Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Equivalence between Time Series Predictability and Bayes Error Rate

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.02559 v1 pith:VE7XW64Q submitted 2022-08-04 cs.IT math.ITphysics.data-an

classification cs.ITmath.ITphysics.data-an
keywords predictabilityerrorratebayespredictionseriestimeaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Predictability is an emerging metric that quantifies the highest possible prediction accuracy for a given time series, being widely utilized in assessing known prediction algorithms and characterizing intrinsic regularities in human behaviors. Lately, increasing criticisms aim at the inaccuracy of the estimated predictability, caused by the original entropy-based method. In this brief report, we strictly prove that the time series predictability is equivalent to a seemingly unrelated metric called Bayes error rate that explores the lowest error rate unavoidable in classification. This proof bridges two independently developed fields, and thus each can immediately benefit from the other. For example, based on three theoretical models with known and controllable upper bounds of prediction accuracy, we show that the estimation based on Bayes error rate can largely solve the inaccuracy problem of predictability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools