Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 100 references

A planetesimal's core dynamo records its redox state and mantle water content in field strength and duration, and iron-meteorite paleomagnetism suggests the non-carbonaceous bodies formed with a little water ice and degassed it.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 13:34 UTC pith:UZFSOPE2

load-bearing objection Competent forward modeling with a genuinely useful framework, but the specific claim that NC planetesimals formed with water ice and degassed efficiently rests on a visual match that the paper's own stated uncertainties undermine. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.02158 v1 pith:UZFSOPE2 submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.EP

Dynamo generation reveals redox conditions during formation of differentiated planetesimals

Hannah R. Sanderson , James F. J. Bryson , Claire I. O. Nichols This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords planetesimaldynamo generationredox statepaleomagnetismwater contentNC-CC dichotomyiron meteoritesthermal evolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the strength and duration of the ancient magnetic fields recorded by differentiated meteorites carry a direct, readable signal of two formation parameters that geochemistry struggles to recover: the oxidation state (expressed as fractional core radius) and the post-differentiation water content of the mantle. Using thermal evolution and dynamo generation models, it finds that planetesimals formed under reducing gas versus water-ice oxidation produce surface fields that differ by one to two orders of magnitude and dynamos that last very different lengths of time. Matching these predictions to existing paleomagnetic data for non-carbonaceous (NC) meteorites points to a specific formation history: these bodies accreted a small amount of water ice and degassed it efficiently during differentiation, leaving a dry mantle with a mid-sized core. The same model shows that thermochronometers cannot make this discrimination, because their closure ages depend only on planetesimal size. If right, this makes meteorite paleomagnetism — combined with dynamo modelling — the key tool for reconstructing the accretion environments of the building blocks of the terrestrial planets.

Core claim

Across the explored parameter space of core radius fraction and mantle water content, the paper finds that dynamo duration and time-averaged surface field strength vary by two orders of magnitude. Field strength is controlled by core size alone: larger cores place the convective dynamo closer to the surface, and the dipole field falls off as the inverse cube of distance, producing stronger surface fields. Dynamo duration is controlled by both parameters: larger cores lengthen dynamo activity by increasing the convective lengthscale, while water in the mantle lowers the solidus and viscosity, speeding core cooling and ending dynamo action sooner. Comparing models with paleomagnetic data from

What carries the argument

A 1D thermal evolution and dynamo generation model for spherically symmetric planetesimals, adapted from earlier work, that tracks core and mantle cooling and decides when a dynamo runs using the magnetic Reynolds number (supercritical above about 10), with the convective lengthscale set to the radius of the liquid portion of the core and the surface dipole field computed from the CMB field via an inverse-cube law. Water enters through two levers: a hydrated-mantle solidus/liquidus parametrisation that lowers melting temperature, and a viscosity law that makes the mantle weaker when water is present in nominally anhydrous minerals. The entire result is the mapping from (core radius fraction,

Load-bearing premise

The dynamo scaling laws inherited from earlier work — the magnetic Reynolds number threshold of about 10, the convective lengthscale being the liquid-core radius, and the field-strength scaling — are quantitatively accurate for planetesimal-sized cores, and none of them is independently benchmarked at the low Reynolds numbers relevant here.

What would settle it

Measure a time-resolved paleomagnetic record from a carbonaceous differentiated meteorite (e.g., an Eagle Station pallasite or a silicate-bearing CC iron) with remanence acquired more than 50 Ma after CAI formation. Endmember 2 predicts fields of tens of microteslas persisting for about 100 Myr; Endmember 3 predicts weaker fields and a shorter dynamo. A record matching Endmember 3 — or a robust null field where Endmember 2 predicts an active dynamo — would overturn the paper's conclusion that such bodies degassed as efficiently as NC planetesimals and would directly stress the model's scaling.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Paleomagnetic records of differentiated meteorites can be used as a formation-environment probe, recovering both oxidation state and post-differentiation mantle water content.
  • The match with NC data reinforces the hypothesis that planetesimals degas water very efficiently during differentiation, so achondrite water contents are not a direct measure of accreted ice.
  • Thermochronometry alone cannot distinguish formation scenarios; future paleomagnetic measurements on CC achondrites (e.g., Eagle Station pallasites) can test whether carbonaceous bodies degassed as efficiently as NC bodies.
  • Measurements on aubrites and brachinites could reveal whether multiple NC sub-reservoirs existed (reduced vs. oxidized gas regions).
  • Paleomagnetic surveys of remanence acquired more than 50 Ma after CAI formation are the most diagnostic window for distinguishing the formation endmembers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the magnetic Reynolds number threshold and the liquid-core-radius lengthscale are not accurate for small, slowly convecting cores, the predicted absolute field strengths are uncertain, but the relative ordering (strong fields from large reduced cores, weak fields from small hydrated cores) likely survives because it is dominated by the geometric inverse-cube term.
  • The paper treats the NC paleomagnetic sample as a single population; individual bodies may differ in size and water content, so the Endmember 2 match is an average. A per-meteorite comparison could reveal whether NC planetesimals span a range of degassing efficiencies.
  • The model excludes sulfide cores for oxidized bodies; since sulfur-rich cores are predicted for the most oxidized endmembers, extending the model to FeS-rich core properties would refine the predictions for those bodies.
  • A direct numerical dynamo simulation of a small, low-magnetic-Reynolds-number core would test whether the assumed scaling laws hold in the regime where the paper's predictions are made.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a 1D thermal evolution and dynamo generation model for differentiated planetesimals, applied to three 'endmember' formation scenarios: dry/reduced (E1), water-ice poor with efficient degassing (E2), and water-ice rich with water retention in NAMs (E3). The model varies fractional core radius (proxy for redox) and mantle water content to explore dynamo duration and surface field strength. The central result is that these endmembers produce stark contrasts in magnetic histories (two orders of magnitude in strength and duration), while thermochronometer closure times are degenerate with planetesimal size. Comparing predictions to published NC paleomagnetic data (H, L/LL chondrites, IIE irons, Main Group pallasites), the authors conclude that NC differentiated planetesimals were most consistent with E2, i.e., they formed with a small amount of water ice and degassed efficiently during differentiation. The paper includes sensitivity tests for differentiation time and core sulfur content, and the code is publicly available.

