Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 88 references

This paper derives a closed-form expression for the Gaussian covariance of pseudo-C_ℓ power spectra for fields sampled at discrete catalogue positions, treating self-pair shot noise exactly.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:53 UTC pith:VD2QIMHD

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful generalization of iNKA to catalogue-based pseudo-Cℓ covariances, with one unresolved high-ℓ validation outlier that needs a direct check before I'd call it fully validated. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14843 v1 pith:VD2QIMHD submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.CO

Analytical covariances for catalogue-based pseudo-C_ells

Kevin Wolz , Elyas Farah , Robert Reischke , David Alonso , Andrina Nicola This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords pseudo-C_ℓcatalogue-based fieldsGaussian covariancenarrow kernel approximationshot noiseangular power spectrumcosmic shearfast radio bursts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Most cosmological probes—galaxy clustering, cosmic shear, fast radio burst dispersion measures—are measured at discrete source positions rather than on continuous maps. This paper claims that the covariance matrix of the pseudo-C_ℓ power spectrum estimators for such catalogue-based fields can be written in closed form, extending the improved Narrow Kernel Approximation. The key move is to replace each source by a small Gaussian cloud, so that products of masks become well defined, while handling the self-pair shot-noise contribution exactly as a white-noise term. The result is an O(ℓ_max³) calculation that the authors validate against simulations in 32 field combinations, from sparse FRB catalogues to dense cosmic-shear samples. If correct, multi-probe analyses can obtain accurate parameter errors without running thousands of mock skies.

Core claim

The central result is Eq. (33), a closed-form expression for the disconnected (Gaussian) covariance of pseudo-C_ℓ estimators for catalogue-based fields. It separates the covariance into signal-signal, signal-noise, and noise-noise terms built from mode-coupling coefficients of smoothed masks, with the self-pair contributions represented by an exact local variance map. The distinct-source-pair contributions use the improved Narrow Kernel Approximation, while the self-pair shot noise is included exactly, avoiding the need to bin sources into pixels. The authors show that this expression reduces to the exact direct pair-sum covariance in the appropriate limit, and they validate it against simul

What carries the argument

Gaussian-smoothed catalogue masks combined with exact self-pair noise terms. Each catalogue source at position n_i is replaced by a Gaussian cloud of width θ_c = sqrt(θ_ip² + (π/ℓ_max)²), producing continuous masks w̄ whose real-space products can be computed stably; the self-pair contribution is captured by the local variance map (awa)² and enters the mode-coupling coefficients Ξ exactly. This regularises the delta-function mask products that otherwise make the standard iNKA covariance ill-defined for discrete catalogues.

Load-bearing premise

After smoothing, the true power spectrum varies slowly enough over the mask coupling kernel that it can be replaced by its average at the two multipoles; this breaks down for steeper spectra, more complex masks, and strong E/B asymmetry.

What would settle it

Generate Gaussian realisations of a catalogue-based field with a steep spectrum (e.g., C_ℓ ∝ ℓ⁻⁴) and a highly irregular mask, compute Eq. (33), and compare with the sample covariance from many realisations and with the exact pair-sum result: if the χ² PTE distribution deviates significantly from uniform or the off-diagonal covariances disagree with the exact sum, the central claim fails in that regime.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Covariance matrices for catalogue-based pseudo-C_ℓ power spectra can be computed analytically in O(ℓ_max³), matching the cost of the power-spectrum estimator itself.
  • The self-pair shot-noise contribution is treated exactly, correctly penalising sparse catalogues and removing a source of numerical instability in auto-spectra.
  • The method is accurate in dense, noise-dominated regimes such as cosmic shear and in sparse, noise-dominated regimes such as fast radio burst dispersion measures, including spin-2 E/B cross-terms.
  • It applies to cross-correlations among catalogue fields, pixelated maps, galaxy clustering with random catalogues, and momentum fields used for kSZ and moving-lens studies.
  • The estimator is implemented in public analysis software, making it directly usable in current and future multi-probe large-scale-structure analyses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the self-pair terms are exact, the residual inaccuracy of Eq. (33) concentrates in the signal-signal term; targeted tests with steep-spectrum fields and complex masks would map the regime where the method needs a hybrid exact/NKA treatment.
  • The failure modes listed by the authors—steeper spectra, more complex masks, and E/B asymmetry—suggest that an adaptive smoothing scale θ_c, chosen per spectral index, could extend the range of validity.
  • The exact pair-sum method provides a gold standard for sparse catalogues; it could be used to calibrate the NKA accuracy as a function of spectral index, mask complexity, and source density.
  • Spin fields beyond 2 are not covered, but the paper's suggestion to treat E and B as independent scalars offers a testable route for approximate covariances in such cases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents an analytic estimator for the disconnected (Gaussian) covariance of pseudo-C_ell power spectra computed from catalogue-based fields. The central result, Eq. (33), extends the improved Narrow-Kernel Approximation by replacing each catalogue source with a Gaussian cloud of width theta_c for distinct-source-pair contributions, while treating self-pair contributions exactly as white-noise-like terms, including signal-noise and noise-noise couplings. The method also includes a brute-force exact summation for sparse catalogues and is implemented in the public NaMaster code. Validation against 1000 simulations across 32 field combinations—covering FRBs, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering, momentum fields, spin-0 and spin-2, and auto/cross-catalogue cases—shows generally good agreement, with one KS-test outlier.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial practical advance: it enables O(ell_max^3) covariance estimates for catalogue-based PCL estimators, which are increasingly used for shear, clustering, FRBs, and momentum-field analyses. The exact treatment of self-pair shot noise and the cross-check against a direct summation method are particular strengths, as is the public-code implementation. The main caveat is that the NKA validity domain is not fully mapped, and the validation leaves one unresolved empirical outlier in a central use case. With that outlier resolved, the result would merit publication in a strong journal.

