Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Pb-intercalated epitaxial graphene on SiC: Full insight into band structure and orbital character of interlayer Pb, and charge transfer into graphene

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The near charge-neutrality of Pb-intercalated epitaxial graphene on SiC comes from charge transfer from both the intercalated lead and the silicon carbide substrate, not from complete screening by the lead layer.

desk verdict A full-BZ ARPES reference for the Pb interlayer band structure, with a charge-transfer conclusion that is plausible but rests on a ~2σ temperature shift and an unverified single-cause assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08172 v2 pith:VDYIOZYF submitted 2025-01-14 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bharti Matta , Philipp Rosenzweig , Kathrin Küster , Craig Polley , Ulrich Starke This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords PbintercalationepitaxialgraphenesiliconcarbideARPESbandstructureorbitalcharacterchargetransfertwo-dimensionallead
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Intercalating a single lead layer between epitaxial graphene and a SiC substrate creates a two-dimensional metal whose bands are nearly free-electron-like, with a (1×1) registry to the substrate. Angle-resolved photoemission shows the lead bands are predominantly out-of-plane ($p_z$) in orbital character, hinting that the lead can hybridize with graphene's $\pi$ orbitals. The paper's central discovery is that the graphene's near charge neutrality results from a balance: electrons donated by the lead and by the n-doped SiC substrate together cancel the intrinsic hole doping. This rules out the alternative picture in which the lead layer fully screens the substrate. The conclusion follows from temperature-dependent ARPES, where cooling increases graphene's p-doping, consistent with freeze-out of n-type dopants in SiC.

What carries the argument

The central object is the (1×1) Pb monolayer at the graphene/SiC interface, treated as a two-dimensional electron gas and probed by ARPES at photon energies near 114 eV, where the Pb photoemission cross section is high. The argument that carries the charge-transfer claim is the temperature dependence of the graphene Dirac point: because n-type dopants in SiC freeze out on cooling, a graphene layer that receives electrons from the substrate should become more p-doped at low temperature, whereas a Pb layer that fully screens the substrate would leave the doping temperature-independent. The measured shift of the Dirac-point energy from 13.5 meV above the Fermi level at room temperature to 42.4 meV at 18 K is the key observation. DFT for a (1×1) Pb monolayer on SiC (without graphene) is the auxiliary machinery that explains the band splittings, gaps, and orbital character.

What would settle it

Measure the graphene Dirac point versus temperature on Pb-intercalated graphene grown on semi-insulating (undoped) SiC: if the p-doping still increases on cooling, the temperature effect does not come from substrate dopant freeze-out and the two-source charge-transfer conclusion would need revision; if it is flat, the substrate-dopant explanation is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the intercalated Pb monolayer under a single layer of epitaxial graphene on 6H-SiC(0001) behaves as a (1×1) two-dimensional electron system with metallic, free-electron-like bands. Fermi-surface mapping gives a Fermi momentum of $k_F \approx 1.4$ Å$^{-1}$ and an effective electron mass of $5.3\,m_e$, and Luttinger counting yields about $6.8\times 10^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$ electrons in the Pb layer. Polarization-dependent ARPES and DFT agree that the Pb bands are mostly $p_z$-like, with in-plane character appearing near the Pb $K$ point. For the charge-transfer question, the paper measures the graphene Dirac-point position at 18 K, 80 K, and room temperature on the same sample; the hole density rises from $(1.2\pm0.8)\times10^{10}$ cm$^{-2}$ at room temperature to $(1.2\pm0.2)\times10^{11}$ cm$^{-2}$ at 18 K. Attributing this increase to freeze-out of n-type dopants in the SiC substrate, the authors conclude that the near charge-neutrality of Pb-QFMLG is a combined effect of charge transfer from Pb and SiC, ruling out complete screening by the Pb layer.

