Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Exact convergence rate of the last iterate in subgradient methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.11134 v1 pith:VBJJJF7E submitted 2023-07-20 math.OC

Exact convergence rate of the last iterate in subgradient methods

classification math.OC
keywords iteratesubgradientconvergenceratesteplastsqrtaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study the convergence of the last iterate in subgradient methods applied to the minimization of a nonsmooth convex function with bounded subgradients. We first introduce a proof technique that generalizes the standard analysis of subgradient methods. It is based on tracking the distance between the current iterate and a different reference point at each iteration. Using this technique, we obtain the exact worst-case convergence rate for the objective accuracy of the last iterate of the projected subgradient method with either constant step sizes or constant step lengths. Tightness is shown with a worst-case instance matching the established convergence rate. We also derive the value of the optimal constant step size when performing $N$ iterations, for which we find that the last iterate accuracy is smaller than $B R \sqrt{1+\log(N)/4}/{\sqrt{N+1}}$ %$\frac{B R \log N}{\sqrt{N+1}}$ , where $B$ is a bound on the subgradient norm and $R$ is a bound on the distance between the initial iterate and a minimizer. Finally, we introduce a new optimal subgradient method that achieves the best possible last-iterate accuracy after a given number $N$ of iterations. Its convergence rate ${B R}/{\sqrt{N+1}}$ matches exactly the lower bound on the performance of any black-box method on the considered problem class. We also show that there is no universal sequence of step sizes that simultaneously achieves this optimal rate at each iteration, meaning that the dependence of the step size sequence in $N$ is unavoidable.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gradient Descent's Last Iterate is Often (slightly) Suboptimal

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Proves it is impossible to achieve optimal last-iterate rates for GD and SGD without knowing the horizon T in advance, incurring an unavoidable poly-log factor penalty even in the deterministic case.

  2. Mirror Descent Beyond Euclidean Stability: An Exponential Separation in Initialization Sensitivity

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    Non-quadratic Mirror Descent exhibits exponential initialization sensitivity in convex settings, shown via 3D constructions and KL-regularized simplex examples, with Bregman anchoring proposed for stabilization.

  3. Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOs

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Scion is a new stochastic LMO-based optimizer family that unifies existing methods, supports unconstrained problems, and delivers hyperparameter transferability plus speedups on nanoGPT training.

  4. Convergence of Continual Learning in Homogeneous Deep Networks

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Continual classification in homogeneous models is sequential projections onto margin sets, with local linear convergence under regularity properties for random and cyclic tasks, extended to regression.