Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Novel cluster-algebraic letters for 5- and 6-point QCD processes

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Breaking dual conformal invariance turns the nine-particle N=4 super Yang-Mills alphabet into the first candidate symbol letters for six-point one-mass QCD integrals, including nested square roots and predictions beyond two loops.

desk verdict A useful, honest paper that produces the first candidate alphabets for 6-point one-mass and new massless/2-mass QCD integrals from cluster algebras; the central prediction is conditional on a conjectural equivalence the authors themselves flag, and the 162/168 count slip should be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.16743 v2 pith:UTLW7Q6F submitted 2026-03-17 hep-th hep-ph

Rigers Aliaj , Gabriele Dian , Georgios Papathanasiou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords clusteralgebrassymbolalphabetsdualconformalinvarianceN=4superYang-MillsQCDscatteringamplitudesnestedsquarerootsmulti-loopFeynmanintegralsmomentumtwistors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that the cluster-algebraic symbol alphabet proposed for nine-particle planar N=4 super Yang-Mills amplitudes can be carried over to QCD: by representing massive legs as pairs of massless ones and sending a dual point to infinity — breaking dual conformal invariance — the same kinds of letters describe planar QCD Feynman integrals at five and six points. The headline results are the first candidate alphabets for six-point integrals with one massive leg, roughly 245 letters of which 29 are genuinely six-point; among these are nested square-root letters whose radicands contain further square roots, a feature previously tied to more complicated, non-polylogarithmic integral families. As checks, the prediction essentially contains the complete one-loop six-point one-mass alphabet and, in the massless limit, essentially the full finite two-loop six-point massless alphabet, while adding 168 letters (162 in the abstract) not seen before, plus 87 new five-point two-mass letters. A sympathetic reader would care because the method turns a symmetry argument into concrete, testable input for multi-loop QCD calculations at colliders.

What carries the argument

The engine is 'breaking dual conformal invariance': massive external legs are written as sums of massless ones in momentum twistor space, and one dual coordinate is sent to infinity so that dual-conformally-invariant cross ratios collapse to ordinary Lorentz-invariant Mandelstam variables while the letter alphabet is preserved. Subalphabets for (9−k)-point k-mass kinematics are extracted as nullspaces of annihilation operators O_{i,j} — the momentum-twistor form of BCFW shifts — applied to the 9-particle cluster alphabet, and solved with finite-field arithmetic. The nested square roots emerge because the genuinely six-point radicands Δ± are parity conjugates containing the rationalisable pse

What would settle it

Compute the symbol of a specific two-loop planar six-point one-mass master integral in the pentagon-triangle topology of figure 4: if the nested square-root letters of eq. (4.22) do not appear, the central prediction fails. Equally decisive would be a three-loop six-point massless computation that either fails to produce the 168 new letters or finds letters outside the predicted set.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the cluster-algebraic alphabet proposed for nine-particle N=4 super Yang-Mills scattering survives the breaking of dual conformal invariance and thereby predicts the symbol alphabets of planar QCD integrals. Reducing the 9-point alphabet to subalphabets with massive legs and taking a dual point to infinity produces roughly 245 candidate letters for six-point one-mass processes: 119 rational, 59 rationalisable, and 68 with non-rationalisable square roots. Of the 29 genuinely six-point letters, twelve are nested square-root letters (Ai ± Biϵ ± Ci√Δ±)/(Ai ± Biϵ ∓ Ci√Δ±) whose radicands Δ± = F ± Gϵ contain a further square root in the Mandelstam variables. The m

