Masking Black Hole Spin with a Modified Chaplygin Gas Envelope: Radiative Degeneracies from a Phenomenological Three-Region Spacetime

Sandip Dutta

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 10 references

Masking Black Hole Spin with a Modified Chaplygin Gas Envelope: Radiative Degeneracies from a Phenomenological Three-Region Spacetime

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A non-spinning black hole in a dense Modified Chaplygin Gas envelope produces the same accretion-disk radiative efficiency as a vacuum Kerr black hole with spin j≈0.3.

desk verdict Efficiency degeneracy is real, but the spectral claim is undermined by a missing r factor in √−g. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04438 v1 pith:UQ6H5AJD submitted 2026-08-05 gr-qc hep-th

Sandip Dutta This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th

keywords RotatingblackholesModifiedChaplygingasDarkEnergyAccretiondisksRadiativeSignatureISCOspinestimationdegeneracy

topics Dark Matter

open problems Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the standard assumption that black hole spin can be read off from the thermal spectrum of a thin accretion disk is ambiguous once the black hole is embedded in dark matter. It builds a three-region spacetime in which a rotating compact object is surrounded by a bounded shell of Modified Chaplygin Gas, with the fluid's pressure entering the metric through the full Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations. Solving the equatorial geodesics and the Novikov-Thorne disk equations, it finds that a non-spinning core (j = 0) inside a dense MCG shell raises the radiative efficiency to η ≈ 6.5%, shifting the spectrum to harder energies. This is exactly the efficiency and profile of a vacuum Kerr black hole with j ≈ 0.3, so continuum-fitting pipelines would systematically overestimate spin if they ignore such an envelope. If correct, the result is a concrete environmental systematic that future spin measurements must rule out with independent probes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pressure back-reaction encoded in the temporal metric component. In the static seed, g_tt = −e^(2Φ(r)) with Φ obtained from dΦ/dr = [M(r) + $4πr^{3}$ P_r] / [r(r − 2M(r))], so the Modified Chaplygin Gas radial pressure P_r enters the gravitational potential explicitly. When carried into the rotating ansatz, this term deepens the potential well, moves the innermost stable circular orbit inward, and raises the disk's radiative efficiency; the exact 4D metric determinant √−g = √(−g_rr(g_tt g_φφ − $g_tφ^{2}$)) replaces the vacuum shortcut $r^{2}$ in all flux integrals. A named identity, Eq. (19), is the derivative ∂_r g_tt = −2 e^(2Φ) [M(r) + $4πr^{3}$ P_r] / [r(r − 2M(r))], which makes the fluid pressure a direct driver of the orbital kinematics.