Significance. If the modeling and comparison are borne out, this provides a genuinely new observable—meteorite paleomagnetism—for testing planetesimal formation scenarios, adding a constraint beyond iron meteorite redox estimates, achondrite water contents, and accretion ages. The contrast between 'different condensation lines', 'migrating water-ice line', and 'NC sub-reservoirs' scenarios is topical, and the suggestion that thermochronometers cannot distinguish endmembers is a useful negative result. The paper also proposes concrete future targets (ungrouped achondrites, stony-irons, angrites) with falsifiable predictions. The model is reproducible via a public repository, and the sensitivity tests are a strength. However, the load-bearing paleomagnetic comparison is qualitative (visual match) rather than quantitative, and the caveats are acknowledged by the authors themselves.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion, Fig. 4d, Table S2] The central conclusion that NC planetesimals 'formed with a small amount of water-ice and degassed efficiently' rests on a visual match between the E2 band and a heterogeneous dataset compiled from at least four parent body types (H, L/LL, IIE, MG pallasite). No likelihood, chi-square, or Bayesian model comparison is performed, and the authors themselves state that the paleointensity uncertainties 'span the paleointensity range of all three endmembers' because the paleofield direction is unknown (Discussion, citing ref. 57). Table S2 shows the two MG pallasite nulls at ~98 and ~115 Ma and a wide IQR for Imilac/Esquel. A quantitative forward model—even a simplified one that samples predicted E1/E2/E3 field strengths with the stated directional uncertainties, explicitly including nulls—is needed to support the claimed preference for E2 over E3 (and over E1 for the 300–500 km size range). A
  2. [Methods, 'Model summary' and Sanderson et al. [37,40] scaling laws] The dynamo generation predictions inherit, without independent benchmarking, the scaling assumptions that (i) the magnetic Reynolds number threshold Rm>10 controls dynamo onset/cessation, (ii) the convective lengthscale equals the liquid-core radius, and (iii) the CMB field follows the Sanderson et al. scaling. These are self-cited and not validated at low Rm for planetesimal-sized cores. This matters because the two-orders-of-magnitude contrast in field strength and duration is the paper's central claim. A sensitivity test varying the Rm threshold (e.g., 10–100) and the lengthscale assumption would establish whether the endmember contrasts survive reasonable uncertainty. If the contrast is robust to these factors, the claim is much stronger; if not, the interpretive comparison to paleomagnetic data is undermined.
  3. [Methods, 'Fractional core radius', Fig. 2a, Section S3.1] The endmember core radius fractions are single representative values: 0.7 for E1 (EH at IW-5), 0.5 for E2 (mean NC iron meteorite), 0.4 for E3 (mean CC iron meteorite). However, the underlying distributions have substantial spread (Fig. 3c; Table S1 shows NC values ranging from 0.35 to 0.61 and CC from 0.26 to 0.50). The paper does not propagate this spread into the predicted magnetic histories. An endmember with r_c/r=0.4 (or a slightly smaller E2 body) might produce field strengths overlapping E3, which would weaken the claim that paleomagnetic data can distinguish these endmembers. The authors should either show that the contrast is robust across the observed spread, or state explicitly how sampling variability affects the comparison.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'suggest these bodies formed with a small amount of water-ice and degassed efficiently' is stronger than the internal caveat in the Discussion noting that the data have very large uncertainties spanning all three endmembers. Suggest softening the abstract or adding a hedging phrase.
  2. [Methods, 'Effect of mantle water content on the mantle viscosity'] The viscosity modification uses 10/C_H^sol with D_w=0.006 from Hirschmann et al. (2009), while the solidus uses D_w,K=0.01 from Katz et al. (2003). The coexistence of two different partition coefficients is briefly explained but could confuse readers; consider a table or a sentence in the main text summarizing the two coefficients and why each is used.
  3. [Fig. 3 and Extended Data Figs 1-2] The white 'no dynamo' regions are important, but the color scales for duration differ across the three radius cases. Consider adding the number of epochs or a note that durations are summed, since the main text mentions multiple epochs but the figure only shows total duration.
  4. [Results / Discussion of thermochronometers] The statement that thermochronometers cannot distinguish endmembers is based on Fig. S7, which shows closure temperature contours in the conductive region for a single radius (300 km). The claim is plausible, but the figure only shows one size; a quantitative statement of the overlap across radii (e.g., closure time ranges) would strengthen the comparison.
  5. [Supplementary, Section S3.2] The 'oxidising gas' reservoir boundaries in Fig. 3 are based on R chondrite sulfide volume percents, but the paper does not further discuss these bodies. A sentence explaining why they are included even though their dynamo predictions are not reliable (as noted for sulfide cores) would help.
  6. [General] The paper would benefit from a brief comparison with previous paleomagnetic modeling of pallasite parent bodies (e.g., Nichols et al. 2021; Bryson et al. 2015) to state how the new core-size/water coupling changes prior interpretations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: endmembers are external inputs, paleomagnetic data are independent, and the model's inherited scaling laws are explicit assumptions, not a self-citation uniqueness chain.

