Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Synthetic Dialogue Dataset Generation using LLM Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17461 v1 pith:V44RUSNX submitted 2024-01-30 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords agentdialoguesevaluationuserconversationallineargenerationhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Linear programming (LP) problems are pervasive in real-life applications. However, despite their apparent simplicity, an untrained user may find it difficult to determine the linear model of their specific problem. We envisage the creation of a goal-oriented conversational agent that will engage in conversation with the user to elicit all information required so that a subsequent agent can generate the linear model. In this paper, we present an approach for the generation of sample dialogues that can be used to develop and train such a conversational agent. Using prompt engineering, we develop two agents that "talk" to each other, one acting as the conversational agent, and the other acting as the user. Using a set of text descriptions of linear problems from NL4Opt available to the user only, the agent and the user engage in conversation until the agent has retrieved all key information from the original problem description. We also propose an extrinsic evaluation of the dialogues by assessing how well the summaries generated by the dialogues match the original problem descriptions. We conduct human and automatic evaluations, including an evaluation approach that uses GPT-4 to mimic the human evaluation metrics. The evaluation results show an overall good quality of the dialogues, though research is still needed to improve the quality of the GPT-4 evaluation metrics. The resulting dialogues, including the human annotations of a subset, are available to the research community. The conversational agent used for the generation of the dialogues can be used as a baseline.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Separation Logic of Generic Resources via Sheafeology

    cs.LO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sheafeology uses sheaf categories to make first-order logic resource-aware, yielding separation logics for generic resources such as memory and random variables.

  2. DatasetAgent: A Novel Multi-Agent System for Auto-Constructing Datasets from Real-World Images

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DatasetAgent is an LLM-powered multi-agent pipeline that automatically constructs image classification, detection, and segmentation datasets from web images, with modest downstream gains shown but weak experimental controls.

  3. Foundation Model Empowered Synesthesia of Machines (SoM): AI-native Intelligent Multi-Modal Sensing-Communication Integration

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a systematic classification and two roadmaps for using foundation models (LLMs and wireless foundation models) to design Synesthesia of Machines systems for 6G, with preliminary case-study evidence ...

Pith tools