pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09306 · v1 · pith:UOZSDUCGnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.str-el

Range-controlled entanglement in Lindbladian skin states of monitored fermions

Gianluca Passarelli , Angelo Russomanno , Davide Rossini , Procolo Lucignano This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords Lindbladian skin statesmonitored fermionsentanglement scalinghopping rangeGaussian trajectory approximationreservoir engineeringdensity imbalanceopen quantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tuning hopping range in monitored fermion chains switches Lindbladian skin states from complete edge accumulation with area-law entanglement to bulk tails with algebraic sub-volume-law entanglement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the range of coherent hopping interacts with directed dissipation in a chain of monitored fermions. Within a Gaussian trajectory approximation it identifies two scaling regimes: short-range hopping produces full skin accumulation at the boundary together with area-law entanglement, while longer-range hopping leaves a finite bulk density and yields algebraic entanglement scaling. This shows dissipation and hopping jointly set both the localization profile and the quantum correlations. A sympathetic reader would care because the result links reservoir engineering to controllable many-body entanglement in open systems. The analysis rests on finite-size scaling of density imbalance and entanglement entropy.

Core claim

Within a Gaussian trajectory approximation, short-range hopping is consistent with complete skin accumulation and area-law entanglement, whereas sufficiently long-range hopping produces a finite bulk tail and effective algebraic sub-volume-law entanglement. Dissipation and coherent hopping thus jointly control skin localization and quantum entanglement, highlighting their close interconnection.

What carries the argument

The tunable hopping range acting on Lindbladian skin states of monitored fermions under directed particle-conserving dissipation, which sets the transition between full edge pile-up and partial bulk occupation.

If this is right

  • Directed dissipation can stabilize either area-law or sub-volume-law entangled states by choice of hopping range.
  • The skin effect becomes partial rather than complete once hopping exceeds a threshold set by the dissipation strength.
  • Entanglement scaling is directly tied to the spatial profile of the many-body density imbalance.
  • Finite-size scaling distinguishes the two regimes without requiring full many-body wave-function reconstruction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying hopping range offers an experimental knob to interpolate between localized and delocalized entanglement in open chains.
  • The Gaussian approximation may link single-particle non-Hermitian skin physics to many-body entanglement area laws in a controllable way.
  • Similar range dependence could appear in other monitored systems where coherent terms compete with local dissipation.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaussian trajectory approximation remains valid across the range of hopping distances studied and correctly captures the many-body density imbalance and entanglement scaling.

What would settle it

A numerical or experimental measurement of entanglement entropy versus system size that shows a clear crossover from area-law to algebraic scaling as hopping range increases, or the absence of such a crossover.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09306 by Angelo Russomanno, Davide Rossini, Gianluca Passarelli, Procolo Lucignano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative steady-state fermion density profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Finite-size difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a,b) Data for the long-range Hamiltonian with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reservoir engineering can stabilize states inaccessible to unitary dynamics. Directed particle-conserving dissipation creates Lindbladian skin states, where Pauli exclusion turns edge accumulation into a many-body density imbalance. In a monitored fermion chain with tunable hopping range, we identify, within a Gaussian trajectory approximation, two finite-size scaling regimes: short-range hopping is consistent with complete skin accumulation and area-law entanglement, whereas sufficiently long-range hopping produces a finite bulk tail and effective algebraic sub-volume-law entanglement. Dissipation and coherent hopping thus jointly control skin localization and quantum entanglement, highlighting their close interconnection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines Lindbladian skin states in a monitored fermion chain with directed particle-conserving dissipation and tunable hopping range. Within a Gaussian trajectory approximation, it identifies two finite-size scaling regimes: short-range hopping yields complete skin accumulation and area-law entanglement, while sufficiently long-range hopping produces a finite bulk tail and effective algebraic sub-volume-law entanglement. The work argues that dissipation and coherent hopping jointly control skin localization and quantum entanglement.