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain stands or falls on whether the proposed nine-particle N=4 super Yang-Mills alphabet is complete and on whether breaking dual conformal invariance preserves the alphabet of every dual-conformally-invariant planar integral; if either assumption fails, the predicted QCD alphabets could be incomplete or contain spurious letters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The roughly 245-letter six-point one-mass alphabet (29 genuinely six-point letters) is the first concrete target alphabet for the two-loop planar master integrals relevant to vector-boson-plus-three-jets production at the LHC.
  • Nested square-root letters appear in purely polylogarithmic integrals with massless propagators, so existing direct algorithms for determining alphabets from Feynman integrals must be extended; the paper points to momentum twistor variables, where the nested letters simplify.
  • In the massless limit the prediction essentially contains the full finite two-loop six-point massless amplitude alphabet; the letters beyond it (168 by the paper's table, 162 in its abstract) are candidates to appear at higher loops.
  • For five-point two-mass kinematics the prediction reproduces a substantial part of the two-loop alphabet and adds 87 new letters (8 permutation orbits) that are candidates at three-loop order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism is fully general: any finite alphabet derived from Gr(4,n) cluster data should transfer to (n−k−1)-point (k−1)-mass QCD kinematics. Building the Gr(4,10) alphabet along the same lines would yield the first candidate letters for six-point two-mass and five-point three-mass integrals.
  • The specific gaps in the five-point two-mass comparison — letters built on the r2 root, one of the four non-rationalisable root types, and products of two non-rationalisable roots — may be letters that cancel from the finite two-loop amplitude, mirroring the known pattern that cluster alphabets can contain letters absent from final amplitudes. Analysing the finite function space of that computatio
  • Because the nested square-root letters carry a flip symmetry, the paper's suggestion that they originate from the pentagon-triangle topology of its figure 4 can be settled by directly computing the symbol of that two-loop topology.
  • If the 168 new massless letters appear at three loops, the cluster-algebra route will have outrun direct calculation; if they cancel, it will fit the established phenomenon of cluster alphabets overshooting the letters that actually contribute.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes candidate symbol alphabets for planar 5- and 6-point QCD processes by starting from the conjectural 9-particle N=4 SYM cluster-algebra alphabet of [17], reducing it to (9-k)-point k-mass DCI subalphabets via invariance operators, and then breaking dual conformal invariance to map these to Lorentz-invariant alphabets. The main new results are: (i) a 6-point one-mass alphabet containing 246 (elsewhere 244) letters, including 12 genuinely new letters with nested square roots of the form (4.22); (ii) a massless limit that, after cyclic completion, essentially contains the known 2-loop massless alphabet of [42,43] and yields 168 (abstract says 162) additional letters; and (iii) 5-point two-mass alphabets whose partial overlap with [44] includes 87 new letters. The paper also provides detailed ancillary files and Mathematica code for reproducing the reductions and comparisons.