Load-bearing premise

The temperature-dependent increase in graphene p-doping is interpreted entirely as freeze-out of n-type dopants in the SiC substrate, while the Pb layer's electronic structure and the interface band alignment are assumed to stay constant with temperature, which is not directly measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pb-QFMLG's near charge neutrality is a two-source balance, so changing the substrate doping level (for example, by using semi-insulating SiC) should shift the graphene doping in a predictable way.
  • The predominantly out-of-plane $p_z$ character of the Pb bands supports the possibility of proximity-induced spin-orbit coupling or superconductivity in the graphene layer.
  • The interlayer Pb behaves as a two-dimensional free-electron-like metal with anisotropic effective mass, which should show up as anisotropic in-plane transport in the Pb layer.
  • The (10×10) graphene replicas seen in ARPES corroborate the grain-boundary and vacancy-line models of the Pb layer and link the superstructure to the charge-neutrality condition.
  • Temperature-dependent ARPES of the Dirac cone provides a general method to separate substrate and intercalant contributions to doping in intercalated epitaxial graphene.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test not performed in the paper would be the same temperature-dependent measurement on a semi-insulating SiC substrate; if the p-doping increase persists, the substrate is not the only temperature-dependent source.
  • The freeze-out argument implies that at very low temperatures the balance is increasingly dominated by Pb, so the Dirac point should saturate once all SiC donors are frozen; tracking the Dirac-point energy down to millikelvin temperatures could estimate the relative donation strengths.
  • Since the Pb $p_z$ orbitals dominate near $\Gamma$, proximity coupling to graphene is likely momentum-dependent, which could be probed by spin-resolved ARPES looking for the predicted antivortex spin texture.
  • The same two-source balance may apply to other intercalants (such as Ge, Au, or Bi) that show near-neutral graphene; comparing their temperature-dependent doping would reveal whether substrate freeze-out generically explains near-neutrality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a comprehensive synchrotron ARPES study of Pb-intercalated quasi-freestanding monolayer graphene on 6H-SiC(0001). The authors map the interlayer Pb bands over the first and repeated Brillouin zones, show that the Pb layer is metallic, (1x1)-ordered with respect to SiC, and quasi-two-dimensional, and fit the main Fermi contours with a free-electron approximation. Photon-energy and polarization-dependent measurements are used to infer a dominant out-of-plane p_z orbital character for the Pb bands, and DFT calculations for a (1x1) Pb monolayer on SiC are presented for comparison. The final experimental section reports that the graphene Dirac point shifts from 32.2 +/- 4.0 meV at 80 K to 42.4 +/- 2.7 meV at 18 K, corresponding to an increase in p-doping of (5.0 +/- 2.6)x10^10 cm^-2, which the authors attribute to freeze-out of n-type donors in the SiC substrate. From this they conclude that the near charge-neutrality of Pb-QFMLG results from combined charge transfer from the interlayer Pb and the substrate, ruling out complete screening of the substrate by the Pb layer.

