Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Appearance pointers are compact tokens that route a diffusion transformer to the right appearance cues at the right places, letting one model obey text- and image-based regional instructions at once.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:40 UTC pith:5ZP56TTN

load-bearing objection The method is genuinely new and useful for multimodal regional control in DiTs, but the paper overstates its numbers and the self-generated benchmark plus unverified mask-prompt alignments leave the headline comparison shakier than it looks. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19344 v1 pith:5ZP56TTN submitted 2026-07-21 cs.CV cs.AIcs.GR

Appearance Pointers -- Multimodal Region Control of Diffusion Transformers

Rahul Sajnani , Yulia Gryaditskaya , Radom\'ir M\v{e}ch , Srinath Sridhar , Matheus Gadelha This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.GR
keywords appearance pointersdiffusion transformersregion controlmultimodal conditioningimage generationtext-to-imageregion correspondencespatial aggregation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper attempts to give diffusion transformers precise regional control: tell the model 'put this material here, this object there' using text or images, and have it obey in a single generation pass. The proposed solution is a new kind of input token called an appearance pointer, computed by a small network that fuses the spatial mask with the text or image description and then injected into the transformer alongside the usual prompt tokens. The pointer does not carry the appearance itself; it tells the model where to use the appearance cues already present in the token stream. The authors train a single model on a synthetic dataset and report that it matches or beats previous methods that were specialized for only text or only image conditioning, while also supporting both at once.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a diffusion transformer can be made to respect user-provided regions—masks with associated text or image descriptions—by inserting compact 'appearance pointer' tokens into its text and image streams. These pointers are generated by a lightweight region correspondence network that jointly encodes the mask, the text, and the image, then aggregates across regions with a spatial pooling step. The pointers act as routing signals: they do not store the appearance themselves but indicate which of the existing tokens should influence which part of the generated image. Because the pointers are computed once per generation and the base transformer is left frozen apart

What carries the argument

The appearance pointer: a compact token, produced by a region correspondence network that fuses a coordinate-enhanced mask with text and/or image tokens, and refined by a region aggregation transformer that collapses multiple regions into a single canvas. It is injected into the diffusion transformer's text and image streams and serves as a routing cue, telling the model which appearance cues to use at which spatial locations.

Load-bearing premise

The method's ability to learn correct region–appearance links depends on the synthetic training data containing accurate mask-to-description pairs; if the vision-language-model-based filtering admits mismatched pairs, the region correspondence network will learn to associate wrong cues with regions.

What would settle it

Run the trained model on a benchmark with 10 or more regions and inspect the pointer tokens' attention maps: if a substantial fraction of pointers attend to the wrong region or the generated region content does not match the given reference image or text, the central routing claim is refuted. A simpler version: feed a reference image of object A but place its mask in a region described as object B; if the model still renders A there, the pointer is not enforcing the mask–description link.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single generative model can handle region-specific instructions from both text and reference images at the same time, enabling workflows like 'place this desk with this material' without retraining.
  • Because pointers are compact and computed once, multi-region conditioning adds modest overhead relative to the base generation cost.
  • The method supports both generation from scratch and insertion/editing, so an artist can reuse the same interface for layout design and targeted scene edits.
  • The region correspondence network is agnostic to the number of regions and can be trained once then applied to new diffusion transformer backbones, assuming the token streams stay compatible.
  • If the results hold, future systems can offer precise material, identity, and layout control without requiring prompt engineering or per-task adapters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pointer mechanism may reduce the need for training-based adapters: if routing is the bottleneck, then any diffusion transformer with a known token structure could be controlled by retraining the small pointer network rather than the generator, suggesting a plausible path to modality-agnostic controllers for future architectures.
  • The reliance on a synthetic, vision-language-model-filtered dataset means the transfer to real images is only as good as the filtering thresholds; a natural extension would be to measure how performance degrades as the filter threshold is relaxed or to construct a real-image benchmark with human-verified mask-prompt pairs.
  • Because the paper reports degraded adherence with ten or more regions, an interesting test is whether the aggregation step can be replaced with a learned spatial weighting that scales sublinearly, or whether the token budget itself is the limiting factor.
  • The 'pointer' idea could analogously be applied to other token-based generative models (e.g., video transformers) that ingest heterogeneous tokens, since the routing mechanism is not specific to image generation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces appearance pointers, compact tokens that are meant to route a Diffusion Transformer (Flux Kontext) to the correct appearance cues at user-specified spatial locations. A region correspondence network fuses masks with text or image prompts, and a region aggregation transformer produces a small set of pointer tokens that are injected into the DiT image and text streams. The approach supports several workflows: region-controlled generation, insertion/editing, pose control, and simultaneous multimodal region control. The authors also introduce AP-37K, a synthetic dataset of multi-region images with text and image descriptions, and report quantitative comparisons against InstanceDiffusion, DreamRenderer, Seg2Any, and MS-Diffusion, plus a real-world evaluation on SACap.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, the paper makes a useful contribution: a single, modality-agnostic interface for localized control of a DiT, with a relatively lightweight module and a public-style dataset. The design is simple and extensible, the paper includes thoughtful ablations (Table 4), and the SACap real-world evaluation (Table 9) is a good-faith attempt to address distribution shift. However, the central quantitative claim is contradicted by the paper's own Table 2, and the main benchmark is generated with the same base model and grounding pipeline used in training. These are load-bearing issues for the 'reaches or surpasses SOTA' statement in the abstract and introduction. The method itself is plausible, but the evidence as presented does not fully support the headline.