Significance. If the completeness assumption underlying the DCI-breaking map holds, this work provides a powerful new source of predictions for multi-loop QCD integrals, and the appearance of nested square-root letters in purely polylogarithmic, massless-propagator integrals would be a genuinely novel structural observation. The explicit ancillary data, the reproducible reduction code, and the strong containment of the known 1-loop hexagon and 2-loop massless alphabets are concrete strengths. However, the central step from 'containment' to 'equality' is not proved, and the 5-point two-mass sector demonstrably fails to reproduce some known letter types; hence the new predictions are conditional on an unverified conjecture, and the quantitative claims contain internal inconsistencies that need to be resolved.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1.1] The method rests on the statement that the DCI-broken cluster alphabet is 'certainly contained' in the master-integral alphabet, while equality is 'not excluded'. This is a containment statement, not a proof of equality. All new predictions (Sections 4.4, 5.3, 6.2) require that the cluster alphabet be complete, i.e. equal to the integral alphabet after breaking DCI. No direct integral-level verification of any new letter is provided. Please either supply a proof or a concrete argument for equality in these kinematics, or explicitly qualify every new letter as a candidate under a completeness conjecture and provide at least one independent check (e.g., via Landau equations or a differential-equation calculation) for a representative new letter.
  2. [§6.2, Table 3] The 5-point two-mass comparison explicitly shows that the prediction misses the r2 square-root family and all double-root letters, and the text states this is 'by construction'. This is direct evidence that the DCI-breaking/subalgebra reduction is not complete in a closely related kinematic sector. The manuscript does not explain why the 6-point one-mass and massless predictions should be immune to the same incompleteness. Please add a discussion of the expected validity domain of the method and, if possible, test at least one of the new 6-point massless letters (e.g., β1 or β10) against the known integral results of [42,43].
  3. [Abstract, §1.2, §4.1, §5.3, Table 2, Table 3] The numerical claims are internally inconsistent. The abstract and §1.2 state 162 new massless letters, while Table 2 and §5.3 state 168. The total 6-point one-mass count is 246 in §1.2 but 244 in §4.1 and §5.1. The genuinely new 6-point one-mass letters are described as 8 rational and 9 rationalisable in §1.2, but §4.4 lists 9 rational and 8 rationalisable. In the 5-point two-mass sector, Table 3 implies 11 new orbits (5 rational + 6 Δ5), while §6.2 reports 4 rational + 4 rationalisable = 8 orbits. These discrepancies concern load-bearing claims and must be reconciled before publication.
  4. [§3.1, §7] The input 9-particle SYM alphabet of [17] is itself conjectural, obtained via a stopping criterion for infinite cluster algebras. The paper notes this in §3.1 but does not state in the conclusions that every subsequent prediction inherits this conjecture. If the 9-particle alphabet were incomplete, the predicted QCD alphabets could miss letters even if the DCI-breaking map were exact. Please state this caveat explicitly in Section 7 and discuss any evidence for the completeness of [17] (e.g., agreement with [18] or with Landau-singularity data).
minor comments (6)
  1. [§5.2] The header 'T ranslation' contains an extra space; please fix.
  2. [§4.2] In the ansatz (4.15), the homogeneity in the Mandelstam variables is assumed but not stated; since the letters are scale-invariant, the assignment of polynomial degree should be clarified.
  3. [Eq. (5.7)] The notation '14 sum_{I,J} s_I ϵ_J ∈ W[139,156]' is difficult to read; the sum and the range notation should be typeset more clearly, and the definition of [i,j] referenced.
  4. [§4.4] The paragraph introducing the rational letters says '9 parity even rational letters' and then lists α1...α9, while §1.2 says 8 rational and 9 rationalisable; this mismatch should be corrected consistently.
  5. [§2.4] The displayed matrix in Eq. (2.38) has an obvious formatting artifact (a stray comma after the matrix row); please fix the typesetting.
  6. [§4.1] The word 'straightforwadly' should be 'straightforwardly'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new alphabets are algebraic consequences of a conjectural input alphabet and are checked against independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the proposed 9-particle N=4 SYM alphabet of [17] and the DCI-breaking procedure of [19], both prior works with overlapping authorship. This is a self-citation, but it is not a circular reduction: the paper explicitly flags the load-bearing completeness/equivalence step as conjectural in Sec. 1.1: 'This will certainly be contained in the alphabet of the master integrals contributing to the amplitude, and one can also not exclude the existence of a good choice of basis where the two coincide.' That is an unproven assumption (a correctness/completeness risk), not an equation reducing a prediction to a fitted input. No parameter of the method is fitted to the target QCD alphabets; the 6-point 1-mass, massless, and 5-point 2-mass letters are obtained by kinematic reduction, shift-invariance constraints, and algebraic reexpression of the input alphabet. The validation against [42,43] and [44] uses externally computed alphabets and reports genuine mismatches (e.g., the missing r2 and double-root families in Sec. 6.2), which would not occur if the result were forced by construction. The small abstract-vs-table discrepancy in the count of new massless letters (162 vs 168) is a numerical/typo issue, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data. It relies on four domain assumptions: the completeness of the 9-particle SYM alphabet, the alphabet-preserving nature of DCI breaking, the subsector-containment principle, and the correctness of cluster-algebraic alphabet constructions. There are no invented physical entities; nested square-root letters are mathematical features, not new postulates.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The proposed 9-particle N=4 SYM alphabet of [17] is complete for the finite amplitude (starting point of the reduction).
    Section 3.2 calls it a 'candidate finite alphabet'; the paper's predictions inherit its conjectural status.
  • domain assumption Breaking DCI preserves the alphabet: a DCI integral and its LI limit have the same letters under kinematic identification.
    Section 1.1 states this 'should' hold, illustrated by the 4-mass box example, but no general proof is provided.
  • domain assumption The alphabet of a canonical basis contains the alphabets of subsectors (propagator contractions), so lower-point subalphabets are obtained as nullspaces of operators.
    Section 3.3, eq. (3.7) uses this to reduce the 9-point alphabet; it is standard integration-by-parts reasoning but assumed.
  • domain assumption Cluster-algebra/infinite-mutation constructions from [13–18] provide the correct symbol alphabet and radicands for Gr(4,n).
    Section 3.1 reviews this; the paper relies on [17] (self-cited) without re-deriving it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel cluster-algebraic letters for 5- and 6-point QCD processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UTLW7Q6F

