Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.11047 v1 pith:V4ZPBFBU submitted 2019-12-23 quant-ph

Destructive Error Interference in Product-Formula Lattice Simulation

classification quant-ph
keywords errorepsilonestimatealgorithmcountdynamicsfirst-orderformula
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum computers can efficiently simulate the dynamics of quantum systems. In this paper, we study the cost of digitally simulating the dynamics of several physically relevant systems using the first-order product formula algorithm. We show that the errors from different Trotterization steps in the algorithm can interfere destructively, yielding a much smaller error than previously estimated. In particular, we prove that the total error in simulating a nearest-neighbor interacting system of $n$ sites for time $t$ using the first-order product formula with $r$ time slices is $O({nt}/{r}+{nt^3}/{r^2})$ when $nt^2/r$ is less than a small constant. Given an error tolerance $\epsilon$, the error bound yields an estimate of $\max\{O({n^2t}/{\epsilon}),O({n^2 t^{3/2}}/{\epsilon^{1/2}})\}$ for the total gate count of the simulation. The estimate is tighter than previous bounds and matches the empirical performance observed in Childs et al. [PNAS 115, 9456-9461 (2018)]. We also provide numerical evidence for potential improvements and conjecture an even tighter estimate for the gate count.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.