What would settle it

A decisive test: compute the predicted Fe Kα line profile and X-ray polarisation for the three-region metric and compare them with the vacuum Kerr prediction at j = 0.3; any difference above current observational sensitivity breaks the degeneracy, while an independent density measurement showing no MCG-like pressure inside the ISCO would remove the mechanism entirely.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a structural degeneracy between intrinsic black hole spin and the surrounding dark matter pressure. The paper constructs a piecewise three-region spacetime: an inner vacuum up to r_b, an intermediate shell of Modified Chaplygin Gas (P = Aρ − B/ρ^n) with the mass and pressure profile obtained from a coupled TOV integration, and an outer vacuum matched at the radius r_s where the fluid pressure vanishes. Rotation is inserted through a pressure-corrected Kerr-form ansatz in which g_tt is not the vacuum Kerr temporal component but the integrated hydrostatic potential, so the radial pressure gradient directly modifies the geodesics. The paper shows that this deepens the effective potential, compressing the ISCO and enhancing Novikov-Thorne viscous dissipation; a static core then reaches η ≈ 6.5%, identical to a vacuum Kerr black hole with j ≈ 0.3. It also corrects the flux by using the exact four-dimensional metric determinant rather than the vacuum value √−g = $r^{2}$.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if dark matter near the horizon is not a perfect fluid with isotropic pressure obeying the Modified Chaplygin Gas equation of state down to radii inside the ISCO; if the envelope is collisionless or does not reach inside the ISCO, the pressure back-reaction that deepens the potential well, compresses the ISCO, and raises the radiative efficiency disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Continuum-fitting spin measurements of black holes embedded in dense dark matter will overestimate the spin by roughly Δj ≈ 0.3–0.4 if the envelope is ignored.
The compressed ISCO shifts the peak flux, effective temperature, and multicolour blackbody luminosity to higher energies, so spectral hardening alone cannot distinguish the two scenarios.
Breaking the degeneracy requires secondary observables such as black-hole shadow ray tracing, fluorescent Fe Kα line profiles, or X-ray polarimetry.
Using the vacuum metric determinant √−g = r^2 inside a fluid-filled region would overestimate the radiative flux, so the exact determinant is necessary for correct Novikov-Thorne calculations.
The effect is localized: deviations from vacuum converge at r ≳ 15 M_T, meaning the far outer disk remains a clean Kerr-like probe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One testable extension is to scan other barotropic equations of state: any fluid with positive pressure inside the ISCO should produce a similar shift, making the degeneracy a generic property of pressure-supported dark matter rather than specific to the MCG form.
If such envelopes are common, published black hole spin catalogs built from continuum fitting may carry a systematic positive bias; comparing spin estimates from continuum fitting with those from reflection or polarimetric methods would expose it.
The quantitative value j ≈ 0.3 depends on the rotating ansatz being a 'running-mass' approximation; a fully self-consistent rotating solution of the Einstein field equations could shift the numbers, so the exact mimicking spin is model-dependent.
A direct falsifier of the mechanism is an independent measurement of the near-horizon density profile (e.g., from quasi-periodic oscillations or reverberation mapping): if the density falls below the values needed to compress the ISCO, the efficiency boost disappears.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear [Colleague],

This paper is worth a read. The author builds a three-region spacetime with a TOV-coupled Modified Chaplygin Gas envelope and shows that a static core surrounded by a dense MCG shell can reach a thin-disk radiative efficiency of about 6.5%, which in standard continuum fitting would be misread as Kerr spin j≈0.3. The TOV integration is a genuine step beyond the usual fixed-halo treatments, and the efficiency part of the degeneracy is calculated from the geodesics directly, so it is independent of the flux normalization. That part holds up.

The problem is the spectral half of the claim. Equation (16) defines the 4D equatorial determinant as √−g = sqrt(−g_rr(g_tt g_φφ − g_tφ²)), but for the line element in Eq. (11) the full determinant includes the angular factor g_θθ = r². The correct expression is r times what the paper writes. In the Schwarzschild limit the paper's formula gives √−g = r, not r²—which the paper itself cites as the standard value. As a consequence the flux in Eq. (25) is inflated by a factor r, and the spectral luminosity in Eqs. (26)–(27) carries that error along. The efficiency η = 1 − E(r_ISCO) is unaffected, so Figure 10(b) survives, but the paper claims the spectral profile also "identically mimics" Kerr. No direct spectral overlay with a true Kerr j=0.3 disk is shown, and with the wrong √−g it could not be. That part is not established.

Other soft spots are smaller. The rotating ansatz is explicitly admitted to violate the field equations; the paper is honest about that, but it undercuts the "strict adherence" language used elsewhere. The inner Darmois-Israel junction is stated but never verified; the pressure is nonzero at r_b, so a surface shell is likely present unless an extra condition is imposed. The ISCO is located by tracing the effective potential rather than solving V''=0 exactly, which is fine but should be described as numerical. No code is deposited, though the equations are explicit enough that a motivated reader could reproduce the static results.