major comments (2)
  1. [§IV.D, Table I (case 5)] The single KS failure—cross-catalogue (G0,G0,G0,G0), PTE=1.3e-4—is attributed to Monte Carlo noise in the empirical inverse covariance, with the only support being that excluding ell>500 gives PTE=0.36. That localization does not distinguish an unstable empirical inverse from a genuine high-ell bias in Eq. (33). Since cross-catalogue clustering is a central use case, please add a direct comparison of diagonal (and off-diagonal) covariance elements at ell>500 between the analytic and empirical covariances, and quantify the numerical stability of the empirical inverse. Until this is addressed, the claim that the method is accurate in realistic scenarios has one unexplained counterexample.
  2. [§IV, Eq. (34) and footnote 4] The validation computes the iNKA input spectrum Cbar from the same theory spectrum that generated the simulations. The real-data fallback—estimating Cbar from measured pseudo-C_ell—is mentioned but not tested. Because this introduces realisation-dependent noise and correlations between the data and its covariance, the practical mode of use is not validated. Please add at least one validation case (e.g., FRB or cosmic shear) where Cbar is estimated from the data rather than the input theory, and quantify the impact on the covariance accuracy.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§IV.D, before Table I] The text notes that cross-catalogue covariance blocks are not positive definite and their chi-squared statistic is not chi-square distributed, yet Table I reports KS PTEs for these cases. Please state explicitly whether the PTEs are empirical percentiles relative to chi^2_sim; otherwise, the cross-catalogue PTE column appears to rely on a theoretical chi-square distribution.
  2. [§III.A, Eq. (21)] theta_c is an important ad hoc smoothing parameter. Please report the sensitivity of Eq. (33) to theta_c and discuss how robustly it should be chosen for general masks, since part of the NKA failure budget could be absorbed by this choice.
  3. [§V] The listed NKA failure modes (steeper spectra, more complex masks, E/B asymmetry) are stated but not quantified. A simple test with a steeper input spectrum or a more complex mask would help readers assess the practical limits of the approximation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the covariance formula is derived from Gaussian Wick contractions and validated against exact summation, not by construction from its inputs.

