Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

High-Density Ultracold Neutron Source for Low-Energy Particle Physics Experiments

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SuperSUN, a superfluid-helium converter, reports a record stored ultracold-neutron density of 273 per cubic centimeter and 60 days of continuous operation.

desk verdict A real experimental milestone with internally consistent numbers—record stored UCN density is a lower bound, but the 'highest ever measured' claim needs a quantitative comparison baseline. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.13030 v1 pith:URTIWKD6 submitted 2025-04-17 physics.ins-det hep-exnucl-ex

Skyler Degenkolb , Estelle Chanel , Simon Baudoin , Marie-Hélène Baurand , Douglas H. Beck , Juliette Blé , Eric Bourgeat-Lami , Zeus Castillo
show 12 more authors
Hanno Filter Maurits van der Grinten Tobias Jenke Michael Jentschel Victorien Joyet Eddy Lelièvre-Berna Husain Manasawala Thomas Neulinger Peter Fierlinger Kseniia Svirina Xavier Tonon Oliver Zimmer
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-dethep-exnucl-ex PACS 29.25.Dz
keywords ultracoldneutronssuperfluidheliumsuperthermalsourceneutronstoragein-situdensitycoldbeamlineelectricdipolemoment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first full-scale demonstration of a long-proposed superthermal source for ultracold neutrons. It claims that SuperSUN, a converter filled with isotopically pure superfluid helium-4, stored 3.88 million ultracold neutrons in its 14.2-liter volume, corresponding to an in-situ density of 273 per cubic centimeter—the highest stored density measured to date. The source also ran continuously for more than 60 days and delivered a steady extracted rate of 21,000 ultracold neutrons per second. If these numbers are right, the source removes a long-standing statistics bottleneck for precision experiments that rely on holding neutrons for hundreds of seconds, including searches for a neutron electric dipole moment, neutron lifetime measurements, and tests of gravity with quantum states.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is superthermal UCN production: a cold neutron with wavelength $0.89\,\mathrm{nm}$ scatters in superfluid helium-4 and creates a single phonon, transferring nearly all its energy and momentum, so the neutron becomes ultracold. In isotopically pure helium-4 there is no neutron absorption, and upscattering out of the UCN energy range is negligible below about 0.6 K, so losses can approach the neutron $\beta$-decay limit. The apparatus multiplies production by guiding the cold beam through a 3-meter-long supermirror-lined converter, uses a CYTOP fluoropolymer coating to reduce wall losses, and seals the extraction aperture with a movable diamond-like-carbon valve; stored UCN leave through coated guides and are counted by a helium-3 detector.

