pith. sign in

arxiv: 1207.3959 · v2 · pith:V3TATG2Mnew · submitted 2012-07-17 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Light mass galileons: Cosmological dynamics, mass screening and observational constraints

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords fieldgalileonmasscosmologicallightadditionalconstraintsdynamics
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we examine the cosmological viability of a light mass galileon field consistent with local gravity constraints. The minimal, L_3=\Box\phi(\partial_\mu \phi)^2, massless galileon field requires an additional term in order to give rise to a viable ghost free late time acceleration of Universe. The desired cosmological dynamics can either be achieved by incorporating an additional terms in the action such as (L_4,L_5) - the higher order galileon Lagrangians or by considering a light mass field a la galileon field potential. We analyse the second possibility and find that: (1) The model produces a viable cosmology in the regime where the non-linear galileon field is subdominant, (2) The Vainshtein mechanism operates at small scales where the non-linear effects become important and contribution of the field potential ceases to be significant. Also the small mass of the field under consideration is protected against strong quantum corrections thereby providing quantum stability to the system.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Galileon versus Quintessence: A comparative phase space analysis and late-time cosmic relevance

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Light-mass Galileon models with cubic interactions and three tested potentials have no stable late-time accelerating attractors in phase space, unlike quintessence which has stable de-Sitter attractors for cosh potentials.