full rationale

The central inference—that NC planetesimals formed with a small amount of water-ice and degassed efficiently—is not forced by construction. The endmember parameters are external inputs: E1 uses an EH-chondrite core radius at IW-5 from Suer et al. [45]; E2 and E3 use mean NC and CC iron-meteorite core radii from Spitzer et al. [10]; and the NAM water-content range comes from Newcombe et al. [7]. These values are not fitted to the paleomagnetic data. The paleomagnetic comparison uses independent measurements from Shah et al., Maurel et al., Tarduno et al., Bryson et al., Nichols et al., and Wang et al. The paper itself notes that the NC paleointensities 'have very large uncertainties which span the paleointensity range of all three endmembers,' so the preference for E2 is a qualitative reading, not an equality imposed by the model. The dynamo and thermal model is inherited from the authors' prior work (Sanderson et al. 2024, 2025), but this is not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem: the key scalings are stated transparently—'When the magnetic Reynolds number is supercritical [37, 40,>10], dynamo generation is possible' and 'the lengthscale of convection [assumed to be the radius of the liquid portion of the core; 40]'—and the model code is publicly available. Any weakness in the quantitative support for E2 over E1/E3 is a correctness/statistical concern, not a circularity. No derivation step reduces by definition to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 11 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's contributions rest on (i) the self-cited Sanderson et al. thermal/dynamo model [37,40] with its scaling laws and crystallization assumptions; (ii) water-effect parameterizations from terrestrial petrology (Katz et al.; Hirth & Kohlstedt; Hirschmann et al.) extrapolated to planetesimal conditions; (iii) geochemical inputs from iron meteorites and chondrite models; and (iv) modeling choices the authors disclose and partly sensitivity-test (S content floor, differentiation time, constant post-differentiation water content). No new physical entities are invented; the three endmembers are parameter combinations, not postulated entities. The most consequential unverified inputs are the low-Rm dynamo scaling laws and the 23 wt% S feasibility floor.

free parameters (7)
  • Initial core sulfur content X_S,0 = 23 wt%
    Feasibility minimum for the wettest endmember; above the estimated core S content of almost all iron meteorites. Sensitivity tested 23–33 wt%; dynamo duration predictions shift with this choice.
  • Endmember fractional core radii = 0.7 (E1), 0.5 (E2), 0.4 (E3)
    From EH-chondrite model at IW-5 (Suer et al.) and NC/CC iron meteorite means (0.48±0.07, 0.39±0.06) rounded to one decimal place; the rounding and within-reservoir spread are not propagated into the paleomagnetic comparison.
  • Endmember NAM water contents X_w = 0, 0, 0.07 wt%
    Upper bound from Newcombe et al. detection-limit measurements; authors note real values could be up to two orders of magnitude lower. Used as the extreme retention case.
  • Differentiation time t_diff = 2 Ma after CAI formation
    Mean NC Hf-W differentiation age; sensitivity tested 0.5–4.5 Ma. Model runs start at differentiation for both NC and CC endmembers.
  • Critical melt fraction phi_C = 0.5
    Constant inherited from the prior model; sets the differentiation melt condition and hence the model start point.
  • Water-rheology threshold = 0.0136 wt%
    Derived from the viscosity modification factor 10/C_sol_H with D_w = 0.006; values below this are treated as dry. A model-construct threshold.
  • Water partition coefficient D_w = 0.006
    From Hirschmann et al. peridotite at ~1 GPa, extrapolated to planetesimal pressures; distinct from D_w,K = 0.01 used in the solidus parameterization.
axioms (11)
  • domain assumption Self-sustaining dynamo requires magnetic Reynolds number > 10, with convective lengthscale equal to the liquid-core radius.
    Methods 'Model summary'; inherited from Sanderson et al. [37,40]. If the scaling is inaccurate at planetesimal core sizes, predicted contrasts and durations change.
  • domain assumption Core solidifies inwards, is a sub-eutectic Fe-FeS alloy, undergoes perfect fractional crystallization with complete S partitioning to the liquid.
    Methods; [40]. Governs when compositional convection stops (eutectic composition) and hence dynamo duration.
  • domain assumption Mantle convection is stagnant-lid with conductive boundary layers; convection ceases when the combined boundary-layer thickness equals mantle thickness.
    Methods; [40]. Controls core cooling rate and the timing of dynamo cessation/re-ignition.
  • standard math Surface field is a dipole decaying as inverse cube from the CMB, with CMB field set by a dynamo scaling law.
    Results: 'magnetic field strength follows an inverse cube law so decreases rapidly with increasing distance from the CMB.'
  • domain assumption Katz et al. (2003) hydrous peridotite solidus/liquidus parameterization applies to differentiated planetesimal mantles.
    Methods; parameterization calibrated at ~1 GPa for peridotite, extrapolated to planetesimal pressures and differentiated-mantle compositions.
  • domain assumption Mantle viscosity is reduced by water via factor 10/C_sol_H (Hirth-Kohlstedt/Keller et al.), with constant D_w = 0.006.
    Methods; the pressure dependence of D_w is stated to be weak but the extrapolation from 1 GPa to planetesimal conditions is untested.
  • domain assumption 26Al decay is the only heat source and the post-differentiation thermal state is set at t_diff = 2 Ma after CAI.
    Methods; standard planetesimal model from [40]; differentiation time sensitivity-tested.
  • domain assumption Water content of the mantle is constant after differentiation (no post-differentiation degassing).
    Methods: 'The concentration of water in NAMs is assumed to be constant throughout a model run.' This is load-bearing for E3.
  • domain assumption Fractional core radius is a monotonic proxy for fO2, and core sulfur content is independent of fO2.
    Introduction / Figure 2; justified by the lack of an fO2-S trend in iron meteorite data, but the scatter is large and S can be affected by degassing, immiscibility, and multi-stage differentiation (authors' own caveats).
  • domain assumption Sulfide (super-eutectic Fe-FeS) cores are excluded from modeling; reservoir boxes for such bodies use the same Fe-core model.
    SI S2.1.1: 'the dynamo duration and average magnetic strength displayed is not valid for these compositions.' Acknowledged scope limitation.
  • domain assumption Differentiation occurred at the same time (2 Ma after CAI) for NC and CC endmembers.
    Methods: 'we adopted a differentiation time of 2 Ma after CAI formation for both endmembers', justified by overlapping Hf-W ages; sensitivity-tested.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 27244 in / 21953 out tokens · 173474 ms · 2026-08-04T13:34:23.756192+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamo generation reveals redox conditions during formation of differentiated planetesimals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UZFSOPE2