full rationale

The main result, Eq. (33), is derived explicitly from the exact Gaussian covariance expression (Eqs. 7-9) together with a catalogue-specific regularization: smooth masks (Eq. 21) and exact self-pair/noise terms (Eqs. 24-32 and Appendix B). The Narrow Kernel Approximation is a stated, independently justified approximation whose failure modes are listed in Sec. V, not a quantity fitted to the covariance it predicts. The brute-force exact covariance (Eq. 51) is derived separately from Wick's theorem and then shown in Appendix D to reduce to Eq. 33, providing an independent internal check. Validation uses the simulation ground-truth C_ell as input to a formula that is supposed to be a function of C_ell; this is a standard closed-loop test, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to [30,31,44] place the work in an existing framework, but the novel catalogue-based extension is derived and benchmarked here rather than imported as an unverified premise. The single KS outlier (case 5) is a robustness/correctness issue, not evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method introduces one regularisation scale (θ_c), relies on the NKA and Gaussian/disconnected statistics, and uses Wick's theorem. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Gaussian smoothing scale θ_c = sqrt(θ_ip^2 + (π/ℓ_max)^2)
    Width of the Gaussian cloud replacing each discrete source (Eq. 21). Chosen by hand as a regularisation scale; numerical convergence is shown in Fig. 2 but not derived from first principles. Not fitted to covariance data.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The disconnected/Gaussian trispectrum is the only covariance contribution considered.
    The estimator targets the Gaussian covariance; connected non-Gaussian terms are ignored (Sec. II B). Validated with lognormal clustering, but not for general non-Gaussian fields.
  • domain assumption Narrow Kernel Approximation: power spectra inside the mode-coupling convolution can be replaced by their average over ℓ and ℓ′.
    This is the core approximation used to pass from Eq. (7) to Eq. (9) and again in Eq. (33). It is valid for sufficiently smooth masks and spectra; the authors list failure modes in Sec. V.
  • ad hoc to paper Replacing delta-function catalogue masks by Gaussian clouds of width θ_c correctly captures distinct-source-pair contributions.
    Eqs. (21)-(22) regularise mask products. The choice of θ_c is justified by numerical convergence tests (Fig. 2), not by an exact derivation.
  • standard math Wick's theorem applies to four-point correlators of the sampled field values.
    Appendix B uses Gaussian four-point identities to correct the data-estimated local variance map; requires field values to be uncorrelated between distinct sources and Gaussian statistics.
  • domain assumption Self-pair and distinct-pair contributions separate cleanly in the two-point correlator.
    Eq. (24) splits source sums into i≠j and i=j terms. This assumes the local variance ⟨a_i^2⟩ fully captures the self-pair term with no additional correlation structure.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 44036 in / 13411 out tokens · 127397 ms · 2026-08-02T00:53:19.689888+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multiple cosmological observables, such as the galaxy overdensity or cosmic shear, consist of fields sampled at the discrete positions of astrophysical sources. Recent work has presented methods to estimate the angular power spectra of such fields, avoiding the construction of pixelated sky maps and the finite-resolution effects associated with them. In this work, we present a method to estimate the disconnected (also known as "Gaussian") covariance of these angular power spectra, addressing subtle effects such as the effective area overlap between different catalogue-based fields and the additional Poisson-like variance arising from the discrete nature of the catalogues. The method relies on the so-called Narrow-Kernel Approximation to account for the contribution of distinct source pairs to the estimator, while including the noise-like contributions from self-pairs exactly. We explicitly compare this approach with a brute-force method that can produce the exact covariance for sparse samples, and validate it against simulations. We show that the method is accurate in realistic scenarios, spanning both dense and noise-dominated datasets (e.g., cosmic shear) and sparse, noise-dominated observables (e.g., fast radio bursts). The method is implemented in the public code NaMaster.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14843 by Andrina Nicola, David Alonso, Elyas Farah, Kevin Wolz, Robert Reischke.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Mask pseudo power spectrum for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The ingredients used to calculate the effective power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Covariances of dispersion-measure auto-power spectra for mock FRBs at 3615 CHIME positions (upper panel) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Power spectrum covariance for the DES-like simulated cosmic shear sample. Results are shown for the covariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Power spectrum variance estimates for spin-0 field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    As before, we use CCL, assuming the redshift distribution for the second redshift bin from [22] and a galaxy bias ofb= 2

    We start by calculating the angular power spectrum of the sample. As before, we use CCL, assuming the redshift distribution for the second redshift bin from [22] and a galaxy bias ofb= 2. We calculate this power spectrum up toℓ max = 1000

  2. [2]

    We generate a Gaussian realisation of the galaxy overdensityδ G from this power spectrum on a HEALPix [67] map with resolution parameter Nside = 512

  3. [3]

    In order to generate a positive-definite overdensity mapδ g from which we can generate a Poisson- sampled catalogue, we perform a log-normal trans- formation [68–70] of the form 1 +δ g = exp[δG −σ 2 G/2],(52) whereσ 2 G ≡ ⟨δ2 G⟩is the variance ofδ G

  4. [4]

    auto-catalogue

    We generate a simulated catalogue via Poisson- sampling, where the probability of finding a galaxy in pixelpis pp ∝w p (1 +δ g,p),(53) wherew p is a completeness map. The completeness mapw p was constructed from the publicly available random catalogues used in [22]. As in previous sections, we generate 1000 such simula- tions and estimate the power spectr...

    2020

  5. [5]

    33) through its pseudo-Cℓ ˜C (awa)2 ℓ , is defined in Eq

    Correcting for⟨a 2 i ⟩ ̸=a2 i The local variance field (awa)2, entering the noise-noise component of the covariance matrix (Eq. 33) through its pseudo-Cℓ ˜C (awa)2 ℓ , is defined in Eq. 25 in terms of the point-wise variance⟨a 2 i ⟩. For a given catalogue, assuming we do not have an a priori estimate of⟨a 2 i ⟩, we simply replace it with its point estimat...

