Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Unified ab initio quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory for cavity-modified electron-phonon-photon coupling in solids

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A unified first-principles framework treats electrons, phonons, and photons in a solid inside an optical cavity, predicting measurable vacuum-induced changes in GaN's electronic structure, lattice vibrations, polarization, and absorption.

desk verdict A serious QEDFT-DFPT framework with a real kernel, but the q→0 predictions are compromised by a silent G=0 truncation. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.24095 v3 pith:UVRXXKCV submitted 2026-03-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.optics

Benshu Fan , I-Te Lu , Michael Ruggenthaler , Angel Rubio This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics PACS 71.15.Mb71.36.+c
keywords QEDFTcavityquantumelectrodynamicsdensityfunctionalperturbationtheoryphononsBorneffectivechargedielectrictensorgalliumnitrideopticalabsorption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to extend quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory (QEDFT) to periodic solids so that cavity-modified ground states connect directly to phonons, polarization, and optical observables. It builds a closed chain: from a polaritonic ground-state potential energy surface, density functional perturbation theory yields interatomic force constants, Born effective charges, and dielectric tensors, while real-time time-dependent QEDFT yields absorption spectra. Applied to wurtzite GaN, the framework predicts that vacuum fluctuations enlarge the band gap, shift phonon frequencies, alter Born effective charges and dielectric tensors, and imprint new features on absorption spectra. If correct, it provides a general first-principles platform for predicting and engineering cavity-modified quantum materials.

What carries the argument

A chain of approximations carries the argument. First, polaritonic surface partitioning separates the coupled electron-photon subsystem from the nuclei; a Born-Oppenheimer-type neglect of the nonadiabatic couplings leaves nuclei moving on the polaritonic ground-state surface. Second, the QEDFT Kohn-Sham construction with the photon-exchange local-density approximation (pxLDA) — a local-density approximation to the electron-photon exchange-correlation potential derived by a force-balance approach — describes the vacuum-field coupling through a potential obtained by solving a Poisson equation, with the collective coupling λ'^2_α = N_cell λ^2_α entering there. Third, DFPT uses the identity that

What would settle it

Measure the THz transmission spectrum of a 1 µm GaN film in a DBR cavity under strong collective coupling (λ'_α/ω_α ≈ 0.1): if the ~2.95 THz peak does not redshift by several GHz relative to the bare cavity, the predicted cavity-induced change in the static dielectric tensor is wrong; likewise, the predicted growth of the band-gap shift with crystal size can be checked by varying the illuminated area.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, within the electronic strong-coupling regime, the equilibrium response of a solid in an optical cavity can be computed from a single polaritonic ground-state potential energy surface obtained by QEDFT, with nuclei moving on that surface in the harmonic approximation. The paper formulates density functional perturbation theory on this surface: interatomic force constants are the curvature of the polaritonic surface, and the linear response of the coupled electron-photon system to nuclear displacements is obtained from a Sternheimer equation augmented by the linear response of the photon-exchange local-density approximation (pxLDA). Applied to wurtzite GaN, this yiel