Significance. The ARPES dataset is a valuable and fairly complete characterization of the interlayer Pb band structure, including its Fermi surface, band splittings, orbital character, and photon-energy dependence. The paper is commendably explicit about the limitations of its DFT model, acknowledging the omission of graphene and the (10x10) superstructure and the failure to capture some experimental features. The polarization-dependent ARPES and DFT comparison provide a useful qualitative picture of p_z-dominated Pb bands. If the temperature-dependent charge-transfer conclusion were firmly established, it would resolve a real debate in the field about the origin of graphene's near charge-neutrality in this system. At present, however, the central charge-transfer mechanism is not uniquely identified: the temperature experiment is suggestive but lacks a control for temperature-dependent changes in the Pb layer and interface, and the measured shift is only about 2 sigma. The manuscript therefore needs additional support or a more cautious framing before the strong screening-ruling-out statement is justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III F, Fig. 6] The central conclusion of this section, that the near charge-neutrality of Pb-QFMLG is a combined effect of charge transfer from Pb and SiC and that complete substrate screening by the Pb layer is ruled out, is not uniquely supported by the presented data. The inference requires that the entire Dirac-point shift Delta_E_D = 10.2 +/- 4.8 meV between 80 K and 18 K is caused by freeze-out of n-type donors in SiC. However, the Pb interlayer and the Pb/SiC interface are assumed to be electronically temperature-independent, and this is not measured. A temperature-dependent Pb-graphene hybridization, Pb-SiC distance, or interface dipole could produce a Dirac-point shift even under complete substrate screening, so the dichotomy between 'combined charge transfer' and 'complete screening' is not exhaustive. The shift is also marginal, with the uncertainty comparable to the shift itself. A concrete way to strengthen the claim would be to extract the Pb band positions at both temperatures in the same experimental run and show that they are unchanged, or to compare with an H-intercalated graphene sample on the same SiC substrate to isolate the substrate contribution. Without such a control, the conclusion should be reworded as being consistent with combined charge transfer rather than as ruling out complete screening.
  2. [Sec. IIID, Figs. 4 and S3] The DFT model excludes the graphene layer and the (10x10) Pb superstructure, and the authors themselves state that the model does not accurately capture the interlayer charge transfer between Pb and SiC, as reflected in the ~600 meV underestimation of the SiC valence band maximum. This limitation is acknowledged in the text but is not carried through to the abstract and conclusion, where the DFT comparison is presented as having 'successfully captured' the key band features. Since the orbital-character claim also relies partly on this DFT calculation, the abstract and conclusion should include a clear caveat that the DFT model is a simplified (1x1) Pb/SiC slab without graphene and that the orbital assignment is qualitative. This would make the paper's overall claims more balanced.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IIIB, Fig. 2(d)] The free-electron fit parameters m* = 5.3 m_e and k_F = 1.4 A^-1 are presented without uncertainties. Given that Fig. S2 shows an anisotropic effective mass, the paper should state explicitly that the fitted mass is an effective isotropic value and give the uncertainty in the resulting carrier density.
  2. [Sec. IIIE] The statement that LV polarization primarily probes in-plane orbitals and LH polarization probes a mix of in-plane and out-of-plane orbitals is based on a simplified dipole matrix-element argument. The manuscript should explicitly list the assumptions behind this interpretation and avoid presenting the inferred p_z dominance as a direct measurement, since final-state and matrix-element effects can alter the intensity ratio.
  3. [Sec. IIIF] The room-temperature reference measurement (Fig. S6) was obtained with a different analyzer and photon energy (home-lab He II) than the 18 K and 80 K synchrotron measurements. If the room-temperature value is used to argue for near-neutrality at RT, the paper should acknowledge the possible systematic offset between the two measurement setups.
  4. [Sec. IIID] In the conclusion, the statement that the DFT calculations 'successfully capture' the band splittings and gaps should be qualified by the acknowledged discrepancies, particularly the missing feature '6' along MK' and the 600 meV VBM misalignment. A one-sentence caveat would make the qualitative agreement claim more accurate.
  5. [Sec. IIIF] The phrase 'increase in p-doping by (5.0 +/- 2.6) x 10^10 cm^-2 (approximately 1.7 times higher)' is better stated without the ratio, since the uncertainty is large and the ratio is not a robust quantity. Reporting the absolute change with its uncertainty is sufficient.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central results rest on direct ARPES measurements and an independent DFT calculation, with no fitted parameter or self-citation serving as the load-bearing derivation of the target claims.

full rationale

The paper's principal claims are (i) the interlayer Pb band structure is metallic, (1x1)-ordered relative to SiC, and approximately free-electron-like; (ii) light-polarization ARPES indicates predominantly out-of-plane pz orbital character, qualitatively supported by DFT; and (iii) temperature-dependent ARPES shows a small increase in graphene p-doping on cooling, attributed to freeze-out of n-type dopants in SiC, indicating that the near charge-neutrality of Pb-QFMLG arises from combined charge transfer from Pb and SiC rather than complete screening by the Pb layer. None of these claims is circular. The temperature-dependent Dirac point energies are directly measured and reported with uncertainties (ED = 42.4 ± 2.7 meV at 18 K and 32.2 ± 4.0 meV at 80 K), and the hole densities are computed from the measured ED values; the conclusion is an interpretation of that measured shift, not a quantity that was fitted and then repackaged as a prediction. The free-electron fit is used descriptively and is explicitly acknowledged to deviate from the measured dispersion, and the DFT calculation is an independent model that is compared to the ARPES data rather than being constructed from the data. Self-citations to earlier work (Refs. [16] and [26]) establish the known near charge-neutrality and the sample preparation context, but they are not the evidential basis for the new temperature-dependent measurement or the charge-transfer interpretation. The attribution of the Dirac-point shift to SiC dopant freeze-out relies on an unmeasured auxiliary assumption that the Pb layer and interface are temperature-independent, but that is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circularity: the reasoning does not reduce by construction to its inputs, nor does it define its conclusion into existence. Accordingly, no circular step can be identified by quoting an equation or a fitted-parameter construction, and the honest finding is no significant circularity with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard photoemission theory, a PBE-DFT structural model, and a semiconductor freeze-out assumption. None of these are new invented entities. The only freely fitted quantities are the parameters of the free-electron model used for visualization.