@misc{pith2026260802158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamo generation reveals redox conditions during formation of differentiated planetesimals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UZFSOPE2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02158}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In the early Solar System, an isotopic dichotomy existed between non-carbonaceous (NC) and carbonaceous (CC) planetesimals. Depending on the formation location of these planetesimals relative to condensation lines in the protoplanetary disk, NC and CC differentiated planetesimals could have had distinct redox states and water contents. However, the extent of these differences and the resulting accretion environments of NC and CC planetesimals are debated. Here, we use thermal evolution and dynamo generation models to explore the effect of planetesimal core size, a proxy for redox state, and mantle water content on planetesimal dynamo generation. We find that combinations of core size and water content consistent with different formation scenarios produce planetesimals with stark contrasts in both magnetic field strength and duration. By comparing our models to existing paleomagnetic data for NC planetesimals, we suggest these bodies formed with a small amount of water-ice and degassed efficiently during differentiation. Future paleomagnetic measurements could determine whether CC planetesimals degassed as efficiently as NC planetesimals and the number of planetesimal formation regions in the NC reservoir. Overall, we demonstrate that meteorite paleomagnetism combined with dynamo generation models provides novel insight into the accretion environments of planetesimals and the evolution of their water contents.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Stable-isotopic anomalies and the accretionary assemblage of the Earth and Mars: A subordinate role for carbonaceous chondrites

    Warren PH. Stable-isotopic anomalies and the accretionary assemblage of the Earth and Mars: A subordinate role for carbonaceous chondrites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2011 Nov;311(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. epsl.2011.08.047

    doi:10.1016/j 2011

  2. [2]

    The NC-CC Isotope Dichotomy: Implications for the Chemical and Isotopic Evolution of the Early Solar Sys- tem

    Bermingham KR, F¨ uri E, Lodders K, Marty B. The NC-CC Isotope Dichotomy: Implications for the Chemical and Isotopic Evolution of the Early Solar Sys- tem. Space Science Reviews. 2020 Nov;216(8):133. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11214-020-00748-w

    2020

  3. [3]

    The great isotopic dichotomy of the early Solar System

    Kruijer TS, Kleine T, Borg LE. The great isotopic dichotomy of the early Solar System. Nature Astronomy. 2020 Jan;4(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-019-0959-9

    2020

  4. [4]

    Quantitative models for the elemental and isotopic frac- tionations in the chondrites: The non-carbonaceous chondrites

    Alexander CMO. Quantitative models for the elemental and isotopic frac- tionations in the chondrites: The non-carbonaceous chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2019 Jun;254:246–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019. 01.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2019 2019

  5. [5]

    Quantitative models for the elemental and isotopic fractiona- tions in chondrites: The carbonaceous chondrites

    Alexander CMO. Quantitative models for the elemental and isotopic fractiona- tions in chondrites: The carbonaceous chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2019 Jun;254:277–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.02.008. 24

    doi:10.1016/j.gca.2019.02.008 2019

  6. [6]

    Updating the Urey-Craig diagram: The iron redox states of the building blocks of the outer solar system

    Amano K, Viennet JC, Beck P, Guyot F, Yaroslavtsev S, Bessas D, et al. Updating the Urey-Craig diagram: The iron redox states of the building blocks of the outer solar system. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2025 Nov;669:119587. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119587

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Degassing of early-formed planetesimals restricted water delivery to Earth

    Newcombe ME, Nielsen SG, Peterson LD, Wang J, Alexander CMO, Sarafian AR, et al. Degassing of early-formed planetesimals restricted water delivery to Earth. Nature. 2023 Mar;615(7954):854–857. Number: 7954. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-023-05721-5

    2023

  8. [8]

    Accretion of the earliest inner Solar System planetesimals beyond the water snowline

    Grewal DS, Nie NX, Zhang B, Izidoro A, Asimow PD. Accretion of the earliest inner Solar System planetesimals beyond the water snowline. Nature Astronomy. 2024 Jan;p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02172-w

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02172-w 2024

  9. [9]

    Hf-W isotope systematics of enstatite chondrites: Parent body chronology and origin of Hf-W fractionations among chondritic meteorites

    Hellmann JL, Van Orman JA, Kleine T. Hf-W isotope systematics of enstatite chondrites: Parent body chronology and origin of Hf-W fractionations among chondritic meteorites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2024 Jan;626:118518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118518

    arXiv 2024

  10. [11]

    Bayesian inference on the isotopic building blocks of Mars and Earth

    Dauphas N, Hopp T, Nesvorn´ y D. Bayesian inference on the isotopic building blocks of Mars and Earth. Icarus. 2024 Jan;408:115805. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.icarus.2023.115805

    arXiv 2024

  11. [12]

    Mechanisms and timing of car- bonaceous chondrite delivery to the Earth

    Nimmo F, Kleine T, Morbidelli A, Nesvorny D. Mechanisms and timing of car- bonaceous chondrite delivery to the Earth. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 25 2024 Dec;648:119112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119112

    arXiv 2024

  12. [13]

    Bifur- cation of planetary building blocks during Solar System formation

    Lichtenberg T, Dr¸ a˙ zkowska J, Sch¨ onb¨ achler M, Golabek GJ, Hands TO. Bifur- cation of planetary building blocks during Solar System formation. Science. 2021 Jan;371(6527):365–370. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3091

    doi:10.1126/science.abb3091 2021

  13. [14]

    Planetesimal rings as the cause of the Solar System’s planetary architecture

    Izidoro A, Dasgupta R, Raymond SN, Deienno R, Bitsch B, Isella A. Planetesimal rings as the cause of the Solar System’s planetary architecture. Nature Astronomy. 2022 Mar;6(3):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01557-z

    doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01557-z 2022

  14. [15]

    Jupiter Formed with More Tar than Ice

    Lodders K. Jupiter Formed with More Tar than Ice. The Astrophysical Journal. 2004 Aug;611(1):587. https://doi.org/10.1086/421970

    doi:10.1086/421970 2004

  15. [16]

