Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 300 references

Anisotropic membrane-deforming colloids attract first at high-curvature spots, then reorient into compact, nearly spherical packs.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 08:18 UTC pith:VEKW7RON

load-bearing objection Solid experimental library of anisotropic membrane-deforming colloids with clear geometric assembly rules; theory is supportive for simple shapes but rests on a free confinement volume. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.10917 v1 pith:VEKW7RON submitted 2026-07-12 cond-mat.soft

Assembly pathways of anisotropic lipid membrane-deforming colloids

Ali Azadbakht , Thomas Weikl , Daniela J. Kraft This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords membrane-mediated interactionsanisotropic colloidscurvature-driven assemblylipid vesiclesHelfrich bending energyshape complementarityself-assembly pathways
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Membrane proteins that bend lipid bilayers often have irregular shapes, yet how those shapes alone organize them has been hard to isolate. This paper uses micrometer-scale colloids of many geometries—ellipsoids, dumbbells, cubes, triangles, tetrahedra, and bent rods—confined under a flat lipid membrane so that each particle deforms the membrane without sticking to it. Direct imaging and energy-minimization calculations show that the particles first pull together at their sharpest, highest-curvature regions, then rotate and slide until they form tight clusters whose overall outline is as round as possible. Flat faces line up in register when they can; high-curvature corners and tips create barriers that trap some pathways in metastable states. The result supplies a shape-based rule set for how anisotropic membrane deformations steer both the route and the final arrangement of inclusions, offering a physical template for how BAR proteins, clathrin, and similar cellular machinery might organize.

Core claim

Membrane-deforming objects of diverse anisotropic shapes initially attract through their regions of highest curvature and subsequently reorient into close-packed arrangements whose circumference is approximately spherical. The packing is achieved by aligning flat faces—preferably in register—and by locally optimized geometry, while high-curvature regions impose energy barriers that select which assembly pathways are observed.

What carries the argument

Attachment-free confinement of shape-controlled colloids under a sessile, partially deflated GUV, combined with numerical minimization of the nonlinear Helfrich bending energy at fixed solvent-pocket volume per particle; this pair of tools maps orientation-dependent membrane energy landscapes onto the observed approach and reorientation pathways.

Load-bearing premise

The ranking of experimental pathways and final states is assumed to be controlled by static minimization of pure bending energy at a fixed confinement volume, without dominant contributions from tension, Gaussian curvature, hydrodynamics or residual forces.

What would settle it

Track pairs of the same shapes under systematically varied confinement volume or added membrane tension: if the predicted tip-first approach, face-register final states, or high-curvature barriers reverse or disappear while the pure-bending energy ranking does not, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Elongated inclusions such as BAR-domain proteins are predicted to approach tip-first then lock side-by-side, with necks or concavities further selecting offset or stacked registers.
  • Polyhedral or faceted membrane proteins should favor face-to-face contacts that keep the overall cluster outline compact and roughly circular.
  • High-curvature corners and tips act as kinetic barriers, so assembly of asymmetric shapes will be pathway-dependent and can trap metastable states.
  • Shape complementarity (lock-and-key cavities) can be used to steer membrane-mediated assembly into specific compact geometries.
  • Out-of-plane lifting becomes favorable only when it sufficiently reduces sharp membrane deformations relative to gravitational or other potential costs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same curvature-first, compact-outline rule should appear in multicomponent membranes once domain stiffness differences are mapped onto effective confinement volumes.
  • Synthetic membrane-shaping colloids or DNA origami could exploit the observed barriers to program sequential, non-equilibrium assembly pathways.
  • Non-additivity already visible with three tetrahedra implies that larger clusters will favor more circular global outlines even when local face contacts are sacrificed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and numerical study of membrane-mediated assembly of anisotropic colloids confined under partially deflated GUVs without attachment. Using optical tweezers and confocal imaging, the authors track pair (and small-cluster) trajectories for ellipsoids, dumbbells, cubes, scalene triangles, tetrahedra, and bent rods. They combine these observations with numerical minimization of the Helfrich bending energy under geometric constraints and fixed confinement volume per particle. The central claim is that objects initially attract via regions of highest curvature and then reorient into compact, near-spherical packings, achieved by face-to-face or side-by-side alignment (in register when possible) and local geometric packing, with high-curvature features imposing barriers that shape pathways and can produce metastable states.

