Symmetry-Protected Ideal Type-II Weyl Phonons in CdTe

B. W. Xia; H. Xu; R. Wang; Y. J. Zhao; Z. J. Chen

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Symmetry-Protected Ideal Type-II Weyl Phonons in CdTe

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper identifies ideal type-II Weyl phonons in zinc-blende CdTe, pinned to high-symmetry zone-boundary lines by a twofold rotation together with time reversal.

desk verdict CdTe type-II Weyl phonons are probably real, but the symmetry proof that pins them to the zone boundary is wrong as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01951 v1 pith:VGRUHX2S submitted 2019-08-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

B. W. Xia , R. Wang , Z. J. Chen , Y. J. Zhao , H. Xu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 63.20.Dj71.15.Mb73.20.At

keywords type-IIWeylphononsCdTezinc-blendestructuretopologicalfirst-principlesphononcalculationsurfacearcssymmetry-protectedpointslatticedynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that zinc-blende cadmium telluride (CdTe), a familiar II-VI semiconductor, contains ideal type-II Weyl phonons: lattice-vibration modes whose band crossing is topologically protected. The Weyl points arise where the longitudinal acoustic branch inverts with a transverse optical branch, forming a tilted crossing at about 3.5 THz along the X-W lines at the Brillouin-zone boundary. The paper argues that the combination of a twofold rotation and time-reversal symmetry pins these points to the zone-boundary high-symmetry lines, and that phonons, lacking spin-orbit coupling, keep the protection intact. Surface calculations show very long surface arcs connecting Weyl points of opposite chirality on (001) and (111) surfaces. If correct, this would be the first report of individual type-II Weyl phonons in a realistic material, making CdTe a concrete platform for studying topological phonons and for phonon-transport or thermal applications.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $2\times 2$ $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ Hamiltonian $H(\mathbf{q}) = d_x(\mathbf{q})\sigma_x + d_y(\mathbf{q})\sigma_y + d_z(\mathbf{q})\sigma_z$ for the two crossing phonon branches. The load-bearing constraint is that the twofold rotation about $z$ combined with time reversal acts as $C_2^z T = \sigma_z K$, which imposes $d_x(q_x,q_y,q_z) = -d_x(q_x,q_y,-q_z)$; periodicity then forces the crossing onto the zone-boundary plane $q_z = 2\pi/a$, where $d_x \equiv 0$, and the other twofold rotations confine the points to the X-W axes. This symmetry machinery explains the pinning and protection of the Weyl points; Chern-number computation fixes their chirality, and the iterative Green's-function surface method produces the long arcs. The underlying physical input is the phonon branch inversion between the longitudinal acoustic and transverse optical branches.

What would settle it

Measure the CdTe phonon dispersion along X-W at the Brillouin-zone boundary with inelastic X-ray or neutron scattering: if the longitudinal acoustic and transverse optical branches show an avoided gap near 3.5 THz instead of a clean crossing, the predicted Weyl phonons are not present.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using first-principles phonon calculations together with a symmetry-constrained $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ model, the paper predicts that CdTe hosts twelve Weyl phonon points of type II. In the computed spectrum, the longitudinal acoustic branch crosses a transverse optical branch at a double-degenerate point at $\omega_{\mathrm{wp}} = 3.5$ THz along X-W. Because the crossing branches carry opposite eigenvalues of the twofold rotation $C_2$, and because $C_2$ combined with time reversal forces the coefficient $d_x$ of the effective two-band Hamiltonian to vanish on the plane $q_z = 2\pi/a$, the Weyl points are constrained to the X-W high-symmetry lines at the boundaries of the face-centered cubic Brillouin zone; the same argument applies on the $q_x = 2\pi/a$ and $q_y = 2\pi/a$ planes. The twelve points have chirality $C = +1$ or $-1$, sit at explicitly listed momenta with $q = 0.054\,\mathrm{\AA}^{-1}$, and are well separated in momentum space. Open iso-frequency pockets at the Weyl frequency confirm the type-II character. A tight-binding surface calculation then yields long surface arcs connecting opposite-chirality projections on both (001) and (111) surfaces, which the paper argues provide a robust one-way channel for surface phonon propagation.

