Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Quantum Geometric Origin of Strain-Tunable Giant Second-Harmonic Generation in Bi$_2$O$_2$X (X=S, Se, Te)

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that straining the layered semiconductors Bi2O2X (X = S, Se, Te) beyond a critical strain of about 3.0–3.6 percent activates second-harmonic generation with susceptibilities near 1 nm/V, on par with the strongest 2D…

desk verdict Solid mechanistic story of strain-activated SHG in Bi2O2X with a clean geometric decomposition, but the headline 1 nm/V peak values rest on an unconverged-looking smearing parameter. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16741 v1 pith:USJH46MT submitted 2025-01-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Zhefeng Lou , Zhihao Gong , Ziye Zhu , Wenbin Li , Xiao Lin , Hua Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 78.20.Bh71.15.Mb73.22.-f
keywords second-harmonicgenerationstrainengineeringBi2O2Xcompoundsquantumgeometryshiftvectormetrictriplephaseproductpolarmetal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that stretching the layered semiconductors Bi2O2X (X = S, Se, Te) past a critical strain of about 3.0–3.6 percent drives a centrosymmetric-to-polar structural transition that activates second-harmonic generation with susceptibilities around 1 nm/V, among the largest reported for two-dimensional materials. It argues that this giant response is not an incidental resonance effect but a consequence of quantum geometric properties of the Bloch wavefunctions: the shift vector, the quantum metric, and the triple phase product of inter-band Berry connections. Mapping the response in reciprocal space shows these three quantities concentrate at the same points and dominate the 'aaa' and 'abb' tensor components. In Bi2O2Te the same strain also closes the gap and produces a semiconductor-to-half-metal-to-polar-metal sequence. If correct, this makes strained Bi2O2X a tunable on-chip nonlinear optical platform with bandgap control.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the decomposition of the second-order susceptibility into three gauge-invariant geometric channels: the shift term, built from the shift vector (the real-space displacement of a photoexcited electron-hole pair) and the quantum metric (a measure of distance between nearby Bloch states); the triple term, built from the triple phase product of inter-band Berry connections (a gauge-invariant product of three connection matrix elements); and the injection term, built from the quantum geometric tensor and band-velocity asymmetry. The paper re-expresses the first two channels as weighted sums of these geometric quantities, permitting a $\mathbf{k}$-resolved map of where the SHG signal comes from. For the 'aaa' component the injection term vanishes under time-reversal symmetry, so the response is carried by the shift and triple channels; for the 'abb' component injection is also active. This turns a bulk response tensor into a statement about local geometric concentrations in reciprocal space.