Significance. If the geometric principles hold, the work supplies a clear experimental map of how anisotropic membrane deformations select assembly pathways and final arrangements, filling a gap left by prior isotropic-sphere studies. The attachment-free GUV–colloid platform, the systematic shape library (printed and synthetic), and the direct comparison of trajectories to minimum-energy pathways for ellipsoids and dumbbells are genuine strengths. The results are relevant both to soft-matter design of membrane-mediated assemblies and as a scaled model for curvature-sensing proteins (BAR domains, clathrin, ESCRT). The paper does not claim machine-checked proofs or fully parameter-free predictions, but the experimental reproducibility across initial conditions and the consistency with Helfrich ranking for the elongated shapes are solid contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. The load-bearing link from geometry to pathway is the ranking of static Helfrich minima at fixed confinement volume v per particle (Methods, Energy Minimization; Figs. 1I, 2D, S2). v is not measured from the experimental GUVs; it is chosen in the range ~6–9 vp so that the energy orderings match the imaged trajectories. Tension and Gaussian curvature are omitted, and dynamics/thermal activation are not modeled. For ellipsoids and dumbbells the agreement is persuasive, but the same quantitative ranking is not shown for triangles, tetrahedra, or bent rods. The manuscript should either (i) report an independent estimate of v (or tension) from the experimental membrane profiles and show that the pathway ranking is robust across a measured range, or (ii) clearly reframe the numerical results as qualitative support rather than mechanistic proof of the curvature-driven pathway rules.
  2. For cubes, scalene triangles, tetrahedra, and bent rods the claimed general principles rest on a small number of representative trajectories (Figs. 3–6 and Supplementary Videos 3–8). While the patterns are consistent with face alignment, compact packing, and high-curvature barriers, the paper asserts pathway dependence and metastability without statistics on how often each final state is reached from controlled initial conditions. A modest quantification (e.g., fraction of trajectories ending in each register for triangles, or stacked vs interlocked for bent rods) would make the kinetic-trapping claim load-bearing rather than anecdotal.
  3. The tetrahedron pair lifts out of plane (Fig. 5C,D; Fig. S3), estimated at ~4 kBT against gravity, while three tetrahedra remain planar (Fig. 5E). The text invokes non-additivity, but no energy comparison that includes the gravitational term is provided for the three-particle case. Without that comparison (or an explicit statement that the three-particle planar state is only experimentally observed), the non-additivity interpretation remains under-supported relative to the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and Conclusion state that objects “initially attract through regions of highest curvature.” For ellipsoids/dumbbells this is tip-first; for cubes it is sometimes corner/edge. A single clarifying sentence distinguishing “highest local curvature of the particle” from “highest induced membrane curvature” would avoid ambiguity.
  2. Fig. 1I,J and Fig. 2D: the solid lines are “guides for the eye.” Given that the numerical data are discrete minimizations, marking the computed points more clearly (and stating the lattice spacing of 200 nm already in the main text) would help the reader assess resolution.
  3. Several figure panels (e.g., Fig. 3D–F, Fig. 4) lack explicit time stamps or path labels that match the Supplementary Videos; adding them would improve navigability.
  4. Typographical slips: “a a large variety” (Conclusion), “energeticaFlly” (dumbbell section), “purchesed” (Materials), and inconsistent hyphenation of “side-to-side” / “side by side.”
  5. The Methods section on Energy Minimization correctly states the Monge Helfrich form (Eqs. 1–3) but does not mention whether the membrane is treated as tensionless or whether a small tension is present in the experimental GUVs; a brief statement would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental pathways are independent observations; Helfrich minimizations at chosen v rationalize them without redefining the target by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims about initial attraction via high-curvature regions, subsequent reorientation into compact near-spherical packings, face alignment, and high-curvature barriers are grounded in direct confocal imaging of particle trajectories for multiple shapes (Figs. 1G, 2A, 3, 4, 5, 6 and Supplementary Videos). Numerical work consists of standard constrained minimization of the pure Helfrich bending energy E_be = ∫ 2κ H^{2} dA (Methods, Energy Minimization) subject to geometric non-overlap and fixed confinement volume v per particle (chosen in the range ~6–9 v_p and shown for two values). These calculations rank orientations and pathways after the fact and match the imaged sequences for ellipsoids, dumbbells and cubes; they do not fit a free parameter to a data subset and then re-label the fit as a prediction of a closely related quantity. Prior self-citations (Azadbakht et al. 2023/2024) supply the attachment-free GUV platform and the non-additivity observation used as context; they do not force the anisotropic pathway results by definition or uniqueness theorem. No self-definitional loop, no ansatz smuggled via citation, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern occurs. The only minor circularity burden is ordinary methodological self-citation that is not load-bearing for the new geometric principles. Score 1 reflects that residual dependence on the freely chosen v (and omission of tension/Gaussian terms) is a modeling assumption, not circularity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on continuum Helfrich membrane theory, the attachment-free confinement geometry, and numerical energy ranking at chosen confinement volumes. No new physical entities are postulated. Free parameters are mainly the confinement volume used in minimizations and numerical discretization choices; domain assumptions are standard soft-matter membrane modeling.

