Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hybrid Quantum-Classical Machine Learning for Sentiment Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.10672 v1 pith:V4B4RRMP submitted 2023-10-08 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords analysisclassicalhybridlearningmachinequantumsentimentalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The collaboration between quantum computing and classical machine learning offers potential advantages in natural language processing, particularly in the sentiment analysis of human emotions and opinions expressed in large-scale datasets. In this work, we propose a methodology for sentiment analysis using hybrid quantum-classical machine learning algorithms. We investigate quantum kernel approaches and variational quantum circuit-based classifiers and integrate them with classical dimension reduction techniques such as PCA and Haar wavelet transform. The proposed methodology is evaluated using two distinct datasets, based on English and Bengali languages. Experimental results show that after dimensionality reduction of the data, performance of the quantum-based hybrid algorithms were consistent and better than classical methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SentiQNF: A Novel Approach to Sentiment Analysis Using Quantum Algorithms and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A small variational quantum classifier with a renamed fuzzy layer reports 100% and 90% sentiment accuracy, but the 100% result conflicts with its own false-positive and false-negative metrics.

Pith tools