Nothing here is fatal to the core idea. The model is plausible, the efficiency degeneracy is a real effect worth quantifying, and the determinant error is fixable. Send it to review; a careful referee should ask for a corrected √−g, a direct spectral comparison with Kerr j=0.3, and a check of the inner junction condition. The right audience gets a useful phenomenological result after revision.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a three-region spacetime to model thin accretion disks around black holes embedded in a bounded Modified Chaplygin Gas (MCG) envelope. A static seed is constructed by integrating the TOV equations for the MCG shell, and rotation is introduced through a pressure-corrected Kerr-form ansatz. The authors compute equatorial geodesics, locate the ISCO, and apply the Novikov-Thorne formalism to obtain flux, temperature, spectral luminosity, and radiative efficiency. The headline claim is that a non-spinning black hole surrounded by a dense MCG envelope yields an efficiency η ≈ 6.5%, which would mimic the thermal emission of a vacuum Kerr black hole with j ≈ 0.3.

Significance. The proposed spin-environment degeneracy is a relevant systematic for continuum fitting and X-ray spin measurements, and the paper has the merit of not fitting parameters to the output: the efficiency is computed from a scan of fixed envelope parameters and compared with exact vacuum-Kerr values, so the circularity burden is low. The static TOV construction is a standard and transparent way to include pressure back-reaction on the geometry. However, several internal consistency problems currently prevent the central claims from being established: the inner junction is not actually satisfied, the claimed exact 4D determinant is incorrect, the rotating extension is admitted to violate the field equations, and no direct spectral comparison with a Kerr j ≈ 0.3 disk is shown. If the static-core degeneracy survives a corrected calculation, it would be an interesting and potentially important result.

major comments (4)

[§2.2, Eqs. (6)–(7)] The Darmois-Israel junction conditions are not satisfied at the inner boundary r = r_b. The TOV integration is initialized with a nonzero pressure P_r(r_b) = A ρ_in − B/ρ_in^n, and no zero-pressure condition is imposed at r_b, so the radial derivative of g_tt is generically discontinuous there. Moreover, only the outer boundary condition on Φ is fixed by Eq. (7); the continuity of the induced metric at the inner boundary, including Φ(r_b^-) = Φ(r_b^+), is not imposed. The paper's claim of a smooth three-region spacetime without a surface layer is therefore not achieved. This needs either an explicit inner matching condition (e.g., P_r(r_b)=0) or the addition of a surface energy-momentum tensor at Σ_b, with its effect on the disk thermodynamics quantified.
[§3, Eq. (16)] Eq. (16) is not the exact 4D equatorial metric determinant. For the line element (11), the full determinant includes the angular factor g_θθ = r², so the correct expression is √−g = r √(−g_rr(g_tt g_φφ − g_tφ²)). In the Schwarzschild limit Eq. (16) gives √−g = r, whereas the text itself states that the standard value is r². Since Eq. (25) and hence the flux and spectral luminosity in Eqs. (26)–(27) and Figs. 6–9 use this determinant, the absolute normalization of the radiative predictions is wrong as presented. This is a local and fixable error, but it must be corrected before the spectral half of the mimicry claim can be trusted.
[§2.3, Eq. (11)] The rotating spacetime used for all nonzero-spin results is explicitly not a solution of the Einstein field equations; the text concedes that this class of models 'may manifest small residual field-equation violations near the core.' The magnitude of these violations is never quantified, so the spin-dependent curves in Figs. 3(b)–10(b) and the mapping η(j) for the MCG models are heuristic. The static j=0 central claim does not rely on this ansatz, but the paper's stated goal of 'strict adherence to the Einstein Field Equations' is overstated, and the nonzero-spin results need either error estimates or an explicit disclaimer that they are phenomenological.
[§4.2 and §5, Figs. 9–10] The paper demonstrates only an efficiency match with Kerr j ≈ 0.3: Fig. 10 shows η as a function of j, but no direct spectral overlay of the static-MCG disk with a vacuum Kerr j = 0.3 disk is presented. Fig. 9 compares MCG models only against the Schwarzschild baseline, not against Kerr, and Eq. (27) is written as a set of local blackbodies without an explicit redshift factor. Consequently, the claim that the spectral profile would 'identically mimic' a spinning Kerr black hole is not established even if the determinant error in Eq. (16) were corrected. A direct comparison of L_ν,∞ for the MCG static case with the same quantity for Kerr j ≈ 0.3 is needed.