free parameters (3)
  • confinement volume per particle v (shown at ~6 vp and 9 vp)
    Interaction energy landscapes depend on the solvent-pocket volume under the membrane; values are chosen/interpolated via a pressure Lagrange multiplier rather than independently measured for each experiment (Methods; Figs. 1I, 2D, S2).
  • numerical lattice constant 200 nm
    Discretization scale for Monge-surface energy minimization; stated as much smaller than particle size but not varied systematically in the text.
  • osmolarity/density deflation conditions (e.g. 300 mM sucrose in, 308 mM outer mix)
    Sets the flat membrane geometry and effective confinement; experimental control parameters that influence deformation magnitude.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Membrane energy is dominated by the Helfrich bending term E_be = ∫ 2κ H² dA in Monge gauge, with particle non-overlap constraints and fixed confinement volume.
    Energy Minimization section; used to rank pathways for ellipsoids, dumbbells, and cubes. Tension, spontaneous curvature, and Gaussian terms are not included as leading drivers.
  • domain assumption Particles remain free to translate/rotate without specific membrane adhesion; membrane may depart from particle surface.
    Core of the attachment-free GUV–colloid platform (Introduction/Results); PEG lipids used to suppress nonspecific attachment.
  • domain assumption Observed reorientations and packs are primarily membrane-bending-energy driven rather than residual optical-trap, hydrodynamic, or strong gravitational effects (except the estimated ~4 kBT tetrahedron lift).
    Implicit throughout Results when equating experimental pathways to minimum-energy conformations.
  • standard math Standard continuum differential geometry for mean curvature in Monge parametrization and multivariate finite differences on a square lattice.
    Equations (1)–(3) and numerical scheme in Methods.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 19580 in / 3105 out tokens · 36212 ms · 2026-07-14T08:18:33.618106+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Membrane-deformation mediated interactions play an important role in the spatial organization of proteins on the cell membrane. Although interactions between isotropic membrane deformations have been extensively investigated, the role of anisotropic deformations remains largely unexplored despite their prevalence in biological systems. Here, we experimentally investigate the assembly of anisotropic colloidal objects that deform a lipid membrane while being confined underneath it, without direct attachment. Combining experiments and numerical calculations, we analyze how a wide range of shapes, including ellipsoids, dumbbells, cubes, scalene triangles, tetrahedra, and bent rods, interact with each other through the membrane deformations they induce. We find that membrane-deforming objects initially attract through regions of highest curvature and subsequently reorient into close packed arrangements with an approximately spherical circumference. This is achieved through the alignment of flat faces - if possible in register - and locally optimized geometric packing, with regions of high curvature imposing energy barriers that influence the assembly pathway. Our work reveals general principles how anisotropic membrane deformations govern the assembly pathways and final particle arrangements, providing new insights into the behavior of membrane-deforming proteins and other inclusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10917 by Ali Azadbakht, Daniela J. Kraft, Thomas Weikl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Curvature-mediated interactions of membrane-deforming ellipsoidal col￾loids (A) Experimental setup and (B) 3D confocal microscopy reconstruction of anisotropic particles (green) confined between a sessile GUV (magenta) and a cover slip; confocal mi￾croscopy observation from below. White arrow indicates the direction of gravity. (C-E) Confocal images of (C) the plane close to the coverslip, (D) a zy-plane c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Curvature-mediated interaction of dumbbell-shaped colloids. (A) Two representative time series of confocal microscopy images showing membrane-mediated in￾teractions between two confined dumbbell-shaped colloids. The particles reorient during approach and ultimately arrange slightly off-set side-by-side arrangement, resembling a diamond configuration (see also Supplementary Video 2 ; vesicle with h = 19 µm … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Curvature-mediated interaction of cubic colloids: (A) SEM image of 3D printed cube and (B) assembly of two such cubes with sharp edges and corners through the membrane-deformation they impose. (C) SEM image of synthesized cube with 1.6 µm side length and (D,E,F) confocal microscopy images of the assembly of (D) two cubes (E) three, (F) four cubes through membrane deformations. Scale bars (A,B) 4 µm, (C) 1 … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sharp edges cause metastable states. (A) SEM image of a 3D printed scalene triangular colloid; scale bar 3 µm; (B, C, D, E) Four time series of confocal microscopy images showing the assembly pathways of two membrane-deforming scalene triangles starting from different initial configurations; vesicle with h = 44 µm and 2R = 64 µm. See Supplementary Video 5. Scale bars 5 µm. Having established some general p… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Curvature-mediated interaction of tetrahedron-shape colloids: (A) SEM image of a 3D printed tetrahedron. (B) A xz-plane cross section of a GUV deformed by a tetrahedron; (C) Time series of confocal microscopy images of the aggregation of two membrane-deformed tetrahedra. Particles attract until two faces are in contact, moving out￾of-plane to minimize vesicle deformation (Supplementary Video 6, vesicle: h … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Curvature-mediated interaction of bent rod-shaped and spherical col￾loids: (A) SEM image of a bent rod. (B,C,D,E) Time series of confocal images showing the assembly of two crescents with different initial orientations. (Vesicle: h = 60 µm and 2R = 84 µm). (B) when their cavities face each other, they assemble into an interlocked arrangement. (C,D, and E) When one of the cavities is closer to the back of t… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 268 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Taraska, Justin W