What would settle it

Measure the second-harmonic spectrum of a Bi2O2Se or Bi2O2Te flake strained past the predicted 3.0–3.6 percent critical strain and compare the photon energies and magnitudes of the resulting peaks with the predicted $|\chi^{(2)}| \approx 1$ nm/V response; if no strain-activated peak appears near the computed photon energies, or the magnitude is far lower, the quantitative claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that strain-induced loss of inversion symmetry in Bi2O2X turns an initially SHG-silent material into one with $|\chi^{(2)}| \approx 1$ nm/V, rivaling the strongest 2D nonlinear materials. The paper identifies the microscopic source: the dominant 'aaa' component is carried by gauge-invariant geometric objects—the shift vector, the quantum metric, and the triple phase product of inter-band Berry connections—whose reciprocal-space concentrations coincide with the hot spots of the SHG spectrum. In Bi2O2Te, the same strain that creates this response tunes the bandgap through zero, giving a half-metal and then a polar metal, so nonlinear switching and metallicity arrive together.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the independent-particle first-principles band structure, with a 0.06 eV broadening and a semi-empirical band-gap correction, correctly captures the resonant transitions that set the 1 nm/V maximum, since no excitonic or many-body corrections are included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strained Bi2O2S, Bi2O2Se, and Bi2O2Te all enter a polar $C_{2v}$ phase with $|\chi_{aaa}|$ and $|\chi_{abb}|$ reaching roughly 1 nm/V, so the entire family becomes a strain-tunable SHG platform.
  • The $\mathbf{k}$-resolved analysis ties the giant response to specific band pairs concentrated near the $\Sigma$ points, meaning band-structure engineering that strengthens these geometric quantities should directly enhance SHG.
  • In Bi2O2Te, increasing strain sweeps the gap through zero, taking the material from a narrow-gap semiconductor to a half-metal and then to a polar metal, so the same sample can be tuned between nonlinear optical and metallic regimes.
  • The optimal strain for the largest $|\chi_{aaa}|$ differs across the series, giving composition- and strain-dependent operating windows for the giant response.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to use the same geometric decomposition as a screening descriptor: for other layered semiconductors, the momentum-space overlap of shift vector, quantum metric, and triple phase product hot spots should predict where strain-activated SHG will be strong.
  • Because the maximum values sit at near-resonant photon energies, the precise 1 nm/V number is tied to the 0.06 eV broadening and the band-gap correction; measuring the SHG spectrum of a strained flake at the predicted photon energies would settle the quantitative claim.
  • The predicted half-metal and polar-metal endpoints in Bi2O2Te raise the question of whether the polar distortions survive at metallic carrier densities, and whether such a polar metal would retain a strong second-order response.
  • One could test the proposed mechanism indirectly by measuring the shift-current photocurrent in the same strained phase, since the shift vector controls both that response and the SHG channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles DFT, Wannier interpolation, and independent-particle perturbative formulas to predict that uniaxial strain drives Bi2O2X (X = S, Se, Te) from a centrosymmetric phase into a polar C2v phase, activating second-harmonic generation with susceptibilities on the order of 1 nm/V, particularly in Bi2O2Te. It decomposes the SHG response into shift, triple, and injection contributions, and uses k-resolved maps to attribute the response to the shift vector, quantum metric, and triple phase product of inter-band Berry connections concentrated near the Sigma points. It also reports strain-induced bandgap variation and, for Bi2O2Te, a semiconductor to half-metal to polar-metal progression.

Significance. If the quantitative prediction holds, the paper identifies a promising family of strain-tunable 2D nonlinear optical materials with SHG magnitudes comparable to the best reported values. The geometric decomposition is a genuine interpretive contribution: it is gauge invariant, internally consistent, and supported by the vanishing of the injection term for the aaa component and by the k-space concentration at the Sigma points. The paper uses standard, reproducible methods (DFT relaxation, Wannier interpolation, and perturbative SHG expressions), and no geometric parameters are fitted. The main weakness is that the headline number of about 1 nm/V is a near-resonant peak value whose magnitude is controlled by the ad hoc smearing eta = 0.06 eV and by the empirical MBJ correction, and the manuscript does not establish convergence or physical meaning for these choices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II and Section IV B, Eqs. (2)-(4)] The central quantitative claim that strained Bi2O2X reaches |chi^(2)| ~ 1 nm/V and rivals the highest values reported in 2D materials is based on peak heights of spectra computed with the Lorentzian smearing eta = 0.06 eV via omega-tilde = omega + i eta/hbar in Eqs. (2)-(4). Near a resonance, the peak amplitude scales approximately as 1/eta, so this value depends on the chosen regularization as much as on the material. The manuscript reports no convergence test with respect to eta and no k-mesh convergence test for the peak values. Please provide a convergence study of the peak |chi_aaa| and |chi_abb| for eta values spanning at least 0.02 to 0.1 eV, together with a k-mesh convergence test at the same eta, and state how the quoted 'order of 1 nm/V' should be interpreted once this dependence is known.
  2. [Section II (MBJ potential) and Fig. S1] The MBJ potential with CMBJ = 1.07 is used in the SHG calculations and is justified only by comparing band gaps in Fig. S1. SHG peak heights, however, depend not only on the gap but on the full set of transition energies and transition matrix elements, and CMBJ is an empirical adjustment. The paper should report how the SHG spectra change when computed with PBE alone, and whether the experimental gap used to set CMBJ corresponds to the strained or unstrained structure. If the large peak values require the MBJ correction, that is an important caveat to the quantitative claim.
  3. [Section III A (electronic structure of Bi2O2Te)] The abstract and Section III A state that Bi2O2Te undergoes a transition from a semiconductor to a half-metal at the critical strain and ultimately to a polar metal. 'Half-metal' is a spin-resolved concept, and no spin-polarized calculations are presented, so this claim cannot be assessed on the basis of the current data. Please either provide spin-polarized band structures that demonstrate half-metallicity or rephrase this as a transition to a gapless or nearly gapless nonmagnetic metal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III B] In the sentence beginning 'As shown in Fig. 2(c), the peaks of frequancy-dependent components', 'frequancy' should be 'frequency'.
  2. [Section III A] In the sentence 'In Bi2O2X, Strain-induced structural distortions...', the word 'Strain' should be lowercase.
  3. [Section II] The sentence 'A dense 90 x 90 x 30 k-point mesh was used for for Brillouin zone integration' contains a duplicated 'for'.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption labels both the strain-free and 6%-strained Bi2O2Te band structures as '(c)'; the second one should be '(f)' to match the in-text reference.
  5. [Reference 30] The title 'Generalized wilson loop method for nonlinear light-matter interaction' should capitalize 'Wilson'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SHG predictions and quantum-geometric decomposition are self-contained, with no parameter fitted to the claimed output.