@misc{pith2026260316743,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel cluster-algebraic letters for 5- and 6-point QCD processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UTLW7Q6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.16743}
}
abstract

By breaking dual conformal invariance, we transform cluster-algebraic predictions for the alphabet of 9-point amplitudes in $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills theory to analogous predictions for 5- and 6-point processes in QCD. We start by obtaining, for the first time, candidate letters for 6-point processes with one massive external leg, and discover that they surprisingly also contain nested square roots. We confirm that our results essentially contain the alphabet of all 1-loop integrals with these kinematics, and in their massless limit also the recently computed alphabet of finite, planar 2-loop amplitudes for 6-point massless QCD processes. In the latter case, we additionally find 162 letters that may appear at higher loops. We similarly produce candidate letters for 5-point 2-mass processes, whose comparison with the literature reveals a nontrivial overlap that also includes new letters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cluster Algebras, Cube Roots, and Energy Correlators in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Infinite mutation sequences of the cluster quiver Q3 generate the six cubic algebraic symbol letters of the near-collinear four-point energy correlator in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    Henke and G

    N. Henke and G. Papathanasiou,Singularities of eight- and nine-particle amplitudes from cluster algebras and tropical geometry,JHEP10(2021) 007 [2106.01392]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [44]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Two-loop five-point two-mass planar integrals and double Lagrangian insertions in a Wilson loop,JHEP10(2024) 167 [2408.05201]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [18]

    L. Ren, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich,Symbol alphabets from tensor diagrams,JHEP12 (2021) 079 [2106.01405]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [1]

    Brink, J.H

    L. Brink, J.H. Schwarz and J. Scherk,Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,Nucl. Phys. B 121(1977) 77

    1977

  5. [2]

    Gliozzi, J

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk and D.I. Olive,Supersymmetry, Supergravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model,Nucl. Phys. B122(1977) 253

    1977

  6. [3]

    Bern, L.J

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]

    arXiv 1994

  7. [4]

    Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys

    J.M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 251601 [1304.1806]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [5]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158

    1991

Show all 83 references
  1. [6]

    Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim

    E. Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim. A110(1997) 1435 [hep-th/9711188]

    1997 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Differential equations for two loop four point functions,Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 485 [hep-ph/9912329]

    2000 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Chetyrkin and F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov,Integration by Parts: The Algorithm to Calculate beta Functions in 4 Loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159

    1981

  4. [9]

    Goncharov, M

    A.B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151605 [1006.5703]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky,Cluster Algebras I: Foundations,Journal of the American Mathematical Society15(2002) 497 [math/0104151]

    2002 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Golden, A.B

    J. Golden, A.B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich,Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates,JHEP01(2014) 091 [1305.1617]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Travaglini et al.,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,J