What would settle it

Measure the in-situ density by a method that does not rely on extracting neutrons through guides—for example, a small calibrated UCN detector inserted directly into the converter, or an independent measurement of production rate and total loss rate to predict saturation density. If such a measurement gives a value well below $273\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ after accounting for extraction losses, the record-density claim would be overturned; conversely, an independent in-situ measurement near $273\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that SuperSUN achieves the highest stored ultracold-neutron density ever measured: $273\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ in-situ, obtained by accumulating for 1500 seconds with a closed valve and then extracting $3.88\times 10^6$ UCN into a detector, dividing by the 14.2-liter converter volume without corrections. The same source demonstrates continuous 'open converter' operation with a steady extraction rate of $2.1\times 10^4\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ sustained over a full 60-day reactor cycle. Storage and accumulation are characterized by bi-exponential time constants near 130 s and 410 s, and the paper shows that the stored spectrum becomes softer, and hence less lossy, with longer accumulation or holding time. The paper argues that soft spectra and long storage times make the source suited to storage experiments that hold neutrons for hundreds of seconds, not just to beam-flux measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes that the 3.88 million ultracold neutrons counted after extraction equal the number stored inside the 14.2-liter converter: no corrections are applied for detector efficiency, transport through guides and windows, the roughly 5% of neutrons too low in energy to leave the source, or pileup; if those combined corrections are large, the true in-situ density could differ from $273\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A stored in-situ density of $273\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$, if taken at face value, makes SuperSUN the benchmark for future UCN storage experiments; no other source has demonstrated a higher density under this measurement convention.
  • The measured accumulation and storage time constants (roughly 130 s and 410 s) imply that storage experiments can operate with repetition periods of a few minutes and still reach close to saturation density, the operating regime projected for a competitive neutron electric dipole moment search.
  • Continuous 60-day operation shows the source can support full reactor cycles as a user facility, not just short proof-of-principle runs.
  • The spectral softening with holding time provides a starting point for modeling energy-dependent losses in any experiment using this source.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the density claim survives a calibration of detector efficiency and transport losses, it would suggest that superfluid-helium superthermal converters can exceed the phase-space density of existing reactor- and spallation-based UCN sources for storage applications, which could change the economic case for building dedicated UCN facilities.
  • The planned addition of a superconducting octupole magnet should allow a direct test of magnetic trapping inside the same converter: comparing saturated densities with the magnet on and off would isolate the gain from the magnetic reflector, a measurement this paper does not report.
  • The observed degradation of about 3% per day in total UCN output without a separation foil implies that long-duration science runs will need the polypropylene foil; an A/B comparison of daily output with and without the foil would separate the foil's static 10% transmission loss from its protective benefit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first measurements from SuperSUN, a new superthermal ultracold-neutron (UCN) source at the Institut Laue-Langevin that uses isotopically pure superfluid 4He below 0.6 K. The authors claim continuous operation over 60 days, a continuous UCN extraction rate of 2.1e4 s^-1, and a saturated stored UCN density of 273 cm^-3, obtained by dividing the 3.88e6 UCN detected after extraction by the 14.2-liter converter volume. They characterize UCN accumulation and storage with phenomenological multi-exponential fits, reporting time constants of about 131 s and 410 s for accumulation and 117 s and 414 s for storage. The paper argues that this is the highest stored UCN density ever measured and discusses implications for the PanEDM experiment and future in-situ storage experiments.

Significance. If the measurements are correct, this is a major advance for ultracold-neutron science: the highest stored UCN density reported to date, with a soft spectrum and long storage times, would enable qualitatively new precision experiments. The central arithmetic is internally consistent and reproducible: 3.88e6 / 14.2e3 cm^3 = 273 cm^-3. The measurements are direct, and the quoted density, being uncorrected for detection and extraction losses, is a conservative lower bound on the true in-situ density; this is a genuine strength. The paper also clearly labels its fitting functions as phenomenological, avoiding any over-interpretation of the time constants. The primary weakness is that the comparative claim 'highest ever measured' is not supported by a quantitative baseline against published UCN densities, and the abstract presents the density without the qualifiers that the body text uses.