full rationale

The paper's central result is the strain-dependent SHG tensor computed from DFT-relaxed structures and Wannier-interpolated wavefunctions via the standard independent-particle response formulas (Eqs. 2-4). The only adjustable computational parameters are the MBJ factor CMBJ = 1.07 and the Lorentzian smearing eta = 0.06 eV; neither is fitted to the computed chi^(2) values, and the paper does not rename either parameter as a prediction. The quantum-geometric quantities (shift vector, quantum metric, triple phase product) are evaluated from the same wavefunctions and used to decompose the already-computed chi^(2). Because the decomposition is an exact rewriting of the response tensor, the k-space correlations shown in Figs. 3-4 are an internal consistency analysis rather than a fitted or circular derivation. The strain-induced polar phase is obtained from first-principles structural relaxation; citations to prior work (including the authors' own refs. 23-25) are corroborative context and not load-bearing. Concerns about the magnitude of near-resonant peaks depending on the smearing width are a robustness or correctness issue, not a circularity issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard first-principles approximations: DFT, Wannier interpolation, and independent-particle perturbation theory for SHG. The only hand-tuned numerical inputs are the MBJ parameter and the smearing width, both disclosed. No new entities are postulated. The main unstated risk is the omission of excitonic and local-field effects, which are not part of the ledger but are a domain assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • MBJ potential parameter CMBJ = 1.07
    Used to improve agreement with experimental band gaps, justified in Fig. S1. It modifies the band structure and therefore the computed SHG magnitude, though it is not directly fitted to SHG.
  • Smearing width eta = 0.06 eV
    Applied to the Dirac delta functions in the SHG susceptibility calculation. Chosen by hand, it affects the height and width of resonant peaks and hence the maximum claimed SHG values.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Kohn-Sham DFT provides accurate ground-state wavefunctions and band energies for these materials
    The entire SHG calculation is based on DFT eigenvalues and eigenstates; no quantum Monte Carlo or experimental verification is offered.
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE exchange-correlation gives reliable structural relaxations and critical strains
    Structure relaxation and critical strain values are computed at the PBE level without beyond-DFT checks (e.g., hybrid functionals or van der Waals corrections for layer sliding).
  • domain assumption The MBJ potential with a fixed CMBJ=1.07 gives sufficiently accurate band gaps for all three compounds
    The same CMBJ value is applied to S, Se, and Te; the justification (Fig. S1) is not shown in the main text, and band-gap accuracy directly affects resonant SHG energies.
  • domain assumption SHG can be described at the independent-particle level, ignoring excitonic and local-field effects
    The SHG formulas in Eqs. (2)-(4) are single-particle expressions; no electron-hole interaction is included, which is a known limitation in 2D semiconductors.
  • domain assumption The Wannier-interpolated tight-binding model accurately reproduces the DFT band structure and matrix elements
    SHG and geometric quantities are computed from a Wannier90 model; the accuracy of the Wannier interpolation is not benchmarked against direct DFT matrix elements.
  • standard math The perturbation-theory expressions for chi(2) (shift, triple, injection) are valid in the independent-particle picture
    Equations (2)-(4) are standard sums over Bloch states, derived in prior literature (refs 30-32) and used here without modification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Geometric Origin of Strain-Tunable Giant Second-Harmonic Generation in Bi$_2$O$_2$X (X=S, Se, Te)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/USJH46MT