free parameters (2)
  • effective electron mass m* = 5.3 times rest electron mass (approx.)
    Fitted to the Fermi surface of the interlayer Pb bands in Sec. III B; used in free-electron approximation and Luttinger density estimate.
  • Fermi momentum k_F = ~1.4 A^-1
    Fitted to the circular Fermi contours of Pb in Fig. 2(d).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption ARPES intensity as a function of light polarization reflects the orbital symmetry of the initial state (s probes in-plane, p probes mixed/out-of-plane), with no significant final-state distortions.
    Used in Sec. III E to assign out-of-plane pz character to the Pb bands.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT with SOC for a (1x1) Pb monolayer on a six-bilayer SiC slab, with H termination and fixed in-plane lattice parameter, provides a qualitatively correct band structure of the intercalated Pb layer.
    Used in Sec. III D to interpret band splittings, gaps, and orbital character.
  • domain assumption n-type dopants in 6H-SiC freeze out as temperature decreases, reducing electron donation from the substrate.
    Used in Sec. III F to interpret the increase in p-doping of graphene at 18 K versus 80 K.
  • standard math Luttinger theorem applies to the 2D electron pockets of the Pb layer to estimate carrier density from the Fermi surface area.
    Invoked in Sec. III B to convert k_F to 6.8e14 cm^-2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pb-intercalated epitaxial graphene on SiC: Full insight into band structure and orbital character of interlayer Pb, and charge transfer into graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VDYIOZYF

@misc{pith2026250108172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pb-intercalated epitaxial graphene on SiC: Full insight into band structure and orbital character of interlayer Pb, and charge transfer into graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VDYIOZYF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08172}
}
abstract

Intercalation is a robust approach for modulating the properties of epitaxial graphene on SiC and stabilizing two-dimensional (2D) intercalant layers at the graphene/SiC interface. In this work, we present synchrotron-based angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements focussing on the band structure of intercalated Pb under a single layer of epitaxial graphene. The interlayer Pb exhibits a metallic character, a $(1 \times 1)$ registry with respect to SiC, and free electron-like bands to a first order. Divergences from the free electron approximation include various band splittings and gaps throughout the Pb Brillouin zone. Light polarization dependent ARPES measurements indicate a predominant out-of-plane orbital character for the Pb bands, suggesting potential interactions between the interlayer Pb and graphene's $\pi$ orbitals that may induce proximity effects in graphene. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations for a $(1 \times 1)$ Pb monolayer on SiC show a reasonable qualitative agreement with the experimentally observed interlayer bands as well as the polarization dependent measurements. Finally, temperature dependent ARPES measurements reveal that the nearly charge-neutral graphene layer involves charge transfer from both the interlayer Pb and the substrate SiC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08172 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) LEED pattern of Pb-QFMLG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) CIS map along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Side view of atomic arrangement of a Pb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Influence of light polarization on the band intensities of interlayer Pb ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Matta, P

    B. Matta, P. Rosenzweig, O. Bolkenbaas, K. Küster, and U. Starke, Momentum microscopy of Pb-intercalated graphene on SiC: Charge neutrality and electronic struc- ture of interfacial Pb, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023250 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Riedl, C

    C. Riedl, C. Coletti, T. Iwasaki, A. A. Zakharov, and U. Starke, Quasi-free-standing epitaxial graphene on SiC obtained by hydrogen intercalation, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 246804 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [2]

    J. L. McChesney, A. Bostwick, T. Ohta, Th. Seyller, K. Horn, J. González, and E. Rotenberg, Extended van Hove Singularity and Superconducting Instability in Doped Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 136803 (2010). 10

    work page 2010

  4. [3]

    K. V. Emtsev, A. A. Zakharov, C. Coletti, S. Forti, and U. Starke, Ambipolar doping in quasifree epitax- ial graphene on SiC(0001) controlled by Ge intercalation, Phys. Rev. B84, 125423 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    Marchenko, A

    D. Marchenko, A. Varykhalov, J. Sánchez-Barriga, Th. Seyller, and O. Rader, Rashba splitting of 100 meV in Au-intercalated graphene on SiC, Appl. Phys. Lett.108, 172405 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [5]