Load-bearing premise

All quantitative predictions rest on the value of the light-matter coupling λ_α, which the framework cannot determine and treats as a free parameter, so an incorrect coupling strength would uniformly rescale or erase the predicted cavity effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cavity-modified phonon dispersions, LO-TO splittings, Born effective charges, and dielectric tensors become computable at the same first-principles level as electronic structure.
  • All predicted effects scale with the single ratio λ'_α/ω_α, so tuning cavity mode volume and frequency gives systematically testable predictions.
  • The predicted redshift of the ~2.95 THz transmission peak of a GaN film in a DBR cavity is within current THz time-domain spectroscopy resolution, giving a concrete experimental check.
  • Real-time QEDFT absorption spectra show both non-resonant cavity-field responses and resonant hybridization above the gap, giving experimentally accessible signatures of vacuum-field coupling.
  • The framework extends to other polar crystals and heterostructures, allowing cavity engineering of piezoelectric, infrared, and transport-related properties without chemical modification.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the light-matter coupling λ_α as a free parameter, so it cannot by itself predict the absolute magnitude of cavity effects; combining it with a quantitative theory of the cavity mode volume would close that gap and is a natural next step.
  • Since collective coupling makes the gap and phonon shifts grow with crystal size, a clean experimental test would be to vary the illuminated area in a fixed cavity and check whether the shifts scale accordingly.
  • The reported light-hole/split-off hybridization at large λ'_α/ω_α suggests cavity vacuum could reshape valence-band curvature and transport, an implication the paper does not pursue.
  • The framework assumes electronic strong coupling and drops photon-assisted nonadiabatic couplings, so its extension to vibrational strong coupling or low-frequency modes would require revisiting those neglected terms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified QEDFT-DFPT framework for periodic solids in optical cavities. The authors partition the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian into a polaritonic electron-photon subsystem and a nuclear subsystem, solve the electron-photon ground state with a Kohn-Sham scheme using the pxLDA exchange potential, and then use DFPT on the cavity-modified ground state to obtain phonon dispersions, interatomic force constants, Born effective charges, dielectric tensors, and optical absorption spectra. The framework is applied to wurtzite GaN, reporting cavity-induced band-gap changes, phonon renormalization, modified polarization and dielectric response, and predicted THz and optical signatures. The DFPT results are cross-checked against finite-difference calculations for the z-polarized cavity mode.

Significance. If the framework is sound, it provides a systematic and broadly applicable route from QEDFT ground states to linear-response properties in solids, going beyond prior application-specific treatments. The polaritonic-surface partitioning combined with Sternheimer DFPT is a natural extension of existing QEDFT work, and the implementation in QE and OCTOPUS is a useful methodological contribution. The derivation of Eqs. (10)-(19) is explicit and internally consistent, and the DFPT/FD comparison in Fig. 3(a) is a helpful sanity check. The main quantitative claims are conditional on the undetermined coupling λ_α, the κ=1 pxLDA approximation, and the treatment of the G=0 term in the response kernel; nevertheless the core framework is significant and worthy of publication after revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II C, Eq. (25)] Equation (25) evaluates the pxLDA response kernel only for G_m≠0. For a phonon wavevector q, the G_m=0 term is proportional to 4π(ε·q)^2/|q|^2 times the q Fourier component of the auxiliary density; this term is finite for q≠0 and direction-dependent as q→0. It is precisely the type of long-range term that controls macroscopic-field effects and LO-TO splitting in polar solids. No cancellation argument is given. The DFPT/FD agreement in Fig. 3(a) does not settle the issue, because the FD supercell implementation may share the same truncation, and no numerical tolerance or q→0 comparison is reported. The authors should either include the G=0 contribution or provide a rigorous justification for dropping it, and recompute the affected phonon, Born-charge, and dielectric results.
  2. [Sec. II B, Eq. (17); text after Eq. (17)] The pxLDA potential is defined by a Poisson equation and, as the manuscript states, is not derived from an e-pt exchange-correlation energy functional. The IFC evaluation in Eq. (18) and the Sternheimer equation in Eq. (19), however, presuppose that the cavity-modified ground state is the stationary point of an energy functional whose second derivative is well defined. If v_pxc is not the functional derivative of any energy, the resulting forces need not be conservative, and the DFPT response may not equal the curvature of the polaritonic surface ϵ_0({R}). The authors should either construct or cite an energy functional for the anisotropic pxLDA, or verify the consistency conditions explicitly, e.g., symmetry of the IFC matrix and satisfaction of the acoustic sum rule.
  3. [Sec. II B/Appendix B; Sec. III A] All quantitative results are presented as functions of λ'_α/ω_α, and the paper states that λ_α cannot be determined within the framework. The collective scaling λ'^2=N_cell λ^2 is an assumption introduced in Appendix B, and κ=1 is not computed for GaN. Since the predicted gap, phonon, polarization, and dielectric shifts are all proportional to these quantities, the abstract's claim of experimentally accessible signatures is not yet supported without a calibration protocol or uncertainty bounds. The parameter scan is a useful phenomenological presentation, but the 'ab initio' characterization of the quantitative predictions should be qualified accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III, first paragraph] 'QEDFT-DFTP' should read 'QEDFT-DFPT'.
  2. [Appendix C] The stated lattice constants 'a=5.9523 Bohr and c=1.6300 Bohr' are inconsistent with wurtzite GaN: c/a should be approximately 1.63, so c is around 9.7 Bohr, not 1.63 Bohr. Please correct the text or clarify the intended notation.
  3. [Sec. III A] The estimate of the effective mode volume from L_c=0.5 μm and r=0.9 is not reproducible from the stated formula Ω_α∼L_c^3 F: with the given numbers one obtains a volume many orders of magnitude larger than 10^13 Bohr^3. Please clarify how the numerical values of Ω_α were obtained.
  4. [Fig. 3(a)] The DFPT/FD cross-check is shown only for the z-polarized mode and uses a single coupling strength. Please state the numerical tolerance of the comparison and indicate explicitly whether the q→0 branches, including the LO-TO region, are included in the comparison.
  5. [Eq. (25)] The reciprocal-lattice sum convention is introduced abruptly. Please define the domain of G_m and the normalization of the Fourier transforms used in Eq. (25) so that the derivation from Eq. (24) can be checked by the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the cavity-modified phonon, polarization, and optical results are forward calculations from an adopted approximate functional and scanned coupling parameters, not reductions of the outputs to the inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The IFC in Eq. (18) is defined as the curvature of the polaritonic surface and is computed via the Sternheimer equation (19) together with the linear response of the adopted pxLDA potential, Eqs. (23)-(25). pxLDA itself (Eq. 17) is an input approximation taken from previous published work (Refs. [52,53]); the paper does not fit any parameter of that functional to the GaN observables it later reports. The light-matter coupling lambda'_alpha/omega_alpha is explicitly declared an effective free parameter in Sec. IIB and is scanned over a range rather than fitted to the gap, phonon, polarization, or absorption data, so Figs. 2-6 are honest forward calculations for chosen parameter values. The collective enhancement lambda'^2 = N_cell lambda^2 (Appendix B) is likewise an input modeling assumption. The DFPT/FD comparison in Fig. 3(a) is an internal consistency check, not a circular validation. No equation reduces a predicted spectrum or tensor to a fitted value or to a restatement of the input Hamiltonian. The G=0 truncation in Eq. (25) is an implementation/accuracy concern, not a circularity, because it does not make the output equivalent to the input. The self-citations supply the approximate functional, not a uniqueness theorem, and the cited functional is an independent published result with stated assumptions that do not include the target GaN predictions. Therefore there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several approximate functionals and scaling assumptions rather than on a fully closed parameter-free derivation. The most important inputs pulled from prior work are the pxLDA functional (Refs. [52,53]) and the collective-coupling prescription; the new DFPT kernel is derived from these. The free coupling parameter λ_α is the largest uncontrolled input.