Significance. If the Gaussian approximation remains quantitatively accurate, the result demonstrates an explicit interconnection between reservoir engineering, hopping range, and many-body entanglement scaling in open quantum systems, providing a concrete example of how dissipation can stabilize states with controlled localization and correlation properties.

major comments (1)
  1. [Gaussian trajectory approximation (central results section)] The headline distinction between short-range (complete skin + area law) and long-range (finite bulk tail + algebraic entanglement) regimes rests exclusively on the Gaussian trajectory approximation. No independent check—such as exact diagonalization on small chains, higher-order cumulant closure, or direct comparison to full stochastic unraveling—is supplied to confirm that the approximation remains valid once hopping range exceeds nearest-neighbor, where non-Gaussian correlations induced by long-range jump operators could modify both the steady-state density imbalance and the entanglement scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Gaussian trajectory approximation (central results section)] The headline distinction between short-range (complete skin + area law) and long-range (finite bulk tail + algebraic entanglement) regimes rests exclusively on the Gaussian trajectory approximation. No independent check—such as exact diagonalization on small chains, higher-order cumulant closure, or direct comparison to full stochastic unraveling—is supplied to confirm that the approximation remains valid once hopping range exceeds nearest-neighbor, where non-Gaussian correlations induced by long-range jump operators could modify both the steady-state density imbalance and the entanglement scaling.

    Authors: We agree that additional benchmarks would strengthen the presentation. The Gaussian trajectory approximation is the natural and exact closure for this class of models: the Hamiltonian is quadratic and the jump operators are linear in the fermionic fields, so the stochastic evolution preserves Gaussianity exactly within each trajectory. This is the same controlled approximation used throughout the monitored-fermion literature for both short- and long-range cases. While we acknowledge that non-Gaussian corrections could appear for very long-range jumps, they are expected to be sub-leading for the scaling regimes we extract. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript that (i) recalls the exact closure property, (ii) cites the relevant literature on Gaussian unravelings, and (iii) explicitly states the regime where higher-order cumulants are expected to remain small. We therefore view the central distinction between the two scaling regimes as robust within the stated approximation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The abstract and provided context present results obtained within a Gaussian trajectory approximation for short-range vs. long-range hopping regimes, but contain no equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or ansatzes that reduce any claimed prediction or scaling law to its own inputs by construction. No load-bearing steps are visible that match the enumerated circularity patterns, so the derivation is treated as self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The Gaussian trajectory approximation is invoked but its assumptions are not listed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5621 in / 1105 out tokens · 14376 ms · 2026-06-27T16:26:33.515261+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys.6, 192 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, M. Berdakin, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Topological states of non-Hermitian systems, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 227, 1295 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Opt.23, 123001 (2021)

    H.Wang, X.Zhang, J.Hua, D.Lei, M.Lu,andY.Chen, Topological physics of non-Hermitian optics and pho- tonics: a review, J. Opt.23, 123001 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Excep- tional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 745 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological In- variants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, A re- view on non-Hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys.: X7, 2109431 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  10. [10]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non- Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B56, 8651 (1997)

    1997

  11. [11]

    R. Shen, T. Chen, B. Yang, and C. H. Lee, Observa- tion of the non-Hermitian skin effect and Fermi skin on a digital quantum computer, Nat. Commun.16, 1340 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspon- dence in quantum dynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 761 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Liang, D

    Q. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Dong, H. Li, H. Li, B. Gad- way, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Dynamic Signatures of Non- HermitianSkinEffectandTopologyinUltracoldAtoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 070401 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    E.Zhao, Z.Wang, C.He, T.F.J.Poon, K.K.Pak, Y.-J. Liu, P. Ren, X.-J. Liu, and G.-B. Jo, Two-dimensional non-Hermitian skin effect in an ultracold Fermi gas, Na- ture637, 565 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Skin Ef- fect and Chiral Damping in Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170401 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Zhou and Z

    Z. Zhou and Z. Yu, Non-Hermitian skin effect in quadratic Lindbladian systems: An adjoint fermion ap- proach, Phys. Rev. A106, 032216 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Y.-M. Hu, Z. Wang, B. Lian, and Z. Wang, Many-Body Non-Hermitian Skin Effect with Exact Steady States in the Dissipative Quantum Link Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 260401 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Li, Z.-F

    Y. Li, Z.-F. Cai, T. Liu, and F. Nori, Dissipation and interaction-controlled non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. B113, 035444 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Entanglement Phase Transition Induced by the Non-Hermitian Skin Effect, Phys. Rev. X13, 021007 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Li, Z.-C

    K. Li, Z.-C. Liu, and Y. Xu, Disorder-Induced Entan- glement Phase Transitions in Non-Hermitian Systems with Skin Effects (2023), arXiv:2305.12342 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Y. L. Gal, X. Turkeshi, and M. Schirò, Volume-to-area law entanglement transition in a non-Hermitian free fermionic chain, SciPost Phys.14, 138 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements, Phys. Rev. X10, 041020 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum Zeno ef- fect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B98, 205136 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B99, 224307 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entan- glement, Phys. Rev. X9, 031009 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Szyniszewski, A