    Forti, A

    S. Forti, A. Stöhr, A. A. Zakharov, C. Coletti, K. V. Emt- sev, and U. Starke, Mini-Dirac cones in the band structure of a copper intercalated epitaxial graphene superlattice, 2D Materials 3, 035003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    S. Link, S. Forti, A. Stöhr, K. Küster, M. Rösner, D. Hirschmeier, C. Chen, J. Avila, M. C. Asensio, A. A. Zakharov, T. O. Wehling, A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Kat- snelson, and U. Starke, Introducing strong correlation effects into graphene by gadolinium intercalation, Phys. Rev. B 100, 121407(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [7]

    Berger, Z

    C. Berger, Z. Song, T. Li, X. Li, A. Y. Ogbazghi, R. Feng, Z. Dai, A. N. Marchenkov, E. H. Conrad, P. N. First, and W. A. de Heer, Ultrathin Epitaxial Graphite: 2D Electron Gas Properties and a Route toward Graphene- based Nanoelectronics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 19912 (2004)

    work page 2004

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    K. V. Emtsev, A. Bostwick, K. Horn, J. Jobst, G. L. Kellogg, L. Ley, J. L. McChesney, T. Ohta, S. A. Re- shanov, J. Röhrl, E. Rotenberg, A. K. Schmid, D. Wald- mann, H. B. Weber, and Th. Seyller, Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of sili...

    2009

  2. [9]

    X. Yu, C. Hwang, C. Jozwiak, A. Köhl, A. Schmid, and A. Lanzara, New synthesis method for the growth of epitaxial graphene, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 184, 100 (2011)

    2011

  3. [10]

    Kruskopf, D

    M. Kruskopf, D. M. Pakdehi, K. Pierz, S. Wundrack, R. Stosch, T. Dziomba, M. Götz, J. Baringhaus, J. Apro- janz, C. Tegenkamp, J. Lidzba, Th. Seyller, F. Hohls, F. J. Ahlers, and H. W. Schumacher, Comeback of epitaxial graphene for electronics: large-area growth of bilayer-fre...

    2016

  4. [11]

    Hayashi, A

    S. Hayashi, A. Visikovskiy, T. Kajiwara, T. Iimori, T. Shi- rasawa, K. Nakastuji, T. Miyamachi, S. Nakashima, K. Yaji, K. Mase, F. Komori, and S. Tanaka, Triangular lattice atomic layer of Sn(1× 1) at graphene/SiC(0001) interface, Applied Physics Express11, 015202 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Forti, S

    S. Forti, S. Link, A. Stöhr, Y. Niu, A. A. Zakharov, C. Co- letti, and U. Starke, Semiconductor to metal transition in two-dimensional gold and its van der Waals heterostack with graphene, Nat. Commun.11, 2236 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Rosenzweig and U

    Ph. Rosenzweig and U. Starke, Large-area synthesis of a semiconducting silver monolayer via intercalation of epitaxial graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 201407(R) (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Briggs, B

    N. Briggs, B. Bersch, Y. Wang, J. Jiang, R. J. Koch, N. Nayir, K. Wang, M. Kolmer, W. Ko, A. De La Fuente Duran, S. Subramanian, C. Dong, J. Shallenberger, M. Fu, Q. Zou, Y.-W. Chuang, Z. Gai, A.-P. Li, A. Bostwick, C. Jozwiak, C.-Z. Chang, E. Rotenberg, J. Zhu, A. C. T. van D...

    2020

  8. [15]

    Y. Sohn, S. W. Jung, F. Göhler, W. J. Shin, S. Cha, T. Seyller, and K. S. Kim, Electronic band structure of Bi-intercalate layers in graphene and SiC(0001), Journal of the Korean Physical Society78, 157 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Schmitt, J

    C. Schmitt, J. Erhardt, P. Eck, M. Schmitt, K. Lee, P. Keßler, T. Wagner, M. Spring, B. Liu, S. Enzner, M. Kamp, V. Jovic, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Roten- berg, T. Kim, C. Cacho, Tien-Lin, G. Sangiovanni, S. Moser, and R. Claessen, Achieving environmental stabil- ity in an ...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Yurtsever, J

