgments on FLUX-generated images. While the inclusion of InternVL2 and CogVLM2 mitigates this, the Qwen2-VL column should be interpreted cautiously, and the paper should explicitly discuss this potential bias.
  5. [Supplementary Section E.3] The supplementary material admits that adaptive region expansion can cause underperformance on spatial accuracy metrics. This admission conflicts with the abstract's sweeping claim of 'surpassing existing methods in both spatial precision and image quality.' Please reconcile this by either restricting the claim to image quality or by reframing spatial precision as a deliberate trade-off with coherence, supported by user-study evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] There is a typo in the contributions list: 'focus attention of entites' should be 'entities'.
  2. [Section 4.2] The word 'inpaining' should be 'inpainting' in the sentence 'preserving these areas while enabling precise entity-level modifications over inpaining regions.'
  3. [Section 3.2] The text says 'the regional attention mechanism defined in Eq. 10' but Eq. 10 is the inter-entity mask definition, not the attention mechanism. The reference should be to Eq. 8 or Eq. 13.
  4. [References] The reference [Huang et al., 2024b] appears with the same title as [Huang et al., 2024a]; this appears to be a duplicate and should be corrected.
  5. [Supplementary Figure 12 caption] The caption says 'A person standing by the river' but the comparison images also show entity-control settings; please clarify the exact prompt and conditions used in the ablation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivation is self-contained and evaluated against external benchmarks; the cited concerns are evaluation confounds, not circular reductions.

full rationale

EliGen's contribution—regional attention with LoRA fine-tuning on a FLUX-generated, Qwen2-VL-annotated dataset—is not derived from the claims it is used to support. The quantitative claims rest on the external COCO benchmark with YOLOv11-based mIoU, CLIP scores, multiple MLLM judges, and a human preference/user study; none of these quantities is fitted from or defined in terms of the reported success rates. The closest candidate for circularity is that Qwen2-VL both annotates the training entities and serves as one of the success-rate judges, but this is an evaluation-alignment risk rather than a construction-level equivalence: the same model is also scored by InternVL2 and CogVLM2, and mIoU/human ratings are independent of Qwen2-VL. The paper's untested assumption that rectangular training masks transfer to arbitrary-shaped masks, and the confounding of base model (FLUX vs SD/SDXL) in comparisons, are experimental-validity concerns, not circular reasoning. No load-bearing self-citation or renamed-known-result pattern appears in the manuscript.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard deep-learning practice plus three paper-specific assumptions: the FLUX/Qwen2-VL synthetic dataset is a valid training distribution, rectangular mask training transfers to arbitrary masks, and MLLM judgments are a reliable measure of entity success. Hyperparameters (LoRA rank, learning rate, steps, guidance scales) are chosen by hand and not swept, so they are listed as free parameters. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • LoRA rank = 64
    Chosen for fine-tuning; determines the capacity of the adapter and thus the achievable layout control.
  • Training steps = 20,000
    Selected to balance convergence and compute; no sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • Learning rate = 0.0001
    AdamW learning rate chosen by hand in Section 3.4.
  • Classifier-free guidance scales = 3.0 (sampling) and 3.5 (embedded FLUX guidance)
    Inference hyperparameters in Section 3.4; they affect image quality and control strength.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption FLUX.1-dev is a suitable base DiT and T5 text embeddings are shared between global and local prompts.
    The method concatenates local prompts with the global prompt in the same embedding space and assumes the pretrained FLUX model can interpret them without additional parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper Training with rectangular masks is sufficient for generalization to arbitrary-shaped masks.
    Explicitly stated in Section 3.3; the arbitrary-mask capability is a headline contribution and depends on this transfer.
  • domain assumption The synthetic dataset generated by FLUX and annotated by Qwen2-VL has correct enough entity labels and matches the model's inference distribution.
    Dataset construction in Section 3.3 and A.1; if labels are noisy, the trained layout control would be fitted to wrong supervision.
  • ad hoc to paper MLLM-based entity success rate is a valid proxy for generation correctness.
    Section 5.1 uses Qwen2-VL, InternVL2, and CogVLM2 as judges without calibration; training annotations come from the same model family as one of the judges.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EliGen: Entity-Level Controlled Image Generation with Regional Attention." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UOXHIICW