@misc{pith2026250116741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Geometric Origin of Strain-Tunable Giant Second-Harmonic Generation in Bi$_2$O$_2$X (X=S, Se, Te)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/USJH46MT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16741}
}
abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) materials with giant nonlinear optical (NLO) responses are essential for the development of advanced on-chip NLO devices. Using first-principles calculations, we predict a remarkable strain-induced enhancement of second-harmonic generation (SHG) in the high-performance 2D semiconductors Bi$_2$O$_2$X (X = S, Se, Te). The SHG susceptibilities of Bi$_2$O$_2$X under strain are on the order of 1~nm/V, rivalling the highest values reported among 2D materials. This giant SHG response originates from gauge-invariant geometric quantities, including the quantum metric, shift vector, and triple phase product. The strain also induces a bandgap variation in Bi$_2$O$_2$X. Intriguingly, in Bi$_2$O$_2$Te, strain-induced bandgap tuning drives a transition from a semiconductor to a half-metal, and ultimately to a polar metal. Our findings present a unique platform that combines strain-tunable bandgap engineering with exceptional NLO properties, while also highlighting the crucial role of quantum geometry in enhancing SHG.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16741 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Crystal and band structures of Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Evolution of the major components of SHG susceptibility tensors in strained Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frequency-dependent (a) imaginary and (b) real part of the ‘shift’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Microscopic origin of Im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Trovatello, A

    C. Trovatello, A. Marini, X. Xu, C. Lee, F. Liu, N. Cur- reli, C. Manzoni, S. Dal Conte, K. Yao, A. Ciattoni, J. Hone, X. Zhu, P. J. Schuck, and G. Cerullo, Optical parametric amplification by monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Photon. 15, 6 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Radic, Parametric signal processing, IEEE J

    S. Radic, Parametric signal processing, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 670 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Z. Sun, A. Martinez, and F. Wang, Optical modulators with 2D layered materials, Nat. Photon. 10, 227 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    S. Yang, D. C. Liu, Z. L. Tan, K. Liu, Z. H. Zhu, and S. Q. Qin, CMOS-compatible WS2-based all-optical mod- ulator, ACS Photonics 5, 342 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Guo, X.-Z

    Q. Guo, X.-Z. Qi, L. Zhang, M. Gao, S. Hu, W. Zhou, W. Zang, X. Zhao, J. Wang, B. Yan, M. Xu, Y.-K. Wu, G. Eda, Z. Xiao, S. A. Yang, H. Gou, Y. P. Feng, G.-C. Guo, W. Zhou, X.-F. Ren, C.-W. Qiu, S. J. Pennycook, and A. T. S. Wee, Ultrathin quantum light source with van der Waals NbOCl2 crystal, Nature 613, 53 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, J. M. Lukens, W. J. Munro, A. M. Weiner, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Quantum optical microcombs, Nat. Photon. 13, 170 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Abdelwahab, B

    I. Abdelwahab, B. Tilmann, Y. Wu, D. Giovanni, I. Verzhbitskiy, M. Zhu, R. Bert´ e, F. Xuan, L. d. S. Menezes, G. Eda, T. C. Sum, S. Y. Quek, S. A. Maier, and K. P. Loh, Giant second-harmonic generation in fer- roelectric NbOI 2, Nat. Photon. 16, 644 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    J. Qi, C. Ma, Q. Guo, C. Ma, Z. Zhang, F. Liu, X. Shi, L. Wang, M. Xue, M. Wu, P. Gao, H. Hong, X. Wang, 7 E. Wang, C. Liu, and K. Liu, Stacking-controlled growth of rBN crystalline films with high nonlinear optical con- version efficiency up to 1%, Adv. Mater. 36, 2303122 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Giant optical second harmonic generation in two-dimensional multiferroics, Nano Lett. 17, 5027 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Kumar, S

    N. Kumar, S. Najmaei, Q. Cui, F. Ceballos, P. M. Ajayan, J. Lou, and H. Zhao, Second harmonic mi- croscopy of monolayer MoS 2, Phys. Rev. B 87, 161403 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    B. Qin, C. Ma, Q. Guo, X. Li, W. Wei, C. Ma, Q. Wang, F. Liu, M. Zhao, G. Xue, J. Qi, M. Wu, H. Hong, L. Du, Q. Zhao, P. Gao, X. Wang, E. Wang, G. Zhang, C. Liu, and K. Liu, Interfacial epitaxy of multilayer rhombohe- dral transition-metal dichalcogenide single crystals, Sci- ...