Load-bearing premise

The entire identification rests on the computed phonon spectrum: if the predicted crossing of the longitudinal acoustic and transverse optical branches along X-W is an artifact of the approximate density functional, the Weyl points in real CdTe would not exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Weyl phonon points survive the absence of inversion symmetry in CdTe, because their protection comes from the coexistence of a twofold rotation and time-reversal symmetry.
Because phonons have no spin-orbit coupling, the Weyl points are not gapped away from the high-symmetry lines: they sit exactly on the Brillouin-zone boundaries and remain symmetry-protected.
The very long surface arcs connecting opposite-chirality Weyl points provide a one-way, backscattering-free propagation channel for elastic waves on the (001) and (111) surfaces, supporting the proposed phonon-transport and topological thermal applications.
CdTe is already a synthesized and experimentally studied semiconductor, so the predicted crossings at about 3.5 THz and the long surface arcs are, in principle, accessible to existing phonon-probing techniques.
The total Chern number of each acoustic or optical pocket is zero, so the bulk remains topologically trivial overall and the nontrivial physics appears through the surface arcs between Weyl points of opposite chirality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same twofold-rotation-plus-time-reversal mechanism should pin type-II Weyl phonons to zone-boundary lines in other zinc-blende II-VI or III-V compounds where the longitudinal acoustic and transverse optical branches invert; a phonon-spectrum screen of such binaries could find additional candidates.
The 'ideal' characterization assumes no other Weyl phonons elsewhere in the Brillouin zone; a systematic full-zone nodal search of the computed phonon spectrum would test that part of the claim directly.
The 3.5 THz Weyl frequency lies in the terahertz range, so time-domain THz spectroscopy or surface-sensitive scattering might reveal dynamical signatures of the open iso-frequency pockets and the long arcs, beyond static surface-state calculations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Here's the short version: the numerical prediction of type-II Weyl phonons in CdTe looks solid, but the symmetry proof that supposedly pins the Weyl points to the zone boundary is wrong as written. I'd send this to peer review with the expectation that the analytic section gets fixed.

What's actually new: this is the first realistic-material proposal for individual type-II Weyl phonons. The branch inversion between the longitudinal acoustic and transverse optical branches, the tilted cones, the Wilson-loop chirality, and the long surface arcs on (001) and (111) are all clearly presented. The DFT workflow is standard—PHONOPY for the phonons, WannierTools for the TB and Wilson loops—and the computed dispersion matches earlier theory and experiment. That part earns its keep.

The soft spot is the k·p symmetry argument. Equations (4) and (5) claim that both d_y and d_z are odd under the extra C2 rotations. But with C2^zT = σ_z K as the paper itself sets up, the unitary part of C2^xT or C2^yT in that same basis has to be diagonal, and acting on H = d_y σ_y + d_z σ_z gives d_y odd and d_z even (or both even). It cannot give both odd. If Eq. (4) were true, the Hamiltonian would vanish on the entire qy = 0 line at qz = 2π/a, which would be a nodal line, not the isolated Weyl points in Fig. 2. So the "symmetry-protected" conclusion as argued doesn't hold. The numerical results are unaffected—the Wilson loop and surface arcs stand independently—but the analytic proof needs redoing.

Two more moderate quibbles. The "ideal" and "only" language isn't backed by a full-zone nodal search; the paper lists 12 WPs on the X-W lines but never rules out others elsewhere. And the functional-robustness checks are in a Supplemental Material I couldn't see, so the central branch inversion rests on a single PBE calculation as far as this review goes. No error bars, no code or inputs either. None of these is disqualifying, but they should be addressed.