major comments (3)
  1. [Summary and outlook; Abstract; Introduction] The claim that 273 cm^-3 is 'the highest ever measured' (or 'the largest UCN density stored and measured to date') is not substantiated by a quantitative comparison with previously reported UCN densities. The paper cites earlier sources [19,21,42-44] but does not give their densities or a table of values, and the factor-14 comparison in the Introduction refers to production rates, not stored density. Since this record claim is a central headline of the paper, please provide a quantitative comparison with published UCN densities, specifying the correction status and definition used for each, or temper the claim accordingly.
  2. [Characterization, paragraph 3; Abstract] The value 273 cm^-3 is labeled 'saturated in-situ density' in the abstract but is actually obtained by dividing the number of UCN detected after extraction (3.88e6) by the converter volume (14.2 L), with no corrections applied. As the text notes, this count excludes the ~5% of UCN unable to exit the source (footnote [39]), pileup losses of up to 10%, and unquantified detector and transport efficiencies; it is therefore a conservative lower bound on the true in-situ number density, not a direct in-situ measurement. Please state in the abstract and summary that this is an uncorrected lower bound derived from extracted counts, and where possible give an estimate of the total correction factor.
  3. [Abstract; Apparatus, paragraph 2] The abstract claims that 'continuous operation with an intense broad-spectrum cold neutron beam is demonstrated over 60 days,' but no data or run log supporting this 60-day period appears in the manuscript. The body text only states that the source 'operates continuously for full reactor cycles, typically 7-9 weeks,' with weekly reservoir refills. Since continuous operation over 60 days is one of the paper's stated firsts, please provide a supporting timeline, a statement of the actual achieved continuous run, or remove the specific '60 days' claim from the abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses '21000 s^-1' whereas the text uses '2.1 × 10^4 s^-1'; please use one consistent notation throughout.
  2. [Introduction, paragraph 2] The phrase 'exceeding earlier demonstrations by a factor 14 [19,21]' refers to UCN production, not stored density; please clarify this in the text so it is not read as a density comparison.
  3. [Footnote [39]] The statement that ~5% of produced UCN cannot exit would be more useful if accompanied by the estimated energy threshold and the fraction of the spectrum below it, rather than only the percentage.
  4. [References [40]] Reference [40] for the DUNya-type detector is from 1974; please check that this is the appropriate primary reference, or add a more recent characterization reference.
  5. [Characterization, paragraph 1] The detected leakage rate of ~80 s^-1 through the monitoring hole during accumulation is a useful systematics check; please state whether this leakage is included in the total UCN production estimate or corrected for in the reported 3.88e6 extracted UCN.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline density is a direct ratio of counted UCN to converter volume, with caveats explicitly stated and no fitted parameter used as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims are direct measurements rather than derived outputs of a fit or of a self-citation chain. The stored density is computed as 3.88e6 detected UCN divided by the 14.2-liter converter volume, giving 273 cm^-3; this is simple arithmetic on independent inputs (detected counts and stated volume), and the paper explicitly calls it "uncorrected" and therefore a conservative lower bound, with the main caveats disclosed in footnote [39] and in the pileup discussion. The phenomenological time constants in Eqs. (1)-(5) are fitted to the data and are explicitly labeled "essentially phenomenological," so they are not dressed up as first-principles predictions. Self-citations such as Refs. [19,21,28,29] serve as prior prototype results, design-goal references, and context for comparison; they are not used to force the present density or rates by construction. The soft spot identified by the skeptic, namely the "highest ever measured" comparative claim lacking a quantitative table of prior source densities, is a verifiability or completeness issue, not circularity, because the present measurement does not depend on those prior values for its own validity. No step in the paper reduces to its own inputs by definition, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central performance claims rest on standard superfluid-helium UCN physics and on the assumption that the measured detector counts directly map to stored UCN density. The fit parameters are descriptive and not used to derive the headline result. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Storage extraction profile parameters (c, tau_3, tau_4) = c = 0.17 +/- 0.02, tau_3 = 117 +/- 10 s, tau_4 = 414 +/- 9 s
    Fitted to the counting-phase UCN extraction time profiles using a bi-exponential model; used to characterize storage dynamics, not the central density claim.
  • Accumulation profile parameters (a, tau_1, tau_1') = a = 0.42 +/- 0.03, tau_1 = 131 +/- 7 s, tau_1' = 410 +/- 13 s
    Fitted to the UCN accumulation curves with a bi-exponential model; describes the evolving spectral composition during filling and is not load-bearing for the headline density.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Superthermal UCN production in superfluid 4He via single-phonon conversion of 0.89 nm cold neutrons is the dominant production mechanism.
    The entire source design rests on the Golub-Pendlebury mechanism; the paper cites refs [13], [17], and [24] for the production cross-section and wavelength dependence.
  • domain assumption Absorption losses in 4He are negligible and upscattering at T <= 0.6 K is negligible; the superleak reduces 3He contamination to acceptable levels.
    Storage times and density claims depend on low loss. The paper notes that warming to 1 K changed conditions, possibly via 3He concentration or superfluid level, so the assumption of stable negligible 3He is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption The number of UCN detected after extraction equals the number stored in the 14.2 L converter volume, without corrections for detector efficiency, transport losses, or the ~5% of UCN that cannot exit.
    The 273 cm^-3 density is obtained by dividing the raw detected count by the volume, as stated in the Characterization section. The paper calls it 'uncorrected,' so the interpretation as 'in-situ density' assumes these corrections are small or at least already included.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Density Ultracold Neutron Source for Low-Energy Particle Physics Experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URTIWKD6

