Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 77 references

NANOGrav 15-year gravitational-wave signals from binary supermassive black-holes seeded by primordial black holes, and implications for the origins of Little Red Dots

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that primordial black holes with a dark-matter fraction of only 10^-14 to 10^-12 can grow into the supermassive black-hole binaries that produce the NANOGrav 15-year gravitational-wave background.

desk verdict A PBH-seeding fit to NANOGrav that doesn't close as written: the allowed region contradicts the paper's own 21-cm bound unless C_BH is specified and large, but the 21-cm cross-check is a useful handle. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.04210 v2 pith:URCCRCQL submitted 2025-11-06 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-ph

Mikage U. Kobayashi , Kazunori Kohri This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEgr-qchep-ph
keywords primordialblackholesNANOGrav15-yeargravitational-wavebackgroundsupermassiveholeseeds21cmcosmologybinarymergershigh-redshiftSMBHspulsartimingarrays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a small population of primordial black holes, initially 1 to 1000 solar masses and making up 10^-14 to 10^-12 of dark matter, can accrete into roughly 10^9 solar-mass black holes by redshift 7, and that the mergers of these black holes generate the nanohertz gravitational-wave background observed by NANOGrav. This matters because standard astrophysical models of binary supermassive black holes underpredict the signal by a factor of several, and because the same seed black holes could explain the long-standing puzzle of supermassive black holes already existing at high redshifts. The paper shows that the required primordial black-hole abundance is low enough to avoid the strict upper bound from the non-detection of the cosmological 21cm line, which would otherwise be heated by accretion emission. It concludes that future gravitational-wave and 21cm observations can directly test this scenario.

What carries the argument

The paper adds a primordial-black-hole seed term to the standard extended Press-Schechter black-hole mass function, representing the grown supermassive black holes as a narrow log-normal distribution centered at 10^9 solar masses with width sigma = 0.05. The gravitational-wave energy spectrum is computed from the binary merger rate using the usual inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform template, with the merger efficiency treated as a fitting parameter. The key constraint that keeps the scenario alive is the 21cm bound on accretion, imported from earlier work: if the accretion rate onto the seeds is Eddington or super-Eddington, the emitted X-ray and UV photons heat the gas at z > 10, and the non

What would settle it

Measure the mass function of supermassive black holes at redshift z ~ 7 down to masses around 10^9 solar masses with a comoving density of a few times 10^-4 Mpc^-3; if the observed density is significantly below the required seed density, the scenario is ruled out. Alternatively, a firm detection of the cosmological 21cm signal at z > 10 that exceeds the accretion-heating bound for f_PBH = 2.5 x 10^-12 would falsify the parameter window.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a very small comoving number density of primordial black hole seeds, n_PBH roughly between 2 and 6 times 10^-4 Mpc^-3, is sufficient to boost the predicted gravitational-wave strain from binary supermassive black holes up to the NANOGrav 15-year value of A = 2.4^+0.7_-0.6 x 10^-15 at 1 year^-1. Assuming the seeds grow to 10^9 solar masses by redshift 7, this corresponds to a primordial black-hole energy fraction f_PBH between 10^-14 and 10^-12 for seed masses between 1 and 10^3 solar masses. The same accretion that enables this growth emits high-energy photons that would heat the intergalactic medium and alter the 21cm line, but the paper finds that the required f_P