    Kozlov, Michael M. and Taraska, Justin W. , month = jan, year =. Generation of nanoscopic membrane curvature for membrane trafficking , volume =. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00511-9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00511-9

  2. [2]

    ACS Nano , author =

    Nonadditivity in. ACS Nano , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c05222 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c05222 2024

  3. [3]

    Soft Matter , author =

    Repulsions and attractions between membrane-deforming spheres,. Soft Matter , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1039/D4SM01415D , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/d4sm01415d 2025

  4. [4]

    Simunovic, Mijo and Evergren, Emma and Callan-Jones, Andrew and Bassereau, Patricia , month = oct, year =. Curving. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology , publisher =. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-060558 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-060558

  5. [5]

    Cell , author =

    An. Cell , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.021 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.021 2020

  6. [6]

    and Kraft, Daniela J

    Melio, Julio and van Hecke, Martin and Henkes, Silke E. and Kraft, Daniela J. , date =. Pivoting colloidal assemblies exhibit mechanical metamaterial behaviour , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10217-z , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10217-z

  7. [7]

    Role of Shape in Particle-Lipid Membrane Interactions: From Surfing to Full Engulfment , volume =

    van der Ham, Stijn and Agudo-Canalejo, Jaime and Vutukuri, Hanumantha Rao , date =. Role of Shape in Particle-Lipid Membrane Interactions: From Surfing to Full Engulfment , volume =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c11106 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c11106

  8. [8]

