Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Fair and autonomous sharing of federate learning models in mobile Internet of Things

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.10650 v2 pith:VCHTA5NW submitted 2020-07-21 cs.CR

Fair and autonomous sharing of federate learning models in mobile Internet of Things

classification cs.CR
keywords modelsharingdatalearningmobiletrustedchallengesfederate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Federate learning can conduct machine learning as well as protect the privacy of self-owned training data on corresponding ends, instead of having to upload to a central trusted data aggregation server. In mobile scenarios, a centralized trusted server may not be existing, and even though it exists, the delay will not be manageable, e.g., smart driving cars. Thus, mobile federate learning at the edge with privacy-awareness is attracted more and more attentions. It then imposes a problem - after data are trained on a mobile terminal to obtain a learned model, how to share the model parameters among others to create more accurate and robust accumulative final model. This kind of model sharing confronts several challenges, e.g., the sharing must be conducted without a third trusted party (autonomously), and the sharing must be fair as model training (by training data)is valuable. To tackle the above challenges, we propose a smart contract and IPFS (Inter-Planetary File System) based model sharing protocol and algorithms to address the challenges. The proposed protocol does not rely on a trusted third party, where individual-learned models are shared/stored in corresponding ends. Conducted through extensive experiments, three main steps of the proposed protocol are evaluated. The average executive time of the three steps are 0.059s, 0.060s and 0.032s, demonstrating its efficiency.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.