  6. [6]

    X ℓ′′ 2ℓ′′ + 1 4π ℓ ℓ′ ℓ′′ 0 0 0 2 ˜C (awa)2 ℓ′′ − 1 (4π)2 X i w4 i ⟨a2 i ⟩2 # = 2 X ℓ′′ 2ℓ′′ + 1 4π ℓ ℓ′ ℓ′′ 0 0 0 2

    Correcting for ˜Na Our derivation of the Gaussian iNKA covariance in Section III C assumed, for simplicity, that we are interested in the covariance of the pseudo-Cℓ ˜C ab ℓ . While in general this is true, as we described in Section II C, the auto-correlation of catalogue-based fields must be corrected for the contribution from self-pairs ˜Na (Eq. 17). F...

  7. [7]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, 8 https://github.com/elyas-farah/c...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Louis, A

    T. Louis, A. La Posta, Z. Atkins, H. T. Jense, I. Abril- Cabezas, G. E. Addison, P. A. R. Ade, S. Aiola, T. Al- ford, D. Alonso, M. Amiri, R. An, J. E. Austermann, E. Barbavara, N. Battaglia, E. S. Battistelli, J. A. Beall, R. Bean, A. Beheshti, B. Beringue, T. Bhandarkar, E. Biermann, B. Bolliet, J. R. Bond, E. Calabrese, V. Ca- palbo, F. Carrero, S.-F. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Nicola, D

    A. Nicola, D. Alonso, J. S´ anchez, A. Slosar, H. Awan, A. Broussard, J. Dunkley, E. Gawiser, Z. Gomes, R. Man- delbaum, H. Miyatake, J. A. Newman, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, S. Skinner, and E. L. Wagoner, Tomographic galaxy clus- tering with the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first year public data release, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020, 044 (2020), arXiv:1912.082...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    R. Zhou, S. Ferraro, M. White, J. DeRose, N. Sailer, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey, D. Brooks, T. Clay- baugh, K. Dawson, A. de la Macorra, B. Dey, P. Doel, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, J. Guy, A. Kremin, A. Lambert, L. Le Guil- lou, M. Levi, C. Magneville, M. Manera, A. Meisner, R. Miquel, J. Moustakas, A. D. Myers, J. A. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Lewis and A

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB, Phys. Rep.429, 1 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0601594 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin, M. S. Madhavacheril, D. Han, K. T. Crowley, I. Abril-Cabezas, P. A. R. Ade, S. Aiola, T. Alford, M. Amiri, S. Amodeo, R. An, Z. Atkins, J. E. Austermann, N. Battaglia, E. S. Battistelli, J. A. Beall, R. Bean, B. Beringue, T. Bhandarkar, E. Bier- mann, B. Bolliet, J. R. Bond, H. Cai, E. Calabrese, V. Calafut, V. Capalbo, F. Carrero...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Bartelmann and P

    M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider, Weak gravitational lensing, Phys. Rep.340, 291 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/9912508 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2001

  14. [14]

    Prat and D

    J. Prat and D. Bacon, Weak gravitational lensing, inEn- cyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 5, Vol. 5 (2026) pp. 508–537, arXiv:2501.07938 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Birkinshaw, The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys

    M. Birkinshaw, The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys. Rep.310, 97 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9808050 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Mroczkowski, D

    T. Mroczkowski, D. Nagai, K. Basu, J. Chluba, J. Sayers, R. Adam, E. Churazov, A. Crites, L. Di Mascolo, D. Eck- ert, J. Macias-Perez, F. Mayet, L. Perotto, E. Pointe- couteau, C. Romero, F. Ruppin, E. Scannapieco, and J. ZuHone, Astrophysics with the Spatially and Spec- trally Resolved Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effects. A Millime- tre/Submillimetre Probe of the ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Hadzhiyska, S

    B. Hadzhiyska, S. Ferraro, B. Ried Guachalla, E. Schaan, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, N. Battaglia, J. R. Bond, D. Brooks, E. Calabrese, S. K. Choi, T. Claybaugh, W. R. Coulton, K. Dawson, M. Devlin, B. Dey, P. Doel, A. J. Duiv- envoorden, J. Dunkley, G. S. Farren, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, P. A. Gallardo, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. Gontcho Gontcho, M. Gralla...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Harscouet, K

    L. Harscouet, K. Wolz, A. Wayland, D. Alonso, and B. Hadzhiyska, kSZ for everyone: the pseudo-Cl ap- proach to stacking, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.14625 (2025), arXiv:2512.14625 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    McCarthy, N

    F. McCarthy, N. Battaglia, R. Bean, J. Richard Bond, H. Cai, E. Calabrese, W. R. Coulton, M. J. Devlin, J. Dunkley, S. Ferraro, V. Gluscevic, Y. Guan, J. Colin Hill, M. C. Johnson, A. Kusiak, A. Lagu¨ e, N. Mac- Crann, M. S. Madhavacheril, K. Moodley, S. Naess, F. J. Qu, B. Ried Guachalla, N. Sehgal, B. D. Sher- win, C. Sif´ on, K. M. Smith, S. T. Staggs,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Y.-C. Cai, J. A. Peacock, A. de Graaff, and S. Alam, Detection of cosmological dipoles aligned with trans- verse peculiar velocities, MNRAS541, 2093 (2025), arXiv:2504.02525 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2093