    Precometary organic matter: A hidden reservoir of water inside the snow line

    Nakano H, Hirakawa N, Matsubara Y, Yamashita S, Okuchi T, Asahina K, et al. Precometary organic matter: A hidden reservoir of water inside the snow line. Scientific Reports. 2020 May;10(1):7755. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-020-64815-6

    2020

  16. [17]

    The action of water

    Brearley AJ. The action of water. In: Lauretta DS, McSween HY, editors. Meteorites and the Early Solar System II. 1st ed. Space Science Series. Tucson, UNITED STATES: University of Arizona Press; 2006. p. 587–624

    2006

  17. [18]

    Formation of the first oxidized iron in the solar system

    Grossman L, Fedkin A V, Simon SB. Formation of the first oxidized iron in the solar system. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2012;47(12):2160–2169. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2012.01353.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2012.01353.x

    arXiv 2012

  18. [19]

    The bulk valence state of Fe and the origin of water in chondrites

    Sutton S, Alexander CMO, Bryant A, Lanzirotti A, Newville M, Cloutis EA. The bulk valence state of Fe and the origin of water in chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2017 Aug;211:115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017. 05.021. 26

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2017 2017

  19. [20]

    Redox variations in the inner solar system with new constraints from vanadium XANES in spinels

    Righter K, Sutton SR, Danielson L, Pando K, Newville M. Redox variations in the inner solar system with new constraints from vanadium XANES in spinels. American Mineralogist. 2016 Sep;101(9):1928–1942. https://doi.org/10.2138/ am-2016-5638

    2016

  20. [21]

    A collective trigger for widespread planetesimal formation revealed by accretion ages

    Bryson JFJ, Sanderson HR, Nimmo F, Sridhar S, Brennecka GA, Marrocchi Y, et al. A collective trigger for widespread planetesimal formation revealed by accretion ages. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2026 May;681:119936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2026.119936

    arXiv 2026

  21. [22]

    Planetesimal formation during protoplanetary disk buildup

    Dr¸ a˙ zkowska J, Dullemond CP. Planetesimal formation during protoplanetary disk buildup. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2018 Jun;614:A62. https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361/201732221

    2018

  22. [23]

    Con- temporary formation of early Solar System planetesimals at two distinct radial locations

    Morbidelli A, Bailli´ e K, Batygin K, Charnoz S, Guillot T, Rubie DC, et al. Con- temporary formation of early Solar System planetesimals at two distinct radial locations. Nature Astronomy. 2022 Jan;6(1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-021-01517-7

    2022

  23. [24]

    Nucleosynthetic Pt isotope anomalies and the Hf-W chronology of core formation in inner and outer solar system planetesimals

    Spitzer F, Burkhardt C, Nimmo F, Kleine T. Nucleosynthetic Pt isotope anomalies and the Hf-W chronology of core formation in inner and outer solar system planetesimals. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2021 Dec;576:117211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117211

    arXiv 2021

  24. [25]

    Chemical characteristics of iron meteorite parent bodies

    Hilton CD, Ash RD, Walker RJ. Chemical characteristics of iron meteorite parent bodies. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2022 Feb;318:112–125. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.11.035. 27

    doi:10.1016/j.gca.2021.11.035 2022

  25. [26]

    Upper limits of water contents in olivine and orthopyroxene of equilibrated chondrites and several achon- drites

    Harries D, Zhao X, Franchi I. Upper limits of water contents in olivine and orthopyroxene of equilibrated chondrites and several achon- drites. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2023;58(5):705–721. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/maps.13980. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/maps.13980

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.13980 2023

  26. [27]

    The H content of aubrites: An evaluation of bulk versus in situ methods for quantifying water in meteorites

    Peterson LD, Newcombe ME, Alexander CMO, Wang J, Klein F, Bekaert DV, et al. The H content of aubrites: An evaluation of bulk versus in situ methods for quantifying water in meteorites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2023 Oct;620:118341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118341

    arXiv 2023

  27. [28]

    Hydrogen in acapulcoites and lodranites: A unique source of water for planetesimals in the inner Solar System

    Stephant A, Zhao X, Anand M, Davidson J, Carli C, Cuppone T, et al. Hydrogen in acapulcoites and lodranites: A unique source of water for planetesimals in the inner Solar System. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2023 Aug;615:118202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118202

    arXiv 2023

  28. [29]

    Evidence against water delivery by impacts within 10 million years of planetesimal formation

    Rider-Stokes BG, Stephant A, Anand M, Franchi IA, Zhao X, White LF, et al. Evidence against water delivery by impacts within 10 million years of planetesimal formation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2024 Sep;642:118860. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118860

    arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Silicate Melting and Volatile Loss During Differentiation in Planetesimals

    Fu RR, Young ED, Greenwood RC, Elkins-Tanton LT. Silicate Melting and Volatile Loss During Differentiation in Planetesimals. In: Planetesimals: Early Differentiation and Consequences for Plan- ets. Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 115–135. Available from: https://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2117/core/books/planetesimals/ silicate-melting-and-volatil...

    2017

  30. [31]

    The H- poor nature of incompletely melted planetesimals: The view from acapulcoites and lodranites

    Peterson LD, Newcombe ME, Alexander CMO, Wang J, Nielsen SG. The H- poor nature of incompletely melted planetesimals: The view from acapulcoites and lodranites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2024 Apr;370:1–14. ADS Bibcode: 2024GeCoA.370....1P. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2024.02.002 2024

  31. [32]

    A recon- struction of the H2O and F contents of the Erg Cech 002 parent body

    Peterson LD, Newcombe ME, Alexander CMO, Wang J, Nielsen SG. A recon- struction of the H2O and F contents of the Erg Cech 002 parent body. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2025 Jun;399:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025. 04.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2025 2025

  32. [33]

    Early accretion of water and volatile elements to the inner Solar System: evidence from angrites

    Sarafian AR, Hauri EH, McCubbin FM, Lapen TJ, Berger EL, Nielsen SG, et al. Early accretion of water and volatile elements to the inner Solar System: evidence from angrites. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2017 Apr;375(2094):20160209. https://doi. org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0209

    arXiv 2017

  33. [34]