free parameters (2)
  • λ_α = λ'_α = 0.1ω_α for band/phonon/polarization scans; λ'_α = 0.025 eV for absorption; mode volumes 10^12–10^13 Bohr^3
    Explicitly stated as undetermined within the framework and treated as an effective free parameter for systematic exploration; collective λ'_α = sqrt(N_cell)λ_α. Enters Eq. 14 and Eq. 17.
  • κ = 1
    Inhomogeneity parameter in Eq. 17; defined for homogeneous vs inhomogeneous systems, set to the maximally inhomogeneous limit throughout without sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Validity and transferability of the pxLDA functional from Refs. [52,53]
    Central e-pt xc potential and its linear-response kernel derive from pxLDA, an approximate force-balance/HEG functional; the GaN results depend on it. Invoked in Sec. II B and Eq. 17.
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer/polaritonic surface partitioning with nonadiabatic couplings A,B,C,D neglected
    Eqs. (10)-(11); authors note C,D become larger at low photon frequency (footnote 62), limiting the framework to electronic strong-coupling / higher-frequency regimes.
  • domain assumption Harmonic approximation for nuclei on the polaritonic ground-state surface and fixed lattice positions
    Eq. (12); authors state that allowing atomic relaxation leads to negligible structural changes, but no quantitative verification is given.
  • domain assumption HEG approximation for the 1RDM and κ=1
    Appendix B Eqs. (B11)-(B16); the exchange force replaces the true 1RDM with a homogeneous-electron-gas form and sets κ=1, a substantial approximation for a polar semiconductor.
  • domain assumption Collective coupling scaling λ'^2 = N_cell λ^2 with N_cell = N_k
    Appendix B Eqs. (B4)-(B6); assumes each unit cell contributes coherently and identically to the paramagnetic current, and identifies the number of cells with the k-grid size.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unified ab initio quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory for cavity-modified electron-phonon-photon coupling in solids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UVRXXKCV