minor comments (5)

[§4.1, Eq. (26)] The factor 4π² in dL_∞/d ln r should be checked against the convention used for the flux F; in the standard Page-Thorne convention for a two-sided disk, the differential luminosity is 4π r²F, not 4π²r²F. The extra π cancels in relative spectral deviations but affects absolute normalizations.
[§2 and §5, spin definition] The spin parameter is introduced as a = J/M_T in §2 but later used as j = a/M_BH in §5 and Fig. 10. Since M_T > M_BH for the enveloped models, this is dimensionally inconsistent, and it is not clear whether the vacuum Kerr comparison in Fig. 10 uses j = a/M_T or j = a/M_BH. Please specify the convention and quantify the effect of the envelope mass on the degeneracy mapping.
[§4.2, Eq. (27)] The luminosity is labeled 'as measured by a distant observer,' but no gravitational redshift or Doppler factor appears in the integrand. If this is an intentional non-relativistic approximation, it should be stated explicitly and its effect on the spectral-deviation plots discussed.
[Figures 1 and 9 captions] Several figure captions and axis labels contain encoding artifacts, e.g., 'envel()e' in Fig. 1 and '/uni0394log' in Fig. 9. These should be cleaned before resubmission.
[§2.1, Eq. (1)] The squared sound speed c_s² = A + nB/ρ^{n+1} can become negative for some of the parameter combinations shown in Fig. 2. A brief comment on the stability of the fluid configurations would help the reader assess whether the assumed MCG parameters are physically admissible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MCG envelope parameters are scanned inputs, and the claimed Kerr-degeneracy is an emergent comparison of independently computed efficiencies, not a fitted output.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The MCG parameters (A, B, n, inner density) are chosen as inputs; the TOV system is integrated; geodesics, the ISCO, and the radiative efficiency η = 1 - E(r_ISCO) are computed from the resulting spacetime; only then is that efficiency compared with the vacuum Kerr efficiency curve. No parameter is fitted to the target η ≈ 6.5% or to j ≈ 0.3, so the degeneracy is an emergent intersection of two independently computed curves rather than a prediction forced by an input. The paper's only structural citations are standard external results (the Novikov-Thorne formalism and the MCG equation of state); there is no load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The rotating extension is explicitly labeled an effective approximation: 'the rotating generalization is an effective approximation' and may have 'small residual field-equation violations near the core', which is a stated limitation, not a circular step. The possible issue that Eq. (16) omits the g_θθ = r² factor in the 4D equatorial metric determinant is a correctness or normalization concern for the flux and spectral profiles, not a circularity: an incorrect √−g does not make any output equal to an input. Thus no circular step is present, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result rests on several chosen parameters (MCG coefficients A, n, B; initial and outer densities; inner boundary radius) and on three strong modeling choices: the MCG description of dark matter, the non-solution Kerr-form rotating ansatz, and smooth Darmois-Israel matching that is not actually satisfied at the inner boundary. No new entities with independent falsifiable handles are introduced; the MCG envelope is a phenomenological device without external evidence.

free parameters (5)