  21. [21]

    Harscouet, A

    L. Harscouet, A. Wayland, and D. Alonso, Dipoles for everyone: the pseudo-C ℓ approach to directional stacking, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.15947 (2026), arXiv:2605.15947 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    H. Wang, K. Masui, S. Andrew, E. Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, R. C. Joseph, V. M. Kaspi, B. Kharel, A. E. Lanman, C. Leung, L. Mas-Ribas, J. Mena-Parra, K. Nimmo, A. B. Pearlman, U.-L. Pen, J. X. Prochaska, R. Raikman, K. Shin, S. R. Siegel, K. M. Smith, and I. H. Stairs, Measurement of the Dispersion-Galaxy Cross-Power Spectrum with the Second CHIME/FRB Cata...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Sharma, E

    K. Sharma, E. Krause, V. Ravi, R. Reischke, L. Connor, P. R. S., and D. Anbajagane, Probing Baryonic Feed- back and Cosmology with the 3×2-point Statistic of Fast Radio Bursts and Galaxies, ApJ998, 109 (2026), arXiv:2509.05866 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Wayland, D

    A. Wayland, D. Alonso, and R. Reischke, Probing bary- onic feedback with fast radio bursts: joint analyses with cosmic shear and galaxy clustering, MNRAS547, stag557 (2026), arXiv:2602.12174 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Sharma, E

    K. Sharma, E. Krause, V. Ravi, D. Anbajagane, L. Con- nor, W. L. Kimmy Wu, S. Ferraro, S. Grandis, D. Alonso, Y.-K. Chiang, C. J. Law, S. Pranjal R., S. McCarty, and S. Pandey, Backlighting the Cosmic Web with Fast Radio Bursts: An Anthology of Dispersion Mea- sure Cross-Correlations with Large-Scale Structure and Baryon Tracers, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:26...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, J

    C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, J. Ruiz-Zapatero, D. Alonso, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, E.-M. Mueller, A. Nicola, and P. Ruiz-Lapuente, The growth of density perturbations in the last 10 billion years from tomographic large-scale structure data, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021, 030 (2021), arXiv:2105.12108 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Reeves, A

    A. Reeves, A. Nicola, A. Refregier, T. Kacprzak, and L. F. Machado Poletti Valle, 12×2 pt combined probes: pipeline, neutrino mass, and data compres- sion, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024, 042 (2024), arXiv:2309.03258 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Sailer, J

    N. Sailer, J. Kim, S. Ferraro, M. S. Madhavacheril, M. White, I. Abril-Cabezas, J. N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, J. Richard Bond, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, E. Calabrese, S.-F. Chen, S. K. Choi, T. Claybaugh, K. Dawson, A. de la Macorra, J. DeRose, A. Dey, B. Dey, P. Doel, J. Dunkley, C. Embil-Villagra, G. S. Farren, A. Font- Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta˜ nag...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Sailer, J

    N. Sailer, J. DeRose, S. Ferraro, S.-F. Chen, R. Zhou, M. White, J. Kim, and M. Madhavacheril, Evolution of structure growth during dark energy domination: In- sights from the cross-correlation of DESI galaxies with CMB lensing and galaxy magnification, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103540 (2025), arXiv:2503.24385 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    La Posta, D

    A. La Posta, D. Alonso, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, and S. Maleubre, Joint tomographic measurement of ther- mal Sunyaev Zeldovich and the cosmic infrared back- ground, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.04269 (2026), arXiv:2603.04269 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    G. Zhao, A. Krolewski, and N. Afshordi, Ther- mal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich cross-correlations with un- WISE galaxies: disentangling radio contamination, dust properties, and electron pressure, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2606.28099 (2026), arXiv:2606.28099 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Hivon, K

    E. Hivon, K. M. G´ orski, C. B. Netterfield, B. P. Crill, S. Prunet, and F. Hansen, MASTER of the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background Anisotropy Power Spectrum: A Fast Method for Statistical Analysis of Large and Com- plex Cosmic Microwave Background Data Sets, ApJ567, 2 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0105302 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Alonso, J

    D. Alonso, J. Sanchez, A. Slosar, and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, A unified pseudo-C ℓ framework, MNRAS484, 4127 (2019), arXiv:1809.09603 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Cooray and W

    A. Cooray and W. Hu, Power Spectrum Covariance of Weak Gravitational Lensing, ApJ554, 56 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0012087 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    M. L. Brown, P. G. Castro, and A. N. Taylor, Cos- mic microwave background temperature and polariza- tion pseudo-Cl estimators and covariances, MNRAS360, 1262 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0410394 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, D