Load-bearing premise

The scenario assumes that 1-10^3 solar-mass primordial black holes can accrete at Eddington or super-Eddington rates to reach ~10^9 solar masses by redshift 7 and then abruptly stop accreting, a growth history imported from earlier work and not modeled here; if feedback or radiation pressure prevents this growth, or if accretion continues to the present, the derived abundance and the entire fit collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is correct, the nHz gravitational-wave background can be explained by mergers of supermassive black holes that grew from primordial seeds, without needing an excess merger rate in standard galaxy-formation models.
  • The same seed population naturally supplies the ~10^9 solar-mass black holes observed at redshift z ~ 7, addressing the origin of high-redshift supermassive black holes.
  • The scenario predicts that the cosmological 21cm signal at z > 10 should fall within the current upper bound but be detectable with future instruments such as the Square Kilometre Array phase 2.
  • The required primordial black-hole abundance, f_PBH between 10^-14 and 10^-12 for seed masses 1 to 10^3 solar masses, lies below existing constraints from CMB distortion and accretion probes, keeping the model observationally viable.
  • Measuring the spectral index of the background at frequencies beyond the first few NANOGrav bands can distinguish a binary-supermassive-black-hole origin from alternative cosmological sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One implicit extension is that if the 21cm constraint is evaded by, say, low radiative efficiency or suppressed gas heating, the allowed f_PBH window would widen, potentially making the scenario easier to fit and opening a larger parameter space for future tests.
  • The paper's log-normal spike at 10^9 solar masses is a phenomenological representation; a more detailed accretion model that tracks the mass distribution of grown seeds could change the predicted gravitational-wave amplitude and spectral shape, offering a sharper observational discriminator.
  • A natural testable extension is to compute the expected abundance of these primordial-seed supermassive black holes at z ~ 7 and compare it with JWST-era observations of faint AGN, since the required comoving density of ~2-6 x 10^-4 Mpc^-3 may already be constrained by quasar surveys.
  • If future pulsar-timing arrays detect a background with a spectrum that deviates from the f^-2/3 inspiral shape at higher frequencies, that would disfavor the binary-merger interpretation entirely and shift the weight onto cosmological sources such as cosmic strings or phase transitions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that light primordial black holes (PBHs) with masses 1–10^3 M_sun, formed at z≳30, grow through (super-)Eddington accretion into 10^9 M_sun supermassive black holes by z~7, after which accretion ceases. These PBH-seeded SMBHs are added to the standard EPS-based SMBH population, and binary-SMBH mergers are used to compute the nHz gravitational-wave background via Eqs. (1)–(9). The model is normalized to the NANOGrav 15-year strain amplitude, yielding a required seed number density 1.97×10^-4 ≲ n_PBH/Mpc^-3 ≲ 6.16×10^-4, which is converted to f_PBH using Eq. (10) and compared with the 21 cm bound from Ref. [62]. The paper claims an allowed region 10^-14 ≲ f_PBH ≲ 10^-12 and 1 M_sun ≲ m_PBH ≲ 10^3 M_sun, and discusses implications for Little Red Dots and future SKA observations.