    Origin and timing of volatile delivery (N, H) to the angrite parent body: Constraints from in situ analyses of melt inclusions

    Deligny C, F¨ uri E, Deloule E. Origin and timing of volatile delivery (N, H) to the angrite parent body: Constraints from in situ analyses of melt inclusions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2021 Nov;313:243–256. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gca.2021.07.038

    2021

  34. [35]

    Paleomag- netic Records of Meteorites and Early Planetesimal Differentiation

    Weiss BP, Gattacceca J, Stanley S, Rochette P, Christensen UR. Paleomag- netic Records of Meteorites and Early Planetesimal Differentiation. Space Science Reviews. 2010 May;152(1):341–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9580-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9580-z 2010

  35. [36]

    The Thermal Evolution of Planetesimals During Accretion and Differentiation: Consequences for Dynamo Generation by Thermally-Driven Convection

    Dodds KH, Bryson JFJ, Neufeld JA, Harrison RJ. The Thermal Evolution of Planetesimals During Accretion and Differentiation: Consequences for Dynamo Generation by Thermally-Driven Convection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 2021 Mar;126(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006704. 29

    doi:10.1029/2020je006704 2021

  36. [37]

    Early and elongated epochs of planetesimal dynamo generation

    Sanderson HR, Bryson JFJ, Nichols CIO. Early and elongated epochs of planetesimal dynamo generation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2024 Dec;648:119083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119083

    arXiv 2024

  37. [38]

    Modeling the evolution of the parent body of acapulcoites and lodranites: A case study for partially differentiated asteroids

    Neumann W, Henke S, Breuer D, Gail HP, Schwarz WH, Trieloff M, et al. Modeling the evolution of the parent body of acapulcoites and lodranites: A case study for partially differentiated asteroids. Icarus. 2018 Sep;311:146–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.03.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.03.024 2018

  38. [39]

    Pale- omagnetic Evidence for a Partially Differentiated Ordinary Chondrite Parent Asteroid

    Bryson JFJ, Weiss BP, Getzin B, Abrahams JNH, Nimmo F, Scholl A. Pale- omagnetic Evidence for a Partially Differentiated Ordinary Chondrite Parent Asteroid. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 2019;124(7):1880–1898. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019JE005951. https: //doi.org/10.1029/2019JE005951

    work page doi:10.1029/2019je005951 2019

  39. [40]

    Unlocking planetesimal magnetic field histories: A refined, versatile model for thermal evolution and dynamo generation

    Sanderson HR, Bryson JFJ, Nichols CIO, Davies CJ. Unlocking planetesimal magnetic field histories: A refined, versatile model for thermal evolution and dynamo generation. Icarus. 2025 Jan;425:116323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. icarus.2024.116323

    arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    The effects of bulk composition on planetesimal core sulfur content and size

    Bercovici HL, Elkins-Tanton LT, O’Rourke JG, Schaefer L. The effects of bulk composition on planetesimal core sulfur content and size. Icarus. 2022 Jul;380:114976. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICARUS.2022.114976

    arXiv 2022

  41. [42]

    Early volatile depletion on planetesimals inferred from C–S systematics of iron meteorite parent bodies

    Hirschmann MM, Bergin EA, Blake GA, Ciesla FJ, Li J. Early volatile depletion on planetesimals inferred from C–S systematics of iron meteorite parent bodies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021 Mar;118(13):e2026779118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026779118. 30

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2026779118 2021

  42. [43]

    The effects of pressure on immiscibility in metallic, core-forming liquids: Implications for protoplane- tary differentiation

    Bromiley GD, Terasaki H, Varnam M. The effects of pressure on immiscibility in metallic, core-forming liquids: Implications for protoplane- tary differentiation. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2026;61(4):720–738. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/maps.70135. https:// doi.org/10.1111/maps.70135

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.70135 2026

  43. [44]

    Origin of life-forming volatile elements in the inner Solar System

    Broadley MW, Bekaert DV, Piani L, F¨ uri E, Marty B. Origin of life-forming volatile elements in the inner Solar System. Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7935):245–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05276-x

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05276-x 2022

  44. [45]

    The formation and structure of iron-dominated planetesimals

    Suer TA, Steenstra ES, Marchi S, Tarduno JA, Pascucci I. The formation and structure of iron-dominated planetesimals. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2025 Dec;704:A226. ADS Bibcode: 2025A&A...704A.226S. https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/202554674

    2025

  45. [46]

    Protracted core formation and impact disruptions shaped the earliest outer Solar System planetesimals

    Grewal DS, Zhang Z, Manilal V, Kruijer TS, Bottke WF, Stewart ST. Protracted core formation and impact disruptions shaped the earliest outer Solar System planetesimals. Science Advances. 2025 Oct;11(40):eadw1668. https://doi.org/10. 1126/sciadv.adw1668

    2025

  46. [47]

    A new parameterization of hydrous mantle melting

    Katz RF, Spiegelman M, Langmuir CH. A new parameterization of hydrous mantle melting. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 2003;4(9). https://doi. org/10.1029/2002GC000433

    doi:10.1029/2002gc000433 2003

  47. [48]

    Water in the oceanic upper mantle: implications for rhe- ology, melt extraction and the evolution of the lithosphere

    Hirth G, Kohlstedt DL. Water in the oceanic upper mantle: implications for rhe- ology, melt extraction and the evolution of the lithosphere. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 1996 Oct;144(1):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(96) 00154-9. 31

    work page doi:10.1016/0012-821x(96 1996

  48. [49]

    Volatiles beneath mid-ocean ridges: Deep melting, channelised transport, focusing, and metasomatism

    Keller T, Katz RF, Hirschmann MM. Volatiles beneath mid-ocean ridges: Deep melting, channelised transport, focusing, and metasomatism. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2017 Apr;464:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.02.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.02.006 2017

  49. [50]