@misc{pith2026260324095,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unified ab initio quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory for cavity-modified electron-phonon-photon coupling in solids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UVRXXKCV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.24095}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory (QEDFT) provides a first-principles framework for describing materials coupled to quantized electromagnetic fields. While QEDFT has successfully captured cavity-induced modifications of electronic structures in atoms and molecules, a fully self-consistent and accurate framework to simulate and predict the structural, phonon-related, polarization and optical response of periodic solids in optical cavities has remained elusive. Here, we introduce a unified QEDFT approach that combines collective light-matter coupling parameter in the electronic ground state, density functional perturbation theory for phonons, and real-time time-dependent QEDFT for optical excitations. This framework enables ab initio calculations of cavity-modified electronic and phononic dispersions, Born effective charges, dielectric tensors, and both resonant and non-resonant optical absorption spectra. Using wurtzite gallium nitride (GaN) in an optical cavity as a case study, we demonstrate that the quantized vacuum field reshapes electronic, phononic and polarization properties, producing experimentally accessible signatures in the dielectric function and absorption spectra. These results establish QEDFT as a general first-principles platform for predicting and exploring cavity-modified quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.24095 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the unified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The crystal structure of wurtzite GaN. (b) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Phonon dispersions of GaN, together with the DOS and PDOS for Ga and N atoms. The black lines represent the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The in-plane (out-of-plane) Born effective charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A thin film of GaN with a thickness of 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) The electronic band structures of GaN around Γ outside the cavity. (b) The band structures under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) The electronic band structures of GaN outside the cavity, with the effective masses labeled along the Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry Rules for Cavity Materials Engineering with Linearly Polarized Vacuum Fields

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a dark cavity with linear polarization, the effective electron-photon coupling is quadratic in momentum, so each point group reduces to the subgroup preserving the polarization axis; the paper classifies this for a...

  2. Macroscopic Polarization and Magnetization from Cavity Vacuum Fluctuations

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A symmetry analysis of the cavity-QED ground state enumerates the crystal classes that acquire cavity-induced polarization or magnetization, confirmed by QEDFT for α-quartz and Mn₃Sn.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Similarly, we define the two-body RDM (2RDM) as ρ(2)(r1,r 2;r ′ 1,r ′

    =N e ˆ ΩBvK dr Φ(r1,r )Φ∗(r′ 1,r ),(B7) wherer = (r2,r 3, ...,rNe ). Similarly, we define the two-body RDM (2RDM) as ρ(2)(r1,r 2;r ′ 1,r ′

  2. [2]

    = Ne(Ne −1) 2 ˆ ΩBvK dr Φ(r1,r 2,r )Φ∗(r′ 1,r ′ 2,r ), (B8) wherer = (r3,r 4, ...,rNe ). Thee-pt exchange force for theα-th photon mode in terms of the 1RDM and 2RDM is fα,px(r) = 1 2 (˜ϵα · ∇′)∇ρ(1)(r,r ′)−( ˜ϵα · ∇′)∇′ρ(1)(r,r ′) r′=r + ˆ ΩBvK (˜ϵα · ∇′ 2)∇2ρ(2)(r,r 2;r ′,r ′

  3. [3]

    r′=r,r′ 2=r2 dr2

    + c.c. r′=r,r′ 2=r2 dr2. (B9) Notice thatf α,px(r) in Eq. (B9) is computed over the whole crystal, rather than being restricted to a single unit cell; in particular, the spatial coordinates (e.g.,randr ′) are extended beyond the unit cell. For a closed-shell system of Slater determinant states, the 2RDM can be expressed in terms of the 1RDM as ρ(2)(r1,r 2...