Significance. If the central claim were supported, the paper would connect two open problems—the origin of high-redshift SMBHs and the amplitude of the nHz GWB—with a single PBH seed population and give a falsifiable prediction for future 21 cm observations. The use of standard EPS merger rates and an external 21 cm constraint is a strength, and the paper is explicit that n_PBH is the parameter fixed by the NG15 amplitude. However, the as-written allowed region is internally inconsistent and the result is degenerate with the unspecified parameter C_BH. These issues undermine the quantitative central claim, although the underlying framework is salvageable.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV and Abstract] The claimed joint region 1 M_sun ≤ m_PBH ≤ 10^3 M_sun and 10^-14 ≤ f_PBH ≤ 10^-12 is inconsistent with the derived n_PBH range (1.97×10^-4 ≤ n_PBH/Mpc^-3 ≤ 6.16×10^-4). Using Eq. (10) with ρ_CDM,0 ≃ 3.3×10^10 M_sun Mpc^-3, the lower n_PBH and m_PBH=10^3 gives f_PBH ≈ 6.0×10^-12, and the upper n_PBH with m_PBH=10^3 gives f_PBH ≈ 1.9×10^-11; both exceed the paper's own 21 cm limit f_PBH < 2.5×10^-12 (Sec. IV). For the quoted f range to hold, m_PBH must be ≲ 1.7×10^2 M_sun at the lower n_PBH and ≲ 5.4×10^1 M_sun at the upper n_PBH. The abstract's parameter region therefore overstates the viable space and must be recomputed and re-stated.
  2. [§III.A, Eq. (4)] The coefficient C_BH is introduced as the probability that BHs merge when their host halos merge, but then is 'treated as a fitting parameter' and never assigned a value. Because the GW amplitude is proportional to C_BH times the PBH mass-function normalization, the quoted n_PBH range is only valid for one unspecified value of C_BH. If C_BH differs from unity, the reported f_PBH band in Fig. 3 is not the actual constraint; if C_BH is meant to be 1, this should be stated explicitly and the consequences for the 21 cm comparison (which are already problematic at m_PBH=10^3) should be addressed. The authors should either fix C_BH or present constraints in the (C_BH, n_PBH) plane.
  3. [§III.B, Eq. (9)] The PBH-seeded SMBH population is modeled as a log-normal spike at 10^9 M_sun with σ=0.05, fixed by hand, and the growth history (super-Eddington accretion until z~7 followed by abrupt cessation) is imported from Ref. [62] without modeling feedback or radiative efficiency. The central amplitude constraint n_PBH is computed under this specific, narrow mass function. A robustness check varying µ, σ, and the accretion/cessation redshift is needed to establish that the quoted n_PBH and f_PBH region is a generic feature of PBH seeding rather than an artifact of the chosen log-normal form.
  4. [Eqs. (1) and (6)] The redshift range of integration in Eq. (1) is not specified. The PBH contribution in Eq. (6) is argued to reach 10^9 M_sun only by z~7; if the integral includes z>7 with the same log-normal mass function, the predicted GW amplitude is overestimated. The authors should state the integration limits (e.g., z≤7 for the PBH term) and confirm that the quoted n_PBH does not rely on contributions from redshifts at which the seeds have not yet grown.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (9)] The exponential in Eq. (9) appears without a minus sign and with σ^2 rather than 2σ^2; as written it is not a normalizable log-normal distribution. Please correct the typo and specify whether σ is defined in log10 or natural log.
  2. [§IV, Eq. (10)] The value of ρ_CDM,0 used to convert n_PBH to f_PBH is not given. The authors should specify Ω_CDM h^2 and h so that the numerical f_PBH values can be reproduced.
  3. [Text and references] There are several typographical slips, e.g., 'accoustic rehating' should be 'acoustic reheating' and 'high-redshifted' appears repeatedly. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption should state the assumed value of C_BH and the integration limits used to draw the magenta band, since the band is part of the central quantitative claim.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'successfully fit the nHz band gravitational wave background' overstates the analysis, which normalizes the amplitude at f=1 yr^-1 assuming an f^-2/3 inspiral spectrum; the full frequency shape and multiple frequency bins are not fitted.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The NG15 'result' is the fitted n_PBH converted to f_PBH via Eq. (10); the 21cm constraint is external and non-circular, but the central claimed allowed region restates the fit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III.B (Eq. 9) and Sec. IV (Eq. 10)]
    "In this study, we compute the GW energy density spectrum including this PBH component, and determine the value of the comoving PBH number density nPBH that reproduces the strain amplitude of the NANOGrav 15-year. ... we find that the required number density of the PBH seeds is constrained to be 1.97e-4 Mpc^-3 ≲ nPBH ≲ 6.16e-4 Mpc^-3. Then, the energy fraction of the seed PBHs to the CDM at present is given by fPBH = mPBH nPBH / rho_CDM,0"

    n_PBH is the normalization A of the added log-normal 10^9 M_sun population in Eq. (9), and the GW spectrum in Eq. (1) is proportional to the BH number density. Thus tuning n_PBH directly sets the NG15 amplitude; the quoted f_PBH range is simply Eq. (10) applied to that fitted n_PBH. The abstract's central claim that PBH abundance 10^-14 ≲ f_PBH ≲ 10^-12 'successfully fit[s]' the NG15 signal is therefore a restatement of the fitted parameter, not an independent prediction. The 21cm bound is an external check that does constrain the band, but the NG15-side 'allowed region' reduces by construction to the chosen normalization.