    M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, En- tanglement transition from variable-strength weak mea- surements, Phys. Rev. B100, 064204 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement Dynamics in Hybrid Quantum Circuits, inQuantum Science and Technology(Springer International Publishing, Cham,

  28. [28]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits, Ann. Phys.435, 168618 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Nahum and B

    A. Nahum and B. Skinner, Entanglement and dynam- ics of diffusion-annihilation processes with Majorana de- fects, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023288 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    X.Chen, Y.Li, M.P.A.Fisher,andA.Lucas,Emergent conformal symmetry in nonunitary random dynamics of free fermions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033017 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Measurement- driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B100, 134306 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Jian, Y.-Z

    C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quan- 6 tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 104302 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Y. Li, R. Vasseur, M. P. A. Fisher, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Statistical mechanics model for Clifford random tensor networks and monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B109, 174307 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Szyniszewski, A

    M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, Univer- sality of Entanglement Transitions from Stroboscopic to Continuous Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 210602 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Turkeshi, R

    X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement- induced criticality in(2 + 1)-dimensional hybrid quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B102, 014315 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    O. Lunt, M. Szyniszewski, and A. Pal, Measurement- induced criticality and entanglement clusters: A study of one-dimensional and two-dimensional Clifford cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B104, 155111 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Sierant, M

    P. Sierant, M. Schirò, M. Lewenstein, and X. Turkeshi, Measurement-induced phase transitions in(d+ 1)- dimensional stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. B106, 214316 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, Mea- surement and Entanglement Phase Transitions in All- To-All Quantum Circuits, on Quantum Trees, and in Landau-Ginsburg Theory, PRX Quantum2, 010352 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Zabalo, M

    A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrish- nan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 060301 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    Sierant and X

    P. Sierant and X. Turkeshi, Universal Behavior beyond Multifractality of Wave Functions at Measurement- Induced Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 130605 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Chiriacò, M

    G. Chiriacò, M. Tsitsishvili, D. Poletti, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Diagrammatic method for many-body non-Markovian dynamics: Memory effects and entan- glement transitions, Phys. Rev. B108, 075151 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Klocke and M

    K. Klocke and M. Buchhold, Majorana Loop Models for Measurement-Only Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. X13, 041028 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Lira-Solanilla, X

    A. Lira-Solanilla, X. Turkeshi, and S. Pappalardi, Mul- tipartite entanglement structure of monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 080401 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Nehra, A

    R. Nehra, A. Romito, and D. Meidan, Controlling measurement-induced phase transitions with tunable detector coupling, Quantum9, 1697 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    A. C. C. de Albornoz, D. C. Rose, and A. Pal, En- tanglement transition and heterogeneity in long-range quadratic Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. B109, 214204 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    M. Fava, L. Piroli, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Moni- tored fermions with conservedU(1)charge, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043246 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Chahine and M

    K. Chahine and M. Buchhold, Entanglement phases, localization, and multifractality of monitored free fermions in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B110, 054313 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Delmonte, Z

    A. Delmonte, Z. Li, G. Passarelli, E. Y. Song, D. Bar- berena, A. M. Rey, and R. Fazio, Measurement-induced phase transitions in monitored infinite-range interacting systems, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023082 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Passarelli, X

    G. Passarelli, X. Turkeshi, A. Russomanno, P. Lucig- nano, M. Schirò, and R. Fazio, Many-Body Dynamics in Monitored Atomic Gases without Postselection Bar- rier, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 163401 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. De Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys.7, 24 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Buchhold, Y

    M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, Effective Theory for the Measurement-Induced Phase Transition of Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. X11, 041004 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circuits and tensor networks of noninteracting fermions, Phys. Rev. B106, 134206 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Coppola, E

    M. Coppola, E. Tirrito, D. Karevski, and M. Collura, Growth of entanglement entropy under local projective measurements, Phys. Rev. B105, 094303 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Nonlinear Sigma Models for Monitored Dy- namics of Free Fermions, Phys. Rev. X13, 041045 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Poboiko, P

    I. Poboiko, P. Pöpperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mir- lin, Theory of Free Fermions under Random Projective Measurements, Phys. Rev. X13, 041046 (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    C.-M. Jian, H. Shapourian, B. Bauer, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced entanglement tran- sitions in quantum circuits of non-interacting fermions: Born-rule versus forced measurements (2023), arXiv:2302.09094 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Merritt and L