  4. [4]

    To circumvent this difficulty, we approximate the 1RDM using the homogeneous electron gas (HEG) as ρHGE (1) (r1,r ′

    = 1 2 ρ(1)(r1,r ′ 1)ρ(1)(r2,r ′ 2)− 1 2 ρ(1)(r1,r ′ 2)ρ(1)(r2,r ′ 1) .(B10) Directly computingf α,px(r) from the wavefunctions is computationally demanding. To circumvent this difficulty, we approximate the 1RDM using the homogeneous electron gas (HEG) as ρHGE (1) (r1,r ′

  5. [5]

    The HEG Fermi energyε HEG F (r1) can be computed using the Fermi wavenumberk F(r) = [3π2ρHEG(r)]1/3 viaε HEG F (r1) =ℏ 2k2 F(r)/2me

    = Ne ΩBvK = N uc e Ωuc = 2 Ωuc 1 Nk X k∈1BZ X n fFD(εnk −ε HEG F (r1))eik·(r1−r′ 1), (B11) where the factor of 2 takes the spin degeneracy into account,N k is the number ofkpoints in the first BZ (1BZ) and is equal to the number of unit cells, i.e.,N cell =N k,nis the band index,f FD(ε−ε F) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, andε HEG F is the Fermi energy o...

  6. [6]

    Flick, M

    J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 3026 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Ruggenthaler, N

    M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, J. Flick, H. Ap- pel, and A. Rubio, From a quantum-electrodynamical light–matter description to novel spectroscopies, Nat. Rev. Chem.2, 0118 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Sci. Adv.4, eaau6969 (2018)

    2018

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Jiang and F

    Q.-D. Jiang and F. Wilczek, Quantum atmospherics for materials diagnosis, Phys. Rev. B99, 201104 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, J. Faist, D. Jaksch, A. Caval- leri, and E. Demler, Quantum electrodynamic control of matter: Cavity-enhanced ferroelectric phase transition, Phys. Rev. X10, 041027 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    H¨ ubener, U

    H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, C. Sch¨ afer, J. And- berger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, En- gineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nat. Mater.20, 438 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Sch¨ afer, U. De Giovan- nini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO 3: Cavity materials engineering, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2105618118 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A

    E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A. Sriram, M. Claassen, and A. Rubio, Controlling the magnetic state of the proximate quantum spin liquidα-RuCl 3 with an optical cavity, npj Comput. Mater.9, 202 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    H¨ ubener, E

    H. H¨ ubener, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. Claassen, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Quantum materials engineering by structured cavity vacuum fluctuations, Mater. Quantum Technol.4, 023002 (2024). 19

    2024

  9. [17]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, S. Latini, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Ru- bio, Cavity-enhanced superconductivity in MgB 2 from first-principles quantum electrodynamics (QEDFT), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.121, e2415061121 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, S. Latini, H. H¨ ubener, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving, Adv. Opt. Photon.17, 441 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Ru- bio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature 606, 41 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 33 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Y. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    E. J. Sie, C. M. Nyby, C. Pemmaraju, S. J. Park, X. Shen, J. Yang, M. C. Hoffmann, B. Ofori-Okai, R. Li, A. H. Reid,et al., An ultrafast symmetry switch in a Weyl semimetal, Nature565, 61 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Henstridge, M

    M. Henstridge, M. F¨ orst, E. Rowe, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlocal nonlinear phononics, Nat. Phys. 18, 457 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    S. Ito, M. Sch¨ uler, M. Meierhofer, S. Schlauderer, J. Freudenstein, J. Reimann, D. Afanasiev, K. Kokh, O. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde,et al., Build-up and dephas- ing of Floquet–Bloch bands on subcycle timescales, Na- ture616, 696 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    S. Zhou, C. Bao, B. Fan, H. Zhou, Q. Gao, H. Zhong, T. Lin, H. Liu, P. Yu, P. Tang,et al., Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engineering in black phosphorus, Nature 614, 75 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    B. Fan, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, S. Zhou, W. Duan, A. Rubio, and P. Tang, Floquet optical selec- tion rules in black phosphorus, Sci. Adv.11, eadw2744 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Neufeld, M