A (MCG linear coefficient) = 0.05 (headline); 0.02, 0.035 in scans
Controls low-density pressure relation; headline efficiency uses A=0.05, n=1.
n (MCG exponent) = 1 (headline); 0.5, 2 in scans
Controls equation of state shape; strong effect on density and pressure profiles.
B (MCG coefficient) = B = A * rho_out^(n+1) (not tabulated)
Set to enforce zero pressure at the outer density rho_out; effectively a free choice of outer density.
rho_in (inner shell density seed) = rho*0 = 1.0 or 1.5 (scaled) in key figures
Determines the shell mass and the depth of the potential well; varied from 0.5 to 1.8.
r_b (inner shell boundary) = not explicitly tabulated; chosen with r_b < r_ISCO
Inner boundary of MCG shell; controls whether the envelope affects the ISCO region.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Modified Chaplygin Gas equation of state P = A*rho - B/rho^n describes dark matter near a black hole.
Imported from cosmology (Ref. [7]); no evidence that dark matter behaves as a Chapman gas on horizon scales. Entered at Eq. (1).
ad hoc to paper The rotating spacetime is represented by the pressure-corrected Kerr-form ansatz of Eq. (11), which is not an exact solution of the Einstein field equations.
The paper admits 'the rotating generalization is an effective approximation' with 'residual field-equation violations near the core' (Section 2.3).
domain assumption Darmois-Israel matching with zero surface stress at both interfaces can be imposed.
The smoothness condition requires P_r=0 at each interface, but the inner boundary condition sets P_r(r_b)>0, so a surface layer is implicitly present.
domain assumption Thin disk thermodynamics follows the Novikov-Thorne formalism with zero torque at ISCO and negligible disk self-gravity.
Standard assumptions inherited from Refs. [9,10]; stated in Section 4.
domain assumption Dark matter interacts with the baryonic disk only gravitationally.
Stated in Section 4; no drag or scattering is included.

invented entities (1)

Bounded Modified Chaplygin Gas dark matter envelope
purpose: Provides a non-vacuum fluid shell that modifies the metric, compresses the ISCO, and elevates the disk radiative efficiency.
The MCG fluid is a phenomenological device with no independent observational handle; all parameters are chosen by hand. Not a new particle or force.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Masking Black Hole Spin with a Modified Chaplygin Gas Envelope: Radiative Degeneracies from a Phenomenological Three-Region Spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UQ6H5AJD

@misc{pith2026260804438,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Masking Black Hole Spin with a Modified Chaplygin Gas Envelope: Radiative Degeneracies from a Phenomenological Three-Region Spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UQ6H5AJD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04438}
}

abstract

Theoretical interpretations of horizon-scale observations often rely on the idealized assumption of an isolated vacuum Kerr geometry. However, astrophysical black holes are expected to be embedded within dense dark matter distributions that can modify the local spacetime geometry. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework to model a rotating compact object surrounded by a bounded dark matter envelope governed by a Modified Chaplygin Gas (MCG) equation of state. To ensure strict adherence to the Einstein Field Equations, we construct a piece-wise, three-region spacetime using a fully coupled Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) integration, allowing the fluid's pressure to taper naturally to zero and dynamically define the outer boundary. Rotation is introduced via a pressure-corrected Kerr-form ansatz where the temporal component is obtained directly from the integrated hydrostatic potential. Using this geometrically rigorous configuration, which explicitly evaluates the exact 4D equatorial metric determinant rather than relying on vacuum approximations, we solve the circular equatorial geodesics and determine the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). Evaluating the thin accretion disk thermodynamics via the Novikov-Thorne formalism reveals that the deep gravitational potential well of the MCG envelope acts as a strong driver for viscous dissipation, systematically shifting the peak thermal flux, effective temperature, and multi-colour blackbody spectral luminosity to higher energy bands. Furthermore, we identify a clear structural degeneracy: a static or slowly rotating black hole embedded in a dense MCG structure can elevate radiative efficiencies up to $\eta \approx 6.5\%$. This framework is presented as a structured proposal to quantify environmental systematic uncertainties in standard black hole spin-estimation techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04438 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Internal fluid configurations within the intermedi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Dimensionless angular velocity profiles Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Dimensionless specific angular momentum profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Dimensionless specific energy profiles E∗ as a function of the normalized radius r/MT . Panel (a) isolates the variations across the MCG parameters (j = 0) near the inner edge; the curves safely converge to the vacuum baseline at larger radii. Panel (b) details the beh…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The time-averaged radiative flux F ∗ = F/( ˙m/M2 T ) across the disk surface. Panel (a) shows variations in the MCG equation of state parameters for a non-rotating black hole (j = 0), contrasted against the vacuum Schwarzschild profile. Panel (b) presents the profile f…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The effective disk temperature profile T ∗ = (F ∗ ) 1/4 corresponding to the flux distributions. Panel (a) highlights the thermal shift induced by the MCG parameters around a static compact core (j = 0). Panel (b) charts the thermal peak amplification for increasing s…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The spatial distribution of the differential disk lu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Spectral deviation ∆ log10(νLν,∞) relative to the vacuum Schwarzschild baseline (dashed line at zero). Because the absolute luminosity spans vast orders of magnitude, this deviation format precisely isolates the percent-level differences of interest. Panel (a) isolates…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Analytic validation of the Spin-Dark Matter Dege [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