    2015 , journal =

    Saleem, Mohammed and Morlot, Sandrine and Hohendahl, Annika and Manzi, John and Lenz, Martin and Roux, Aurélien , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1038/ncomms7249 , issn =

    doi:10.1038/ncomms7249 2015

  9. [9]

    and Evans, Evan A

    Nagle, John F. and Evans, Evan A. and Bassereau, Patricia and Baumgart, Tobias and Tristram-Nagle, Stephanie and Dimova, Rumiana , number =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2025011118 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2025011118 2021

  10. [10]

    and Lipowsky, Reinhard , number =

    Dimova, Rumiana and Aranda, Said and Bezlyepkina, Natalya and Nikolov, Vesselin and Riske, Karin A. and Lipowsky, Reinhard , number =. 2006 , journal =. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/28/S04 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/28/s04 2006

  11. [11]

    and Mundigl, Olaf and De Camilli, Pietro , number =

    David, Carol and McPherson, Peter S. and Mundigl, Olaf and De Camilli, Pietro , number =. 1996 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.331 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.331 1996

  12. [12]

    2017 , journal =

    Noguchi, Hiroshi , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c7sm01375b , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c7sm01375b 2017

  13. [13]

    and Bouzid, M

    Allard, A. and Bouzid, M. and Betz, T. and Simon, C. and Abou-Ghali, M. and Lemi. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz3050 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz3050 2020

  14. [14]

    and Head, D

    Mizuno, D. and Head, D. A. and MacKintosh, F. C. and Schmidt, C. F. , number =. 2008 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ma801218z , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ma801218z 2008

  15. [15]

    and Sahu, Amaresh , number =

    Takatori, Sho C. and Sahu, Amaresh , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.158102 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.158102 2020

  16. [16]

    Manneville, J. B. and Bassereau, P. and Ramaswamy, S. and Prost, J. , number =. 2001 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.021908 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.64.021908 2001

  17. [17]

    2016 , journal =

    Bechinger, Clemens and Di Leonardo, Roberto and L. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.045006 , issn =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.045006 2016

  18. [18]

    and Gompper, Gerhard and Vermant, Jan , number =

    Vutukuri, Hanumantha Rao and Hoore, Masoud and Abaurrea-Velasco, Clara and van Buren, Lennard and Dutto, Alessandro and Auth, Thorsten and Fedosov, Dmitry A. and Gompper, Gerhard and Vermant, Jan , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2730-x , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2730-x 2020

  19. [19]

    and Kotar, Jurij and Cicuta, Pietro , number =

    Brown, Aidan T. and Kotar, Jurij and Cicuta, Pietro , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.84.021930 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.84.021930 2011

  20. [20]

    B.Sunil and Spangler, Eric J

    Laradji, Mohamed and Kumar, P. B.Sunil and Spangler, Eric J. , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.104989 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.104989 2020

  21. [21]

    , number =

    Mkrtchyan, Sergey and Ing, Christopher and Chen, Jeff Z.Y. , number =. 2010 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.011904 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.81.011904 2010

  22. [22]

    1997 , journal =

    Dietrich, Christian and Angelova, Miglena and Pouligny, Bernard , number =. 1997 , journal =. doi:10.1051/jp2:1997208 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1051/jp2:1997208 1997

  23. [23]

    and Paunov, Vesselin N

    Al-Shehri, Hamza and Horozov, Tommy S. and Paunov, Vesselin N. , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c4sm01030b , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c4sm01030b 2014

  24. [24]

    and Illya, Gregoria and Harmandaris, Vagelis A

    Reynwar, Benedict J. and Illya, Gregoria and Harmandaris, Vagelis A. and M. 2007 , journal =. doi:10.1038/nature05840 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05840 2007

  25. [25]

    , number =

    Chaffey, N. , number =. 2003 , journal =. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg023 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1093/aob/mcg023 2003

  26. [26]

    2015 , journal =

    Nedev, Spas and Carretero-Palacios, Sol and K. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ph500371z , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ph500371z 2015

  27. [27]

    2015 , journal =

    Zong, Yiwu and Liu, Jing and Liu, Rui and Guo, Honglian and Yang, Mingcheng and Li, Zhiyuan and Chen, Ke , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03565 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03565 2015