@misc{pith2026250413030,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Density Ultracold Neutron Source for Low-Energy Particle Physics Experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URTIWKD6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.13030}
}
abstract

SuperSUN, a new superthermal source of ultracold neutrons (UCN) at the Institut Laue-Langevin, exploits inelastic scattering of neutrons in isotopically pure superfluid $^4$He at temperatures below $0.6\,$K. For the first time, continuous operation with an intense broad-spectrum cold neutron beam is demonstrated over 60 days. We observe continuous UCN extraction rates of $21000\,$s$^{-1}$, and storage in the source with saturated $\textit{in-situ}$ density $273\,$cm$^{-3}$. The high stored density, low-energy UCN spectrum, and long storage times open new possibilities in fundamental and applied physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.13030 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Diagram of SuperSUN, indicating the main neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Example data for two operating modes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Detected UCN rate during an accumulation-mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Variation of fit parameters (a) with accumulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Variation of the total extracted UCN number with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A New High-Intensity Source for Ultracold Neutrons

    physics.ins-det 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The completed TUCAN He-II superthermal source with LD2 moderator yields up to 6.75(3)×10^5 UCN/s continuously and 1.34(1)×10^7 UCNs after 60 s accumulation, exceeding all other operating sources.

  2. Initial results of the TRIUMF ultracold advanced neutron source

    nucl-ex 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The TRIUMF TUCAN ultracold neutron source detected (9.3 +/- 0.8) x 10^5 UCNs in 60 s irradiations at 37 uA, with yields rising linearly with beam current.

  3. Towards Precise Simulations and Inference for the Neutron EDM

    nucl-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GEANT4 simulations of the SuperSUN ultracold neutron source are paired with neural simulation-based inference to recover UCN loss parameters from time-of-flight spectra.

  4. Concept of the UCN Source at the WWR-K Reactor (AlSUN)

    physics.ins-det 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A proposed superfluid-helium ultracold neutron source for the WWR-K reactor is estimated to reach up to 6e4 UCN per cubic centimeter in the source and 5e3 in experiments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [39]

    These DLC coatings are pre- pared with deuterated precursor chemicals, to maintain a high scattering length density despite impurities

    Hydrogen impurities in DLC can significantly reduce its neutron optical potential. These DLC coatings are pre- pared with deuterated precursor chemicals, to maintain a high scattering length density despite impurities

    work page

  2. [1]

    (5) Here a is a weight parameter, analogous to c in Eqs

    = [afa(t;τ1) + (1−a)fa(t;τ′ 1)]P iNiP i[afa(ti;τ1) + (1−a)fa(ti;τ′ 1)] . (5) Here a is a weight parameter, analogous to c in Eqs. (3) and (4). Overall normalization in Eqs. (4) and (5) is fixed by the data. The fit results for storage are c = 0.17± 0.02, τ3 = 117 s± 10 s, and τ4 = 414 s± 9 s. For accumulation, we obtaina = 0.42±0.03,τ1 = 131 s±7 s, and τ′...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Steyerl, Ultracold Neutrons (World Scientific, 2020)

    A. Steyerl, Ultracold Neutrons (World Scientific, 2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [3]

    Golub, D

    R. Golub, D. Richardson, and S. Lamoreaux, Ultra-Cold Neutrons (CRC Press, 1991)

    work page 1991

  5. [4]

    V. K. Ignatovich, The physics of ultracold neutrons (Clarendon Press, 1990)

    work page 1990

  6. [5]

    C. Abel, S. Afach, N. J. Ayres, C. A. Baker, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar, M. Burghoff, E. Chanel, et al. , Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    F. M. Gonzalez, E. M. Fries, C. Cude-Woods, T. Bai- ley, M. Blatnik, L. J. Broussard, N. B. Callahan, J. H. Choi, S. M. Clayton, S. A. Currie, et al. (UCNτ Collab- oration), Improved neutron lifetime measurement with UCNτ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 162501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    M. P. Mendenhall, R. W. Pattie, Y. Bagdasarova, D. B. Berguno, L. J. Broussard, R. Carr, S. Currie, X. Ding, B. W. Filippone, A. Garc´ ıa, et al. (UCNA Collabo- ration), Precision measurement of the neutron β-decay asymmetry, Phys. Rev. C 87, 032501 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    Cronenberg, P

