Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 44 references

This paper demonstrates the first topological antilaser, in which a topologically protected chiral edge mode absorbs two coherent inputs perfectly and keeps near-unity absorption even under strong disorder.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 08:12 UTC pith:VEHM5TCC

load-bearing objection First experimental topological antilaser with genuinely clean CPA dips; the central result holds, but the 'super-universal' W=3 claim outruns the evidence. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.17719 v2 pith:VEHM5TCC submitted 2026-01-25 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Topological antilaser

Rui-Chang Shen , Chunquan Peng , Bingbing Wang , Wentao Xie , Siyuan Zhang , Peiheng Zhou , Baile Zhang , Y. D. Chong
show 1 more author
Haoran Xue
This is my paper
classification physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topological antilasercoherent perfect absorptionchiral edge modestopological protectiondisorder robustnessanomalous Floquet insulatornonreciprocal microwave networktime-reversed laser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first experimental topological antilaser: a device that converts a topologically protected chiral edge mode into a coherent perfect absorber, the time-reversed counterpart of a topological laser. Because the edge mode resists backscattering and preserves its spatial profile under perturbation, the perfect-absorption condition survives disorder that detunes ordinary antilasers. The authors show near-unity absorption at a disorder strength of W = 1.45, and that in strongly disordered lattices antilasing works for essentially arbitrary placements of loss and input ports, while trivial modes fail in most cases. The result establishes topologically protected absorption as the missing counterpart of topological lasing.

Core claim

The central claim is that coherent perfect absorption, previously fragile to imperfections, can be topologically protected by driving a chiral edge mode of a nonreciprocal photonic lattice into a CPA condition. The authors construct a honeycomb network of circulators, identify chiral edge modes at 6.765 GHz, and tune two coherent microwave inputs plus a local loss to an isolated zero-output critical point in the four-dimensional parameter space of frequency, phase difference, attenuation difference, and added loss. Under random length disorder of the connecting strips up to W = 1.45, the total output stays below about 0.08, corresponding to near-unity absorption, while antilasers built on bu

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the chiral edge mode of a nonreciprocal honeycomb scattering network, in which each node is a three-port circulator with a fixed scattering matrix describing transmission and reflection between ports. These modes propagate unidirectionally along the boundary and remain delocalized under disorder, so the field distribution stays nearly unchanged as measured by the Pearson correlation coefficient. The CPA condition is an isolated critical point in the tuning space where two coherent inputs interfere destructively; topological protection keeps that field distribution stable, which preserves the interference condition and allows antilasing to be found for arbitrary pla

Load-bearing premise

The robustness claim rests on modeling disorder as independent random length changes of the connecting strips while keeping each circulator's scattering matrix unchanged; if real disorder also perturbs the circulators themselves or their magnetic bias, the edge-mode field profile may not stay stable enough to preserve perfect absorption.