    A. Yurtsever, J. Onoda, T. Iimori, K. Niki, T. Miyamachi, M. Abe, S. Mizuno, S. Tanaka, F. Komori, and Y. Sugi- moto, Effects of Pb Intercalation on the Structural and Electronic Properties of Epitaxial Graphene on SiC, Small 12, 3956 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    S. Chen, P. A. Thiel, E. Conrad, and M. C. Tringides, Growth and stability of Pb intercalated phases under graphene on SiC, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 124005 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    D. Yang, Q. Xia, H. Gao, S. Dong, G. Zhao, Y. Zeng, F. Ma, and T. Hu, Fabrication and mechanism of Pb- intercalated graphene on SiC, Appl. Surf. Sci.569, 151012 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Gruschwitz, C

    M. Gruschwitz, C. Ghosal, T.-H. Shen, S. Wolff, Th. Seyller, and C. Tegenkamp, Surface Transport Prop- erties of Pb-Intercalated Graphene, Materials14, 7706 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    T. Hu, D. Yang, H. Gao, Y. Li, X. Liu, K. Xu, Q. Xia, and F. Ma, Atomic structure and electronic properties of the intercalated Pb atoms underneath a graphene layer, Carbon 179, 151 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Ghosal, M

    C. Ghosal, M. Gruschwitz, J. Koch, S. Gemming, and C. Tegenkamp, Proximity-Induced Gap Opening by Twisted Plumbene in Epitaxial Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 116802 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Y. Han, M. Kolmer, M. C. Tringides, and J. W. Evans, Thermodynamics and kinetics of Pb intercalation under graphene on SiC(0001), Carbon205, 336 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Y. Han, S. Chen, J. Hall, S. Roberts, M. Kolmer, J. W. Evans, and M. C. Tringides, Degeneracy in Intercalated Pb Phases under Buffer-Layer Graphene on SiC(0001) and Diffuse Moiré Spots in Surface Diffraction, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 7053 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Schädlich, C

    P. Schädlich, C. Ghosal, M. Stettner, B. Matta, S. Wolff, F. Schölzel, P. Richter, M. Hutter, A. Haags, S. Wen- zel, Z. Mamiyev, J. Koch, S. Soubatch, P. Rosenzweig, C. Polley, F. S. Tautz, C. Kumpf, K. Küster, U. Starke, T. Seyller, F. C. Bocquet, and C. Tegenkamp, Domain Bou...

    2023

  19. [27]

    A. Vera, B. Zheng, W. Yanez, K. Yang, S. Y. Kim, X. Wang, J. C. Kotsakidis, H. El-Sherif, G. Krishnan, R. J. Koch, T. A. Bowen, C. Dong, Y. Wang, M. Wetherington, E. Rotenberg, N. Bassim, A. L. Friedman, R. M. Wallace, C. Liu, N. Samarth, V. H. Crespi, and J. A. Robinson, Larg...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Schölzel, P

    F. Schölzel, P. Richter, A. D. P. Unigarro, S. Wolff, H. Schwarz, A. Schütze, N. Rösch, S. Gemming, T. Seyller, and P. Schädlich, Large-area lead monolayers under cover: Intercalation, doping, and phase transformation, Small Structures 6, 2400338 (2025). 11

    2025

  21. [29]

    J. Wang, M. Kim, L. Chen, K.-M. Ho, M. Tringides, C.-Z. Wang, and S. Wang, Manipulation of electronic property of epitaxial graphene on SiC substrate by Pb intercalation, Phys. Rev. B103, 085403 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Brozzesi, P

    S. Brozzesi, P. Gori, D. S. Koda, F. Bechstedt, and O. Pulci, Thermodynamics and electronic structure of ad- sorbed and intercalated plumbene in graphene/hexagonal SiC heterostructures, Scientific Reports14, 2947 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Y. Han, M. Kolmer, J. W. Evans, and M. C. Tringides, First-principles analysis of intercalated Pb structures under buffer-layer graphene on SiC(0001): Pb(111)-, plumbene-, and amorphous-like Pb layers, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 044002 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    L.-L. Wang, S. Chen, M. Kolmer, Y. Han, and M. C. Tringides, Strain-modulated intercalated phases of Pb monolayer with dual periodicity in SiC(0001)-graphene interface, Applied Surface Science681, 161572 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Gruschwitz, T

