Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLMFactor: Extracting Profitable Factors through Prompts for Explainable Stock Movement Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10811 v1 pith:VFJCCMIB submitted 2024-06-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CE

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CE
keywords stockfactorsframeworkllmfactorllmsacrossanalysisbackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention for their exceptional performance across a broad range of tasks, particularly in text analysis. However, the finance sector presents a distinct challenge due to its dependence on time-series data for complex forecasting tasks. In this study, we introduce a novel framework called LLMFactor, which employs Sequential Knowledge-Guided Prompting (SKGP) to identify factors that influence stock movements using LLMs. Unlike previous methods that relied on keyphrases or sentiment analysis, this approach focuses on extracting factors more directly related to stock market dynamics, providing clear explanations for complex temporal changes. Our framework directs the LLMs to create background knowledge through a fill-in-the-blank strategy and then discerns potential factors affecting stock prices from related news. Guided by background knowledge and identified factors, we leverage historical stock prices in textual format to predict stock movement. An extensive evaluation of the LLMFactor framework across four benchmark datasets from both the U.S. and Chinese stock markets demonstrates its superiority over existing state-of-the-art methods and its effectiveness in financial time-series forecasting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantifying Qualitative Insights: Leveraging LLMs to Market Predict

    q-fin.CP 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM factor scoring on daily securities reports improves directional KOSPI200 forecasts over ARIMA and LSTM at a two-day look-back, though with reproducibility and evaluation caveats.

  2. Forecasting Commodity Price Shocks Using Temporal and Semantic Fusion of Prices Signals and Agentic Generative AI Extracted Economic News

    q-fin.CP 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A dual-stream LSTM with attention is claimed to forecast commodity price shocks with 0.94 AUC using price data and LLM-generated news summaries, but the evaluation has look-ahead leakage.

  3. FinGPT: Enhancing Sentiment-Based Stock Movement Prediction with Dissemination-Aware and Context-Enriched LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using BERTopic-based news clustering, daily price granularity, and instruction tuning, the authors report 63% binary accuracy for weekly stock movement prediction, up from a 55% baseline.

Pith tools