REVIEW 2 cited by
Kubernetes Deployment Options for On-Prem Clusters
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Over the last decade, the Kubernetes container orchestration platform has become essential to many scientific workflows. Despite its popularity, deploying a production-ready Kubernetes cluster on-premises can be challenging for system administrators. Many of the proprietary integrations that application developers take for granted in commercial cloud environments must be replaced with alternatives when deployed locally. This article will compare three popular deployment strategies for sites deploying Kubernetes on-premise: Kubeadm with Kubespray, OpenShift / OKD and Rancher via K3S/RKE2.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Enabling Secure and Ephemeral AI Workloads in Data Mesh Environments
A proposed tool, sskuba-ctl, claims to create ephemeral, self-service Kubernetes clusters in under ten minutes across clouds using an immutable OS and infrastructure-as-code.
-
Distributedness based scheduling
A variance-based Kubernetes scheduling heuristic that spreads similarly labeled pods across nodes is proposed, but with no experimental validation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.