Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Moduli-Space Laplacians, Asymptotic Geometry, and the Emergent String Conjecture

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Tower masses in quantum gravity are Laplacian eigenfunctions with quantized exponents

desk verdict A serious, unusually candid paper that derives a quantized Laplacian constraint on tower masses under an explicit no-sliding assumption; the central claim is conditional, but the direct examples give it real support. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20603 v1 pith:UQKXMPEB submitted 2026-07-22 hep-th hep-ph

Christian Aoufia , Muldrow Etheredge , Bernardo Fraiman , Sanjay Raman , Alexander Stewart This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-ph PACS 04.65.+e11.25.-w
keywords swamplanddistanceconjectureemergentstringmoduli-spaceLaplaciantowermassesaxiondecayconstantsinstantontaxonomyCalabi-Yaucompactification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that in every infinite-distance limit of a quantum-gravity moduli space, the mass of the lightest particle tower is an eigenfunction of the Laplacian on moduli space. The eigenvalue, called the hyperbolic towers coefficient, is forced by the Emergent String Conjecture to be a small rational number: N/(D−d) for a Kaluza–Klein tower decompactifying from d to D dimensions, and N/2 for a string-oscillator tower, with N a nonnegative integer. This quantization ties together three seemingly separate asymptotic data: how fast tower masses decay, how fast axion circles shrink, and which instantons have small action. The authors verify the rule in examples preserving 4, 8, 16, and 32 supercharges, including concrete Calabi–Yau compactifications, and show that in symmetric moduli spaces the coefficients can be read off from root systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hyperbolic towers coefficient c = ∇² log m, the moduli-space Laplacian of the logarithm of the characteristic mass of the lightest tower. Around it sit the α-vector α = −∇ log m (the tower decay direction in field space), the β-vectors β_I = ∇ log S_I of instanton actions/axion decay constants, and their sum Γ = Σ β_I, which is minus the gradient of log sqrt(det G) on the principal plane. Proposition 3 shows c = Γ·α; Proposition 4 quantizes c by combining the ESC length formula for α with the integer lattice structure of β·α inherited from the radion and dilaton lattice rules (eqs. 2.56–2.60). In symmetric moduli spaces the machinery is the restricted-root Weyl vect

What would settle it

Compute c = ∇² log m for the lightest KK tower of Type I′ string theory (dual to heterotic on S¹), where the α-vector slides due to a running decompactification: if the result is not a nonnegative integer multiple of 1/(D−d) (or at best of 1/(2(D−d))), Proposition 4 fails exactly where Assumption 1 is violated. A second decisive check is an emergent-string compactification with open-string sectors: if c takes values such as N/4 rather than the claimed N/2, the stated 1/2 quantization would be falsified for that class.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Proposition 4 (Hyperbolic Towers Quantization) is the centerpiece: for the principal tower characterizing an asymptotic limit, c ≡ ∇² log m is N/(D−d) for a KK tower decompactifying from d to D dimensions and N/2 for a string oscillator, with N ∈ Z≥0. Equivalently, the mass m itself solves ∇²m = (|α|² + c)m with |α| given by eq. (1.3)/(2.63), so the mass is a positive eigenfunction of the moduli-space Laplacian. The derivation runs through the Γ-vector, the sum of the β-vectors describing the exponential decay of axion kinetic terms; Proposition 3 shows c = Γ·α, and the quantization follows because each β·α is a lattice-valued rational from brane taxonomy. The paper further claims that the d