  28. [28]

    and Wright, Amanda J

    Bowman, Richard W. and Wright, Amanda J. and Padgett, Miles J. , number =. 2010 , journal =. doi:10.1088/2040-8978/12/12/124004 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1088/2040-8978/12/12/124004 2010

  29. [29]

    2021 , journal =

    Florentsen, Christoffer Dam and Kamp-Sonne, Alexander and Moreno-Pescador, Guillermo and Pezeshkian, Weria and Hakami Zanjani, Ali Asghar and Khandelia, Himanshu and Nylandsted, Jesper and Bendix, Poul Martin , number =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1039/d0sm00241k , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/d0sm00241k 2021

  30. [30]

    and McRaven, Michael D

    Tay, Matthew Zirui and Liu, Pinghuang and Williams, La Tonya D. and McRaven, Michael D. and Sawant, Sheetal and Gurley, Thaddeus C. and Xu, Thomas T. and Dennison, S. Moses and Liao, Hua Xin and Chenine, Agnès Laurence and Alam, S. Munir and Moody, M. Anthony and Hope, Thomas J. and Haynes, Barton F. and Tomaras, Georgia D. , number =. 2016 , journal =. d...

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005817 2016

  31. [31]

    , number =

    Friedrich, Rudolf and Peinke, Joachim and Sahimi, Muhammad and Reza Rahimi Tabar, M. , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.05.003 , issn =

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.05.003 2011

  32. [32]

    and Kieffer, Roland and Tam, Daniel and Aubin-Tam, Marie Eve , number =

    Dols-Perez, Aurora and Marin, Victor and Amador, Guillermo J. and Kieffer, Roland and Tam, Daniel and Aubin-Tam, Marie Eve , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b09983 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.9b09983 2019

  33. [33]

    2003 , journal =

    Aoyama, Yasuhiro and Kanamori, Takuya and Nakai, Takashi and Sasaki, Toshinori and Horiuchi, Shohei and Sando, Shinsuke and Niidome, Takuro , number =. 2003 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ja029608t , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ja029608t 2003

  34. [34]

    and Rieloff, Ellen and Dabkowska, Aleksandra P

    Wang, Meina and Mihut, Adriana M. and Rieloff, Ellen and Dabkowska, Aleksandra P. and M. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1807790116 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1807790116 2019

  35. [35]

    and Pavesio, Carlos , number =

    Agrawal, Rupesh and Smart, Thomas and Nobre-Cardoso, João and Richards, Christopher and Bhatnagar, Rhythm and Tufail, Adnan and Shima, David and Jones, Phil H. and Pavesio, Carlos , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1038/srep15873 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/srep15873 2016

  36. [36]

    2018 , journal =

    Sheikh-Hasani, Vahid and Babaei, Mehrad and Azadbakht, Ali and Pazoki-Toroudi, Hamidreza and Mashaghi, Alireza and Moosavi-Movahedi, Ali Akbar and Reihani, Seyed Nader Seyed , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1364/boe.9.001256 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1364/boe.9.001256 2018

  37. [37]

    2013 , journal =

    Weitz, Sebastian and Destainville, Nicolas , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c3sm50954k , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c3sm50954k 2013

  38. [38]

    , number =

    van der Wel, Casper and Kraft, Daniela J. , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/29/4/044001 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/29/4/044001 2017

  39. [39]

    2020 , journal =

    Pezeshkian, Weria and K. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16094-y , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16094-y 2020

  40. [40]

    2007 , journal =

    M. 2007 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.011921 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.76.011921 2007

  41. [41]

    and Kent, Helen M

    Peter, Brian J. and Kent, Helen M. and Mills, Ian G. and Vallis, Yvonne and Butler, P. Jonathan G. and Evans, Philip R. and McMahon, Harvey T. , number =. 2004 , journal =. doi:10.1126/science.1092586 , issn =

    doi:10.1126/science.1092586 2004

  42. [42]

    1992 , journal =

    Paulson, Mats , number =. 1992 , journal =. doi:10.3109/10409239209082560 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3109/10409239209082560 1992

  43. [43]