full rationale

The paper is transparent that it fits the PBH-seed number density to the NANOGrav 15-year strain amplitude, and the quoted n_PBH and f_PBH ranges are the fitted parameter and its Eq. (10) conversion, respectively. This is the main circularity: the central 'explanation' of the nHz GWB reduces to placing enough 10^9 M_sun binaries in the EPS merger-rate calculation. The 21cm constraint, imported from Ref. [62], is an external observational check and gives the overlap region independent content, so this is not a fully degenerate self-derivation. The self-citation to Ref. [62] is load-bearing for the growth model and 21cm bound, but it is tied to external observations and is not a bare uniqueness assertion, so I do not count it as a separate circular step. Separately, the quoted n_PBH range combined with the paper's own 21cm exclusion f_PBH ≥ 2.5e-12 appears internally inconsistent for m_PBH ≳ 130 M_sun if C_BH = 1; that is a consistency/correctness concern rather than a circularity concern and does not change the score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on four fitted/ad hoc elements: the PBH seed number density (fit), the merger probability coefficient (unspecified), and the log-normal parameters (hand-picked). The growth-to-10^9-M_sun assumption and its 21-cm bound are imported from a previous paper by one of the authors. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • n_PBH (comoving number density of PBH seeds) = 1.97e-4 to 6.16e-4 Mpc^-3
    Fitted to reproduce the NANOGrav 15-year strain amplitude A = 2.4e-15 (Sec. IV).
  • C_BH (merger probability coefficient) = not stated
    Declared a fitting parameter in Eq. (4) but never assigned a numerical value; it controls the overall merger rate.
  • log-normal peak mass µ = 10^9 M_sun
    Chosen to represent SMBHs that dominate the nHz band; not derived from the growth model (Eq. 9).
  • log-normal width σ = 0.05
    Hand-chosen narrow width; all PBH-origin SMBHs treated as nearly monochromatic at 10^9 M_sun (Eq. 9).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard EPS halo merger rate and halo mass function (Eqs. 5, 7)
    Used to compute the SMBH merger rate; standard but derived from Press-Schechter theory with assuming spherical collapse.
  • domain assumption Halo mass–BH mass relation M ∝ m^(3/5) (Eq. 3)
    From Wyithe & Loeb [58,73]; assigns a unique halo mass to each BH mass.
  • ad hoc to paper PBH seeds grow to 10^9 M_sun by z~7 via super-Eddington accretion, then stop accreting
    Imported from Ref. [62]; the cessation of accretion after z~7 is stated 'for some reasons' in Sec. II and is essential for passive evolution.
  • domain assumption 21-cm constraint on accreting PBHs from Ref. [62]
    Used as the external bound f_PBH < 2.5e-12; the derivation is not reproduced in this paper.
  • standard math Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform template of Ajith et al. (Eqs. 1-2)
    Standard waveform model used to evaluate |h(f)|.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NANOGrav 15-year gravitational-wave signals from binary supermassive black-holes seeded by primordial black holes, and implications for the origins of Little Red Dots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URCCRCQL

@misc{pith2026251104210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NANOGrav 15-year gravitational-wave signals from binary supermassive black-holes seeded by primordial black holes, and implications for the origins of Little Red Dots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URCCRCQL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.04210}
}
abstract

In this paper, we explain the recently reported a nHz-band gravitational-wave background from NANOGrav 15-year through the merger of binary super-massive black holes with masses of $10^9 M_{\odot}$ formed by the growth of primordial black holes. When a primordial black hole accretes at a high accretion rate, it emits a large number of high-energy photons. These heat the plasma, causing high-redshift cosmological 21cm line emission. Since this has not been detected, there is a strict upper bound on the accretion rate. We have found that with the primordial black hole abundance $10^{-14} \lesssim f_{\rm PBH} \lesssim 10^{-12}$ and the mass $1 M_{\odot} \lesssim m_{\rm PBH} \lesssim 10^3 M_{\odot}$, we successfully fit the nHz band gravitational wave background from NANOGrav 15-year while avoiding the 21 cm line emission. In addition, we also discuss the implication for the origins of the Little Red Dots. We propose that future observations of the gravitational wave background and the cosmological 21cm line can test this scenario.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.04210 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison of the best-fit GW spectrum of the NANOGrav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. BH mass function given by Eq. (6) at different redshifts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Abundance of the PBH seeds required to fit the GW signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 73 linked inside Pith