    O. Neufeld, M. E. Tzur, O. Kfir, A. Fleischer, and O. Co- hen, Light’s symmetry, asymmetry, and their role in non- linear optics and ultrafast phenomena, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19433 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, E. F. Kjønstad, A. Rubio, and H. Koch, Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states, Phys. Rev. X10, 041043 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Munkhbat, A

    B. Munkhbat, A. Canales, B. K¨ u¸ c¨ uk¨ oz, D. G. Baranov, and T. O. Shegai, Tunable self-assembled casimir micro- cavities and polaritons, Nature597, 214 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Konecny, V

    L. Konecny, V. P. Kosheleva, H. Appel, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Relativistic linear response in quantum- electrodynamical density functional theory, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031052 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    G. Kipp, H. M. Bretscher, B. Schulte, D. Herrmann, K. Kusyak, M. W. Day, S. Kesavan, T. Matsuyama, X. Li, S. M. Langner,et al., Cavity electrodynamics of van der Waals heterostructures, Nat. Phys.21, 1926 (2025)

    1926

  26. [34]

    Galego, C

    J. Galego, C. Climent, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, Cavity Casimir-Polder forces and their effects in ground- state chemical reactivity, Phys. Rev. X9, 021057 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    X. Li, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, Cavity frequency- dependent theory for vibrational polariton chemistry, Nat. Commun.12, 1315 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Sch¨ afer, J

    C. Sch¨ afer, J. Flick, E. Ronca, P. Narang, and A. Rubio, Shining light on the microscopic resonant mechanism re- sponsible for cavity-mediated chemical reactivity, Nat. Commun.13, 7817 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    W. Ahn, J. F. Triana, F. Recabal, F. Herrera, and B. S. Simpkins, Modification of ground-state chemical reactiv- ity via light–matter coherence in infrared cavities, Science 380, 1165 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Y. Ke, Z. Song, and Q.-D. Jiang, Vacuum-induced sym- metry breaking of chiral enantiomer formation in chemi- cal reactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 223601 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect, Sci- ence375, 1030 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Rubio, A new Hall for quantum protection, Science 375, 976 (2022)

    A. Rubio, A new Hall for quantum protection, Science 375, 976 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, F. Appugliese, V. Rokaj, J. Wang, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Rubio, and J. Faist, Testing the renormalization of the von Klitzing constant by cavity vacuum fields, Phys. Rev. X14, 021038 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Bori¸ ci, F. Appugliese, C. Re- ichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quantum Hall phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic,et al., Cavity-mediated ther- mal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS 2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- mediated electron-photon superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 133602 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity quantum Eliashberg enhance- ment of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167002 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang, J. Xu, D. Sun, B. S. Kim, D. Shin, S. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Pereira,et al., Cavity- altered superconductivity, Nature650, 864 (2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    Chakraborty, M

    A. Chakraborty, M. Pini, M. Z¨ undel, and F. Piazza, Con- trolling collective phenomena via the quantum state of in- teraction mediators: Changing the criticality of photon- mediated superconductivity via Fock states of light, PRX Quantum6, 020341 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    H. Xu, A. Baydin, Q. Yi, I.-T. Lu, N. Zhu, T. E. Kritzell, J. Doumani, D. Kim, F. Tay, A. Rubio,et al., Vacuum-dressed superconductivity in NbN observed in a high-Qterahertz cavity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08191 (2026)

    2026

  41. [49]

    E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Comparison of quan- tum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proc. IEEE51, 89 (2005). 20

    2005

  42. [50]

    J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying chemical landscapes by cou- pling to vacuum fields, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.51, 1592 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    T. W. Ebbesen, Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective, Acc. Chem. Res.49, 2403 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Mandal, M

    A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynam- ics, Chem. Rev.123, 9786 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Ruggenthaler, D

    M. Ruggenthaler, D. Sidler, and A. Rubio, Understand- ing polaritonic chemistry fromab initioquantum electro- dynamics, Chem. Rev.123, 11191 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Sidler, M

    D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Collectively- modified intermolecular electron correlations: The con- nection of polaritonic chemistry and spin glass physics: Focus review, Chem. Rev.126, 4 (2026)

    2026

  47. [55]