    Thermal evolution and sin- tering of chondritic planetesimals

    Henke S, Gail HP, Trieloff M, Schwarz WH, Kleine T. Thermal evolution and sin- tering of chondritic planetesimals. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2012 Jan;537:A45. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117177

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117177 2012

  50. [51]

    Long-lived magnetism on chondrite parent bodies

    Shah J, Bates HC, Muxworthy AR, Hezel DC, Russell SS, Genge MJ. Long-lived magnetism on chondrite parent bodies. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2017 Oct;475:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.035

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.035 2017

  51. [52]

    Meteorite evidence for partial differentiation and protracted accretion of plan- etesimals

    Maurel C, Bryson JFJ, Lyons RJ, Ball MR, Chopdekar R V, Scholl A, et al. Meteorite evidence for partial differentiation and protracted accretion of plan- etesimals. Science Advances. 2020 Jul;6(30):eaba1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.aba1303

    2020

  52. [53]

    A Long-Lived Planetesimal Dynamo Powered by Core Crystallization

    Maurel C, Bryson JFJ, Shah J, Chopdekar R V, T Elkins-Tanton L, A Raymond C, et al. A Long-Lived Planetesimal Dynamo Powered by Core Crystallization. Geophysical Research Letters. 2021;48(6):e2020GL091917. https://doi.org/10. 1029/2020GL091917

    2021

  53. [54]

    Evidence for a Dynamo in the Main Group Pallasite Parent Body

    Tarduno JA, Cottrell RD, Nimmo F, Hopkins J, Voronov J, Erickson A, et al. Evidence for a Dynamo in the Main Group Pallasite Parent Body. Science. 2012 Nov;338(6109):939–942. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223932

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1223932 2012

  54. [55]

    Long-lived magnetism from solidification-driven convection on the palla- site parent body

    Bryson JFJ, Nichols CIO, Herrero-Albillos J, Kronast F, Kasama T, Alimadadi H, et al. Long-lived magnetism from solidification-driven convection on the palla- site parent body. Nature. 2015 Jan;517(7535):472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature14114. 32

    2015

  55. [56]

    Pallasite paleomagnetism: Quiescence of a core dynamo

    Nichols CIO, Bryson JFJ, Herrero-Albillos J, Kronast F, Nimmo F, Harrison RJ. Pallasite paleomagnetism: Quiescence of a core dynamo. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2016 May;441:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSL.2016. 02.037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016 2016

  56. [57]

    A Time-Resolved Paleomagnetic Record of Main Group Pallasites: Evidence for a Large-Cored, Thin-Mantled Parent Body

    Nichols CIO, Bryson JFJ, Cottrell RD, Fu RR, Harrison RJ, Herrero-Albillos J, et al. A Time-Resolved Paleomagnetic Record of Main Group Pallasites: Evidence for a Large-Cored, Thin-Mantled Parent Body. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 2021 Jul;126(7):e2021JE006900. ISBN: 10.1029/2021. https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2021JE006900

    work page doi:10.1029/2021 2021

  57. [58]

    Constraints on asteroid magnetic field evolu- tion and the radii of meteorite parent bodies from thermal modelling

    Bryson JFJ, Neufeld JA, Nimmo F. Constraints on asteroid magnetic field evolu- tion and the radii of meteorite parent bodies from thermal modelling. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2019 Sep;521:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSL. 2019.05.046

    doi:10.1016/j.epsl 2019

  58. [59]

    Lifetime of the solar nebula constrained by meteorite paleomagnetism

    Wang H, Weiss BP, Bai XN, Downey BG, Wang J, Wang J, et al. Lifetime of the solar nebula constrained by meteorite paleomagnetism. Science. 2017 Feb;355(6325):623–627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5043

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaf5043 2017

  59. [60]

    Implications of Differentiated Late Accretion for the Volatile Inventory of the Bulk Silicate Earth

    Grewal DS, Manilal V. Implications of Differentiated Late Accretion for the Volatile Inventory of the Bulk Silicate Earth. The Planetary Science Journal. 2025 Jan;6(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ad9606

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad9606 2025

  60. [61]

    New constraints on early Solar System chronology from Al–Mg and U–Pb isotope systematics in the unique basaltic achondrite Northwest Africa 2976

    Bouvier A, Spivak-Birndorf LJ, Brennecka GA, Wadhwa M. New constraints on early Solar System chronology from Al–Mg and U–Pb isotope systematics in the unique basaltic achondrite Northwest Africa 2976. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2011 Sep;75(18):5310–5323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.033. 33

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.033 2011

  61. [62]

    U-Pb, Rb-Sr and Ar-Ar systematics of the ungrouped achondrites Northwest Africa 6704 and Northwest Africa 6693

    Amelin Y, Koefoed P, Iizuka T, Fernandes V A, Huyskens MH, Yin QZ, et al. U-Pb, Rb-Sr and Ar-Ar systematics of the ungrouped achondrites Northwest Africa 6704 and Northwest Africa 6693. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2019 Jan;245:628–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.09.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2018.09.021 2019

  62. [63]

    Carbonaceous achondrites Northwest Africa 6704/6693: Milestones for early Solar System chronology and genealogy

    Sanborn ME, Wimpenny J, Williams CD, Yamakawa A, Amelin Y, Irving AJ, et al. Carbonaceous achondrites Northwest Africa 6704/6693: Milestones for early Solar System chronology and genealogy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2019 Jan;245:577–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.10.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2018.10.004 2019

  63. [64]

    A detailed record of early solar system melting in the carbonaceous achondrites Northwest Africa 7680 and 6962

    Hyde BC, Moser DE, Tait KT, Darling JR, Yin QZ, Sanborn ME, et al. A detailed record of early solar system melting in the carbonaceous achondrites Northwest Africa 7680 and 6962. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2022;57(9):1722–1744. https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13897

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.13897 2022

  64. [65]

    Rapid protoplanet formation in the outer Solar System recorded in a dunite from the carbonaceous chondrite reservoir