    C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, D. Alonso, and E. Bellini, Discon- nected pseudo-C l covariances for projected large-scale structure data, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019, 043 (2019), arXiv:1906.11765 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Nicola, C

    A. Nicola, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, D. Alonso, J. Dunkley, P. G. Ferreira, A. Slosar, and D. N. Spergel, Cosmic shear power spectra in practice, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2021, 067 (2021), arXiv:2010.09717 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Camphuis, K

    E. Camphuis, K. Benabed, S. Galli, E. Hivon, and M. Lil- ley, Accurate cosmic microwave background covariance matrices: Exact calculation and approximations, A&A 668, A62 (2022), arXiv:2204.13721 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Barreira, E

    A. Barreira, E. Krause, and F. Schmidt, Complete super-sample lensing covariance in the response ap- proach, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018, 015 (2018), arXiv:1711.07467 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Barreira, E

    A. Barreira, E. Krause, and F. Schmidt, Accurate cos- mic shear errors: do we need ensembles of simula- tions?, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018, 053 (2018), arXiv:1807.04266 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Friedrich, F

    O. Friedrich, F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho, O. Alves, R. Rosenfeld, J. Sanchez, X. Fang, T. F. Ei- fler, E. Krause, C. Chang, Y. Omori, A. Amon, E. Bax- ter, J. Elvin-Poole, D. Huterer, A. Porredon, J. Prat, V. Terra, A. Troja, A. Alarcon, K. Bechtol, G. M. Bernstein, R. Buchs, A. Campos, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, R. Cawthon, A. Choi, J. Cor...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Atkins, Z

    Z. Atkins, Z. Li, D. Alonso, J. Richard Bond, E. Cal- abrese, A. J. Duivenvoorden, J. Dunkley, S. Giardiello, C. Herv ´ ıas-Caimapo, J. Colin Hill, H. T. Jense, J. Kim, T. Louis, K. Moodley, T. W. Morris, S. Naess, M. D. Niemack, L. Page, A. L. Posta, C. Sif´ on, and E. J. Wol- lack, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: semi-analytic covariance matrices for t...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Efstathiou, Myths and truths concerning estimation of power spectra: the case for a hybrid estimator, MNRAS 349, 603 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307515 [astro-ph]

    G. Efstathiou, Myths and truths concerning estimation of power spectra: the case for a hybrid estimator, MNRAS 349, 603 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307515 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    Dalal, X

    R. Dalal, X. Li, A. Nicola, J. Zuntz, M. A. Strauss, S. Sugiyama, T. Zhang, M. M. Rau, R. Mandelbaum, M. Takada, S. More, H. Miyatake, A. Kannawadi, M. Shirasaki, T. Taniguchi, R. Takahashi, K. Osato, T. Hamana, M. Oguri, A. J. Nishizawa, A. A. P. Malag´ on, T. Sunayama, D. Alonso, A. Slosar, W. Luo, R. Arm- strong, J. Bosch, B.-C. Hsieh, Y. Komiyama, R. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    G. S. Farren, A. Krolewski, N. MacCrann, S. Ferraro, I. Abril-Cabezas, R. An, Z. Atkins, N. Battaglia, J. R. Bond, E. Calabrese, S. K. Choi, O. Darwish, M. J. Devlin, A. J. Duivenvoorden, J. Dunkley, J. C. Hill, M. Hilton, K. M. Huffenberger, J. Kim, T. Louis, M. S. Madhavacheril, G. A. Marques, J. McMahon, K. Mood- ley, L. A. Page, B. Partridge, F. J. Qu...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    E. T. Lau, ´A. Bogd´ an, D. Nagai, N. Cappelluti, and M. Shirasaki, Cosmology and Astrophysics with the Dif- fuse eRASS1 X-Ray Angular Power Spectrum, ApJ983, 8 (2025), arXiv:2410.22397 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    DeRose and S.-F

    J. DeRose and S.-F. Chen, The Lensing Counter Nar- rative: An Effective Description of Small-Scale Clus- tering in Weak Lensing Power Spectra, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.18981 (2025), arXiv:2510.18981 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Hall and N

    A. Hall and N. Tessore, Pixelization effects in cosmic shear angular power spectra, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025, 048 (2025), arXiv:2501.08718 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Baleato Lizancos and M

    A. Baleato Lizancos and M. White, Harmonic analysis of discrete tracers of large-scale structure, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2024, 010 (2024), arXiv:2312.12285 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    K. Wolz, D. Alonso, and A. Nicola, Catalog-based pseudo-Cℓ s, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025, 028 (2025), arXiv:2407.21013 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Tessore, B