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Assumption 1: every non-string infinite-distance limit must be a decompactification over a vacuum manifold satisfying Einstein's equations with no running or warped field profiles; if this fails, as it does in Type I′ string theory, the α-vector slides and the exact rational values of c change, possibly halving the quantization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, every asymptotic limit of a quantum-gravity moduli space carries a rational c-value attached to its lightest tower, and that number is a prediction that can be checked by direct Laplacian computation.
  • The exponential decay of the axion-fiber volume is fixed by the same c: sqrt(det g) ~ m^{c/α²}, so axion decay constants cannot shrink at arbitrary rates in these limits.
  • The instanton spectrum is constrained: the Γ-vector controlling tower masses is a sum of instanton β-vectors, so the lattice of instanton actions must be compatible with the tower's rational c-value, i.e. instantons must satisfy the taxonomy rules.
  • In symmetric moduli spaces, c-values are computed from restricted root systems, so the allowed c-values refine the possible representations and weights of towers consistent with the Emergent String Conjecture.
  • The mass eigenfunction equation ∇²m = (|α|² + c)m ties the Emergent String Conjecture to spectral geometry of moduli space and potentially to a quantum-mechanical description of moduli space, a connection the paper explicitly invites.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to use the quantization as a diagnostic: in any candidate EFT with a known moduli-space metric, computing c for the leading tower and comparing with the rational lattice could falsify the tower's interpretation (for example, revealing a missed emergent string).
  • If Assumption 1 fails generically, as in Type I′ where the α-vector slides, the rational lattice may be halved by open-string sectors; the robust prediction may then be membership in (1/2)N/(D−d) rather than N/(D−d), a weaker version that still lets the structure be tested.
  • The 9d maximal supergravity example is recursive: c-values and Γ-vectors in one duality frame can be used to bootstrap the higher-dimensional theory's instanton lattice, suggesting the relation may serve as a tool for discovering hidden dual descriptions.
  • Because the species scale is also shown to satisfy similar Laplacian relations (Tables 4, 6, 8, 10), the quantization may extend from particle towers to the species scale as a general principle; the paper computes but does not elevate this to a proposition, so this is an inference.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new structural constraint on the asymptotic geometry of moduli spaces of quantum gravity vacua, dubbed the 'hyperbolic towers quantization' condition. Under three stated assumptions — in particular Assumption 1, that all infinite-distance limits are either emergent-string limits or decompactifications over Einstein-vacuum manifolds with no running profiles — the authors argue that for any principal tower (a KK tower decompactifying from d to D dimensions, or an oscillator tower of an emergent string) the logarithm of its mass is an eigenfunction of the moduli-space Laplacian with a quantized eigenvalue: c = ∇² log m = N/(D−d) for KK towers and N/2 for string oscillators, with N a nonnegative integer (Proposition 4). They relate these c-values to a vector Γ, the sum of instanton β-vectors characterizing the exponential decay of axion fibers, and verify the proposal in a wide range of examples preserving 32, 16, 8, and 4 supercharges: 10d IIB, 9d maximal supergravity, symmetric moduli spaces of maximal and half-maximal theories, 5d N=1 supergravity from M-theory on Calabi–Yau threefolds, and 4d N=1 EFT string limits from E8×E8 heterotic compactifications. The paper also shows that in symmetric spaces the c-values can be computed systematically from restricted root systems, and that the species scale obeys similar relations in the examples treated.

Significance. If the main proposition holds, the paper identifies a new, quantitative link between three pieces of asymptotic data in quantum gravity: the exponential decay rates of light tower masses (α-vectors), the shrinking of axion fibers (β-vectors and their sum Γ), and the spectrum of instantons. The claim that the principal-tower masses are Laplacian eigenfunctions with small rational eigenvalues is a sharp, falsifiable refinement of the Distance and Emergent String Conjectures, and it goes beyond earlier observations by providing a systematic derivation from string perturbation theory and dimensional reduction. The paper's strengths include its explicit and reproducible computations: all examples compute c directly from known metrics/prepotentials rather than by curve fitting, and the symmetric-space analysis gives a closed formula (c = Γ·λ) that is checked against many duality frames. The authors are also honest about the limitations of their assumptions, explicitly noting where they fail and where the claim remains open (e.g., Type I′). The main value is thus a conditional structural theorem with strong evidence; the main weakness is that the scope of the conditionality is not reflect

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, §2.3, §6] Proposition 4 is stated as a general result for quantum-gravity moduli spaces, but its derivation relies essentially on Assumption 1 (no running decompactification, i.e., no sliding of α-vectors). The paper itself concedes in §2.3 that when Assumption 1 fails the quantization may be 'possibly halved due to open string sectors', and Type I′ is cited in §2.1 and §6 as a known vacuum where sliding occurs. Consequently, the exact rational values N/(D−d) and N/2 are not established for the general class of quantum-gravity vacua; they are proven only for a subclass whose boundary is not characterized. The examples in §§3–5 all satisfy Assumption 1 (or are handled separately, as in §4.5), and none probes the sliding regime; the Type I′ Laplacian is explicitly left open in §6. I recommend that the authors either restrict the title/abstract claims to the no-sliding subclass, provide a physical cr
  2. [§2.7, eqs. (2.43), (2.60)] The quantization step in §2.7 is, given the definition Γ = Σ β in eq. (2.43), an immediate corollary of the instanton/β-taxonomy rules of [40], as summarized in eq. (2.60). The genuinely new content of the paper is the dictionary relating Γ to the Laplacian/Christoffel trace (eqs. (2.44)–(2.45)) and the proof that c = Γ·α (Proposition 3). This is a valuable reformulation, but the claim that the ESC itself 'quantizes' the c-values should be softened: it is the taxonomy rules of [40], combined with the structural link established here, that give the quantization. The authors should state this division of credit explicitly to avoid overstating the novelty of Proposition 4 as an independent derivation.
  3. [§2.4] Assumption 3 (asymptotically flat slice) is needed to pass from the one-dimensional fibration structure along a single geodesic to the global block-diagonal metric of Proposition 1 and hence to the global form of Proposition 3. The authors note in §2.4 that they cannot provide a general argument for Assumption 3 and in fact suspect it may fail in certain 4d limits. Section 5 demonstrates that in 4d N=1 theories the flat slice exists only locally in growth sectors. The manuscript should distinguish clearly which results require the global Assumption 3 and which hold locally; in particular, the Laplacian computations in Sections 4 and 5 are local and may not require Assumption 3, but the global Γ-vector interpretation does. Adding this distinction would prevent a reader from concluding that the global fibration structure is established in cases where only the local version has been verifie
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, eqs. (2.20)–(2.22)] The transition from 2−a ∈ Z≥0 to 2−a ∈ 2Z≥0 is crucial but dense. Consider adding a short remark or table clarifying that the first follows from worldsheet topology alone, while the stronger evenness condition uses the absence of open-string sectors (Assumption 1).
  2. [§3.1] The footnote about a typo in [41] is useful. For the reader's convenience, include a one-line derivation of ∇² log T_{p,q} = 1 in the conventions of eq. (3.2) (with the factor 1/2 in the metric), since the normalization is essential.
  3. [Figures 1 and 2] The labels such as '1c=1' are terse. Define explicitly: the leading number is the number of decompactified dimensions n (with '∞' for an emergent string) and the subscript is the c-value.
  4. [§4.1] The symbol h1,1 is used in eqs. (4.23) and (4.27) before its relation to the 5d vector-multiplet count is stated. Define h1,1 = nV + 1 immediately after eq. (4.1).
  5. [§5.2, Table 3] The notation (κVκ)ij and similar is used in Table 3 but defined only below the table. Move the definitions of these shorthand symbols before Table 3 to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Proposition 4 is derived from independent string-theoretic inputs and checked by direct Laplacian computations; self-citations to [40] are consistency links, not load-bearing, with the main caveat being Assumption 1's limitation.