major comments (3)
  1. [Introduction & §5.1, Table 2] The Introduction states that for text-described regions 'our approach is the best or second best in all the six metrics.' Table 2 contradicts this: in Region CLIP-T the method scores 27.24, which is the lowest among the four methods (InstanceDiffusion 27.54, DreamRenderer 28.03, Seg2Any 27.67), and in Global CLIP-T 28.93 it is second, not first. The abstract's 'reaches or surpasses' is therefore not supported by the paper's own headline table. Please correct the claim and discuss the CLIP-T gap; this is a central claim, not a wording issue.
  2. [§4, §5.1, Appendix E/F] The headline results are measured on AP-37K, a dataset produced with the same base model (Flux) and the same grounding pipeline used to train AppearancePointers. The VLM filter in §A.1 checks pose/material consistency of edited crops (thresholds 0.84/0.79) but never verifies that the Grounded SAM mask corresponds to the object description or that the edited crop aligns with the region in the original image. Appendix F concedes residual verification errors may persist. Since Tables 2-3 are evaluated on this same synthetic distribution, beating baselines there can reflect in-distribution advantage; the SACap real-world results (Table 9) only partially mitigate this, and even there zero-shot Region CLIP-T (25.57) is below Seg2Any (26.24). Please provide a stronger external evaluation or retrain/compare baselines on AP-37K and report the distribution-shift numbers in the main paper.
  3. [§5.1, Metrics] The definitions of DINO-I and CLIP-I are ambiguous: they compare 'the generated and ground truth image patches', but for text-region-to-image generation there is no ground-truth output image. If the original AP-37K image is used as the reference, these metrics reward reconstruction of the training distribution and penalize diverse but valid outputs, which would skew Table 2 in favor of the in-distribution model. Please specify the reference patches, explain why they are appropriate for a generation task, and consider reporting also a distribution-insensitive region-alignment metric (e.g., CLIP-T only or human evaluation).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 5 caption] The caption says 'AppearancePointers-27K' while the rest of the paper refers to AP-37K; unify naming.
  2. [§3.2, Complexity] The sentence 'ant T is the number or regions' appears to be a typo for 'and T is the number of denoising steps'; R and T are used inconsistently in the complexity formula.
  3. [Tables 4 and 6] The ablation results appear twice (main text and Appendix C) with different row orders and incomplete cross-referencing; merge or clearly point from one to the other.
  4. [Algorithm 1] Line 8 uses 'AppearancePointerMask' while Sec. A.3 names it 'Appearance Pointer Mask'; also define RPbg before it is used in line 2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No construction-level circularity; the learned pointer mapping and external SACap evaluation keep the derivation independent, though the headline Tables 2/3 are partly in-distribution and one dataset-recipe citation is same-group.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the claimed 'prediction' is the generated image conditioned on appearance pointers, but appearance pointers are not defined in terms of the generated image; they are the output of a learned region correspondence network Phi_RC and aggregation Phi_A (Eqs. 1-3), trained with a flow-matching objective on image/region pairs produced by an external pipeline (FLUX, Grounded SAM, InternVL). No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted quantity by construction. The external SACap-eval table (Table 9) provides a real-image benchmark, and the paper explicitly acknowledges the distribution-shift advantage of its own AP-37K benchmark in Appendix E: 'We do recognize some advantage distribution shift advantage might still and ran experiments on real data below.' This breaks any claim that the headline numbers are forced. The same-group citations (Sigma-Gen [37] for the dataset-generation recipe and positional-encoding scheme) are methodological precedents rather than load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz justifications; the edit quality is additionally checked by an external VLM, InternVL. The in-distribution evaluation in Tables 2/3 and the VLM-filter residual risk admitted in Appendix F ('residual errors in the verification process may persist and potentially degrade appearance-transfer performance') are genuine correctness/benchmark risks, but they are not circularity: the method remains a learned function from masks and prompts to outputs, and its behavior is separately tested on real data. Hence no significant circularity; the score of 2 reflects the minor same-group citation and the in-distribution benchmark caveat rather than a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on several free hyperparameters (LoRA rank, VLM thresholds, sampling probabilities) and on the assumed reliability of the FLUX/T5/VAE stack and of the synthetic data pipeline. The only invented entity is the appearance pointer token itself, which is not independently verifiable outside the model.