@misc{pith2026250101097,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EliGen: Entity-Level Controlled Image Generation with Regional Attention},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UOXHIICW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01097}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in diffusion models have significantly advanced text-to-image generation, yet global text prompts alone remain insufficient for achieving fine-grained control over individual entities within an image. To address this limitation, we present EliGen, a novel framework for Entity-level controlled image Generation. Firstly, we put forward regional attention, a mechanism for diffusion transformers that requires no additional parameters, seamlessly integrating entity prompts and arbitrary-shaped spatial masks. By contributing a high-quality dataset with fine-grained spatial and semantic entity-level annotations, we train EliGen to achieve robust and accurate entity-level manipulation, surpassing existing methods in both spatial precision and image quality. Additionally, we propose an inpainting fusion pipeline, extending its capabilities to multi-entity image inpainting tasks. We further demonstrate its flexibility by integrating it with other open-source models such as IP-Adapter, In-Context LoRA and MLLM, unlocking new creative possibilities. The source code, model, and dataset are published at https://github.com/modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio.git.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01097 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Entity control ability of EliGen. The global prompt is “top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. EliGen enables spatial and semantic control of each entity. (a) By incorporating local prompts and masks for each entity, it generates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The regional attention mechanism within the double-stream transformer block of DiT. (a) The diffusion model. (b) The global [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative results conditioned on multiple rectangular-shaped entities. Test case combinations evolve from simple to complex, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results with arbitrary-shaped entities. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The dataset distributions of entity numbers and categories. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Styled entity control with IP-Adapter and our EliGen. Upon receiving the desired entity information, we can generate a target image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Entity transfer with In-Context LoRA and our EliGen. Given the identity defined by the source image, EliGen can seamlessly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dialogue-based image design and editing with MLLM and our EliGen. Users can utilize MLLM to design the layout of the image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Training qualitative comparison between our constructed dataset and Laion dataset. The image pair is generated from the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Attention maps of the local prompt “person” with latent. The visualization results are derived from the regional attention (RA) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Generalization tests across different random seeds. Variations in the random seed induce changes in the initial noise input to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Continuous variation tests on positional inputs. The samples are generated using the same prompt and initial noise. EliGen can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Generalization tests with incorrect spatial relationships between entities. In the provided examples, the input positional relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Generalization with incorrect entity shapes. EliGen demonstrates the ability to adaptively adjust entity morphology based on input [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Pure text-to-image generation capability of EliGen. Despite fine-tuning on an entity-level control task, EliGen retains strong [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Appearance Pointers -- Multimodal Region Control of Diffusion Transformers

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Appearance pointers are compact tokens that let a diffusion transformer apply text, image, or combined prompts to specific image regions in a single pass.

  2. CoT-lized Diffusion: Let's Reinforce T2I Generation Step-by-step

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CoT-Diff couples a multimodal LLM's step-by-step 3D layout reasoning into the diffusion denoising loop, claiming large gains in spatial alignment for text-to-image generation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation

    [Bar-Tal et al., 2023] Omer Bar-Tal, Lior Yariv, Yaron Lip- man, and Tali Dekel. Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation

    work page 2023

  2. [4]

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    [Esser et al., 2024] Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas M ¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03206,

    arXiv 2024

  3. [5]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance

    [Ho and Salimans, 2022] Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598,

    arXiv 2022

  4. [8]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    [Hu et al., 2021] Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685,

    arXiv 2021

  5. [10]

    In-context lora for dif- fusion transformers

    [Huang et al., 2024b] Lianghua Huang, Wei Wang, Zhi-Fan Wu, Yupeng Shi, Huanzhang Dou, Chen Liang, Yutong Feng, Yu Liu, and Jingren Zhou. In-context lora for dif- fusion transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23775 ,

    arXiv

  6. [11]

    Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models

    [Karras et al., 2022] Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, and Samuli Laine. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models. Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 35:26565–26577,

    work page 2022

  7. [12]