  1. [62]

    Kohri, T

    K. Kohri, T. Sekiguchi, and S. Wang, Cosmological 21-cm line observations to test scenarios of super-Eddington accretion on to black holes being seeds o f high-redshifted supermassive black holes, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043539 (2022), arXiv:2201.05300 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravi tational- wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [2]

    D. H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle, The Primordial Density Perturbation (2009)

    2009

  4. [3]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matarrese, Gravitational waves from inflation, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39, 399 (2016), arXiv:1605.01615 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Solar-Mass Primordial Black Hole s Explain NANOGrav Hint of Gravitational Waves, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136040 (2021), arXiv:2009.11853 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [5]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Semianalytic calculation of grav itational wave spectrum non- linearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, Gravitati onal Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations during a Gradual Transition from an Early Mat ter Era to the Radiation Era, JCAP 10, 071, [Erratum: JCAP 08, E01 (2023)], arXiv:1904.12878 [as tro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, Enhanceme nt of Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations due to a Sudden Transition f rom an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043532 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 049901 (2023)], arXiv:1904.12879 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 77 references
  1. [8]

    Dom` enech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Revie w, Universe 7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    G. Dom` enech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Revie w, Universe 7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Balaji, G

    S. Balaji, G. Dom` enech, and G. Franciolini, Scalar-ind uced gravitational wave interpre- 12 tation of PTA data: the role of scalar fluctuation propagatio n speed, JCAP 10, 041, arXiv:2307.08552 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Afzal et al

    A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals f rom New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermae, Recent Gravitational Wave Observation by Pulsar Timing Arrays and Primordial Black Ho les: The Importance of Non- Gaussianities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 201401 (2023), arXiv:2306.17149 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Wang, Z.-C

    S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, J.-P. Li, and Q.-H. Zhu, Implicatio ns of pulsar timing array data for scalar-induced gravitational waves and primordial black h oles: Primordial non-Gaussianity fNL considered, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L012060 (2024), arXiv:2307.00572 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, and T. Terada, Detected stochasti c gravitational waves and subsolar-mass primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063506 (2024), arXiv:2306.17834 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Harigaya, K

    K. Harigaya, K. Inomata, and T. Terada, Induced gravita tional waves with ki- nation era for recent pulsar timing array signals, Phys. Rev . D 108, 123538 (2023), arXiv:2309.00228 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, and T. T. Yanagida, Axion curvaton model for the gravitational waves observed by pulsar timing arrays, P hys. Rev. D 109, 043508 (2024), arXiv:2309.11398 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    R. Inui, C. Joana, H. Motohashi, S. Pi, Y. Tada, and S. Yok oyama, Primordial black holes and induced gravitational waves from logarithmic non -Gaussianity, JCAP 03, 021, arXiv:2411.07647 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, C. Lin, and V. Vaskonen, Cosmic sup erstrings revisited in light of NANOGrav 15-year data, Phys. Rev. D 108, 103511 (2023), arXiv:2306.17147 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Kitajima and K

    N. Kitajima and K. Nakayama, Nanohertz gravitational w aves from cosmic strings and dark photon dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138213 (2023), arXiv:2306.17390 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Z. Wang, L. Lei, H. Jiao, L. Feng, and Y.-Z. Fan, The nanoh ertz stochastic gravitational wave background from cosmic string loops and the abundant hi gh redshift massive galaxies, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 120403 (2023), arXiv:2306.17150 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Lazarides, R

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, and Q. Shafi, Superheavy quasista ble strings and walls bounded 13 by strings in the light of NANOGrav 15 year data, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095041 (2023), arXiv:2306.17788 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Eichhorn, R

    A. Eichhorn, R. R. Lino dos Santos, and J. L. Miqueleto, F rom quantum grav- ity to gravitational waves through cosmic strings, Phys. Re v. D 109, 026013 (2024), arXiv:2306.17718 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Chowdhury, G