free parameters (8)
  • LoRA rank = 128
    Chosen for fine-tuning the conditional tokens; not derived.
  • Prodigy learning rate = 1.0
    Optimizer hyperparameter set by the authors.
  • Hidden dimension of region correspondence block = 768
    Architecture choice; bottleneck from 3072 to 768.
  • VLM filtering thresholds = 0.84 (pose), 0.79 (material)
    Thresholds for accepting generated training samples; affect data quality.
  • Prompt sampling probabilities = p in [0,0.4], etc. (Eq. 7)
    Distribution over image-only, text-only, and combined region prompts during training.
  • Position ID resampling multiplier = m in [1,6]
    Random multiplier to mimic more regions during training.
  • Number of training regions = 7 (including background)
    Training uses up to 7 regions; scaling to more is tested but degrades.
  • Downsampling factor k = not specified
    Used in mask transformer for efficiency; exact value is not given.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption FLUX Kontext is a dual-stream DiT that can natively ingest heterogeneous tokens and that its attention mechanism will route signals as intended when new tokens are added.
    The method relies on the base model's ability to incorporate appearance pointer tokens, which is not proven beyond qualitative attention maps.
  • domain assumption The pre-trained T5 and VAE encoders provide aligned, sufficient representations for image and text prompts.
    The method uses these encoders without modification; their compatibility is assumed.
  • domain assumption Grounded SAM produces accurate masks for objects in generated images, providing reliable region labels.
    Used in dataset construction; errors in grounding would propagate to training labels.
  • domain assumption InternVL VLM ratings are reliable enough to filter out inconsistent pose/material edits.
    The dataset quality depends on VLM thresholds; residual errors are acknowledged in the Limitations.
  • domain assumption Synthetic data distribution from FLUX approximates real-world image distribution sufficiently for transfer.
    The model is trained on synthetic data and tested on SACap real-world data; the paper acknowledges some transfer gap.
invented entities (1)
  • Appearance pointer tokens (I_AP, T_AP) no independent evidence
    purpose: Route the DiT's attention to the correct region-specific cues from text or image prompts.
    These are learned token types inside the model; there is no independent way to observe or verify them outside the network's generated outputs.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25607 in / 9643 out tokens · 91892 ms · 2026-08-01T12:40:30.470948+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Controllable image generation remains challenging for creative professionals, who often require precise regional control over materials, object identities, and spatial arrangements that cannot be reliably achieved through text prompting alone. Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) can natively ingest heterogeneous tokens stemming from texts and images, but they lack mechanisms for determining where and how these tokens should influence the output. We introduce appearance pointers, compact tokens that guide DiTs toward the correct appearance cues at the correct spatial locations by aligning text or image inputs with user-specified masks. Appearance pointers are produced by a region correspondence network and refined through a spatial aggregation mechanism, enabling the model to handle multiple regional descriptions without significantly increasing token load. Our approach introduces the first modality-agnostic interface for localized multimodal control in a DiT without retraining the base model from scratch. Across a range of metrics, our single model reaches or surpasses the performance of modality-specific state of the art methods, offering a simple and extensible path toward precise, region-aware, multimodal guidance in generative image synthesis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19344 by Matheus Gadelha, Radom\'ir M\v{e}ch, Rahul Sajnani, Srinath Sridhar, Yulia Gryaditskaya.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Appearance Pointers enable precise, multimodal, region-aware im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of AppearancePointers. Our framework converts heterogeneous inputs (text, images, and spatial masks) into appearance pointers (yellow). After en￾coding via FLUX VAE and T5 text encoder, multimodal signals from image (IPi) and text (T Pi), are fused with their spatial masks (Ri) to form Appearance Pointers (IAP, T AP), dictating exactly which features map to specific regions. During sampling, the d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Region-Prompt Linking. To enable the full utilization of the multi-modal conditioning mechanism of the DiT generative