    Yolov11: An overview of the key archi- tectural enhancements

    [Khanam and Hussain, 2024] Rahima Khanam and Muham- mad Hussain. Yolov11: An overview of the key archi- tectural enhancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725,

    arXiv 2024

  8. [13]

    Pick-a-pic: An open dataset of user preferences for text- to-image generation

    [Kirstain et al., 2023] Yuval Kirstain, Adam Polyak, Uriel Singer, Shahbuland Matiana, Joe Penna, and Omer Levy. Pick-a-pic: An open dataset of user preferences for text- to-image generation

    work page 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [14]

    [Labs, 2024] Black Forest Labs. Flux. https: //blackforestlabs.ai/announcing-black-forest-labs,

    2024

  2. [15]

    Laion-aesthetics v2

    [LAION, 2022] LAION. Laion-aesthetics v2. https://github. com/christophschuhmann/improved-aesthetic-predictor,

    2022

  3. [16]

    Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to- image generation

    [Li et al., 2023] Yuheng Li, Haotian Liu, Qingyang Wu, Fangzhou Mu, Jianwei Yang, Jianfeng Gao, Chunyuan Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to- image generation. In CVPR,

    2023

  4. [17]

    Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion trans- former with fine-grained chinese understanding

    [Li et al., 2024] Zhimin Li, Jianwei Zhang, Qin Lin, Jiangfeng Xiong, Yanxin Long, Xinchi Deng, Yingfang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Minbin Huang, Zedong Xiao, et al. Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion trans- former with fine-grained chinese understanding. arXiv e- prints,

    2024

  5. [18]

    Microsoft coco: Com- mon objects in context

    [Lin et al., 2014] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Be- longie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Com- mon objects in context. In ECCV,

    2014

  6. [20]

    Directed diffusion: Direct control of object placement through at- tention guidance

    [Ma et al., 2024] Wan-Duo Kurt Ma, Avisek Lahiri, John P Lewis, Thomas Leung, and W Bastiaan Kleijn. Directed diffusion: Direct control of object placement through at- tention guidance. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 38, pages 4098–4106,

    2024

  7. [21]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis.Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106,

    [Mildenhall et al., 2021] Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srini- vasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ra- mamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis.Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106,

    2021

  8. [22]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion mod- els

    [Mou et al., 2023] Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Yanze Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongang Qi, Ying Shan, and Xiaohu Qie. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08453,

    2023 arXiv

  9. [23]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    [Peebles and Xie, 2022] William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09748,

    2022 arXiv

  10. [24]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis

    [Podell et al., 2024] Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. In ICLR,

    2024

  11. [25]

    Exploring the lim- its of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text trans- former

    [Raffel et al., 2020] Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the lim- its of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text trans- former. Journal of machine learning research, 21(14...

    2020

  12. [26]

    Deepspeed: System optimizations enable training deep learning models with over 100 billion parameters

    [Rasley et al., 2020] Jeff Rasley, Samyam Rajbhandari, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. Deepspeed: System optimizations enable training deep learning models with over 100 billion parameters. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery ...

    2020

  13. [27]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation

    [Ronneberger et al., 2015] Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fis- cher, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October ...

    2015

  14. [29]

    Instantx flux.1-dev ip-adapter page,

    [Team, 2024] InstantX Team. Instantx flux.1-dev ip-adapter page,

    2024

  15. [30]

    Wang, Evan Montoya, David Munechika, Haoyang Yang, Benjamin Hoover, and Duen Horng Chau

    [Wang et al., 2022] Zijie J. Wang, Evan Montoya, David Munechika, Haoyang Yang, Benjamin Hoover, and Duen Horng Chau. DiffusionDB: A large-scale prompt gallery dataset for text-to-image generative models. arXiv:2210.14896 [cs],

    2022 arXiv

  16. [31]

    Qwen2-vl: Enhanc- ing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution

    [Wang et al., 2024a] Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shi- jie Wang, Zhihao Fan, Jinze Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, et al. Qwen2-vl: Enhanc- ing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191,

    arXiv

  17. [32]

    Ifadapter: In- stance feature control for grounded text-to-image gener- ation

    [Wu et al., 2024] Yinwei Wu, Xianpan Zhou, Bing Ma, Xue- feng Su, Kai Ma, and Xinchao Wang. Ifadapter: In- stance feature control for grounded text-to-image gener- ation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08240,

    2024 arXiv

  18. [33]

    Qwen2.5 technical report

    [Yang et al., 2024] An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Bao, K...