    G. Travaglini et al.,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443001 [2203.13011]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. G¨ urdogan and C. Kalousios,Algebraic singularities of scattering amplitudes from tropical geometry,JHEP04(2021) 002 [1912.08217]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Arkani-Hamed, T

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Lam and M. Spradlin,Non-perturbative geometries for planarN= 4 SYM amplitudes,JHEP03(2021) 065 [1912.08222]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Henke and G

    N. Henke and G. Papathanasiou,How tropical are seven- and eight-particle amplitudes?, JHEP08(2020) 005 [1912.08254]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Herderschee,Algebraic branch points at all loop orders from positive kinematics and wall crossing,JHEP07(2021) 049 [2102.03611]

    A. Herderschee,Algebraic branch points at all loop orders from positive kinematics and wall crossing,JHEP07(2021) 049 [2102.03611]. – 48 –

    2021 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Chicherin, J.M

    D. Chicherin, J.M. Henn and G. Papathanasiou,Cluster algebras for Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 091603 [2012.12285]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Aliaj and G

    R. Aliaj and G. Papathanasiou,An exceptional cluster algebra for Higgs plus jet production, JHEP01(2025) 197 [2408.14544]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [21]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang,Notes on cluster algebras and some all-loop Feynman integrals, JHEP06(2021) 119 [2103.02796]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    S. He, Z. Li, Y. Tang and Q. Yang,Bootstrapping octagons in reduced kinematics from A 2 cluster algebras,JHEP10(2021) 084 [2106.03709]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang,Truncated cluster algebras and Feynman integrals with algebraic letters,JHEP12(2021) 110 [2106.09314]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang,Comments on all-loop constraints for scattering amplitudes and Feynman integrals,JHEP01(2022) 073 [2108.07959]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    S. He, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang and P. Zhao,Notes on Worldsheet-Like Variables for Cluster Configuration Spaces,SIGMA19(2023) 045 [2109.13900]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang,Kinematics, cluster algebras and Feynman integrals,2112.11842

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    S. He, Z. Li, R. Ma, Z. Wu, Q. Yang and Y. Zhang,A study of Feynman integrals with uniform transcendental weights and their symbology,JHEP10(2022) 165 [2206.04609]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    S. He, J. Liu, Y. Tang and Q. Yang,The symbology of Feynman integrals from twistor geometries,2207.13482

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bossinger, J.M

    L. Bossinger, J.M. Drummond and R. Glew,Adjacency for scattering amplitudes from the Gr¨ obner fan,JHEP11(2023) 002 [2212.08931]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Glew,Holographic correlators and scattering amplitudes: N = 4 SYM and beyond, Ph.D

    R. Glew,Holographic correlators and scattering amplitudes: N = 4 SYM and beyond, Ph.D. thesis

  24. [31]

    Zhao and Y

    P. Zhao and Y. Wang,Cluster alphabets from generalized worldsheets: A geometric approach to finite types,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 105013

    2023

  25. [32]

    Pokraka, M

    A. Pokraka, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich and H.-C. Weng,Symbol Alphabets in QCD and Flag Cluster Algebras,2506.11895

  26. [33]

    Bossinger, J

    L. Bossinger, J. Drummond, R. Glew, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and R. Wright,Singularities of massless scattering and cluster algebras,2507.01015

    arXiv

  27. [34]

    Bossinger and J.-R

    L. Bossinger and J.-R. Li,Cluster structures on spinor helicity and momentum twistor varieties,2408.14956

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster and O. G¨ urdo˘ gan,Cluster Adjacency Properties of Scattering Amplitudes inN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 161601 [1710.10953]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. Henn, P. Jakubˇ c ´ ık, J. Lim, C.C. Mella, N. Syrrakos et al.,Graded transcendental functions: an application to four-point amplitudes with one off-shell leg, JHEP12(2024) 215 [2410.19088]. – 49 –

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Klinkert, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Leading-color two-loop amplitudes for four partons and a W boson in QCD,JHEP04(2022) 042 [2110.07541]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Badger, H.B