backbone, we generate a set of feature maps targeting the image and text streams of the backbone DiT model. Note that either the image or the text prompts can be omitted, but we will always generate feature maps targeting the two conditioning streams of the DiT model. Refer to Sec. 3.1 for … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Appearance pointers generation. The Re￾gion Aggregation Transformer creates a concise repre￾sentation of regional conditions, Appearance Pointers. Region Aggregation. With the regions linked to their corresponding con￾ditions we can condition the diffusion transformer to generate region con￾trolled images. However, naively injecting all re￾gion tokens along with their conditional tokens increases the token… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the dataset creation pipeline. (I) We generate diverse scenes by sam￾pling objects of varying scales and prompting an LLM to produce scene- and object-level descrip￾tions. (II) Images are synthesized using Flux.1 Dev and grounded with Grounded SAM. (III) For each object, we produce pose and material edits and filter them using a VLM. Existing personalization and object-insertion datasets [37, 4… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison on region-conditioned generation from tex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparison on region￾conditioned generation from image prompts. Each example provides object reference images (left) and user-defined region masks (second col￾umn), specifying where each object should appear in the final scene. We compare against MSDiffusion, a recent multi-subject generation method & Dream￾Renderer* that has depth supervision. Across var￾ied scenarios, our results show more ac… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Multi-Subject Insertion. we perform multi subject insertion with Appear￾ancePointers and benchmark against iterative InsertAnything. InsertAnything tends to degrade image results after repeated subject insertion and deforms objects such as the white bottle in row 1, the table and leaves in row 2. C Ablations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: MultiModal Region Conditioned Generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: MultiModal Region Conditioned Insertion. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Image Generation and Editing Gallery AppearancePointers can perform regional edits and generation using heterogeneous conditions in the wild. Each region is accompanied by a number which relates the condition to the region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Image Generation and Editing Gallery AppearancePointers can perform regional edits and generation using heterogeneous conditions in the wild. Each region is accompanied by a number which relates the condition to the region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Image Generation and Editing Gallery AppearancePointers can perform regional edits and generation using heterogeneous conditions in the wild. Each region is accompanied by a number which relates the condition to the region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Image Editing with Images and Region Prompts. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Layout Guided Generation. AppearancePointers can perform layout guided image generation. In this example, an image segmentation model is used to identify region of an input image. Then, we select a subset of these regions and gen￾erate a new image following the same layout. Region 1 is described by a new subject image, while the other regions have text descriptions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a) Precise Easy Segmentation in UI (clicks visualized in red). (b) Obtaining precise regions from other images using a single click and using them as conditions for generating/editing images. (c) Real-world regions+text to image generation zero-shot with AppearancePointers on SACap-eval. (d) Sparse Bbox subject conditioned image generation from MS-Bench. than smaller ones. Second, because our dataset ver… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Appearance Pointer Points to Correct Regions of Interest displaying its ef￾ficacy in multimodal region-controlled gen￾eration. We provide the attention map visu￾alization in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Failure Cases. We test scaling the number of regions using text prompt for AppearancePointers. Increasing number of regions upto 10 in this case can degrade region adherence and quality. Here, the sofa is not captured accurately. H Additional Dataset Details H.1 Dataset VLM Check Edits by FLUX Kontext may not necessarily be accurate and can have incon￾sistencies that can result in an erroneous signal for … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 28 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01324 (2022)