    2024

  4. [12]

    H. Wang, Q. Chen, Y. Cao, W. Sang, F. Tan, H. Li, T. Wang, Y. Gan, D. Xiang, and T. Liu, Anisotropic strain-tailoring nonlinear optical response in van der Waals NbOI2, Nano Lett. 24, 3413 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    K. L. Seyler, J. R. Schaibley, P. Gong, P. Rivera, A. M. Jones, S. Wu, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Electrical control of second-harmonic generation in a WSe 2 monolayer transistor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 407 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Y. Wang, J. Xiao, H. Zhu, Y. Li, Y. Alsaid, K. Y. Fong, Y. Zhou, S. Wang, W. Shi, Y. Wang, A. Zettl, E. J. Reed, and X. Zhang, Structural phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 driven by electrostatic doping, Nature 550, 487 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Y. Wang, J. Xiao, T.-F. Chung, Z. Nie, S. Yang, and X. Zhang, Direct electrical modulation of second-order optical susceptibility via phase transitions, Nat. Electron. 4, 725 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    C. Chen, M. Wang, J. Wu, H. Fu, H. Yang, Z. Tian, T. Tu, H. Peng, Y. Sun, X. Xu, J. Jiang, N. B. M. Schr¨ oter, Y. Li, D. Pei, S. Liu, S. A. Ekahana, H. Yuan, J. Xue, G. Li, J. Jia, Z. Liu, B. Yan, H. Peng, and Y. Chen, Electronic structures and unusually robust bandgap in an ...

    2018

  9. [17]

    J. Wu, H. Yuan, M. Meng, C. Chen, Y. Sun, Z. Chen, W. Dang, C. Tan, Y. Liu, J. Yin, Y. Zhou, S. Huang, H. Q. Xu, Y. Cui, H. Y. Hwang, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, B. Yan, and H. Peng, High electron mobility and quantum os- cillations in non-encapsulated ultrathin semiconducting Bi2O2Se, N...

    2017

  10. [18]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Tu, J. Wang, Y. Zhu, C. Tan, L. Chen, M. Wu, R. Zhu, Y. Liu, H. Fu, J. Yu, Y. Zhang, X. Cong, X. Zhou, J. Zhao, T. Li, Z. Liao, X. Wu, K. Lai, B. Yan, P. Gao, Q. Huang, H. Xu, H. Hu, H. Liu, J. Yin, and H. Peng, Single-crystalline van der Waals layered dielec- tri...

    2023

  11. [19]

    C. Tan, M. Yu, J. Tang, X. Gao, Y. Yin, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, X. Gao, C. Zhang, X. Zhou, L. Zheng, H. Liu, K. Jiang, F. Ding, and H. Peng, 2D fin field-effect transis- tors integrated with epitaxial high-k gate oxide, Nature 616, 66 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. Yu, R. Zhu, M. Wang, C. Tan, T. Tu, X. Zhou, C. Zhang, M. Yu, X. Gao, Y. Wang, H. Liu, P. Gao, K. Lai, and H. Peng, A single-crystalline na- tive dielectric for two-dimensional semiconductors with an equivalent oxide thickness below 0.5 nm, Nat. Elec- tron. 5, 643 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    T. Li, T. Tu, Y. Sun, H. Fu, J. Yu, L. Xing, Z. Wang, H. Wang, R. Jia, J. Wu, C. Tan, Y. Liang, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, Y. Dai, C. Qiu, M. Li, R. Huang, L. Jiao, K. Lai, B. Yan, P. Gao, and H. Peng, A native ox- ide high-κ gate dielectric for two-dimensional electronics, Nat. Elec...

