REVIEW 3 cited by
A Sampling Theory Perspective on Activations for Implicit Neural Representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) have gained popularity for encoding signals as compact, differentiable entities. While commonly using techniques like Fourier positional encodings or non-traditional activation functions (e.g., Gaussian, sinusoid, or wavelets) to capture high-frequency content, their properties lack exploration within a unified theoretical framework. Addressing this gap, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of these activations from a sampling theory perspective. Our investigation reveals that sinc activations, previously unused in conjunction with INRs, are theoretically optimal for signal encoding. Additionally, we establish a connection between dynamical systems and INRs, leveraging sampling theory to bridge these two paradigms.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Can Transformers Really Do It All? On the Compatibility of Inductive Biases Across Tasks
Learned replacement non-linearities show transformers are rarely optimal for algorithmic tasks, with benefits that are task-specific, while language/code gains are smaller and more transferable.
-
FLAIR: Frequency- and Locality-Aware Implicit Neural Representations
FLAIR combines band-localized activations with wavelet-energy-guided encoding to help implicit neural representations learn sharper high-frequency details.
-
Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations
A bias-free MLP filter applied multiplicatively to Fourier features, with a line-search learning-rate controller, reduces noise and improves implicit neural representation fitting across images, shapes, and NeRF.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.