REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal δ-Correct Best-Arm Selection for Heavy-Tailed Distributions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Optimal δ-Correct Best-Arm Selection for Heavy-Tailed Distributions
read the original abstract
Given a finite set of unknown distributions or arms that can be sampled, we consider the problem of identifying the one with the maximum mean using a $\delta$-correct algorithm (an adaptive, sequential algorithm that restricts the probability of error to a specified $\delta$) that has minimum sample complexity. Lower bounds for $\delta$-correct algorithms are well known. $\delta$-correct algorithms that match the lower bound asymptotically as $\delta$ reduces to zero have been previously developed when arm distributions are restricted to a single parameter exponential family. In this paper, we first observe a negative result that some restrictions are essential, as otherwise, under a $\delta$-correct algorithm, distributions with unbounded support would require an infinite number of samples in expectation. We then propose a $\delta$-correct algorithm that matches the lower bound as $\delta$ reduces to zero under the mild restriction that a known bound on the expectation of $(1+\epsilon)^{th}$ moment of the underlying random variables exists, for $\epsilon > 0$. We also propose batch processing and identify near-optimal batch sizes to speed up the proposed algorithm substantially. The best-arm problem has many learning applications, including recommendation systems and product selection. It is also a well-studied classic problem in the simulation community.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decision-Centric Large Deviations for Data-Driven Capital Buffers in Ruin Models
A data-driven capital buffer for ruin models is safe only above a pointwise profile f*; the naive plug-in of the estimated adjustment coefficient misses the target exponential decay rate.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.