    Balaji, Y., Nah, S., Huang, X., Vahdat, A., Song, J., Zhang, Q., Kreis, K., Ait- tala, M., Aila, T., Laine, S., et al.: ediff-i: Text-to-image diffusion models with an ensemble of expert denoisers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01324 (2022)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Bansal, A., Chu, H.M., Schwarzschild, A., Sengupta, S., Goldblum, M., Geiping, J., Goldstein, T.: Universal guidance for diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 843–852 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (2023)

    Bar-Tal, O., Yariv, L., Lipman, Y., Dekel, T.: Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04279 (2024)

    Cao, P., Zhou, F., Song, Q., Yang, L.: Controllable generation with text-to-image diffusion models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04279 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    In: 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

    Chen, M., Laina, I., Vedaldi, A.: Training-free layout control with cross-attention guidance. In: 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37(2024)

    Chen, X., Feng, Y., Chen, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Shen, Y., Zhao, H.: Zero-shot image editing with reference imitation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37(2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, X., Huang, L., Liu, Y., Shen, Y., Zhao, D., Zhao, H.: Anydoor: Zero-shot object-level image customization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 6593–6602 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, Z., Wu, J., Wang, W., Su, W., Chen, G., Xing, S., Zhong, M., Zhang, Q., Zhu, X., Lu, L., et al.: Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 24185–24198 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    Couairon, G., Careil, M., Cord, M., Lathuiliere, S., Verbeek, J.: Zero-shot spa- tial layout conditioning for text-to-image diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Cui, X., Sun, Q., Wang, M., Li, L., Zhou, W., Li, H.: Layoutenc: Leveraging en- hancedlayoutrepresentationsfortransformer-basedcomplexscenesynthesis.ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications21(4), 1–21 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (2024), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/esser24a.html

    Esser, P., Kulal, S., Blattmann, A., Entezari, R., Müller, J., Saini, H., Levi, Y., et al.: Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (2024), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/esser24a.html

    2024

  12. [12]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Con- ference Proceedings (2023)

    Ham, C., Hays, J., Lu, J., Singh, K.K., Zhang, Z., Hinz, T.: Modulating pretrained diffusion models for multimodal image synthesis. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Con- ference Proceedings (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14636 (2023)

    He, Y., Salakhutdinov, R., Kolter, J.Z.: Localized text-to-image generation for free via cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14636 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Jia, C., Luo, M., Dang, Z., Dai, G., Chang, X., Wang, M., Wang, J.: Ssmg: Spatial- semantic map guided diffusion model for free-form layout-to-image generation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Journal of Computer Science and Technology 39(3), 509–541 (2024)

    Jiang, R., Zheng, G.C., Li, T., Yang, T.R., Wang, J.D., Li, X.: A survey of multi- modal controllable diffusion models. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 39(3), 509–541 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Kim, Y., Lee, J., Kim, J.H., Ha, J.W., Zhu, J.Y.: Dense text-to-image genera- tion with attention modulation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 7701–7711 (2023) 36 R. Sajnani et al

    2023

  17. [17]

    Labs,B.F.:Flux.1:Officialinferencerepositoryforfluxopen-weightmodels.https: //github.com/black-forest-labs/flux(2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    ArXivabs/2506.15742(2025),https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 279464475

    Labs,B.F.,Batifol,S.,Blattmann,A.,Boesel,F.,Consul,S.,Diagne,C.,Dockhorn, T., English, J., English, Z., Esser, P., Kulal, S., Lacey, K., Levi, Y., Li, C., Lorenz, D., Muller, J., Podell, D., Rombach, R., Saini, H., Sauer, A., Smith, L.: Flux.1 kontext: Flow matching for in-context image generation and editing in latent space. ArXivabs/2506.15742(2025),htt...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    Li,Y., Liu, H.,Wu,Q., Mu, F., Yang, J.,Gao, J.,Li,C., Lee, Y.J.:Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2021)

    Li, Z., Wu, J., Koh, I., Tang, Y., Sun, L.: Image synthesis from layout with locality- aware mask adaption. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11520 (2023)