    G. Cronenberg, P. Brax, H. Filter, P. Geltenbort, T. Jenke, G. Pignol, M. Pitschmann, M. Thalhammer, and H. Abele, Acoustic Rabi oscillations between gravi- tational quantum states and impact on symmetron dark energy, Nature Phys. 14, 1022 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    Jenke, J

    T. Jenke, J. Bosina, J. Micko, M. Pitschmann, R. Sed- mik, and H. Abele, Gravity resonance spectroscopy and dark energy symmetron fields: qBOUNCE experiments performed with Rabi and Ramsey spectroscopy, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, 1131 (2021), arXiv:2012.07472 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Altarev, C

    I. Altarev, C. A. Baker, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, M. Daum, P. Fierlinger, P. Geltenbort, K. Green, M. G. D. van der Grinten, et al., Test of Lorentz invari- ance with spin precession of ultracold neutrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 081602 (2009)

    2009

  4. [11]

    A. N. Ivanov, M. Wellenzohn, and H. Abele (qBounce), Tests of Lorentz-Invariance Violation in the Standard- Model Extension with Ultracold Neutrons in qBounce Experiments, in 8th Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Sym- metry (2020) pp. 118–121

    2020

  5. [12]

    N. J. Ayres, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar, T. Bouil- laud, E. Chanel, P.-J. Chiu, B. Clement, C. B. Crawford, M. Daum, et al. , Search for an interaction mediated by axion-like particles with ultracold neutrons at the PSI, New J. Phys. 25, 103012 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    G. Ban, J. Chen, T. Lefort, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, W. Saenz-Arevalo, P.-J. Chiu, B. Cl´ ement, P. Larue, G. Pignol, S. Roccia, M. Guigue, T. Jenke, B. Perrio- lat, and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Search for neutron-to- hidden-neutron oscillations in an ultracold neutron beam, Phys. Re...

    2023

  7. [14]

    Golub and J

    R. Golub and J. Pendlebury, The interaction of ultra-cold neutrons (UCN) with liquid helium and a superthermal UCN source, Physics Letters A 62, 337 (1977)

    1977

  8. [15]

    Ageron, W

    P. Ageron, W. Mampe, R. Golub, and J. Pendelbury, Measurement of the ultra cold neutron production rate in an external liquid helium source, Physics Letters A66, 469 (1978)

    1978

  9. [16]

    Golub, C

    R. Golub, C. Jewell, P. Ageron, W. Mampe, B. Heckel, and I. Kilvington, Operation of a superthermal ultra-cold neutron source and the storage of ultra-cold neutrons in superfluid helium 4, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 51, 187 (1983)

    1983

  10. [17]

    C. R. Brome et al. , Magnetic trapping of ultracold neutrons, Phys. Rev. C 63, 055502 (2001), arXiv:nucl- ex/0103003

    2001

  11. [18]

    Baker, S

    C. Baker, S. Balashov, J. Butterworth, P. Geltenbort, K. Green, P. Harris, M. van der Grinten, P. Iaydjiev, S. Ivanov, J. Pendlebury, D. Shiers, M. Tucker, and H. Yoshiki, Experimental measurement of ultracold neu- tron production in superfluid 4He, Physics Letters A308, 67 (2003)

    2003

  12. [19]

    Zimmer, K

    O. Zimmer, K. Baumann, M. Fertl, B. Franke, S. Mironov, C. Plonka, D. Rich, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, H. F. Wirth, and B. van den Brandt, A Superfluid he- lium converter for accumulation and extraction of ul- tracold neutrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 104801 (2007), arXiv:0705.3960 [nucl-ex]

    2007 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Zimmer, F

    O. Zimmer, F. M. Piegsa, and S. N. Ivanov, Superther- mal source of ultracold neutrons for fundamental physics experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 134801 (2011)