    2020

  14. [22]

    Wu and X

    M. Wu and X. C. Zeng, Bismuth oxychalcogenides: A new class of ferroelectric/ferroelastic materials with ultra high mobility, Nano Lett. 17, 6309 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Z. Zhu, J. Hu, X. Yao, and S. Zhao, Quadruple-well ferro- electricity and topological domain structures in strained Bi2O2Se, J. Mater. Chem. C 12, 5951–5957 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Z. Zhu, X. Yao, S. Zhao, X. Lin, and W. Li, Giant modu- lation of the electron mobility in semiconductor Bi 2O2Se via incipient ferroelectric phase transition, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 4541 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Z. Lou, Y. Zhao, Z. Gong, Z. Zhu, M. Wu, T. Wang, J. Wang, H. Qi, H. Zuo, Z. Xu, J. Shen, Z. Wang, L. Li, S. Xu, W. Kong, W. Li, X. Zheng, H. Wang, and X. Lin, Phase engineering of giant second harmonic generation in Bi2O2Se, Adv. Mater. , 2409887 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    F. Wang, S. Yang, J. Wu, X. Hu, Y. Li, H. Li, X. Liu, J. Luo, and T. Zhai, Emerging two-dimensional bismuth oxychalcogenides for electronics and optoelectronics, In- foMat 3, 1251 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    X. Yang, L. Qu, F. Gao, Y. Hu, H. Yu, Y. Wang, M. Cui, Y. Zhang, Z. Fu, Y. Huang, W. Feng, B. Li, and P. Hu, High-performance broadband photoelectrochemical pho- todetectors based on ultrathin Bi 2O2S nanosheets, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 7175 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    J. Shi, P. Yu, F. Liu, P. He, R. Wang, L. Qin, J. Zhou, X. Li, J. Zhou, X. Sui, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, T. C. Sum, X. Qiu, Z. Liu, and X. Liu, 3R MoS 2 with broken inversion symmetry: A promising ultrathin non- linear optical device, Adv. Mater. 29, 1701486 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Ferroicity-driven nonlinear pho- tocurrent switching in time-reversal invariant ferroic ma- terials, Sci. Adv. 5, eaav9743 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    H. Wang, X. Tang, H. Xu, J. Li, and X. Qian, Gen- eralized wilson loop method for nonlinear light-matter interaction, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 61 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Bhalla, K

    P. Bhalla, K. Das, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum ge- ometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227401 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    A. M. Parks, J. V. Moloney, and T. Brabec, Gauge invari- ant formulation of the semiconductor bloch equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236902 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  26. [34]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  27. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  28. [36]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency ofab initiototal energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approx- imation with correct asymptotic behavior, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988)

    1988

  30. [38]

    D. C. Langreth and M. J. Mehl, Beyond the local-density approximation in calculations of ground-state electronic 8 properties, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1809 (1983)

    1983

  31. [39]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  32. [40]

    Tran and P

    F. Tran and P. Blaha, Accurate band gaps of semiconduc- tors and insulators with a semilocal exchange-correlation potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, S

    J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, S. S. Tsirkin, and I. Souza, Ab initio calculation of the shift photocurrent by Wannier interpo- lation, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245143 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Garcia-Goiricelaya, J

    P. Garcia-Goiricelaya, J. Krishna, and J. Iba˜ nez- Azpiroz, Including many-body effects into the Wannier- interpolated quadratic photoresponse tensor, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205101 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- wei...

    2020

  37. [45]

    Autere, H

    A. Autere, H. Jussila, Y. Dai, Y. Wang, H. Lipsanen, and Z. Sun, Nonlinear optics with 2D layered materials, Adv. Mater. 30, 1705963 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Zhao, P. Yu, G. Yang, and Z. Liu, Second harmonic generation in 2D layered materials, 2D Mater. 7, 042002 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nat. Phys. 18, 290 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Li and H

    T. Li and H. Peng, 2D Bi 2O2Se: An emerging material platform for the next-generation electronic industry, Acc. Mater. Res. 2, 842 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    T. Tong, Y. Chen, S. Qin, W. Li, J. Zhang, C. Zhu, C. Zhang, X. Yuan, X. Chen, Z. Nie, X. Wang, W. Hu, F. Wang, W. Liu, P. Wang, X. Wang, R. Zhang, and Y. Xu, Sensitive and ultrabroadband phototransis- tor based on two-dimensional Bi 2O2Se nanosheets, Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 19...

    2019

  42. [50]

    Q. Fu, C. Zhu, X. Zhao, X. Wang, A. Chaturvedi, C. Zhu, X. Wang, Q. Zeng, J. Zhou, F. Liu, B. K. Tay, H. Zhang, S. J. Pennycook, and Z. Liu, Ultrasensitive 2D Bi 2O2Se phototransistors on silicon substrates, Adv. Mater. 31, 1804945 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.