    D. Chowdhury, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Dark energy, D -branes and pulsar timing arrays, JCAP 11, 090, arXiv:2307.01188 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Servant and P

    G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Constraining postinflat ionary axions with pulsar timing ar- rays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123516 (2023), arXiv:2307.03121 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Antusch, K

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, S. Saad, and J. Steiner, Singling o ut SO(10) GUT models using recent PTA results, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095053 (2023), arXiv:2307.04595 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Yamada and K

    M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Dark baryon from pure Yang-Mi lls theory and its GW signature from cosmic strings, JHEP 09, 197, arXiv:2307.06586 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  19. [26]

    Ge, Stochastic gravitational wave background: birt h from string-wall death, JCAP 06, 064, arXiv:2307.08185 [gr-qc]

    S. Ge, Stochastic gravitational wave background: birt h from string-wall death, JCAP 06, 064, arXiv:2307.08185 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    Basilakos, D

    S. Basilakos, D. V. Nanopoulos, T. Papanikolaou, E. N. S aridakis, and C. Tzere- fos, Gravitational wave signatures of no-scale supergravi ty in NANOGrav and beyond, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138507 (2024), arXiv:2307.08601 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Kitajima, J

    N. Kitajima, J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, G ravitational waves from domain wall collapse, and application to nanohertz signals with QCD-coupled axions, Phys. Lett. B 851, 138586 (2024), arXiv:2306.17146 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    S.-Y. Guo, M. Khlopov, X. Liu, L. Wu, Y. Wu, and B. Zhu, Foo tprints of axion- like particle in pulsar timing array data and James Webb Spac e Telescope observations, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 111011 (2024), arXiv:2306.17022 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Blasi, A

    S. Blasi, A. Mariotti, A. Rase, and A. Sevrin, Axionic do main walls at Pulsar Timing Arrays: QCD bias and particle friction, JHEP 11, 169, arXiv:2306.17830 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Gouttenoire and E

    Y. Gouttenoire and E. Vitagliano, Domain wall interpre tation of the PTA signal confronting black hole overproduction, Phys. Rev. D 110, L061306 (2024), arXiv:2306.17841 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das, and I. Saha, Scale of Di rac leptogenesis and left-right symmetry in the light of recent PTA results, JCAP 10, 053, arXiv:2307.00656 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Lu, C.-W

    B.-Q. Lu, C.-W. Chiang, and T. Li, Clockwork axion footp rint on nanohertz stochastic grav- 14 itational wave background, Phys. Rev. D 109, L101304 (2024), arXiv:2307.00746 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Li, Probing the high temperature symmetry breaki ng with gravitational waves from domain walls, Nucl

    X.-F. Li, Probing the high temperature symmetry breaki ng with gravitational waves from domain walls, Nucl. Phys. B 1018, 117036 (2025), arXiv:2307.03163 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [35]

    X. K. Du, M. X. Huang, F. Wang, and Y. K. Zhang, Did the nHZ G ravitational Waves Signatures Observed By NANOGrav Indicate Multiple Sector S USY Breaking?, (2023), arXiv:2307.02938 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Babichev, D

    E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta, and A. Vikman, NANOGrav spectral index γ=3 from melting domain walls, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123529 (2023), arXiv:2307.04582 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    G. B. Gelmini and J. Hyman, Catastrogenesis with unstab le ALPs as the origin of the NANOGrav 15 yr gravitational wave signal, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138356 (2024), arXiv:2307.07665 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Fujikura, S

    K. Fujikura, S. Girmohanta, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki, NAN OGrav signal from a dark confor- mal phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138203 (2023), arXiv:2306.17086 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Addazi, Y.-F

    A. Addazi, Y.-F. Cai, A. Marciano, and L. Visinelli, Hav e pulsar timing array methods detected a cosmological phase transition?, Phys. R ev. D 109, 015028 (2024), arXiv:2306.17205 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Bai, T.-K