    2024 arXiv

  19. [34]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models

    [Ye et al., 2023] Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    2023 arXiv

  20. [35]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image dif- fusion models

    [Zhang et al., 2023] Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image dif- fusion models. In ICCV,

    2023

  21. [36]

    Learning multi-dimensional human preference for text-to-image generation

    [Zhang et al., 2024] Sixian Zhang, Bohan Wang, Junqiang Wu, Yan Li, Tingting Gao, Di Zhang, and Zhongyuan Wang. Learning multi-dimensional human preference for text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages...

    2024

  22. [37]

    Layoutd- iffusion: Controllable diffusion model for layout-to-image generation

    [Zheng et al., 2023] Guangcong Zheng, Xianpan Zhou, Xuewei Li, Zhongang Qi, Ying Shan, and Xi Li. Layoutd- iffusion: Controllable diffusion model for layout-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 22490–22499,

    2023

  23. [38]

    Migc: Multi-instance generation con- troller for text-to-image synthesis

    [Zhou et al., 2024] Dewei Zhou, You Li, Fan Ma, Xiaoting Zhang, and Yi Yang. Migc: Multi-instance generation con- troller for text-to-image synthesis. In CVPR,

    2024

  24. [39]

    Flux Qwen2-VL 72B Global Prompt:A cute orange and white striped kitten sitting on a fluffy white cloud in a blue sky with other clouds around

    EliGen: Entity-Level Controlled Image Generation with Regional Attention Supplementary Material A Dataset Details A.1 Dataset Construction Pipeline Origin Caption from DiffusionDB:Striped kitten, sitting on a fluffy white cloud, blue sky background, other clouds around, adorab...

    2024

  25. [40]

    At each denoising step, the predicted noise from the DiT is fused with the noise derived from the original image

    The input image I is first encoded into an initial latent embedding zinit. At each denoising step, the predicted noise from the DiT is fused with the noise derived from the original image. This fusion ensures that the foreground regions are inpainted with the generated entitie...

    2024

  26. [41]

    Moreover, the image distribution within the dataset should closely align with the output distribution of the model itself

    D Ablation Study D.1 Training Qualitative Comparison for Dataset Image Source The primary objective of training the EliGen model is to ac- tivate its capability for layout control, which necessitates the construction of a dataset annotated with entities. Moreover, the image di...

    2022

  27. [2014]

    Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detec- tion

    [Liu et al., 2023] Shilong Liu, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Jie Yang, Qing Jiang, Chunyuan Li, Jianwei Yang, Hang Su, et al. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detec- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05499,

    2023 arXiv

  28. [2015]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    [Song et al., 2021] Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Ste- fano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. ArXiv, abs/2010.02502,

    2021 arXiv

  29. [2020]

    Cogvlm2: Vi- sual language models for image and video understanding

    [Hong et al., 2024] Wenyi Hong, Weihan Wang, Ming Ding, Wenmeng Yu, Qingsong Lv, Yan Wang, Yean Cheng, Shiyu Huang, Junhui Ji, Zhao Xue, et al. Cogvlm2: Vi- sual language models for image and video understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16500,

    2024 arXiv

  30. [2022]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    [Ho et al., 2020] Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, volume 33, pages 6840–6851. Curran Asso- ciat...

    2020

  31. [2023]

    Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual- linguistic tasks

    [Chen et al., 2024] Zhe Chen, Jiannan Wu, Wenhai Wang, Weijie Su, Guo Chen, Sen Xing, Muyan Zhong, Qinglong Zhang, Xizhou Zhu, Lewei Lu, et al. Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual- linguistic tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confe...

    2024

  32. [2024]

    Flux-controlnet- inpainting

    [Creative, 2024] Alimama Creative. Flux-controlnet- inpainting. https://github.com/alimama-creative/ FLUX-Controlnet-Inpainting.git,

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.