    S. Badger, H.B. Hartanto, J. Kry´ s and S. Zoia,Two-loop leading colour helicity amplitudes for Wγ+ j production at the LHC,JHEP05(2022) 035 [2201.04075]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Febres Cordero, G

    F. Febres Cordero, G. Figueiredo, M. Kraus, B. Page and L. Reina,Two-loop master integrals for leading-colorpp→t tHamplitudes with a light-quark loop,JHEP07(2024) 084 [2312.08131]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, N. Giraudo and S. Zoia,Two-loop integrals fort t+jet production at hadron colliders in the leading colour approximation,JHEP07(2024) 073 [2404.12325]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Becchetti, C

    M. Becchetti, C. Dlapa and S. Zoia,Canonical differential equations for the elliptic two-loop five-point integral family relevant to tt¯+jet production at leading color,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) L031501 [2503.03603]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Abreu, P.F

    S. Abreu, P.F. Monni, B. Page and J. Usovitsch,Planar six-point Feynman integrals for four-dimensional gauge theories,JHEP06(2025) 112 [2412.19884]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [43]

    J. Henn, A. Matijaˇ si´ c, J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,Complete Function Space for Planar Two-Loop Six-Particle Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 031601 [2501.01847]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Broadhurst,Summation of an infinite series of ladder diagrams,Physics Letters B307 (1993) 132

    D. Broadhurst,Summation of an infinite series of ladder diagrams,Physics Letters B307 (1993) 132

    1993

  38. [46]

    Drummond, J

    J.M. Drummond, J. Henn, V.A. Smirnov and E. Sokatchev,Magic identities for conformal four-point integrals,JHEP01(2007) 064 [hep-th/0607160]

    2007 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Alday and J.M

    L.F. Alday and J.M. Maldacena,Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,JHEP06 (2007) 064 [0705.0303]

    2007 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Drummond, G.P

    J.M. Drummond, G.P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev,Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,Nucl. Phys. B795(2008) 385 [0707.0243]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Drummond, J

    J.M. Drummond, J. Henn, G.P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev,Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B826(2010) 337 [0712.1223]

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Dirac,Wave equations in conformal space,Annals Math.37(1936) 429

    P.A.M. Dirac,Wave equations in conformal space,Annals Math.37(1936) 429

    1936

  43. [51]

    Usyukina and A.I

    N.I. Usyukina and A.I. Davydychev,An Approach to the evaluation of three and four point ladder diagrams,Phys. Lett. B298(1993) 363

    1993

  44. [52]

    Dlapa, M

    C. Dlapa, M. Helmer, G. Papathanasiou and F. Tellander,Symbol alphabets from the Landau singular locus,JHEP10(2023) 161 [2304.02629]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Jiang, J

    X. Jiang, J. Liu, X. Xu and L.L. Yang,Symbol letters of Feynman integrals from Gram determinants,2401.07632

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Matijaˇ si´ c,Singularity structure of Feynman integrals with applications to six-particle scattering processes, Ph.D

    A. Matijaˇ si´ c,Singularity structure of Feynman integrals with applications to six-particle scattering processes, Ph.D. thesis, Munich U., 2024. 10.5282/edoc.34154. – 50 –

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Effortless: Efficient generation of odd letters with multiple roots as leading singularities

    A. Matijaˇ si´ c and J. Miczajka, “Effortless: Efficient generation of odd letters with multiple roots as leading singularities.” https://github.com/antonela-matijasic/Effortless/tree/main, 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    Correia, M

    M. Correia, M. Giroux and S. Mizera,SOFIA: Singularities of Feynman Integrals Automatized,2503.16601

  49. [57]