    Ruggenthaler, J

    M. Ruggenthaler, J. Flick, C. Pellegrini, H. Appel, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory, Phys. Rev. A90, 012508 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Ruggenthaler, Ground-state quantum- electrodynamical density-functional theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.01417 (2015)

    M. Ruggenthaler, Ground-state quantum- electrodynamical density-functional theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.01417 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Sch¨ afer, F

    C. Sch¨ afer, F. Buchholz, M. Penz, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Makingab initioQED functional(s): Non- perturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2110464118 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    I.-T. Lu, M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, S. La- tini, M. Penz, and A. Rubio, Electron-photon exchange- correlation approximation for quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A109, 052823 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    McTague and J

    J. McTague and J. J. Foley, Non-Hermitian cavity quan- tum electrodynamics–configuration interaction singles approach for polaritonic structure with ab initio molecu- lar Hamiltonians, J. Chem. Phys.156, 154103 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Mordovina, C

    U. Mordovina, C. Bungey, H. Appel, P. J. Knowles, A. Rubio, and F. R. Manby, Polaritonic coupled-cluster theory, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023262 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    M. K. Svendsen, M. Ruggenthaler, H. H¨ ubener, C. Sch¨ afer, M. Eckstein, A. Rubio, and S. Latini, Effec- tive equilibrium theory of quantum light-matter interac- tion in cavities for extended systems and the long wave- length approximation, Commun. Phys.8, 425 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    In typi- cal cavity geometries only a very small subset of the pho- tonic continuum is modified, whereas the vast majority of free-space modes remain unchanged

    The electron mass used here is the physical mass. In typi- cal cavity geometries only a very small subset of the pho- tonic continuum is modified, whereas the vast majority of free-space modes remain unchanged. The self-energy contribution from these unmodified modes is alread...

  55. [63]

    Flick, H

    J. Flick, H. Appel, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cavity Born–Oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron–nuclear-photon systems, J. Chem. Theory Com- put.13, 1616 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Feist, J

    J. Feist, J. Galego, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Polaritonic chemistry with organic molecules, ACS Photonics5, 205 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Sch¨ afer, M

    C. Sch¨ afer, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio,Ab ini- tiononrelativistic quantum electrodynamics: Bridging quantum chemistry and quantum optics from weak to strong coupling, Phys. Rev. A98, 043801 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    R. M. Martin,Electronic structure: basic theory and practical methods(Cambridge university press, 2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Therefore, below a certain photon frequency, we might not be able to ne- glect those terms, which we leave for the future investi- gation

    We note that theC kj andD kj terms become larger when the photon frequency becomes smaller. Therefore, below a certain photon frequency, we might not be able to ne- glect those terms, which we leave for the future investi- gation

  60. [68]

    C. F. Craig, W. R. Duncan, and O. V. Prezhdo, Trajec- tory surface hopping in the time-dependent Kohn-Sham approach for electron-nuclear dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 163001 (2005)

    2005

  61. [69]

    M. Guan, D. Chen, S. Hu, H. Zhao, P. You, and S. Meng, Theoretical insights into ultrafast dynamics in quantum materials, Ultrafast Sci.2022(2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    In the SI unit,λ α is proportional to q ℏ Ωαϵ0 whereℏ andϵ 0 are the reduced Planck constant and the vacuum permittivity, respectively

  63. [71]

    M. K. Svendsen, K. S. Thygesen, A. Rubio, and J. Flick, Ab initio calculations of quantum light–matter interac- tions in general electromagnetic environments, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 926 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Hsu, Chemistry meets plasmon polaritons and cav- ity photons: A perspective from macroscopic quantum electrodynamics, J

    L.-Y. Hsu, Chemistry meets plasmon polaritons and cav- ity photons: A perspective from macroscopic quantum electrodynamics, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 1604 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Tancogne-Dejean, M

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Ap- pel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Cas- tro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa,et al., Octopus, a compu- tational framework for exploring light-driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems, J. Che...

