Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Beyond Direct Diagnosis: LLM-based Multi-Specialist Agent Consultation for Automatic Diagnosis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16107 v1 pith:V6TGOQJF submitted 2024-01-29 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords diagnosisautomaticconsultationagentsapproachdiseaseslanguagellm-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic diagnosis is a significant application of AI in healthcare, where diagnoses are generated based on the symptom description of patients. Previous works have approached this task directly by modeling the relationship between the normalized symptoms and all possible diseases. However, in the clinical diagnostic process, patients are initially consulted by a general practitioner and, if necessary, referred to specialists in specific domains for a more comprehensive evaluation. The final diagnosis often emerges from a collaborative consultation among medical specialist groups. Recently, large language models have shown impressive capabilities in natural language understanding. In this study, we adopt tuning-free LLM-based agents as medical practitioners and propose the Agent-derived Multi-Specialist Consultation (AMSC) framework to model the diagnosis process in the real world by adaptively fusing probability distributions of agents over potential diseases. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach compared with baselines. Notably, our approach requires significantly less parameter updating and training time, enhancing efficiency and practical utility. Furthermore, we delve into a novel perspective on the role of implicit symptoms within the context of automatic diagnosis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WSI-Agents: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System for Multi-Modal Whole Slide Image Analysis

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A route, verify, and summarize agent system uses existing pathology models and a knowledge base to select the best whole-slide image answer.

  2. Silence is Not Consensus: Disrupting Agreement Bias in Multi-Agent LLMs via Catfish Agent for Clinical Decision Making

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A "catfish" agent that injects structured dissent into multi-agent LLM teams improves clinical question-answering accuracy by reducing premature consensus.

  3. Agentic AI Systems Applied to tasks in Financial Services: Modeling and model risk management crews

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CrewAI-based multi-agent system with human oversight built financial models and carried out model risk management checks on three public credit datasets, with results comparable to AutoML and Kaggle baselines.

Pith tools