    Euclid Collaboration, N. Tessore, B. Joachimi, A. Loureiro, A. Hall, G. Canas-Herrera, I. Tutusaus, N. Jeffrey, K. Naidoo, J. D. McEwen, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, F. Bernardeau, D. Bonino, E. Bran- chini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, A. Caillat, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, V. F. Cardone, J. Carreter...

    arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Reinecke, S

    M. Reinecke, S. Belkner, and J. Carron, Improved cos- mic microwave background (de-)lensing using general spherical harmonic transforms, A&A678, A165 (2023), arXiv:2304.10431 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Mohammed, U

    I. Mohammed, U. Seljak, and Z. Vlah, Perturbative ap- proach to covariance matrix of the matter power spec- trum, MNRAS466, 780 (2017), arXiv:1607.00043 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    F. J. Qu, B. Ried Guachalla, E. Schaan, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Ferraro, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, A. Baleato Lizancos, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, R. Canning, F. J. Castander, E. Chaussidon, T. Claybaugh, A. Cuceu, A. de la Ma- corra, B. Dey, P. Doel, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero- Romero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. G. A. Gontcho, G. Gutier- rez, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, K. Hons...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    S. C. Hotinli, K. M. Smith, S. Ferraro, A. Beheshti, A. Kosowsky, E. Pierpaoli, and E. Schaan, First detection of the moving lens effect with ACT and DESI LS, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.18938 (2026), arXiv:2605.18938 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Cornish, D

    T. Cornish, D. Alonso, B. Leistedt, and K. Wolz, Sys- tematics mitigation for catalogue-based angular power spectra, MNRAS547, stag360 (2026), arXiv:2510.19912 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. John- son, Y. Katariya, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Nec- ula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman- Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: composable transforma- tions of Python+NumPy programs,http://github. com/jax-ml/jax(2018), version 0.3.13

    2018

  58. [58]

    D. R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M. A. McLaughlin, D. J. Narkevic, and F. Crawford, A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin, Science318, 777 (2007), arXiv:0709.4301 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    Abbott, B

    Chime/Frb Collaboration, T. Abbott, B. C. Andersen, S. Andrew, K. Bandura, M. Bhardwaj, Y. Bhusare, C. Brar, T. Cassanelli, S. Chatterjee, J.-F. Cliche, A. M. Cook, A. Curtin, M. Dobbs, F. A. Dong, G. Eadie, T. Eftekhari, E. Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, D. Good, M. Halpern, J. W. T. Hessels, A. Ibik, N. Jain, R. C. Joseph, Z. Kader, V. M. Kaspi, A. Khan, B. K...

    arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    B. Wang, Z. Lu, Y. Liu, J.-J. Wei, and X.-F. Wu, Measuring the Angular Auto-power Spectrum of Fast Radio Burst Dispersion Measures as a Robust Cos- mological Probe and Baryon Tracer, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2607.04106 (2026), arXiv:2607.04106 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Reischke, D

    R. Reischke, D. Neumann, K. A. Bertmann, S. Hagstotz, and H. Hildebrandt, Calibrating baryonic feedback with weak lensing and fast radio bursts, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2026, 006 (2026), arXiv:2309.09766 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Hallinan, V

    G. Hallinan, V. Ravi, S. Weinreb, J. Kocz, Y. Huang, D. P. Woody, J. Lamb, L. D’Addario, M. Catha, C. Law, S. R. Kulkarni, E. S. Phinney, M. W. Eastwood, K. Bouman, M. McLaughlin, S. Ransom, X. Siemens, J. Cordes, R. Lynch, D. Kaplan, A. Brazier, S. Bhatna- gar, S. Myers, F. Walter, and B. Gaensler, The DSA- 2000 — A Radio Survey Camera, inBulletin of the...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  63. [63]

    K. V. Berghaus, Y. Du, V. S. H. Lee, A. Prabhu, R. Reis- chke, L. Connor, and K. M. Zurek, Physics beyond the Standard Model with the DSA-2000, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2025, 035 (2025), arXiv:2505.23892 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2000

  64. [64]

    Guerrini, L

    S. Guerrini, L. W. K. Goh, F. Hervas-Peters, C. Da- ley, M. Kilbinger, A. Wittje, C. Murray, L. Baumont, S. Fabbro, H. Hildebrandt, M. J. Hudson, L. van Waer- beke, A. H. Wright, T. de Boer, J.-C. Cuillandre, E. Magnier, and A. W. McConnachie, UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: IV. 2D cosmological constraints in har- monic space, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.13543 ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Ouellette, Y

    A. Ouellette, Y. Omori, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, D. R. Bar- ron, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bian- chini, L. E. Bleem, S. Bocquet, F. R. Bouchet, E. Cam- phuis, M. G. Campitiello, J. E. Carlstrom, J. Carron, C. Chang, C. L. Chang, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi, T.-L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. Crawfo...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    A. Amon, D. Gruen, M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, S. Do- delson, A. Choi, C. Doux, L. F. Secco, S. Samuroff, E. Krause, J. Cordero, J. Myles, J. DeRose, R. H. Wechsler, M. Gatti, A. Navarro-Alsina, G. M. Bern- stein, B. Jain, J. Blazek, A. Alarcon, A. Fert´ e, P. Lemos, M. Raveri, A. Campos, J. Prat, C. S´ anchez, M. Jarvis, O. Alves, F. Andrade-Oliveira, E. ...