Bottom line: this is a meaningful candidate for topological phononics in a common, well-known semiconductor. It deserves a serious referee. I'd recommend accepting it as a submission and asking for a corrected symmetry analysis, a clean full-BZ search (or softened claims), and the supplemental functional data made available. The physics is likely right; the proof just needs to catch up.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles and symmetry-based evidence for type-II Weyl phonons in zinc-blende CdTe. Using PBE DFT, finite-displacement interatomic force constants, a Wannier tight-binding model, Wilson-loop Chern-number calculations, and iterative Green's-function surface calculations, the authors identify a crossing between the longitudinal-acoustic and transverse-optical branches along the X-W lines at the fcc Brillouin-zone boundaries, with 12 Weyl points at four symmetry-related positions. They argue that the coexistence of two-fold rotational symmetry and time-reversal symmetry pins the Weyl points to the zone-boundary high-symmetry lines, and they show long surface arcs on the (001) and (111) surfaces. The abstract and introduction characterize the result as 'ideal' type-II Weyl phonons and suggest that CdTe hosts only such Weyl phonons.

Significance. If the prediction is correct, CdTe would be a readily available, experimentally well-studied material platform for type-II Weyl phonons, with the specific merit that the Weyl points are located at the Brillouin-zone boundary and are therefore symmetry-protected in the absence of spin-orbit coupling for phonons. The numerical workflow is mostly standard, and the phonon spectrum agrees with earlier theoretical and experimental work, which lends credibility to the basic identification. The Wilson-loop chirality calculation and the surface-state calculations are genuine outputs of the DFT-derived tight-binding model, not fits to the claimed surface arcs. However, the central analytic symmetry proof contains a concrete algebraic error, and the 'ideal' and 'only' claims are not supported by a full-zone nodal search. With corrections, the main prediction could stand, but the manuscript in its current form needs nontrivial revision.

major comments (3)

[Symmetry analysis, Eqs. (3)-(5)] Equations (4) and (5), as printed, state that both d_y and d_z are odd under q_y -> -q_y (respectively q_x -> -q_x). Combined with d_x = 0 on the q_z = 2π/a plane from Eq. (3), this would make the entire q_y = 0 line a nodal line on which the 2x2 effective Hamiltonian vanishes, contradicting the isolated Weyl points shown in Fig. 2. The representation argument also indicates that C2^x T and C2^y T act diagonally in the C2^z eigenbasis because they commute with C2^z, so they can only flip the off-diagonal components d_x and d_y while leaving d_z invariant. The correct constraint is d_y(qx,qy,2π/a) = -d_y(qx,-qy,2π/a) and d_z(qx,qy,2π/a) = d_z(qx,-qy,2π/a), with the analogous statement for the q_x coordinate. With this correction, the pinning of the crossing to the q_x axis (where the off-diagonal terms vanish and the crossing requires d_z = 0) is recovered, but the proof as written is internally inconsistent and must be revised.
[Abstract and Introduction; Fig. 3] The abstract and introduction claim that CdTe hosts 'ideal' type-II Weyl phonons and that candidates in which 'only ideal type-II Weyl phonons are present' are being explored. The manuscript presents phonon dispersions along high-symmetry lines and one constant-q plane, and the Wilson-loop calculation is performed for the identified points, but no full-Brillouin-zone search for all band degeneracies is presented. Without such a search, the 'only' claim is unsupported, and the meaning of 'ideal' is not made precise. Please either add a full-zone nodal search over a dense q mesh, or soften the claims to state specifically that the identified Weyl points are boundary-pinned type-II Weyl phonons.
[Computational methods and Supplemental Material] The identification of the Weyl points depends entirely on the branch inversion between the longitudinal-acoustic and transverse-optical branches along X-W in the PBE phonon spectrum. The manuscript states that the inversion is robust to several exchange-correlation functionals, but the supporting results are only cited to the Supplemental Material, which was not available for this review. Because this is a load-bearing check, the Supplemental Material should be included with the revision, or the main text should summarize the dependence of q_wp and ω_wp on the functional, so that the robustness claim can be evaluated.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 2 caption and text] The text and caption refer to a 'titled Dirac point'; this should be 'tilted Dirac point'.
[After Eq. (3)] The periodic-condition argument leading to d_x = 0 at q_z = 2π/a is terse; the reciprocal-lattice period along the relevant axis should be stated explicitly so that the reader can verify the conclusion.
[Weyl point positions, Fig. 3(d)] The coordinate notation (2π/a, 0, ±q) and (0, ±q, 2π/a) is ambiguous about which plane is being described and how the 12 points are counted; one sentence defining the convention would improve clarity.
[Surface arcs, Fig. 4] The claim that the surface arcs are 'guaranteed to be very long' should be qualified: the numerical length and visibility depend on the separation of the projected Weyl points as well as on the absence of bulk-state contamination, which is checked numerically but not guaranteed analytically.
[Introduction] The phrase 'only ideal type-II Weyl phonons are present' is stronger than the demonstrated result; it should be reconciled with the absence of a full-zone search, as noted in the major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: Weyl-point positions, chiralities, and surface arcs are outputs of DFT and derived tight-binding calculations, not inputs; the symmetry analysis constrains but does not assume the result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The phonon spectrum and the acoustic-optical branch inversion in CdTe are obtained from DFT-PBE lattice dynamics with non-analytical term correction; the Weyl-point frequency (ω_wp = 3.5 THz) and positions (q = 0.054 Å^-1) are read off the computed dispersion rather than fitted. The 2×2 k·p Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is a generic expansion of the two crossing branches, and the C2/T constraints in Eqs. (3)-(5) restrict where crossings can occur but do not by construction create the crossings or fix their chirality. The chirality is computed independently with the Wilson-loop/Wannier-center method, and the surface arcs are obtained from a Wannier tight-binding Hamiltonian built from the real-space interatomic force constants, with no parameter fitted to the claimed arcs. No load-bearing result is imported from the authors' prior work; the cited packages and methods are external. Caveats that affect confidence but not circularity are that the supplemental functional-robustness checks were not available in this review and that the 'ideal' characterization would require a documented full-Brillouin-zone nodal search. Correctness concerns about the algebraic derivation of Eq. (4) are separate from whether the paper's results reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT and lattice-dynamics assumptions. The Weyl point position and frequency are computational outputs, not free parameters used to force the derivation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