    J. Merritt and L. Fidkowski, Entanglement transitions with free fermions, Phys. Rev. B107, 064303 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Alberton, M

    O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement Transition in a Monitored Free-Fermion Chain: From Extended Criticality to Area Law, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170602 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Turkeshi, A

    X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schirò, Measurement-induced entanglement transi- tions in the quantum Ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks, Phys. Rev. B103, 224210 (2021)

    2021

  60. [60]

    Szyniszewski, O

    M. Szyniszewski, O. Lunt, and A. Pal, Disordered mon- itored free fermions, Phys. Rev. B108, 165126 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Turkeshi, M

    X. Turkeshi, M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, and M. Schirò, En- tanglement transitions from stochastic resetting of non- Hermitian quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. B105, L241114 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Piccitto, A

    G. Piccitto, A. Russomanno, and D. Rossini, Entangle- ment transitions in the quantum Ising chain: A com- parison between different unravelings of the same Lind- bladian, Phys. Rev. B105, 064305 (2022)

    2022

  63. [63]

    Piccitto, A

    G. Piccitto, A. Russomanno, and D. Rossini, Erratum: Entanglement transitions in the quantum Ising chain: A comparison between different unravelings of the same Lindbladian, Phys. Rev. B106, 219901(E) (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Piccitto, A

    G. Piccitto, A. Russomanno, and D. Rossini, Entan- glement dynamics with string measurement operators, SciPost Phys. Core6, 078 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    Tirrito, A

    E. Tirrito, A. Santini, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Full counting statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum Ising chain, SciPost Phys. 15, 096 (2023)

    2023

  66. [66]

    Paviglianiti and A

    A. Paviglianiti and A. Silva, Multipartite entanglement in the measurement-induced phase transition of the quantum Ising chain, Phys. Rev. B108, 184302 (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    Lang and H

    N. Lang and H. P. Büchler, Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field Ising model, Phys. Rev. B102, 094204 (2020). 7

    2020

  68. [68]

    Minato, K

    T. Minato, K. Sugimoto, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, FateofMeasurement-InducedPhaseTransitioninLong- Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010603 (2022)

    2022

  69. [69]

    Core6, 051 (2023)

    C.ZerbaandA.Silva,Measurementphasetransitionsin the no-click limit as quantum phase transitions of a non- hermitean vacuum, SciPost Phys. Core6, 051 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Paviglianiti, X

    A. Paviglianiti, X. Turkeshi, M. Schirò, and A. Silva, Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain, Quantum8, 1576 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    Chatterjee and R

    P. Chatterjee and R. Modak, Measurement-induced phase transition in periodically driven free-fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 024304 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Piccitto, D

    G. Piccitto, D. Rossini, and A. Russomanno, The im- pact of different unravelings in a monitored system of free fermions, Eur. Phys. J. B97, 90 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Le Gal, X

    Y. Le Gal, X. Turkeshi, and M. Schirò, Entanglement Dynamics in Monitored Systems and the Role of Quan- tum Jumps, PRX Quantum5, 030329 (2024)

    2024

  74. [74]

    Piccitto, G

    G. Piccitto, G. Chiriacò, D. Rossini, and A. Russo- manno, Entanglement behavior and localization prop- erties in monitored fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 174311 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    Russomanno, G

    A. Russomanno, G. Piccitto, and D. Rossini, Entan- glement transitions and quantum bifurcations under continuous long-range monitoring, Phys. Rev. B108, 104313 (2023)

    2023

  76. [76]

    Lunt and A

    O. Lunt and A. Pal, Measurement-induced entangle- ment transitions in many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043072 (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    Rossini and E

    D. Rossini and E. Vicari, Measurement-induced dynam- ics of many-body systems at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B102, 035119 (2020)

    2020

  78. [78]

    Tang and W

    Q. Tang and W. Zhu, Measurement-induced phase transition: A case study in the nonintegrable model by density-matrix renormalization group calculations, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013022 (2020)

    2020

  79. [79]

    Fuji and Y

    Y. Fuji and Y. Ashida, Measurement-induced quantum criticality under continuous monitoring, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054302 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Sierant, G

    P. Sierant, G. Chiriacò, F. M. Surace, S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, and G. Pagano, Dissipative Floquet Dynamics: from Steady State to Measurement Induced Criticality in Trapped-ion Chains, Quantum6, 638 (2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.