    2007 , journal =

    Nikolov, Vesselin and Lipowsky, Reinhard and Dimova, Rumiana , number =. 2007 , journal =. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.100032 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.100032 2007

  44. [44]

    and Jiang, Zhiping and Lee, Jennifer C

    Pfefferkorn, Candace M. and Jiang, Zhiping and Lee, Jennifer C. , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.032 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.032 2012

  45. [45]

    B.Vijaya and

    Monteiro, Antony Prakash and Kumar, K. B.Vijaya and. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/3/15 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/3/15 2011

  46. [46]

    and Fakhri, N

    Gladrow, J. and Fakhri, N. and Mackintosh, F. C. and Schmidt, C. F. and Broedersz, C. P. , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.248301 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.248301 2016

  47. [47]

    2014 , journal =

    Dasgupta, Sabyasachi and Katava, Marina and Faraj, Mohammed and Auth, Thorsten and Gompper, Gerhard , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1021/la502627h , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/la502627h 2014

  48. [48]

    and Nagayama, Kuniaki , number =

    Kralchevsky, Peter A. and Nagayama, Kuniaki , number =. 1994 , journal =. doi:10.1021/la00013a004 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/la00013a004 1994

  49. [49]

    Loudet, J. C. and Alsayed, A. M. and Zhang, J. and Yodh, A. G. , number =. 2005 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.018301 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.018301 2005

  50. [50]

    and Varkevisser, Thijs and Teunisse, Margot and Hoecht, Jonas and Ketzetzi, Stefania and Ouhajji, Samia and Kraft, Daniela J

    Doherty, Rachel P. and Varkevisser, Thijs and Teunisse, Margot and Hoecht, Jonas and Ketzetzi, Stefania and Ouhajji, Samia and Kraft, Daniela J. , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1039/d0sm01320j , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/d0sm01320j 2020

  51. [51]

    2010 , journal =

    M. 2010 , journal =. doi:10.1143/ptps.184.351 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.184.351 2010

  52. [52]

    and Alkawareek, Mahmoud Y

    Behzadi, Shahed and Serpooshan, Vahid and Tao, Wei and Hamaly, Majd A. and Alkawareek, Mahmoud Y. and Dreaden, Erik C. and Brown, Dennis and Alkilany, Alaaldin M. and Farokhzad, Omid C. and Mahmoudi, Morteza , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c6cs00636a , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c6cs00636a 2017

  53. [53]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.47216 , keywords =

    2016 , author =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.47216 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.47216 2016

  54. [54]

    , number =

    Hirst, Jennifer and Robinson, Margaret S. , number =. 1998 , journal =. doi:10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00056-1 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-4889(98)00056-1 1998

  55. [55]

    and Liu, Allen P

    Irajizad, Ehsan and Walani, Nikhil and Veatch, Sarah L. and Liu, Allen P. and Agrawal, Ashutosh , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1039/C6SM02623K , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c6sm02623k 2017

  56. [56]

    and Shillcock, Julian C

    Johannes, Ludger and Pezeshkian, Weria and Ipsen, John H. and Shillcock, Julian C. , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.01.009 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.01.009 2018

  57. [57]

    2005 , journal =

    Cuvelier, Damien and Der. 2005 , journal =. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.056473 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.056473 2005

  58. [58]

    2017 , journal =

    Mart. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c6sm00923a , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c6sm00923a 2017

  59. [59]

    B and Dommersnes, P

    Fournier, J. B and Dommersnes, P. G , number =. 1997 , journal =. doi:10.1209/epl/i1997-00548-y , issn =

    work page doi:10.1209/epl/i1997-00548-y 1997

  60. [60]

    and Corradi, Valentina and Souza, Paulo C.T

    Marrink, Siewert J. and Corradi, Valentina and Souza, Paulo C.T. and Ing. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00460 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00460 2019

  61. [61]

    1973 , journal =

    Zeeberg, Barry and Caswell, Michael , number =. 1973 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ja00789a081 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00789a081 1973

  62. [62]

    Lau, A. W.C. and Prasad, A. and Dogic, Z. , number =. 2009 , journal =. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/87/48006 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/87/48006 2009