    J. Henn, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,A first look at the function space for planar two-loop six-particle Feynman integrals,JHEP03(2022) 056 [2112.10605]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    J.M. Henn, A. Matijaˇ si´ c and J. Miczajka,One-loop hexagon integral to higher orders in the dimensional regulator,JHEP01(2023) 096 [2210.13505]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    J.M. Henn, A. Matijaˇ si´ c, J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,A computation of two-loop six-point Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization,JHEP08(2024) 027 [2403.19742]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    9-particle alphabet reduction

    R. Aliaj, G. Dian and G. Papathanasiou, “9-particle alphabet reduction.” https://github.com/GabrieleDian/9-particle-Alphabet-reduction.git

  53. [61]

    Eden, P.V

    R.J. Eden, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive and J.C. Polkinghorne,The analytic S-matrix, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1966)

    1966

  54. [62]

    Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,JHEP05(2013) 135 [0905.1473]

    A. Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,JHEP05(2013) 135 [0905.1473]

    2013 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Arkani-Hamed, J.L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125 [1012.6032]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Papathanasiou,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 5: Analytic bootstraps for scattering amplitudes and beyond,J

    G. Papathanasiou,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 5: Analytic bootstraps for scattering amplitudes and beyond,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443006 [2203.13016]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bourjaily, Y.-H

    J.L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A.J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, M. Volk et al.,Direct Integration for Multi-Leg Amplitudes: Tips, Tricks, and When They Fail, in Antidifferentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes, 3, 2021, DOI [2103.15423]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Arkani-Hamed, J.L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A.B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes, Cambridge University Press (4, 2016), 10.1017/CBO9781316091548, [1212.5605]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes,1308.1697

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Britto, F

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten,Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 181602 [hep-th/0501052]

    2005 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Drummond, J.M

    J.M. Drummond, J.M. Henn and J. Trnka,New differential equations for on-shell loop integrals,JHEP04(2011) 083 [1010.3679]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Speyer and L

    D. Speyer and L. Williams,The Tropical Totally Positive Grassmannian,Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics22(2005) 189 [math/0312297]

    2005 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Canakci and R

    I. Canakci and R. Schiffler,Cluster algebras and continued fractions,Compositio Mathematica154(2018) 565 [1608.06568]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Reading,A combinatorial approach to scattering diagrams,1806.05094

    N. Reading,A combinatorial approach to scattering diagrams,1806.05094

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,JHEP07(2019) 031 [1905.08019]

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,JHEP07(2019) 031 [1905.08019]. – 51 –

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Binoth, J.P

    T. Binoth, J.P. Guillet and G. Heinrich,Reduction formalism for dimensionally regulated one loop N point integrals,Nucl. Phys. B572(2000) 361 [hep-ph/9911342]

    2000 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow et al.,All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering,2306.15431

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Mitev and Y

    V. Mitev and Y. Zhang,SymBuild: a package for the computation of integrable symbols in scattering amplitudes,1809.05101

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Besier, P

    M. Besier, P. Wasser and S. Weinzierl,RationalizeRoots: Software Package for the Rationalization of Square Roots,Comput. Phys. Commun.253(2020) 107197 [1910.13251]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Bitoun, C

    T. Bitoun, C. Bogner, R.P. Klausen and E. Panzer,Feynman integral relations from parametric annihilators,Lett. Math. Phys.109(2019) 497 [1712.09215]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera and S. Telen,Landau Singularities Revisited: Computational Algebraic Geometry for Feynman Integrals,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 101601 [2311.14669]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka,The Amplituhedron,JHEP10(2014) 030 [1312.2007]

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Carrˆ olo, D

    S. Carrˆ olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang and Y. Zhang,Hexagonal Wilson loop with Lagrangian insertion at two loops inN= 4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP07(2025) 214 [2505.01245]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Carrˆ olo, D

    S. Carrˆ olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang and Y. Zhang,Bootstrapping Six-Gluon QCD Amplitudes,2510.20565

  75. [83]

    Carrˆ olo, D

    S. Carrˆ olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang and Y. Zhang,QCD Scattering Amplitudes and Prescriptive Unitarity,2602.02783. – 52 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.