    Y. Bai, T.-K. Chen, and M. Korwar, QCD-collapsed domain walls: QCD phase transition and gravitational wave spectroscopy, JHEP 12, 194, arXiv:2306.17160 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  34. [41]

    Megias, G

    E. Megias, G. Nardini, and M. Quiros, Pulsar timing arra y stochastic background from light Kaluza-Klein resonances, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095017 (2023), arXiv:2306.17071 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Han, K.-P

    C. Han, K.-P. Xie, J. M. Yang, and M. Zhang, Self-interac ting dark matter implied by nano- Hertz gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115025 (2024), arXiv:2306.16966 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    L. Zu, C. Zhang, Y.-Y. Li, Y. Gu, Y.-L. S. Tsai, and Y.-Z. F an, Mirror QCD phase transition as the origin of the nanohertz Stochastic Gravit ational-Wave Background, Sci. Bull. 69, 741 (2024), arXiv:2306.16769 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Ghosh, A

    T. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal, H.-K. Guo, F. Hajkarim, S. F. King, K. Sinha, X. Wang, and G. White, Did we hear the sound of the Universe boiling? Analysis using the full fluid velocity profiles and NANOGrav 15-year data, JCAP 05, 100, arXiv:2307.02259 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  38. [45]

    Y. Xiao, J. M. Yang, and Y. Zhang, Implications of nano-H ertz gravitational waves on electroweak phase transition in the singlet dark matter mod el, Sci. Bull. 68, 3158 (2023), 15 arXiv:2307.01072 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Li and K.-P

    S.-P. Li and K.-P. Xie, Collider test of nano-Hertz grav itational waves from pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055018 (2023), arXiv:2307.01086 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Di Bari and M

    P. Di Bari and M. H. Rahat, Split Majoron model confronts the NANOGrav signal and cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055019 (2024), arXiv:2307.03184 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    J. S. Cruz, F. Niedermann, and M. S. Sloth, NANOGrav meet s Hot New Early Dark Energy and the origin of neutrino mass, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138202 (2023), arXiv:2307.03091 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Gouttenoire, First-Order Phase Transition Interpr etation of Pulsar Timing Array Signal Is Consistent with Solar-Mass Black Holes, Phys

    Y. Gouttenoire, First-Order Phase Transition Interpr etation of Pulsar Timing Array Signal Is Consistent with Solar-Mass Black Holes, Phys. Rev . Lett. 131, 171404 (2023), arXiv:2307.04239 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Ahmadvand, L

    M. Ahmadvand, L. Bian, and S. Shakeri, Heavy QCD axion mo del in light of pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115020 (2023), arXiv:2307.12385 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    H. An, B. Su, H. Tai, L.-T. Wang, and C. Yang, Phase transi tion during inflation and the gravitational wave signal at pulsar timing arrays, Phys . Rev. D 109, L121304 (2024), arXiv:2308.00070 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  45. [52]

    Wang, Constraining Cosmological Phase Transitions with Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release 1, (2023), arXiv:2307.15970 [astro-ph.CO]

    D. Wang, Constraining Cosmological Phase Transitions with Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release 1, (2023), arXiv:2307.15970 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Kormendy and L

    J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of Superma ssive Black Holes and Host Galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 511 (2013), arXiv:1304.7762 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telesco pe Re- sults. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astroph ys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [55]

    M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, Massive b lack hole binaries in active galactic nuclei, Nature 287, 307 (1980)

    1980

  49. [56]

    Rajagopal and R

    M. Rajagopal and R. W. Romani, Ultralow frequency gravi tational radiation from massive black hole binaries, Astrophys. J. 446, 543 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9412038

    1995 arXiv

  50. [57]

    A. H. Jaffe and D. C. Backer, Gravitational waves probe the coalescence rate of massive black hole binaries, Astrophys. J. 583, 616 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210148

    2003 arXiv

  51. [58]

    J. S. B. Wyithe and A. Loeb, Low - frequency gravitationa l waves from massive black hole binaries: Predictions for LISA and pulsar timing array s, Astrophys. J. 590, 691 (2003), 16 arXiv:astro-ph/0211556