full rationale

The central derivation in Section 2.7 does not reduce to a fit or a definition. For KK towers, c = Γ·α is computed as Σ β_I·α with β_I·α = p/(D−d) (eq. 2.51), where p is the form degree of the reduced gauge field; the integer N is the sum of p-values, not a fitted parameter. For oscillator towers, c = N/2 follows from m_osc ∼ exp(−φ/√(d−2)) (eq. 2.53), the axion kinetic coefficients fθ ∼ exp((k/2)√(d−2)φ) with 2−a ∈ 2Z≥0 (eqs. 2.22–2.23), and the Laplacian (2.42); the half-integer unit comes from string perturbation theory (worldsheet Euler characteristic), not from the conclusion. The examples compute ∇²log m directly from explicit metrics/prepotentials (e.g., §3.1 ∇²log T = 1 and c = 1/2 for IIB oscillators; §4.4.3 c = 2 + O(λ^{−3}); §5.5.1 Γ-vector reproduces Table 5) rather than tuning Γ to match c. The taxonomy rules of [40] are introduced after Proposition 4 is established ('In fact, we can connect the above quantization of c-values with the taxonomy rules of [40]') and are used as a consistency check (eqs. 2.60–2.61), not as the proof of quantization. The paper itself flags the main weakness: Assumption 1 excludes sliding/running decompactifications, and 'In examples where Assumption 1 fails, which are beyond the scope of the present paper, we expect the quantization condition of Proposition 4 to be possibly halved due to open string sectors' (§2.3); §6 leaves the Type I′ Laplacian calculation open. This is an assumption-dependence/correctness limitation, not a circularity: within the stated domain, the c-values are not equivalent to the inputs by construction. No circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data: the c-values, α-vectors, and Γ-vectors are computed from explicit metrics, prepotentials, and root systems, and the quantization emerges from lattice inputs (p-form degrees, worldsheet Euler characteristics, [40] taxonomy rules). No new physical entities (particles/forces/dimensions) are postulated; c, Γ, and β are derived functionals of the assumed moduli-space geometry. The load-bearing inputs are the three explicitly stated assumptions (each admitted by the authors to have counterexamples or to be unproven), the same-program taxonomy rules of [40], the sharpened-DC α-lengths, and the compactifiability criterion of [63]. Notably, the 6d N=(1,0) tensor-branch example satisfies the quantization despite violating Assumptions 1 and 2, showing the assumptions are sufficient but apparently not necessary for the property.