    Liu, C., Liu, D.: Late-constraint diffusion guidance for controllable image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11520 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Liu, J., Huang, T., Xu, C.: Training-free composite scene generation for layout-to- image synthesis. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 37–53. Springer (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    In: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases

    Lukovnikov, D., Fischer, A.: Enabling controlnet to follow localized descriptions using cross-attention control. In: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. pp. 310–327. Springer (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02487 (2025)

    Mao, C., Zhang, J., Pan, Y., Jiang, Z., Han, Z., Liu, Y., Zhou, J.: Ace++: Instruction-based image creation and editing via context-aware content filling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02487 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

    Mao, J., Wang, X.: Training-free location-aware text-to-image synthesis. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia (2023)

    Mao, J., Wang, X., Aizawa, K.: Guided image synthesis via initial image editing in diffusion model. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08872 (2023)

    Mao, J., Wang, X., Aizawa, K.: Semantic-driven initial image construction for guided image synthesis in diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08872 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    ArXivabs/2306.06101(2023),https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:259129271

    Mishchenko, K., Defazio, A.: Prodigy: An expeditiously adaptive parameter-free learner. ArXivabs/2306.06101(2023),https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:259129271

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (2024)

    Mo,S.,Mu,F.,Lin,K.H.,Liu,Y.,Guan,B.,Li,Y.,Zhou,B.:Freecontrol:Training- free spatial control of any text-to-image diffusion model with any condition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08453 (2023)

    Mou, C., Wang, X., Xie, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, J., Qi, Z., Shan, Y., Qie, X.: T2i- adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08453 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications20(11) (2024)

    Niu, Y., Wu, L., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhu, G., Wang, J.: Multi-model style-aware diffusion learning for semantic image synthesis. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications20(11) (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193 (2023)

    Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El-Nouby, A., et al.: Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06070 (Nov 2024) Appearance Pointers 37

    Peng, B., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Yang, M.C., Jia, J.: Controlnext: Powerful and efficient control for image and video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06070 (Nov 2024) Appearance Pointers 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05427 (2023)

    Phung, Q., Ge, S., Huang, J.B.: Grounded text-to-image synthesis with attention refocusing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05427 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18435 (2023)

    Qi, Z., Huang, G., Huang, Z., Guo, Q., Chen, J., Han, J., Wang, J., Zhang, G., Liu, L., Ding, E., et al.: Layered rendering diffusion model for zero-shot guided image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18435 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14159 (2024)

    Ren, T., Liu, S., Zeng, A., Lin, J., Li, K., Cao, H., Chen, J., Huang, X., Chen, Y., Yan, F., et al.: Grounded sam: Assembling open-world models for diverse visual tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14159 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.06469 (2025)

    Saha, O., Krs, V., Mech, R., Maji, S., Blackburn-Matzen, K., Gadelha, M.: Sigma- gen: Structure and identity guided multi-subject assembly for image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.06469 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03485 (2024)

    Shirakawa, T., Uchida, S.: Noisecollage: A layout-aware text-to-image diffusion model based on noise cropping and merging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03485 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14555 (2024)

    Shuai, X., Ding, H., Ma, X., Tu, R., Jiang, Y.G., Tao, D.: A survey of multimodal-guided image editing with text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14555 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15009 (2025)

    Song, W., Jiang, H., Yang, Z., Quan, R., Yang, Y.: Insert anything: Image insertion via in-context editing in dit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15009 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16157 (2024)

    Sun, W., Li, T., Lin, Z., Zhang, J.: Spatial-aware latent initialization for control- lable image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16157 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    IEEE transactions on multimedia (2025)

    Taghipour, A., Ghahremani, M., Bennamoun, M., Rekavandi, A.M., Laga, H., Boussaid, F.: Box it to bind it: Unified layout control and attribute binding in text-to-image diffusion models. IEEE transactions on multimedia (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Tan, Z., Liu, S., Yang, X., Xue, Q., Wang, X.: Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 14940–14950 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 37 (2024)

    Tian, Y., Tu, Z., Chen, H., Hu, J., Xu, C., Wang, Y.: U-dits: Downsample tokens in u-shaped diffusion transformers. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 37 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) pp