    2003 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Enoki, K

    M. Enoki, K. T. Inoue, M. Nagashima, and N. Sugiyama, Gra vitational waves from supermassive black hole coalescence in a hierarchical galaxy formation model, Astrophys. J. 615, 19 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404389

    2004 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Sesana, A

    A. Sesana, A. Vecchio, and C. N. Colacino, The stochasti c gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for ob servations with Pulsar Timing Arrays, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 390, 192 (2008), arXiv:0804.4476 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [61]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Constra ints on primordial black holes, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 116902 (2021), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    C. J. Willott, L. Albert, D. Arzoumanian, J. Bergeron, D . Crampton, P. Delorme, J. B. Hutchings, A. Omont, C. Reyle, and D. Schade, Eddington-lim ited accretion and the black hole mass function at redshift 6, Astron. J. 140, 546 (2010), arXiv:1006.1342 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  56. [64]

    F. Wang, J. Yang, X. Fan, J. F. Hennawi, A. J. Barth, E. Ban ados, F. Bian, K. Bout- sia, T. Connor, F. B. Davies, R. Decarli, A.-C. Eilers, E. P. F arina, R. Green, L. Jiang, J.-T. Li, C. Mazzucchelli, R. Nanni, J.-T. Schindler, B. Ven emans, F. Walter, X.-B. Wu, and M. Yue, ...

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    J. D. Bowman, A. E. E. Rogers, R. A. Monsalve, T. J. Mozdze n, and N. Mahesh, An absorp- tion profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spec trum, Nature 555, 67 (2018), arXiv:1810.05912 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Singh, J

    S. Singh, J. Nambissan T., R. Subrahmanyan, N. Udaya Sha nkar, B. S. Girish, A. Raghu- nathan, R. Somashekar, K. S. Srivani, and M. Sathyanarayana Rao, On the detec- tion of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background, Nature A stron. 6, 607 (2022), arXiv:2112.06778 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kohri, T

    K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Suyama, Testing scenarios of primordial black holes being the seeds of supermassive black holes by ultracompact minih alos and CMB µ-distortions, Phys. Rev. D 90, 083514 (2014), arXiv:1405.5999 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Jeong, J

    D. Jeong, J. Pradler, J. Chluba, and M. Kamionkowski, Si lk damping at a redshift of a bil- 17 lion: a new limit on small-scale adiabatic perturbations, P hys. Rev. Lett. 113, 061301 (2014), arXiv:1403.3697 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tada, Revisiting constr aints on small scale perturbations from big-bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 94, 043527 (2016), arXiv:1605.04646 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [70]

    E. S. Phinney, A Practical theorem on gravitational wav e backgrounds, (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028

    2001 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Ajith et al

    P. Ajith et al. , A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalesci ng binary black holes. I. Non-spinning binaries, Phys. Rev. D 77, 104017 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 129901 (2009)], arXiv:0710.2335 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, J. Urrutia , V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Prospects for future binary black hole gravitational wave s tudies in light of PTA measure- ments, Astron. Astrophys. 676, A38 (2023), arXiv:2301.13854 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Barkana and A

    R. Barkana and A. Loeb, In the beginning: The First sourc es of light and the reionization of the Universe, Phys. Rept. 349, 125 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010468

    2001 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Dodelson, Modern Cosmology (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003)

    S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003)

    2003

  67. [75]

    Poulin, P

    V. Poulin, P. D. Serpico, F. Calore, S. Clesse, and K. Koh ri, CMB bounds on disk-accreting massive primordial black holes, Phys. Re v. D 96, 083524 (2017), arXiv:1707.04206 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    P. D. Serpico, V. Poulin, D. Inman, and K. Kohri, Cosmic m icrowave background bounds on primordial black holes including dark matter halo accretio n, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023204 (2020), arXiv:2002.10771 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Weltman et al

    A. Weltman et al. , Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 37, e002 (2020), arXiv:1810.02680 [astro-ph.CO]. 18

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.