assumptions (8)
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 1: ESC without running decompactification — every infinite-distance limit is a tensionless-string limit or a decompactification over an Einstein-vacuum manifold with no running profiles.
    Introduced to avoid 'sliding' of α-vectors [38]; needed for constant α (Prop. 3) and for the parity input 2−a ∈ 2Z≥0 (eq. 2.22) that yields the 1/2 unit for oscillator c-values. Authors concede Type I′ violates it and that quantization 'may be possibly halved' otherwise (§2.1, §2.3).
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 2: every non-decompactification limit is an emergent perturbative critical fundamental string, with the EFT organized in a string-coupling expansion.
    Needed for the string-frame action inputs (2.14)–(2.15) and the integrality a = χ(Σ) used in (2.20)–(2.23). The authors state it fails for 6d N=(1,0) nT>1 tensionless heterotic limits (§2.3, §4.5.1).
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3: the duality frame C exponentiates to an asymptotically flat geodesic cone P (the 'principal plane').
    Underlies the global nilmanifold-fibration ansatz (2.1)/(2.27) and the flat-coordinate Laplacian (2.42) from which Props. 1 and 3 follow. The authors explicitly state they cannot prove it and suspect it fails for generic 4d N=2 limits (fn. 11).
  • domain assumption α-vector and instanton β-taxonomy rules of [40]: α_i·α_j = 1/(d−2) + δ_ij/(D_i−d) (2.41); p-brane/instanton radion and dilaton lattice rules (2.56)–(2.60), in particular β·α_KK = −P/(D−d) and β·α_osc = −P/2 with P ∈ Z.
    This is the lattice input that makes the c-values quantized; imported from same-group prior work without re-derivation in this paper, and it is the direct source of the integer N in Prop. 4 (§2.7).
  • domain assumption Sharpened Distance Conjecture / ESC tower lengths: |α| = sqrt((D−2)/((D−d)(d−2))) for KK towers and 1/sqrt(d−2) for string oscillators (eq. 1.3).
    Fixes the α-vector normalization used in (2.50)–(2.54) to convert β-components into the quantization units; standard input from the prior ESC literature [10, 61].
  • domain assumption Compactifiability criterion of [63]: no exponentially growing axion fibers, so β_vectors ∈ C∨ (2.28)–(2.30).
    Restricts the sum over β-vectors to the dual cone, defining Γ as the sum over the correct axion set; imported from prior work [63, 64].
  • standard math Mathematical identity: for the warped metric ds² = dt² + g_ab(t)dφ^a dφ^b, ∇² log m = −(α/2)∂_t log det g when log m = −αt (eqs. 2.47–2.49); constant |∇ log m| implies m is an exponentiation of a distance function.
    Computational core of Props. 3–4; a differential-geometric identity, not an independent physical input.
  • domain assumption Standard string/supergravity spectrum inputs: BPS masses and tensions from central charges (4.10)–(4.11), the 9d mass formula (3.14), the string-frame effective action (2.14), prepotential data of the chosen Calabi-Yau manifolds.
    External EFT inputs used to compute the example Laplacians; standard and reproducible from the cited literature [72–76, 87, 88, 111, 112].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Moduli-Space Laplacians, Asymptotic Geometry, and the Emergent String Conjecture." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UQKXMPEB

@misc{pith2026260720603,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Moduli-Space Laplacians, Asymptotic Geometry, and the Emergent String Conjecture},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UQKXMPEB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20603}
}
read the original abstract

At asymptotic limits of moduli spaces of quantum gravity vacua, we argue that the masses of the lightest particle towers are eigenfunctions of the moduli-space Laplacian. The associated eigenvalues are quantized by the Emergent String Conjecture and determine the exponential decay rates of axionic directions in these limits. We also connect the quantization of Laplacian eigenvalues to the spectrum of instantons for the theory. We support our claims with diverse examples that preserve between 4 and 32 supercharges.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Integral Scaling for EFT Strings from the Bottom-Up

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under brane-taxonomy axioms and an n_e≤7 homogeneity bound, integral scaling with w≤3 is an exhaustive finite consequence for all EFT string candidates in 4d N=1 moduli slices.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 119 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [40]

    Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,2505.10615

    M. Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,2505.10615

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    Brennan, F

    T.D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoSTASI2017(2017) 015 [1711.00864]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [3]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [4]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Graña and A

    M. Graña and A. Herráez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021) 273 [2107.00087]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture,Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2023) 035003 [2201.08380]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    Agmon, A

    N.B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M.J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187. – 87 –

    arXiv

Show all 141 references
  1. [8]

    Van Riet and G

    T. Van Riet and G. Zoccarato,Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics,Phys. Rept.1049(2024) 1 [2305.01722]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl.Phys.B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    2007 arXiv

  3. [10]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,JHEP 02(2022) 190 [1910.01135]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP10(2018) 164 [1808.05958]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings, duality and weak coupling limits for two-form fields,JHEP02(2022) 096 [1904.06344]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instantons and infinite distances,JHEP08(2019) 088 [1904.04848]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Baume, F

    F. Baume, F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instanton Corrections and Emergent Strings, JHEP04(2020) 174 [1912.02218]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [15]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Modular Fluxes, Elliptic Genera, and Weak Gravity Conjectures in Four Dimensions,JHEP08(2019) 104 [1901.08065]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Klaewer, S.-J

    D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum corrections in 4dN= 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2021) 252 [2011.00024]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Xu,On TCS G2 manifolds and 4D emergent strings,JHEP10(2020) 045 [2006.02350]

    F. Xu,On TCS G2 manifolds and 4D emergent strings,JHEP10(2020) 045 [2006.02350]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Lee and T

    S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Elliptic K3 surfaces at infinite complex structure and their refined Kulikov models,JHEP09(2022) 143 [2112.07682]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Physics of Infinite Complex Structure Limits in eight Dimensions,2112.08385

    arXiv

  13. [20]

    Álvarez-García, D

    R. Álvarez-García, D. Kläwer and T. Weigand,Membrane limits in quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066024 [2112.09136]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Rudelius,Gopakumar-Vafa invariants and the Emergent String Conjecture,JHEP03 (2024) 061 [2309.10024]