    2011

  14. [21]

    Masuda, K

    Y. Masuda, K. Hatanaka, S.-C. Jeong, S. Kawasaki, R. Matsumiya, K. Matsuta, M. Mihara, and Y. Watan- abe, Spallation Ultracold Neutron Source of Superfluid Helium below 1 K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 134801 (2012)

    2012

  15. [22]

    F. M. Piegsa, M. Fertl, S. N. Ivanov, M. Kreuz, K. K. H. Leung, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, T. Soldner, and O. Zim- mer, New source for ultracold neutrons at the Insti- tut Laue-Langevin, Phys. Rev. C 90, 015501 (2014), arXiv:1404.3527 [physics.ins-det]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Ahmed, E

    S. Ahmed, E. Altiere, T. Andalib, B. Bell, C. P. Bidinosti, E. Cudmore, M. Das, C. A. Davis, B. Franke, M. Gericke, et al. (TUCAN), First ultracold neutrons produced at TRIUMF, Phys. Rev. C 99, 025503 (2019)

    2019

  17. [24]

    Bison, M

    G. Bison, M. Daum, K. Kirch, B. Lauss, D. Ries, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, G. Zsigmond, T. Brenner, P. Geltenbort, T. Jenke, et al., Comparison of ultracold neutron sources for fundamental physics measurements, Phys. Rev. C 95, 045503 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    Schmidt-Wellenburg, K

    P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, K. Andersen, and O. Zimmer, Ultra cold neutron production by multiphonon processes in superfluid helium under pressure, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 611...

    2009

  19. [26]

    S. K. Lamoreaux and R. Golub, Angular distribution of ultracold neutrons produced by scattering of cold neu- 6 trons in superfluid 4He, Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 58, 792 (1993)

    1993

  20. [27]

    Golub, On the storage of neutrons in superfluid 4He, Physics Letters A 72, 387 (1979)

    R. Golub, On the storage of neutrons in superfluid 4He, Physics Letters A 72, 387 (1979)

    1979

  21. [28]

    Chanel, D

    E. Chanel, D. Beck, J. Bl´ e, S. Degenkolb, C. Desalme, L. Dimmler, R. Georgii, M. H.M., T. Neulinger, and F. Waldherr, Characterization of SuperSUN phase I, part I, Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) doi:10.5291/ILL- DATA.TEST-3284 (2023)

    2023 doi

  22. [29]

    D. Wurm, D. H. Beck, T. Chupp, S. Degenkolb, K. Fier- linger, P. Fierlinger, H. Filter, S. Ivanov, C. Klau, M. Kreuz, et al. , The PanEDM neutron electric dipole moment experiment at the ILL, EPJ Web Conf. 219, 02006 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Chanel, S

    E. Chanel, S. Baudoin, M.-H. Baurand, N. Belkhier, E. Bourgeat-Lami, S. Degenkolb, M. van der Grinten, M. Jentschel, V. Joyet, M. Kreuz, et al. , Concept and strategy of SuperSUN: A new ultracold neutron con- verter, Journal of Neutron Research 24, 111 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    m-value

    The “ m-value” of multilayer coatings used for neutron supermirrors is the factor by which the critical angle ex- ceeds that of Ni with natural isotopic composition

  25. [32]

    Degenkolb, M

    S. Degenkolb, M. Kreuz, and O. Zimmer, A tapered tran- sition guide with irregular octagonal cross-section, Jour- nal of Neutron Research 20, 117 (2018)

    2018

  26. [33]

    Plonka, P

    C. Plonka, P. Geltenbort, T. Soldner, and H. H¨ ase, Rep- lika mirrors—nearly loss-free guides for ultracold neu- trons—measurement technique and first preliminary re- sults, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Re- search Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detector...