    2020

  66. [74]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni,et al., Advanced capabili- ties for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, J. Phys: Condens. Matter29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  68. [76]

    Pellegrini, J

    C. Pellegrini, J. Flick, I. V. Tokatly, H. Appel, and A. Ru- bio, Optimized effective potential for quantum electrody- namical time-dependent density functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 093001 (2015)

    2015

  69. [77]

    Flick, Simple exchange-correlation energy functionals for strongly coupled light-matter systems based on the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Phys

    J. Flick, Simple exchange-correlation energy functionals for strongly coupled light-matter systems based on the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 143201 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    Novokreschenov, A

    D. Novokreschenov, A. Kudlis, I. Iorsh, and I. Tokatly, Quantum electrodynamical density functional theory for generalized Dicke model, Phys. Rev. B108, 235424 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    Tasci, L

    C. Tasci, L. A. Cunha, and J. Flick, Photon many-body dispersion: Exchange-correlation functional for strongly coupled light-matter systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 073002 (2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    M.-L. M. Tchenkoue, M. Penz, I. Theophilou, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Force balance approach for advanced approximations in density functional theo- ries, J. Chem. Phys.151, 154107 (2019). 21

    2019

  73. [81]

    Tancogne-Dejean, M

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. Penz, A. Laestadius, M. A. Csirik, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Exchange en- ergies with forces in density-functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.160, 024103 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. De Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  75. [83]

    Gonze, B

    X. Gonze, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, F. Arnardi, L. Baguet, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, F. Bottin, J. Bouchet, E. Bousquet,et al., The ABINIT project: Impact, environment and recent developments, Comput. Phys. Commun.248, 107042 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Ponc´ e, D

    S. Ponc´ e, D. Jena, and F. Giustino, Hole mobility of strained GaN from first principles, Phys. Rev. B100, 085204 (2019)

    2019

  77. [85]

    I. V. Tokatly, Time-dependent density functional theory for many-electron systems interacting with cavity pho- tons, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 233001 (2013)

    2013

  78. [86]

    Herzig Sheinfux, L

    H. Herzig Sheinfux, L. Orsini, M. Jung, I. Torre, M. Cec- canti, S. Marconi, R. Maniyara, D. Barcons Ruiz, A. H¨ otger, R. Bertini,et al., High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Mater.23, 499 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    V. Y. Davydov, Y. E. Kitaev, I. Goncharuk, A. Smirnov, J. Graul, O. Semchinova, D. Uffmann, M. Smirnov, A. Mirgorodsky, and R. Evarestov, Phonon dispersion and Raman scattering in hexagonal GaN and AlN, Phys. Rev. B58, 12899 (1998)

    1998

  80. [88]

    T. Ruf, J. Serrano, M. Cardona, P. Pavone, M. Pabst, M. Krisch, M. D’astuto, T. Suski, I. Grzegory, and M. Leszczynski, Phonon dispersion curves in wurtzite- structure GaN determined by inelastic X-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 906 (2001)

    2001

  81. [89]

    Parlinski and Y

    K. Parlinski and Y. Kawazoe, Ab initio study of phonons in hexagonal GaN, Phys. Rev. B60, 15511 (1999)

    1999

  82. [90]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  83. [91]

    C. E. Dreyer, A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle, and D. Van- derbilt, Correct implementation of polarization constants in wurtzite materials and impact on III-nitrides, Phys. Rev. X6, 021038 (2016)

    2016

  84. [92]

    Yasui, K

    T. Yasui, K. Kawamoto, Y.-D. Hsieh, Y. Sakaguchi, M. Jewariya, H. Inaba, K. Minoshima, F. Hindle, and T. Araki, Enhancement of spectral resolution and ac- curacy in asynchronous-optical-sampling terahertz time- domain spectroscopy for low-pressure gas-phase analysis, Opt. Expr...

    2012

  85. [93]

    Shin, I.-T

    D. Shin, I.-T. Lu, B. Fan, E. V. Bostrom, H. Liu, M. K. Svendsen, S. Latini, P. Tang, and A. Rubio, Multiple pho- ton field-induced topological states in bulk HgTe, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23494 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  86. [94]

    M. J. Van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rig- nanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 ele- ment optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun.226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  87. [95]

    Vanderbilt,Berry phases in electronic structure the- ory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topo- logical insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry phases in electronic structure the- ory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topo- logical insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  88. [96]

    S. J. Byrnes, Multilayer optical calculations, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.02720 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.