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, M

    C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, M. Zennaro, G. Aric` o, D. Alonso, and R. E. Angulo, Cosmic shear with small scales: DES- Y3, KiDS-1000 and HSC-DR1, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024, 024 (2024), arXiv:2403.13794 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    N. E. Chisari, D. Alonso, E. Krause, C. D. Leonard, P. Bull, J. Neveu, A. S. Villarreal, S. Singh, T. McClin- tock, J. Ellison, Z. Du, J. Zuntz, A. Mead, S. Joudaki, C. S. Lorenz, T. Tr¨ oster, J. Sanchez, F. Lanusse, M. Ishak, R. Hlozek, J. Blazek, J.-E. Campagne, H. Al- moubayyed, T. Eifler, M. Kirby, D. Kirkby, S. Plaszczyn- ski, A. Slosar, M. Vrastil,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    A. H. Wright, B. St¨ olzner, M. Asgari, M. Bilicki, B. Giblin, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, B. Joachimi, K. Kuijken, S.-S. Li, R. Reischke, M. von Wietersheim-Kramsta, M. Yoon, P. Burger, N. E. Chis- 28 ari, J. de Jong, A. Dvornik, C. Georgiou, J. Harnois- D´ eraps, P. Jalan, A. J. William, S. Joudaki, G. F. Lesci, L. Linke, A. Loureiro, C. Ma...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, O. Alves, A. Amon, D. Anbajagane, F. Andrade-Oliveira, W. d’Assignies, S. Avila, D. Ba- con, J. Beas-Gonzalez, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, G. M. Bernstein, J. Blazek, S. Bocquet, D. Brooks, H. Cama- cho, G. Camacho-Ciurana, R. Camilleri, G. Campailla, A. Campos, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, ...

    arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Aric` o, R

    G. Aric` o, R. E. Angulo, M. Zennaro, S. Contreras, A. Chen, and C. Hern´ andez-Monteagudo, DES Y3 cos- mic shear down to small scales: Constraints on cosmology and baryons, A&A678, A109 (2023), arXiv:2303.05537 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Verdiani, L

    F. Verdiani, L. Harscouet, M. Zennaro, D. Alonso, and B. Hadzhiyska, Cosmological constraints from the an- gular power spectrum and bispectrum of luminous red galaxies and CMB lensing, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2026, 027 (2026), arXiv:2510.17796 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    K. M. G´ orski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wan- delt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretiza- tion and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, ApJ622, 759 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  74. [74]

    Coles and B

    P. Coles and B. Jones, A lognormal model for the cosmo- logical mass distribution., MNRAS248, 1 (1991)

    1991

  75. [75]

    Ram ´ ırez-P´ erez, J

    C. Ram ´ ırez-P´ erez, J. Sanchez, D. Alonso, and A. Font- Ribera, CoLoRe: fast cosmological realisations over large volumes with multiple tracers, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022, 002 (2022), arXiv:2111.05069 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Tessore, A

    N. Tessore, A. Loureiro, B. Joachimi, M. von Wietersheim-Kramsta, and N. Jeffrey, GLASS: Genera- tor for Large Scale Structure, The Open Journal of As- trophysics6, 11 (2023), arXiv:2302.01942 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Tessore and A

    N. Tessore and A. Hall, Shot noise in clustering power spectra, The Open Journal of Astrophysics8, 154 (2025), arXiv:2507.03749 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Storey-Fisher, D

    K. Storey-Fisher, D. W. Hogg, H.-W. Rix, A.-C. Eilers, G. Fabbian, M. R. Blanton, and D. Alonso, Quaia, the Gaia-unWISE Quasar Catalog: An All-sky Spectroscopic Quasar Sample, ApJ964, 69 (2024), arXiv:2306.17749 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Couchot, S

    F. Couchot, S. Henrot-Versill´ e, O. Perdereau, S. Plaszczynski, B. Rouill´ e d’Orfeuil, M. Spinelli, and M. Tristram, Cosmology with the cosmic microwave background temperature-polarization correlation, A&A 602, A41 (2017), arXiv:1609.09730 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    T. E. Oliphant,A guide to NumPy, Vol. 1 (Trelgol Pub- lishing USA, 2006)

    2006

Showing first 80 references.