    2007

  27. [34]

    A. P. Serebrov, A. Vasil’ev, M. S. Lasakov, E. Siber, A. N. Murashkin, A. I. Egorov, A. K. Fomin, S. V. Sbitnev, P. Geltenbort, and O. Zimmer, Replica neutron guides for experiments with ultracold neutrons, Technical Physics 62, 164 (2017)

    2017

  28. [35]

    Zimmer, P

    O. Zimmer, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, M. Fertl, H. F. Wirth, M. Assmann, J. Klenke, and B. van den Brandt, Ultracold neutrons extracted from a superfluid-helium converter coated with fluorinated grease, Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 589 (2010)

    2010

  29. [36]

    Yoshiki, H

    H. Yoshiki, H. Nakai, and E. Gutsmiedl, A new superleak to remove He3 for UCN experiments, Cryogenics 45, 399 (2005)

    2005

  30. [37]

    A. G. C. Chemicals Inc., Amorphous Fluoropolymer CYTOP, https://www.agc-chemicals.com/file.jsp? id=jp/en/fluorine/products/cytop/download/pdf/ CYTOP_EN_Brochure.pdf, accessed: 2024-03-12

    2024

  31. [38]

    Neulinger, D

    T. Neulinger, D. Beck, E. Connolly, S. Degenkolb, P. Fierlinger, H. Filter, J. Hingerl, P. Nordin, T. Saer- beck, and O. Zimmer, Ultracold neutron storage in a bot- tle coated with the fluoropolymer CYTOP, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 141 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    The minimum total UCN energy for extraction is ∼ 15 neV higher than the lowest total UCN energy that can exist in the source, implying that approximately 5% of the UCN produced are unable to exit the source

  33. [41]

    Groshev, V

    L. Groshev, V. Dvoretskij, A. Demidov, V. Lushchikov, S. Nikolaev, Y. Panin, Y. Pokotilovskij, A. Strelkov, and F. Shapiro, [in Russian] Aqueous and zirconium-hydride converters of ultracold neutrons. Neutron confinement in copper and glass vessels., Proc. All-Union conference...

    1974

  34. [42]

    Neulinger, H

    T. Neulinger, H. Filter, and O. Zimmer, Vertical time- of-flight spectroscopy of ultracold neutrons, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1059, 168947 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Steyerl, H

    A. Steyerl, H. Nagel, F.-X. Schreiber, K.-A. Steinhauser, R. G¨ ahler, W. Gl¨ aser, P. Ageron, J. Astruc, W. Drexel, G. Gervais, and W. Mampe, A new source of cold and ultracold neutrons, Physics Letters A 116, 347 (1986)

    1986

  36. [44]

    Bison, W

    G. Bison, W. Chen, P.-J. Chiu, M. Daum, C. B. Dooren- bos, K. Kirch, V. Kletzl, B. Lauss, D. Pais, I. Rien¨ acker, et al. , Time-of-flight spectroscopy of ultracold neutrons at the PSI UCN source, The European Physical Journal A 59, 215 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    D.-T. Wong, M. Hassan, J. Burdine, T. Chupp, S. Clay- ton, C. Cude-Woods, S. Currie, T. Ito, C.-Y. Liu, M. Makela, et al., Characterization of the new ultracold neutron beamline at the LANL UCN facility, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelera...

    2023

  38. [46]

    Golub and S

    R. Golub and S. K. Lamoreaux, Neutron electric-dipole moment, ultracold neutrons and polarized 3He, Physics Reports 237, 1 (1994)

    1994

  39. [47]

    Ahmed, R

    M. Ahmed, R. Alarcon, A. Aleksandrova, S. Baeßler, L. Barron-Palos, L. Bartoszek, D. Beck, M. Behzadipour, I. Berkutov, J. Bessuille, et al. (nEDM), A New Cryo- genic Apparatus to Search for the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, JINST 14 (11), P11017

  40. [48]

    Degenkolb, P

    S. Degenkolb, P. Fierlinger, and O. Zimmer, Approaches to high-density storage experiments with in-situ produc- tion and detection of ultracold neutrons, Journal of Neu- tron Research 24, 123 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Zimmer and R

    O. Zimmer and R. Golub, Ultracold neutron accumula- tion in a superfluid-helium converter with magnetic mul- tipole reflector, Phys. Rev. C 92, 015501 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.