    T. Rudelius,Gopakumar-Vafa invariants and the Emergent String Conjecture,JHEP03 (2024) 061 [2309.10024]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Álvarez-García, S.-J

    R. Álvarez-García, S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Non-minimal elliptic threefolds at infinite distance. Part I. Log Calabi-Yau resolutions,JHEP08(2024) 240 [2310.07761]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Blumenhagen, A

    R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou,The emergence proposal and the emergent string,JHEP10(2023) 145 [2305.10490]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Álvarez-García, S.-J

    R. Álvarez-García, S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Non-minimal elliptic threefolds at infinite distance II: asymptotic physics,JHEP01(2025) 058 [2312.11611]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [25]

    K. Chen, Q. Lou and Y.-N. Wang,Massive spectrum in F-theory and the distance conjecture, JHEP01(2025) 128 [2407.20788]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Basile,Emergent Strings at an Infinite Distance with Broken Supersymmetry,Astronomy2 (2023) 206 [2201.08851]

    I. Basile,Emergent Strings at an Infinite Distance with Broken Supersymmetry,Astronomy2 (2023) 206 [2201.08851]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile and G. Leone,Species scale, worldsheet CFTs and emergent geometry, JHEP12(2024) 111 [2405.03683]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Hassfeld, J

    B. Hassfeld, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Emergent strings in Type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP01(2026) 140 [2504.01066]. – 88 –

    2026

  22. [29]

    Monnee, T

    J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Physics and geometry of complex structure limits in type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP03(2026) 063 [2509.07056]

    2026

  23. [30]

    Monnee, T

    J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,K points and type IIB/heterotic duality with NS5-branes,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 066002 [2510.02435]

    2026

  24. [31]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile, G. Leone and M. Lotito,UV/IR relations from the worldsheet, 2603.11157

  25. [32]

    Basile, D

    I. Basile, D. Lüst and C. Montella,Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture,JHEP07(2024) 208 [2311.12113]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. Lust and C. Montella,Species entropy and thermodynamics,JHEP10(2023) 059 [2305.10489]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Basile, N

    I. Basile, N. Cribiori, D. Lust and C. Montella,Minimal black holes and species thermodynamics,JHEP06(2024) 127 [2401.06851]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Herráez, D

    A. Herráez, D. Lüst, J. Masias and M. Scalisi,On the origin of species thermodynamics and the black hole - tower correspondence,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 083 [2406.17851]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Bedroya, R.K

    A. Bedroya, R.K. Mishra and M. Wiesner,Density of states, black holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,JHEP01(2025) 144 [2405.00083]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Kaufmann, S

    L. Kaufmann, S. Lanza and T. Weigand,Asymptotics of 5d supergravity theories and the emergent string conjecture,JHEP06(2025) 230 [2412.12251]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,JHEP12(2023) 182 [2306.16440]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,JHEP03(2025) 213 [2405.20332]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Etheredge and B

    M. Etheredge and B. Heidenreich,Geodesic gradient flows in moduli space,JHEP03(2025) 035 [2311.18693]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ruehle and B

    F. Ruehle and B. Sung,Attractors, Geodesics, and the Geometry of Moduli Spaces, 2408.00830

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Aoufia, A

    C. Aoufia, A. Castellano and L. Ibáñez,Laplacians in Various Dimensions and the Swampland,2506.03253

  36. [44]

    Álvarez-García and F

    R. Álvarez-García and F. Ruehle,Harmonic Analysis of the Instanton Prepotential, 2604.08725

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Álvarez-García and F

    R. Álvarez-García and F. Ruehle,Kaleidoscopes, Waves and the Prepotential,2606.05280

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Montero, A.M

    M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,Transplanckian axions!?,JHEP08(2015) 032 [1503.03886]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich and T. Rudelius,A Distance Conjecture for Branes, 2407.20316

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Maldacena, A

    J. Maldacena, A. Maloney and B. McPeak,Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound, 2605.05336

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Di Ubaldo, L.V

    G. Di Ubaldo, L.V. Iliesiu, H.W. Lin and C. Yan,Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture,2605.05305. – 89 –

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Artime, R

    M. Artime, R. Blumenhagen and P. Leivadaros,Taxonomy of Instanton Corrections in Infinite Distance Limits,2605.03005

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Etheredge, M

    M. Etheredge, M. Reece, T. Rudelius and C. Tudball,Sharpening the Supersymmetric Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture,2605.22912

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Reece, T

    M. Reece, T. Rudelius and C. Tudball,Quantum Gravity Cutoff from Axions: A Type IIB Landscape Study,2606.21650

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Baines, V

    S. Baines, V. Collazuol, B. Fraiman, M. Graña and D. Waldram,The Boundary of Symmetric Moduli Spaces and the Swampland Distance Conjecture,2508.18401

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Baines, V

    S. Baines, V. Collazuol, B. Fraiman, M. Graña and D. Waldram,EFTs with Symmetric Moduli Spaces: the Landscape and the Swampland,2605.26212

