REVIEW 3 cited by
A Survey of Deep Active Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey of Deep Active Learning
read the original abstract
Active learning (AL) attempts to maximize the performance gain of the model by marking the fewest samples. Deep learning (DL) is greedy for data and requires a large amount of data supply to optimize massive parameters, so that the model learns how to extract high-quality features. In recent years, due to the rapid development of internet technology, we are in an era of information torrents and we have massive amounts of data. In this way, DL has aroused strong interest of researchers and has been rapidly developed. Compared with DL, researchers have relatively low interest in AL. This is mainly because before the rise of DL, traditional machine learning requires relatively few labeled samples. Therefore, early AL is difficult to reflect the value it deserves. Although DL has made breakthroughs in various fields, most of this success is due to the publicity of the large number of existing annotation datasets. However, the acquisition of a large number of high-quality annotated datasets consumes a lot of manpower, which is not allowed in some fields that require high expertise, especially in the fields of speech recognition, information extraction, medical images, etc. Therefore, AL has gradually received due attention. A natural idea is whether AL can be used to reduce the cost of sample annotations, while retaining the powerful learning capabilities of DL. Therefore, deep active learning (DAL) has emerged. Although the related research has been quite abundant, it lacks a comprehensive survey of DAL. This article is to fill this gap, we provide a formal classification method for the existing work, and a comprehensive and systematic overview. In addition, we also analyzed and summarized the development of DAL from the perspective of application. Finally, we discussed the confusion and problems in DAL, and gave some possible development directions for DAL.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Learning Where to Simulate: Generative Active Sampling for Online PDE Surrogate Training
OGAS uses a parallel diffusion model to bias PDE configuration sampling toward high surrogate difficulty, reducing 99th-percentile errors and error variance versus uniform sampling across tested 2D PDEs.
-
Data-Efficient Neural Operator Training via Physics-Based Active Learning
Physics-based active learning using PDE residuals improves data efficiency for neural operator training on Burgers and Navier-Stokes equations while adding a physics inductive bias.
-
Revisiting Active Sequential Prediction-Powered Mean Estimation
Non-asymptotic analysis of prediction-powered mean estimation shows that no-regret learning for query probabilities converges to the maximum allowed constant value, independent of covariates.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.