REVIEW 1 cited by
MIBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Model Inversion Attack and Defense
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Model Inversion (MI) attacks aim at leveraging the output information of target models to reconstruct privacy-sensitive training data, raising critical concerns regarding the privacy vulnerabilities of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Unfortunately, in tandem with the rapid evolution of MI attacks, the absence of a comprehensive benchmark with standardized metrics and reproducible implementations has emerged as a formidable challenge. This deficiency has hindered objective comparison of methodological advancements and reliable assessment of defense efficacy. To address this critical gap, we build the first practical benchmark named MIBench for systematic evaluation of model inversion attacks and defenses. This benchmark bases on an extensible and reproducible modular-based toolbox which currently integrates a total of 19 state-of-the-art attack and defense methods and encompasses 9 standardized evaluation protocols. Capitalizing on this foundation, we conduct extensive evaluation from multiple perspectives to holistically compare and analyze various methods across different scenarios, such as the impact of target resolution, model predictive power, defense performance and adversarial robustness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Revisiting the Privacy Risks of Split Inference: A GAN-Based Data Reconstruction Attack via Progressive Feature Optimization
PFO improves GAN-based split-inference reconstruction via progressive intermediate-feature optimization, but its quantitative claims rest on internally inconsistent metric tables.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.