Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

R-GCN: The R Could Stand for Random

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.02424 v2 pith:VGFJZTFP submitted 2022-03-04 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords r-gcnrandomaggregatingconvolutionalgraphlearnedneighboursnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The inception of the Relational Graph Convolutional Network (R-GCN) marked a milestone in the Semantic Web domain as a widely cited method that generalises end-to-end hierarchical representation learning to Knowledge Graphs (KGs). R-GCNs generate representations for nodes of interest by repeatedly aggregating parameterised, relation-specific transformations of their neighbours. However, in this paper, we argue that the the R-GCN's main contribution lies in this "message passing" paradigm, rather than the learned weights. To this end, we introduce the "Random Relational Graph Convolutional Network" (RR-GCN), which leaves all parameters untrained and thus constructs node embeddings by aggregating randomly transformed random representations from neighbours, i.e., with no learned parameters. We empirically show that RR-GCNs can compete with fully trained R-GCNs in both node classification and link prediction settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 5 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Sequential Learner Modeling Using Multi-Relational Graph Convolutional Networks

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An unsupervised multi-relational GCN learner-modeling pipeline is described, but its own user study finds no significant benefit over the single-relation ConceptGCN baseline.

Pith tools