The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2508.01643 · v1 · pith:V7Z7EG6B · submitted 2025-08-03 · cs.IR · cs.CL

ChEmbed: Enhancing Chemical Literature Search Through Domain-Specific Text Embeddings

Reviewed by Pithpith:V7Z7EG6Bopen to challenge →

classification cs.IR cs.CL
keywords chemicalembeddingmodelsretrievalchembedliteraturetextchemrxiv
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in chemistry heavily depend on accurate and relevant retrieval of chemical literature. However, general-purpose text embedding models frequently fail to adequately represent complex chemical terminologies, resulting in suboptimal retrieval quality. Specialized embedding models tailored to chemical literature retrieval have not yet been developed, leaving a substantial performance gap. To address this challenge, we introduce ChEmbed, a domain-adapted family of text embedding models fine-tuned on a dataset comprising chemistry-specific text from the PubChem, Semantic Scholar, and ChemRxiv corpora. To create effective training data, we employ large language models to synthetically generate queries, resulting in approximately 1.7 million high-quality query-passage pairs. Additionally, we augment the tokenizer by adding 900 chemically specialized tokens to previously unused slots, which significantly reduces the fragmentation of chemical entities, such as IUPAC names. ChEmbed also maintains a 8192-token context length, enabling the efficient retrieval of longer passages compared to many other open-source embedding models, which typically have a context length of 512 or 2048 tokens. Evaluated on our newly introduced ChemRxiv Retrieval benchmark, ChEmbed outperforms state-of-the-art general embedding models, raising nDCG@10 from 0.82 to 0.91 (+9 pp). ChEmbed represents a practical, lightweight, and reproducible embedding solution that effectively improves retrieval for chemical literature search.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Iterative RAG Beats Ideal Evidence: A Diagnostic Study in Scientific Multi-hop Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    Iterative RAG outperforms Gold Context RAG by up to 25.6 points on ChemKGMultiHopQA across 11 LLMs, mainly by staging retrieval to avoid context overload and correct hypothesis drift.