10 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[1]

Boshkayev, A

K. Boshkayev, A. Idrissov, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, Mon . Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, 1115 (2020). DOI:10.1093/mnras/staa1564. arXiv:2006.01269 [ astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2020
[2]

Kurmanov, K

E. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, R. Giamb` o, T. Konysbayev, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, H. Quevedo, Astrophys. J. 925, 210 (2022). DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ac41d4. arXiv:2110. 15402 [astro-ph.HE]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac41d4 2022
[3]

Exploring Prompt-Based Methods for Zero-Shot Hypernym Prediction with Large Language Models

K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, Y. Kurmanov, O. Luongo, M. M uccino, A. Taukenova, A. Urazalina, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 230 (2024). DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12446-w. arXiv:2401.04515 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[4]

Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Phys

M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064041 (2014). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.064041. arXiv:1405.2569 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2014
[5]

Real-Time Hand Gesture Identification in Thermal Images

A. Kamenshchik, P. Petriakova, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124020 (2023). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124020. arXiv:2303.02321 [gr -qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[6]

Jusuﬁ, M

K. Jusuﬁ, M. Jamil, P. Salucci, T. Zhu, S. Haroon, Phys. Re v. D 101, 044035 (2020). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044035. arXiv:1911.07520 [gr -qc]

arXiv 2020
[7]

M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 66, 043507 (2002). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043507. arXiv:gr-qc/0202064

arXiv 2002
[8]

Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44, 1 (1966); Erratum: Nuovo Cimento B 48, 463 (1967)

W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44, 1 (1966); Erratum: Nuovo Cimento B 48, 463 (1967)

work page 1966

Show all 10 references

[9]

I. D. Novikov, K. S. Thorne, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) , ed. by C. DeWitt, B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973), p. 343

1973
[10]

D. N. Page, K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J. 191, 499 (1974). DOI:10.1086/152990. 15

1974 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Boshkayev, A

K. Boshkayev, A. Idrissov, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, Mon . Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, 1115 (2020). DOI:10.1093/mnras/staa1564. arXiv:2006.01269 [ astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2020

[2] [2]

Kurmanov, K

E. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, R. Giamb` o, T. Konysbayev, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, H. Quevedo, Astrophys. J. 925, 210 (2022). DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ac41d4. arXiv:2110. 15402 [astro-ph.HE]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac41d4 2022

[3] [3]

Exploring Prompt-Based Methods for Zero-Shot Hypernym Prediction with Large Language Models

K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, Y. Kurmanov, O. Luongo, M. M uccino, A. Taukenova, A. Urazalina, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 230 (2024). DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12446-w. arXiv:2401.04515 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[4] [4]

Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Phys

M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064041 (2014). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.064041. arXiv:1405.2569 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2014

[5] [5]

Real-Time Hand Gesture Identification in Thermal Images

A. Kamenshchik, P. Petriakova, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124020 (2023). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124020. arXiv:2303.02321 [gr -qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[6] [6]

Jusuﬁ, M

K. Jusuﬁ, M. Jamil, P. Salucci, T. Zhu, S. Haroon, Phys. Re v. D 101, 044035 (2020). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044035. arXiv:1911.07520 [gr -qc]

arXiv 2020

[7] [7]

M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 66, 043507 (2002). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043507. arXiv:gr-qc/0202064

arXiv 2002

[8] [8]

Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44, 1 (1966); Erratum: Nuovo Cimento B 48, 463 (1967)

W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44, 1 (1966); Erratum: Nuovo Cimento B 48, 463 (1967)

work page 1966