What would settle it

A concrete test: fabricate or simulate a topological sample with the same disorder strength W = 1.45 but introduce disorder in the circulator scattering matrices or bias fields instead of only strip lengths, then measure the minimum total output; if it rises well above 0.08 or the Pearson correlation of the field profile drops sharply, the claimed universal robustness to disorder fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Perfect absorption no longer requires a precisely engineered distribution of loss; dissipation can be placed anywhere along the edge, relaxing device constraints.
  • Disorder-resistant absorption could make coherent perfect absorbers practical in fabricated chips where manufacturing tolerances would otherwise detune the interference condition.
  • The time-reversal duality between lasers and absorbers now extends to topological systems, implying that every topological laser configuration has a corresponding topologically protected absorber.
  • The phenomenon is not tied to the specific anomalous Floquet insulator used here; the paper verifies theoretically that Chern insulators with chiral edge modes support the same effect, suggesting transfer to optical, phononic, and possibly non-Hermitian platforms.
  • The demonstrated four-dimensional tuning procedure offers a practical way to locate CPA in complex lattices, potentially useful for mode-selective absorption and sensing.
  • The field-profile stability used to explain the robustness suggests a quantitative criterion—Pearson correlation of the field under disorder—that can be used to predict antilaser stability in other topological systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the robustness truly stems from the edge mode's stable spatial profile rather than the specific anomalous Floquet phase, then a direct experimental comparison in a Chern insulator platform with comparable loss would provide a clean test of the mechanism.
  • The disorder model is restricted to independent length variations of the connecting strips while keeping each circulator's scattering matrix fixed; a test that also randomizes circulator phases, scattering parameters, or bias-field strengths would reveal whether the protection extends to all perturbations or only to geometric path-length disorder.
  • Because the antilaser sits at a critical point where total output is extremely sensitive to parameter shifts, the same setup could function as a sensitive detector: small external perturbations could push the output steeply away from zero, and the degree of topological protection could tune the trade-off between robustness and sensitivity.
  • Extending the concept to non-Hermitian topological modes such as skin modes may change how much protection the field profile receives, since skin-mode localization is itself disorder-sensitive; studying this could clarify which topological invariants protect absorption versus propagation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental realization of a 'topological antilaser' in a nonreciprocal microwave scattering network based on circulators in a honeycomb lattice. By injecting two coherent inputs into a chiral edge mode at 6.765 GHz, the authors observe coherent perfect absorption (CPA) at isolated points in frequency, phase, amplitude, and local-loss parameter space. They then study robustness to structural disorder modeled as independent random strip-length variations, finding that the chiral-edge-mode antilaser maintains near-unity absorption up to W=1.45, in contrast to bulk-mode and 1D-trivial-mode antilasers. In a strongly disordered sample with W=3, numerical scans over all port and loss-site placements are claimed to show 'super-universal' antilasing for the topological case but failure for a large fraction of the trivial case, supported by three experimental configurations. The authors attribute these properties to disorder-immune propagation and stable spatial profiles of topological chiral edge modes.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work would establish a new functionality—topologically protected coherent perfect absorption—as the time-reversed counterpart to topological lasing, with potential implications for robust energy dissipation, wave control, and sensing. The experimental platform is well chosen: low-loss nonreciprocal microwave networks, precise fabrication, and direct measurement of scattering parameters. The numerical simulations use measured S-parameters rather than fitting the target output, which is a notable strength. The observation of clear antilasing dips, the disorder scaling data, and the experimental demonstrations at W=3 are valuable regardless of the interpretive label. However, the stronger claims—topological protection under strong disorder and 'super-universal' behavior—depend on several assumptions that are not fully demonstrated in the present manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4 (Fig. 4) and 'Prevalence of topological antilaser'] The manuscript never verifies that the quasienergy gap and chiral edge mode survive the strong disorder W=3 used in Fig. 4. The disorder is defined by ΔL_i with W=2πAf√ε_eff/c; at W=3 and f≈7 GHz this corresponds to a single-link phase perturbation of ~2.6 rad, comparable to the propagation phase. For an anomalous Floquet insulator, such large phase disorder can close the gap, in which case the edge mode is no longer topologically protected. The paper only demonstrates field-profile stability up to W=1.5 (Fig. 3e,f) and then extrapolates to W=3. The three experimental configurations in Fig. 4d-f show antilasing in the 'topological' sample, but without evidence of an open gap and propagating chiral edge mode at W=3, the causal claim that topological protection is the mechanism is not established. The authors should provide a disordered band-structure or edge-transport calculation for W=3
  2. [§4 (Fig. 4a) and 'super-universal' claim] The 'super-universal' conclusion rests on a post-hoc -36 dB cutoff: the text states 'we find that -36 dB is a good cutoff line' after inspecting the data. Since the minimum output values are explicitly sensitive to the parameter-scanning step, this classification threshold is not a physical observable but an analysis choice. More importantly, the 2520-position scan in Fig. 4a appears to be performed on a single disorder realization (one strongly disordered sample), while the text claims universality 'regardless of ... the specific disorder realizations.' No distribution over disorder realizations is shown for the W=3 calculations. The authors should either provide multi-realization statistics or weaken the 'super-universal' claim to 'holds for the tested realization and configurations.'
  3. [§3 (Fig. 3) and 'Robustness of topological antilaser'] The comparison between the topological chiral-edge antilaser (6.765 GHz), the bulk-mode antilaser (6.591 GHz), and the 1D-trivial-mode antilaser (6.927 GHz, hollowed sample) is not frequency- or platform-matched. The bulk mode is at a different frequency in the same sample, and the trivial mode uses a hollowed structure without circulators, which has different intrinsic loss and mode structure. Thus the faster degradation of the non-topological cases could be partly a linewidth, loss, or mode-confinement effect rather than a direct consequence of the absence of topological protection. A more controlled comparison—for example, tuning the parameters so that the bare sensitivity to disorder is normalized, or using modes with comparable quality factors—is needed to support the conclusion that the topological edge mode is intrinsically more robust.
  4. [§2 (Eq. 1) and disorder model] The disorder model includes only independent uniform length variations of the connecting strips, with the circulator scattering matrix S0 (Eq. 1) held fixed. Realistic strong disorder in a fabricated network would also perturb the circulator responses, port couplings, and possibly the bias magnets, which could change the interference condition in ways not captured by link phase disorder. Since the W=3 universality claim is central, the authors should either include circulator-level disorder in their numerical model or justify, with measurements, that strip-length variations dominate the experimental disorder. Otherwise the robustness may not transfer to other sources of fabrication error.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §4] The phrase 'arbitrary placements of dissipation and input ports' is stronger than demonstrated: the experiment uses three configurations on one W=3 sample, and the numerical scan is over edge positions of a single sample. Consider qualifying as 'all tested edge placements in a strongly disordered sample.'
  2. [§4, first paragraph] The text says 'we randomly choose the positions of the two ports and the lossy site' but Fig. 4a is described as scanning 'all possible combinations.' Please clarify whether the scan is exhaustive or random, and specify the number of disorder realizations.
  3. [§3, Fig. 3e] The caption states 'the disorder realization is the same as in the experiments'—please specify whether this means a single realization or an ensemble average, since Fig. 3f uses 1000 realizations for the numerical curves.
  4. [§4, Fig. 4a] The term 'super-universal' is not defined in the text and is potentially misleading. A quantitative definition (e.g., fraction of configurations below a pre-registered threshold) would improve precision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the reported robustness is directly measured and simulated from independent disorder perturbations, not derived from the target outputs or from load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The antilasing condition is found experimentally by scanning frequency, phase, attenuation, and loss positions (Fig. 2), not by fitting a parameter to the claimed robustness. The disorder study uses measured circulator scattering matrices (Eq. 1) with independent random strip-length variations ΔL_i, and the same disorder is applied to non-topological controls; no output quantity is used to fit the model. The claim that chiral edge modes retain a stable profile is supported by measured field distributions (Fig. 1e) and by the Pearson-correlation diagnostic (Eq. 2), rather than assumed by definition. Background citations, including the authors' own CPA and Floquet-Bloch modeling papers, provide standard framework and are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as the sole evidence for the central claim. Concerns about whether the quasienergy gap remains open at W=3 would be empirical or modeling limitations, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard CPA framework, the topological-edge-mode stability assumption, and a simplified disorder model. No new physical entities are introduced; 'topological antilaser' is a device concept assembled from existing ingredients. The main free choice is the -36 dB cutoff used to define 'antilasing realized' in the prevalence study.