    Touvron, H., Cord, M., Sablayrolles, A., Synnaeve, G., J’egou, H.: Going deeper with image transformers. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) pp. 32–42 (2021),https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 232428161

    2021

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13226 (2025)

    Wang, J., Hu, J., Ma, X., Ma, H., Wei, X., Wu, E.: Image editing with diffusion models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13226 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Wang, J., Chan, K.C., Loy, C.C.: Exploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 37, pp. 2555–2563 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00050 (2022)

    Wang, W., Bao, J., Zhou, W., Chen, D., Chen, D., Yuan, L., Li, H.: Semantic image synthesis via diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00050 (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025),https://openreview.net/forum? id=PJqP0wyQek

    Wang, X., Fu, S., Huang, Q., He, W., Jiang, H.: MS-diffusion: Multi-subject zero- shot image personalization with layout guidance. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025),https://openreview.net/forum? id=PJqP0wyQek

    2025

  50. [50]

    Wang, X., Darrell, T., Rambhatla, S.S., Girdhar, R., Misra, I.: Instancediffusion: Instance-level control for image generation (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10522 (2023) 38 R

    Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, J., Jin, C.: Enhancing object coherence in layout-to- image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10522 (2023) 38 R. Sajnani et al

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13081 (2025)

    Wei, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, M., Ji, Z., Zhang, L., Zuo, W.: Personalized image generation with deep generative models: A decade survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13081 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08872 (2023)

    Xiao, J., Li, L., Lv, H., Wang, S., Huang, Q.: R&b: Region and boundary aware zero-shot grounded text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08872 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    Xie, J.,Li,Y., Huang,Y.,Liu, H.,Zhang,W., Zheng,Y.,Shou, M.Z.:Boxdiff: Text- to-image synthesis with training-free box-constrained diffusion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    Xue, H., Huang, Z., Sun, Q., Song, L., Zhang, W.: Freestyle layout-to-image syn- thesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025)

    Yang, A., Li, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Gao, C., Huang, C., Lv, C., et al.: Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    Yang, B., Luo, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, G., Liang, X., Lin, L.: Law-diffusion: Com- plex scene generation by diffusion with layouts. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02527 (2025)

    Yang, P., Cheung, N.M., Ma, X.: Text to image generation and editing: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02527 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    Zeng, Y., Lin, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Collomosse, J., Kuen, J., Patel, V.M.: Scenecomposer: Any-level semantic image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19365 (2024)

    Zhan, Z., Chen, D., Mei, J.P., Zhao, Z., Chen, J., Chen, C., Lyu, S., Wang, C.: Conditional image synthesis with diffusion models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19365 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01097 (2025)

    Zhang, H., Duan, Z., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y.: Eligen: Entity-level controlled image generation with regional attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01097 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00596 (2025)

    Zhang, H., Wang, S., Li, J., Wu, Z., et al.: Seg2any: Open-set segmentation- mask-to-image generation with precise shape and semantic control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00596 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    In: ICCV (2023)

    Zhang, L., Rao, A., Agrawala, M.: Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In: ICCV (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12342 (2023)

    Zhao, P., Li, H., Jin, R., Zhou, S.K.: Loco: Locally constrained training-free layout- to-image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12342 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Zhao, S., Chen, D., Chen, Y.C., Bao, J., Hao, S., Yuan, L., Wong, K.Y.K.: Uni- controlnet:All-in-onecontroltotext-to-imagediffusionmodels.AdvancesinNeural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    Zheng, G., Zhou, X., Li, X., Qi, Z., Shan, Y., Li, X.: Layoutdiffusion: Controllable diffusion model for layout-to-image generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12046 (2025)

    Zheng, Z., Isobe, T., Shen, T., Jia, X., Zhao, J., Li, X., Ge, M., Li, B., Wang, Q., Li, D., et al.: Layout-conditioned autoregressive text-to-image generation via structured masking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12046 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12885 (2025)

    Zhou, D., Li, M., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: Dreamrenderer: Taming multi- instance attribute control in large-scale text-to-image models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12885 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05131 (2025)

    Zhou, D., Xie, J., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: 3dis-flux: simple and efficient multi-instance generation with dit rendering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05131 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025