REVIEW
Auxiliary Diagnosing Coronary Stenosis Using Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Auxiliary Diagnosing Coronary Stenosis Using Machine Learning
read the original abstract
How to accurately classify and diagnose whether an individual has Coronary Stenosis (CS) without invasive physical examination? This problem has not been solved satisfactorily. To this end, the four machine learning (ML) algorithms, i.e., Boosted Tree (BT), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF) are employed in this paper. First, eleven features including basic information of an individual, symptoms and results of routine physical examination are selected, as well as one label is specified, indicating whether an individual suffers from different severity of coronary artery stenosis or not. On the basis of it, a sample set is constructed. Second, each of these four ML algorithms learns from the sample set to obtain the corresponding optimal classified results, respectively. The experimental results show that: RF performs better than other three algorithms, and the former algorithm classifies whether an individual has CS with an accuracy of 95.7% (=90/94).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.