  63. [63]

    2012 , journal =

    Daubersies, Laure and Leng, Jacques and Salmon, Jean Baptiste , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1039/C2SM25500F , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c2sm25500f 2012

  64. [64]

    and Han, Koohee and Bharti, Bhuvnesh and Robinson, Tom and Velev, Orlin D

    Ewins, Eleanor J. and Han, Koohee and Bharti, Bhuvnesh and Robinson, Tom and Velev, Orlin D. and Dimova, Rumiana , number =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.1039/d1cc07026f , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/d1cc07026f 2022

  65. [65]

    2018 , journal =

    Curk, Tine and Wirnsberger, Peter and Dobnikar, Jure and Frenkel, Daan and. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00786 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00786 2018

  66. [66]

    , number =

    Raatz, Michael and Lipowsky, Reinhard and Weikl, Thomas R. , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c3sm52498a , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c3sm52498a 2014

  67. [67]

    2015 , journal =

    Agudo-Canalejo, Jaime and Lipowsky, Reinhard , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01285 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01285 2015

  68. [68]

    , number =

    Leibler, S. , number =. 1986 , journal =. doi:10.1051/jphys:01986004703050700 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1051/jphys:01986004703050700 1986

  69. [69]

    2017 , journal =

    Vahid, Afshin and. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c7sm00433h , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c7sm00433h 2017

  70. [70]

    and Stbye, Henrik and Snder, Stine L

    Moreno-Pescador, Guillermo and Florentsen, Christoffer D. and Stbye, Henrik and Snder, Stine L. and Boye, Theresa L. and Veje, Emilie L. and Sonne, Alexander K. and Semsey, Szabolcs and Nylandsted, Jesper and Daniels, Robert and Bendix, Poul Martin , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b01052 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b01052 2019

  71. [71]

    and Wang, Marisa and Stebe, Kathleen J

    Cavallaro, Marcello and Botto, Lorenzo and Lewandowski, Eric P. and Wang, Marisa and Stebe, Kathleen J. , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116344108 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1116344108 2011

  72. [72]

    2009 , journal =

    Sorre, Benoit and Callan-Jones, Andrew and Manneville, Jean Baptiste and Nassoy, Pierre and Joanny, Jean François and Prost, Jacques and Goud, Bruno and Bassereau, Patricia , number =. 2009 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811243106 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0811243106 2009

  73. [73]

    , number =

    Li, Ningwei and Sharifi-Mood, Nima and Tu, Fuquan and Lee, Daeyeon and Radhakrishnan, Ravi and Baumgart, Tobias and Stebe, Kathleen J. , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03406 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03406 2017

  74. [74]

    , number =

    Bahrami, Amir Houshang and Weikl, Thomas R. , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04855 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04855 2018

  75. [75]

    2019 , journal =

    Yan, Zengshuai and Wu, Zeming and Li, Shixin and Zhang, Xianren and Yi, Xin and Yue, Tongtao , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c9nr03554k , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c9nr03554k 2019

  76. [76]

    Kim, K. S. and Neu, John and Oster, George , number =. 1998 , journal =. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77672-6 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77672-6 1998

  77. [77]

    2008 , journal =

    Lewinski, Nastassja and Colvin, Vicki and Drezek, Rebekah , number =. 2008 , journal =. doi:10.1002/smll.200700595 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.200700595 2008

  78. [78]

    K.M.Atique , number =

    Karal, Mohammad Abu Sayem and Ahammed, Shareef and Levadny, Victor and Belaya, Marina and Ahamed, Md Kabir and Ahmed, Marzuk and Mahbub, Zaid Bin and Ullah, A. K.M.Atique , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.104916 , issn =

    doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.104916 2020

  79. [79]

    2020 , journal =

    Koseki, Kaoru and Suzuki, Hiroaki , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00872 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00872 2020

  80. [80]

    Devika and Ghazani, Arezou A

    Chithrani, B. Devika and Ghazani, Arezou A. and Chan, Warren C.W. , number =. 2006 , journal =. doi:10.1021/nl052396o , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/nl052396o 2006

Showing first 80 references.