free parameters (1)
  • antilasing cutoff for numerical classification = -36 dB
    In the 'Prevalence' section, the authors define antilasing as realized when the minimum total output falls below -36 dB, a threshold chosen after inspecting the numerical distribution. The 'super-universal' claim depends on this cutoff.
axioms (5)
  • standard math CPA is equivalent to a zero of the scattering matrix and is the time-reversed operation of lasing at threshold.
    Invoked in the introduction and used to define the target condition; standard result from cited CPA literature [22,23].
  • domain assumption In an anomalous Floquet insulator, chiral edge modes remain unidirectionally propagating and delocalized under disorder.
    Cited from [35,38] and used to explain the disorder robustness, quantified by the Pearson correlation ρ(W) in Eq. 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Structural disorder is fully captured by independent uniform random length variations of the connecting strips only, with the circulator scattering matrix unchanged.
    Used to define W in the robustness section; ignores disorder in circulators, bias magnets, and port couplings.
  • domain assumption The measured S-matrix of one circulator characterizes all nodes in the network.
    Used to compute dispersion and simulations; assumes fabrication uniformity across the array.
  • domain assumption Ports and lossy antenna do not significantly perturb the chiral edge mode.
    The setup of Fig. 2a assumes weakly coupled probes; if the coupling perturbs the mode, the CPA tuning condition changes.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16 in / 11894 out tokens · 258220 ms · 2026-08-03T08:12:43.965330+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Coherent perfect absorption (CPA)-the time-reversed operation of lasing at threshold-relies on finely tuned interference and is intrinsically fragile to disorder and structural imperfections. Whether absorption can be endowed with topological protection, by analogy to topological lasing, has remained an open question. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a topological antilaser: the time-reversed counterpart of a topological laser, in which chiral edge modes of a photonic lattice enable perfect light absorption protected by topology. Using a nonreciprocal microwave network with low intrinsic loss, we show that the topological antilaser preserves near-unity absorption under strong disorder, and, unlike conventional antilasers, remains functional for arbitrary placements of dissipation and input ports, even when the lattice is strongly perturbed. This robustness arises from the disorder-immune propagation and stable spatial profile of the topological edge modes. Our results establish topologically protected absorption as the missing counterpart of topological lasing, opening new directions for studying robust energy dissipation, wave control, and coherent-absorption-based detection technologies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references