    M. Gruschwitz, T. Güldenpfennig, A. Cordier, C. Ghosal, S. Sologub, and C. Tegenkamp, Transport characteristics of epitaxial graphene proximitized to a two-dimensional Pb interface layer, Phys. Rev. B109, 245430 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    I. I. Klimovskikh, M. M. Otrokov, V. Yu. Voroshnin, D. Sostina, L. Petaccia, G. Di Santo, S. Thakur, E. V. Chulkov, and A. M. Shikin, Spin–Orbit Coupling Induced Gap in Graphene on Pt(111) with Intercalated Pb Mono- layer, ACS Nano11, 368 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. I. Klimovskikh, F. Calleja, A. M. Shikin, O. Vilkov, A. G. Rybkin, D. Estyunin, S. Muff, J. H. Dil, A. L. Vázquez de Parga, R. Miranda, H. Ochoa, F. Guinea, J. I. Cerdá, E. V. Chulkov, and A. Arnau, Evidence of large spin-orbit coupling effects in quasi-free-...

    2018

  28. [36]

    Cherkez, P

    V. Cherkez, P. Mallet, T. Le Quang, L. Magaud, and J.-Y. Veuillen, Electronic properties of Pb islands on graphene: Consequences of a weak interface coupling from a combined STM and ab initio study, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195441 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Paschke, T

    F. Paschke, T. Birk, S. Forti, U. Starke, and M. Fonin, Hydrogen-Intercalated Graphene on SiC as Platform for Hybrid Superconductor Devices, Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 2000082 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Ramachandran, M

    V. Ramachandran, M. F. Brady, A. R. Smith, R. M. Feenstra, and D. W. Greve, Preparation of atomically flat surfaces on silicon carbide using hydrogen etching, J. Electron. Mater. 27, 308 (1998)

    1998

  31. [39]

    Soubatch, S

    S. Soubatch, S. E. Saddow, S. P. Rao, W. Y. Lee, M. Kon- uma, and U. Starke, Structure and Morphology of 4H-SiC Wafer Surfaces after H2-Etching, Mater. Sci. Forum483, 761 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    Riedl, C

    C. Riedl, C. Coletti, and U. Starke, Structural and elec- tronic properties of epitaxial graphene on SiC(0 0 0 1): a review of growth, characterization, transfer doping and hy- drogen intercalation, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43, 374009 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mau...

    2009

  34. [42]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Ger...

    2017

  35. [43]

    K. V. Emtsev, F. Speck, Th. Seyller, L. Ley, and J. D. Riley, Interaction, growth, and ordering of epitaxial graphene on SiC0001 surfaces: A comparative photo- electron spectroscopy study, Phys. Rev. B77, 155303 (2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    1 do not present atomic resolution

    The STM measurements shown in Fig. 1 do not present atomic resolution

  37. [45]

    2(d) and (e)

    First and repeated BZ measurements for a Pb-QFMLG show that the surface BZ of interlayer Pb coincides with that of the SiC substrate, as discussed in Figs. 2(d) and (e)

  38. [46]

    Here, the ARPES data obtained in half of the Fermi sur- face has been mirrored with respect to theMΓM direction of Pb (KΓK′ direction of graphene)

  39. [47]

    J. M. Luttinger and J. C. Ward, Ground-State Energy of a Many-Fermion System. II, Phys. Rev.118, 1417 (1960)

    1960

  40. [48]

    J. M. Luttinger, Fermi Surface and Some Simple Equi- librium Properties of a System of Interacting Fermions, Phys. Rev. 119, 1153 (1960)

    1960

  41. [49]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional ARPES and DFT results

  42. [50]

    Theπ bands do not appear at |⃗k||| = 1.702 Å−1 (momen- tum value corresponding to theK point of graphene along its ΓK direction) because the CIS map is not taken at the Fermi energy but instead at a binding energy of1.1 eV

  43. [51]

    Zhang, P

    P. Zhang, P. Richard, T. Qian, Y.-M. Xu, X. Dai, and H. Ding, A precise method for visualizing dispersive fea- tures in image plots, Review of Scientific Instruments82, 043712 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Mammadov, J

    S. Mammadov, J. Ristein, R. J. Koch, M. Ostler, C. Raidel, M. Wanke, R. Vasiliauskas, R. Yakimova, and T. Seyller, Polarization doping of graphene on silicon carbide, 2D Materials1, 035003 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    K. Yang, Y. Wang, and C.-X. Liu, Momentum-Space Spin Antivortex and Spin Transport in Monolayer Pb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 166601 (2022). 12 Supplementary Information Pb-intercalated epitaxial graphene on SiC: Full insight into band structure and orbital character of interlayer...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.