    Rider-Stokes BG, Zhao X, Jackson SL, Suttle MD, Franchi IA, White LF, et al. Rapid protoplanet formation in the outer Solar System recorded in a dunite from the carbonaceous chondrite reservoir. Communications Earth & Environment. 2025 Jul;6(1):524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02483-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02483-y 2025

  65. [66]

    Bocaiuva–A Silicate-Inclusion Bearing Iron Meteorite Related to the Eagle-Station Pallasites

    Malvin DJ, Wasson JT, Clayton RN, Mayeda TK, Curvello WDS. Bocaiuva–A Silicate-Inclusion Bearing Iron Meteorite Related to the Eagle-Station Pallasites. Meteoritics. 1985 Jun;20:259. ADS Bibcode: 1985Metic..20..259M. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1985.tb00864.x

    arXiv 1985

  66. [67]

    Northwest Africa 176: A Unique Iron Meteorite with Silicate Inclusions Related to Bocaiuva

    Liu M, Scott ERD, Keil K, Wasson JT, Clayton RN, Mayeda T, et al. Northwest Africa 176: A Unique Iron Meteorite with Silicate Inclusions Related to Bocaiuva

  67. [68]

    Silicate-bearing iron meteorites and their implications for the evo- lution of asteroidal parent bodies

    Ruzicka A. Silicate-bearing iron meteorites and their implications for the evo- lution of asteroidal parent bodies. Geochemistry. 2014 Mar;74(1):3–48. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2013.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2013.10.001 2014

  68. [69]

    Enstatite achondrite meteorites (aubrites) and the histories of their asteroidal parent bodies

    Keil K. Enstatite achondrite meteorites (aubrites) and the histories of their asteroidal parent bodies. Geochemistry. 2010 Jan;70(4):295–317. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chemer.2010.02.002

    doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2010.02.002 2010

  69. [70]

    A large proto-Mercury as the aubrite parent body; 2022

    Cartier C, Charlier B, Boyet M, Spalding C, Namur O. A large proto-Mercury as the aubrite parent body; 2022. p. 135–135. ADS Bibcode: 2022merc.conf..135C. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022merc.conf..135C

    2022

  70. [71]

    Geochemical constraints on core-mantle differ- entiation in Mercury and the aubrite parent body

    Steenstra ES, van Westrenen W. Geochemical constraints on core-mantle differ- entiation in Mercury and the aubrite parent body. Icarus. 2020 Apr;340:113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113621

    arXiv 2020

  71. [72]

    Parent body histories recorded in Rumuruti chondrite sulfides: Implications for the onset of oxidized, sulfur-rich core forma- tion

    Crossley SD, Ash RD, Sunshine JM, Corrigan CM, McCoy TJ. Parent body histories recorded in Rumuruti chondrite sulfides: Implications for the onset of oxidized, sulfur-rich core forma- tion. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2023;58(3):383–404. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/maps.13959. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/maps.13959

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.13959 2023

  72. [73]

    The impact history and prolonged magmatism of the angrite parent body

    Rider-Stokes BG, Anand M, White LF, Darling JR, Tart` ese R, White- house MJ, et al. The impact history and prolonged magmatism of the angrite parent body. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2024;59(1):23–39. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/maps.14102. https:// doi.org/10.1111/maps.14102. 35

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.14102 2024

  73. [74]

    The effect of melt composition on metal-silicate partitioning of siderophile elements and constraints on core formation in the angrite parent body

    Steenstra ES, Sitabi AB, Lin YH, Rai N, Knibbe JS, Berndt J, et al. The effect of melt composition on metal-silicate partitioning of siderophile elements and constraints on core formation in the angrite parent body. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2017 Sep;212:62–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.05. 034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2017.05 2017

  74. [75]

    Chronology of the angrite parent body and implications for core formation in protoplanets

    Kleine T, Hans U, Irving AJ, Bourdon B. Chronology of the angrite parent body and implications for core formation in protoplanets. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2012 May;84:186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.032 2012

  75. [76]

    Appraising the late-stage magmatic fO2 of diabasic angrites with a novel phase equilibrium approach

    Bell AS, Shearer C, Pinkham L, Irving AJ. Appraising the late-stage magmatic fO2 of diabasic angrites with a novel phase equilibrium approach. Implications for new and existing models of angrite petrogenesis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2023 May;348:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2023.02.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2023.02.019 2023

  76. [77]

    The fate of magmas in planetesimals and the reten- tion of primitive chondritic crusts

    Fu RR, Elkins-Tanton LT. The fate of magmas in planetesimals and the reten- tion of primitive chondritic crusts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2014 Mar;390:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.047

    doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.047 2014

  77. [78]

    Origin and Evolution of Volatile-rich Aster- oids

    Castillo-Rogez J, Young ED. Origin and Evolution of Volatile-rich Aster- oids. In: Planetesimals: Early Differentiation and Consequences for Planets. Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 92–114. Pages: 92-114 Publisher: Cam- bridge University Press. Available from: https://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk: 2117/core/books/planetesimals/origin-and-evolution-o...

    2017

  78. [79]

    Slow evolution of Europa’s interior: metamorphic ocean origin, delayed metallic core formation, and limited seafloor volcanism

    Trinh KT, Bierson CJ, O’Rourke JG. Slow evolution of Europa’s interior: metamorphic ocean origin, delayed metallic core formation, and limited seafloor volcanism. Science Advances. 2023 Jun;9(24):eadf3955. https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.adf3955. 36

    2023

  79. [80]

    Recurrent planetesimal formation in an outer part of the early solar system

    Neumann W, Ma N, Bouvier A, Trieloff M. Recurrent planetesimal formation in an outer part of the early solar system. Scientific Reports. 2024 Jul;14(1):14017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63768-4

    doi:10.1038/s41598-024-63768-4 2024

  80. [81]

    The composition of KLB- 1 peridotite

    Davis F A, Tangeman JA, Tenner TJ, Hirschmann MM. The composition of KLB- 1 peridotite. American Mineralogist. 2009 Jan;94(1):176–180. https://doi.org/ 10.2138/am.2009.2984

    arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.