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and L. Paoloni,On the moduli space curvature at infinity,JHEP 02(2024) 103 [2311.07979]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Castellano, F

    A. Castellano, F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and L. Paoloni,The Moduli Space Curvature and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,2410.10966

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and M. Wiesner,Asymptotic curvature divergences and non-gravitational theories,JHEP02(2025) 151 [2409.02991]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Blanco, F

    A. Blanco, F. Marchesano and L. Melotti,Curvature divergences in 5dN= 1supergravity, JHEP11(2025) 026 [2505.05558]

    2025

  51. [59]

    Castellano, F

    A. Castellano, F. Marchesano and L. Paoloni,Curvature divergences and gravity decoupling in Calabi–Yau rigid limits,2602.04957

  52. [60]

    Aoufia, G.F

    C. Aoufia, G.F. Casas and F. Marchesano,Gravity Decoupling and Axionic Shift Symmetries, 2605.28938

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,JHEP12(2022) 114 [2206.04063]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Aoufia, M

    C. Aoufia, M. Etheredge, B. Fraiman, S. Raman and A. Stewart,Asymptotic Ricci Curvature and Chern-Simons Couplings, 2026

    2026

  55. [63]

    Delgado, D

    M. Delgado, D. van de Heisteeg, S. Raman, E. Torres, C. Vafa and K. Xu,Finiteness and the Emergence of Dualities,2412.03640

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Grimm, D

    T.W. Grimm, D. Prieto and M. van Vliet,Tame embeddings, volume growth, and complexity of moduli spaces,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 106015 [2503.15601]

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,JHEP09(2021) 197 [2104.05726]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Shenker,The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory, inCargese Study Institute: Random Surfaces, Quantum Gravity and Strings, pp

    S.H. Shenker,The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory, inCargese Study Institute: Random Surfaces, Quantum Gravity and Strings, pp. 809–819, 8, 1990

    1990

  59. [67]

    Anchordoqui, D

    L.A. Anchordoqui, D. Lust and S. Lüst,Species Quantum Mechanics,2510.25846

  60. [68]

    Anchordoqui, M

    L. Anchordoqui, M. Etheredge and D. Lust,Moduli Space Quantum Mechanics,2603.06795

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture, JHEP01(2024) 122 [2308.01331]

    M. Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture, JHEP01(2024) 122 [2308.01331]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Obers and B

    N.A. Obers and B. Pioline,U duality and M theory,Phys. Rept.318(1999) 113 [hep-th/9809039]. – 90 –

    1999 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Hamada, M

    Y. Hamada, M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,Finiteness and the swampland,J. Phys. A55(2022) 224005 [2111.00015]

    2022 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Cadavid, A

    A.C. Cadavid, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria and S. Ferrara,Eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on Calabi-Yau threefolds,Phys. Lett. B357(1995) 76 [hep-th/9506144]

    1995 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ferrara, R.R

    S. Ferrara, R.R. Khuri and R. Minasian,M theory on a Calabi-Yau manifold,Phys. Lett. B 375(1996) 81 [hep-th/9602102]

    1996 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. Minasian and A. Sagnotti,Low-energy analysis of M and F theories on Calabi-Yau threefolds,Nucl. Phys. B474(1996) 323 [hep-th/9604097]

    1996 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Bergshoeff, S

    E. Bergshoeff, S. Cucu, T. de Wit, J. Gheerardyn, S. Vandoren and A. Van Proeyen,N = 2 supergravity in five-dimensions revisited,Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) 3015 [hep-th/0403045]

    2004 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Lauria and A

    E. Lauria and A. Van Proeyen,N= 2Supergravity inD= 4,5,6Dimensions, vol. 966 (3, 2020), 10.1007/978-3-030-33757-5, [2004.11433]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Ecker,Regularity Theory for Mean Curvature Flow, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkhäuser Boston (2004)

    K. Ecker,Regularity Theory for Mean Curvature Flow, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkhäuser Boston (2004)

    2004

  70. [78]

    Katz, H.-C

    S. Katz, H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,Swampland Constraints on 5dN= 1 Supergravity,JHEP07(2020) 080 [2004.14401]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Boyarsky, J.A

    A. Boyarsky, J.A. Harvey and O. Ruchayskiy,A Toy model of the M5-brane: Anomalies of monopole strings in five dimensions,Annals Phys.301(2002) 1 [hep-th/0203154]

    2002 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Reece, T

    M. Reece, T. Rudelius and C. Tudball,Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers,JHEP09(2025) 146 [2505.22713]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Intriligator, D.R

    K.A. Intriligator, D.R. Morrison and N. Seiberg,Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of Calabi-Yau spaces,Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 56 [hep-th/9702198]

    1997 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Bonetti and T.W

    F. Bonetti and T.W. Grimm,Six-dimensional (1,0) effective action of F-theory via M-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds,JHEP05(2012) 019 [1112.1082]

    2012 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Grimm, A

    T.W. Grimm, A. Kapfer and J. Keitel,Effective action of 6D F-Theory with U(1) factors: Rational sections make Chern-Simons terms jump,JHEP07(2013) 115 [1305.1929]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Grimm and A

