Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ThoughtSource: A central hub for large language model reasoning data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.11596 v5 pith:UUIDL4OQ submitted 2023-01-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningthoughtsourcelanguagechain-of-thoughtdatalargellmsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 have recently demonstrated impressive results across a wide range of tasks. LLMs are still limited, however, in that they frequently fail at complex reasoning, their reasoning processes are opaque, they are prone to 'hallucinate' facts, and there are concerns about their underlying biases. Letting models verbalize reasoning steps as natural language, a technique known as chain-of-thought prompting, has recently been proposed as a way to address some of these issues. Here we present ThoughtSource, a meta-dataset and software library for chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. The goal of ThoughtSource is to improve future artificial intelligence systems by facilitating qualitative understanding of CoTs, enabling empirical evaluations, and providing training data. This first release of ThoughtSource integrates seven scientific/medical, three general-domain and five math word question answering datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Proof-of-TBI -- Fine-Tuned Vision Language Model Consortium and OpenAI-o3 Reasoning LLM-Based Medical Diagnosis Support System for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Prediction

    cs.AI 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Proof-of-TBI integrates a consortium of fine-tuned vision-language models and the OpenAI-o3 reasoning LLM to predict mild TBI from MRI scans, but the evaluation is qualitative and lacks performance metrics.

  2. Rethinking Thinking Tokens: Understanding Why They Underperform in Practice

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Thinking Tokens underperform Chain-of-Thought on arithmetic and QA benchmarks, and the paper attributes this to noisy gradients from a single shared token embedding.

Pith tools