  1. [1]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013905 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states, Nature461, 772 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Hafezi, E

    M. Hafezi, E. A. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and J. M. Taylor, Robust optical delay lines with topological protection, Nat. Phys.7, 907 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  9. [9]

    A. B. Khanikaev, S. Hossein Mousavi, W.-K. Tse, M. Kar- garian, A. H. MacDonald, and G. Shvets, Photonic topo- logical insulators, Nat. Mater.12, 233 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    Wu and X

    L.-H. Wu and X. Hu, Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 223901 (2015)

    2015

  11. [11]

    F. Gao, H. Xue, Z. Yang, K. Lai, Y. Yu, X. Lin, Y. Chong, G. Shvets, and B. Zhang, Topologically protected refrac- tion of robust kink states in valley photonic crystals, Nat. Phys.14, 140 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological photonics, Nat. Photon.8, 821 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, et al., Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lattice, Nat. Photon.11, 651 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    and lossy site (24) positions in a strongly disordered sample. The red and blue dots represent numerical results for the topological case and the 1D trivial case, respectively.b, An example where antilasing is realized in a disordered topological sample.c, An example where antilasing is impossible in a disordered trivial sample.d-f, Experimental realizati...

  16. [16]

    Bahari, A

    B. Bahari, A. Ndao, F. Vallini, A. El Amili, Y. Fainman, and B. Kant´ e, Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries, Science358, 636 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev, Topological insulator laser: Theory, Science 359, eaar4003 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological insulator laser: Experiments, Science359, eaar4005 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Y. Zeng, U. Chattopadhyay, B. Zhu, B. Qiang, J. Li, Y. Jin, L. Li, A. G. Davies, E. H. Linfield, B. Zhang, et al., Electrically pumped topological laser with valley edge modes, Nature578, 246 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Kim, M.-S

    H.-R. Kim, M.-S. Hwang, D. Smirnova, K.-Y. Jeong, Y. Kivshar, and H.-G. Park, Multipolar lasing modes from topological corner states, Nat. Commun.11, 5758 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Dikopoltsev, T