    T.W. Grimm and A. Kapfer,Anomaly Cancelation in Field Theory and F-theory on a Circle, JHEP05(2016) 102 [1502.05398]

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Corvilain,6dN = (1, 0) anomalies on S1 and F-theory implications,JHEP08(2020) 133 [2005.12935]

    P. Corvilain,6dN = (1, 0) anomalies on S1 and F-theory implications,JHEP08(2020) 133 [2005.12935]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Witten,On flux quantization inM-theory and the effective action,J

    E. Witten,On flux quantization inM-theory and the effective action,J. Geom. Phys.22 (1997) 1 [hep-th/9609122]

    1997 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance,JHEP06(2024) 037 [2311.01536]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Hayashi, H.-C

    H. Hayashi, H.-C. Kim and M. Kim,Spectra of BPS strings in 6d supergravity and the Swampland,JHEP03(2025) 123 [2310.12219]

    2025 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Taylor,TASI Lectures on Supergravity and String Vacua in Various Dimensions, 1104.2051

    W. Taylor,TASI Lectures on Supergravity and String Vacua in Various Dimensions, 1104.2051

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Vafa,Evidence for F theory,Nucl

    C. Vafa,Evidence for F theory,Nucl. Phys. B469(1996) 403 [hep-th/9602022]. – 91 –

    1996 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Morrison and C

    D.R. Morrison and C. Vafa,Compactifications of F theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 1,Nucl. Phys. B473(1996) 74 [hep-th/9602114]

    1996 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Morrison and C

    D.R. Morrison and C. Vafa,Compactifications of F theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B476(1996) 437 [hep-th/9603161]

    1996 arXiv

  85. [93]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture, Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321 [1810.05169]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Nishino and E

    H. Nishino and E. Sezgin,New couplings of six-dimensional supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B505 (1997) 497 [hep-th/9703075]

    1997 arXiv

  87. [95]

    H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa and K. Xu,Finite Landscape of 6d N=(1,0) Supergravity,SciPost Physics20(2026) 016

    2026

  88. [96]

    Andrianopoli, M

    L. Andrianopoli, M. Bertolini, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara and P. Fre’,General matter coupled N=2 supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B476(1996) 397 [hep-th/9603004]

    1996 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Cecotti, S

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello,Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4(1989) 2475

    1989

  90. [98]

    Ferrara and S

    S. Ferrara and S. Sabharwal,Quaternionic Manifolds for Type II Superstring Vacua of Calabi-Yau Spaces,Nucl. Phys. B332(1990) 317

    1990

  91. [99]

    Antoniadis, S

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian and K.S. Narain,R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces,Nucl. Phys. B507(1997) 571 [hep-th/9707013]

    1997 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Antoniadis, R

    I. Antoniadis, R. Minasian, S. Theisen and P. Vanhove,String loop corrections to the universal hypermultiplet,Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 5079 [hep-th/0307268]

    2003 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Ambrosetti, I

    N. Ambrosetti, I. Antoniadis, J.-P. Derendinger and P. Tziveloglou,The Hypermultiplet with Heisenberg Isometry in N=2 Global and Local Supersymmetry,JHEP06(2011) 139 [1005.0323]

    2011 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Grieco, I

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1,2504.16984

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    Grimm, C

    T.W. Grimm, C. Li and E. Palti,Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits,JHEP03(2019) 016 [1811.02571]

    2019 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Corvilain, T.W

    P. Corvilain, T.W. Grimm and I. Valenzuela,The Swampland Distance Conjecture for Kähler moduli,JHEP08(2019) 075 [1812.07548]

    2019 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Cvetic and M

    M. Cvetic and M. Wiesner,Nonperturbative resolution of strong coupling singularities in 4D N=1 heterotic M-theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 106008 [2408.12458]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1 infinite distance limits – Part I:gs obstructions,2603.12315

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1 infinite distance limits – Part II: Kähler obstructions,2603.13470

  100. [108]

    Kaufmann, T

    L. Kaufmann, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,On Quantum Obstructions in Type IIA Orientifolds,2604.25988

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    Kaplunovsky,One loop threshold effects in string unification,hep-th/9205070

    V.S. Kaplunovsky,One loop threshold effects in string unification,hep-th/9205070

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Dixon, V

    L.J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis,Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,Nucl. Phys. B355(1991) 649

    1991

  103. [111]

    Candelas, A.M

    P. Candelas, A.M. Dale, C.A. Lutken and R. Schimmrigk,Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 493. – 92 –

    1988

  104. [112]

    Green, T

    P.S. Green, T. Hubsch and C.A. Lutken,All Hodge Numbers of All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Class. Quant. Grav.6(1989) 105

    1989

  105. [113]

    Trenner and P.M.H

    T. Trenner and P.M.H. Wilson,Asymptotic curvature of moduli spaces for calabi-yau threefolds, 2010

    2010

  106. [114]

    Raman and C

    S. Raman and C. Vafa,Swampland and the Geometry of Marked Moduli Spaces,2405.11611

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?, inFrom My Vast Repertoire ...: Guido Altarelli’s Legacy, A

    F. Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?, inFrom My Vast Repertoire ...: Guido Altarelli’s Legacy, A. Levy, S. Forte and G. Ridolfi, eds., pp. 227–266 (2019), DOI [1706.08749]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Almumin, M.-C

    Y. Almumin, M.-C. Chen, M. Cheng, V. Knapp-Perez, Y. Li, A. Mondol et al.,Neutrino Flavor Model Building and the Origins of Flavor and CP Violation,Universe9(2023) 512 [2204.08668]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Kobayashi and M

    T. Kobayashi and M. Tanimoto,Modular flavor symmetric models,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39 (2024) 2441012 [2307.03384]

    2024 arXiv

  110. [118]

    G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio and X.-G. Liu,Automorphic Forms and Fermion Masses,JHEP01 (2021) 037 [2010.07952]

    2021 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Nilles and S

    H.P. Nilles and S. Ramos-Sanchez,The flavor puzzle: Textures and symmetries,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2441003 [2308.14810]

    2024 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Ding and S.F

    G.-J. Ding and S.F. King,Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry,Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 084201 [2311.09282]

    2024 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Nilles and S

    H.P. Nilles and S. Ramos-Sanchez,Flavor’s Delight,Entropy26(2024) 355 [2404.16933]

    2024 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Liu and G.-J

    X.-G. Liu and G.-J. Ding,Modular flavor symmetry and vector-valued modular forms,JHEP 03(2022) 123 [2112.14761]

    2022 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Ferrara, .D

    S. Ferrara, .D. Lust and S. Theisen,Target Space Modular Invariance and Low-Energy Couplings in Orbifold Compactifications,Phys. Lett. B233(1989) 147

    1989

  116. [124]

    Lauer, J

    J. Lauer, J. Mas and H.P. Nilles,Duality and the Role of Nonperturbative Effects on the World Sheet,Phys. Lett. B226(1989) 251

    1989

  117. [125]

    Lerche, D

    W. Lerche, D. Lust and N.P. Warner,Duality Symmetries inN = 2Landau-ginzburg Models, Phys. Lett. B231(1989) 417

    1989

  118. [126]

    Li, X.-G

    X. Li, X.-G. Liu, H.P. Nilles, M. Ratz and A. Stewart,Flavor symmetries and winding modes, JHEP09(2025) 026 [2506.12887]

    2025 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Nilles, S

    H.P. Nilles, S. Ramos–Sánchez and P.K.S. Vaudrevange,Eclectic flavor scheme from ten-dimensional string theory – I. Basic results,Phys. Lett. B808(2020) 135615 [2006.03059]

    2020 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Nilles, S

    H.P. Nilles, S. Ramos–Sánchez and P.K.S. Vaudrevange,Eclectic flavor scheme from ten-dimensional string theory - II detailed technical analysis,Nucl. Phys. B966(2021) 115367 [2010.13798]

    2021 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Baur, H.P

    A. Baur, H.P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, A. Trautner and P.K.S. Vaudrevange,The eclectic flavor symmetries ofT2/ZK orbifolds,JHEP09(2024) 159 [2405.20378]

    2024 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Qu and G.-J

    B.-Y. Qu and G.-J. Ding,Non-holomorphic modular flavor symmetry,JHEP08(2024) 136 [2406.02527]. – 93 –

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Adams, O

    A. Adams, O. DeWolfe and W. Taylor,String universality in ten dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(2010) 071601 [1006.1352]

    2010 arXiv

  124. [132]

    H.-C. Kim, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Branes and the Swampland,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 066006 [1905.08261]

    2019 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Kim, H.-C

    H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 026003 [1912.06144]

    2020 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Montero and C

    M. Montero and C. Vafa,Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle,JHEP01(2021) 063 [2008.11729]

    2021 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Cvetic, M

    M. Cvetic, M. Dierigl, L. Lin and H.Y. Zhang,String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8d,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 211602 [2008.10605]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Hamada and C

    Y. Hamada and C. Vafa,8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,JHEP06(2021) 178 [2104.05724]

    2021 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Bedroya, Y

    A. Bedroya, Y. Hamada, M. Montero and C. Vafa,Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d>6,JHEP02(2022) 082 [2110.10157]

    2022 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Tarazi and C

    H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,On the finiteness of 6d supergravity Landscape,JHEP05(2026) 007 [2106.10839]

    2026 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso and T. Weigand,Quantum gravity bounds onN = 1 effective theories in four dimensions,JHEP03(2023) 197 [2210.10797]

    2023 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Bedroya, S

    A. Bedroya, S. Raman and H.-C. Tarazi,Non-BPS path to the string lamppost,2303.13585

    arXiv

  133. [141]

    Baykara, M

    Z.K. Baykara, M. Dierigl, H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa and K. Xu,Bounds on discrete gauge symmetries in supergravity,JHEP03(2026) 171 [2511.09613]. – 94 –

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.