    A. Dikopoltsev, T. H. Harder, E. Lustig, O. A. Egorov, J. Beierlein, A. Wolf, Y. Lumer, M. Emmerling, C. Schnei- der, S. H¨ ofling,et al., Topological insulator vertical-cavity 7 laser array, Science373, 1514 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    L. Yang, G. Li, X. Gao, and L. Lu, Topological-cavity surface-emitting laser, Nat. Photon.16, 279 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Chong, L

    Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010)

    2010

  24. [24]

    D. G. Baranov, A. Krasnok, T. Shegai, A. Al` u, and Y. Chong, Coherent perfect absorbers: linear control of light with light, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17064 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Longhi, PT-symmetric laser absorber, Phys

    S. Longhi, PT-symmetric laser absorber, Phys. Rev. A 82, 031801 (2010)

    2010

  26. [26]

    Chong, L

    Y. Chong, L. Ge, and A. D. Stone, PT-symmetry breaking and laser-absorber modes in optical scattering systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 093902 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption, Science331, 889 (2011)

    2011

  28. [28]

    Zhang, K

    J. Zhang, K. F. MacDonald, and N. I. Zheludev, Control- ling light-with-light without nonlinearity, Light Sci. Appl. 1, e18 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    Z. J. Wong, Y.-L. Xu, J. Kim, K. O’Brien, Y. Wang, L. Feng, and X. Zhang, Lasing and anti-lasing in a single cavity, Nat. Photon.10, 796 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    P. Wei, C. Cro¨ enne, S. Tak Chu, and J. Li, Symmetri- cal and anti-symmetrical coherent perfect absorption for acoustic waves, Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 121902 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    J. Song, P. Bai, Z. Hang, and Y. Lai, Acoustic coherent perfect absorbers, New J. Phys.16, 033026 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    Roger, S

    T. Roger, S. Vezzoli, E. Bolduc, J. Valente, J. J. Heitz, J. Jeffers, C. Soci, J. Leach, C. Couteau, N. I. Zheludev, et al., Coherent perfect absorption in deeply subwave- length films in the single-photon regime, Nat. Commun. 6, 7031 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Pichler, M

    K. Pichler, M. K¨ uhmayer, J. B¨ ohm, A. Brandst¨ otter, P. Ambichl, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Random anti- lasing through coherent perfect absorption in a disordered medium, Nature567, 351 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    C. Wang, W. R. Sweeney, A. D. Stone, and L. Yang, Co- herent perfect absorption at an exceptional point, Science 373, 1261 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Slobodkin, G

    Y. Slobodkin, G. Weinberg, H. H¨ orner, K. Pichler, S. Rot- ter, and O. Katz, Massively degenerate coherent perfect absorber for arbitrary wavefronts, Science377, 995 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Zhang, P

    Z. Zhang, P. Delplace, and R. Fleury, Superior robust- ness of anomalous non-reciprocal topological edge states, Nature598, 293 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Q. Chen, Z. Zhang, H. Qin, A. Bossart, Y. Yang, H. Chen, and R. Fleury, Anomalous and Chern topological waves in hyperbolic networks, Nat. Commun.15, 2293 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Liang and Y

    G. Liang and Y. Chong, Optical resonator analog of a two-dimensional topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 203904 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the” parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  41. [41]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quanti- zation of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional param- agnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B74, 085308 (2006)

    2006

  42. [42]

    Zhang, X.-Q

    D. Zhang, X.-Q. Luo, Y.-P. Wang, T.-F. Li, and J. You, Observation of the exceptional point in cavity magnon- polaritons, Nat. Commun.8, 1368 (2017)

    2017

  43. [43]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  44. [44]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018). Methods Sample details The nonreciprocal network sample consists of three-port circulators interconnected with waveguides. The circula- tor (UIYSC9B55T6, UIY Co.) incorporates a samarium- cobalt (SmCo) permanent magnet that generates ...

    2018