Weyl point position q_wp = 0.054 Å^{-1}
Extracted from the PBE phonon dispersion. The symmetry analysis constrains the Weyl point to the X-W line but does not predict its position; the value is a DFT output, not a hand-tuned input.
Weyl point frequency ω_wp = 3.5 THz
Frequency of the LA-TO crossing from the DFT calculation. Again a computational output rather than an ad hoc parameter; the topological classification does not depend on the exact value.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption DFT-PBE phonon dispersions approximate the true lattice dynamics of CdTe with sufficient accuracy for the topological classification.
The entire identification of Weyl phonons rests on the computed phonon spectra. The authors mention checks with other functionals in the Supplemental Material, but that material is not available in this review, so the accuracy of PBE is assumed.
domain assumption The non-analytical term correction handles the polar LO-TO splitting correctly at q to 0.
Standard lattice-dynamics treatment for polar materials, used in the Methods section. It relies on Born effective charges and the static dielectric tensor from density-functional perturbation theory.
standard math Phonon time-reversal symmetry T is conserved.
Used in the symmetry analysis around Eq. (2). This is a basic property of the dynamical matrix in the harmonic approximation.
domain assumption The two crossing branches carry opposite C2 eigenvalues ±1.
Assumed for the k.p representation, specifically C2 z T = σ_z K. The paper states that the crossing branches belong to opposite eigenvalues, verified from the DFT eigenvectors; the symmetry argument depends on this assignment.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry-Protected Ideal Type-II Weyl Phonons in CdTe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VGRUHX2S

@misc{pith2026190801951,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry-Protected Ideal Type-II Weyl Phonons in CdTe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VGRUHX2S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01951}
}

read the original abstract

Nontrivial low-energy excitations of crystalline solids have insightfully strengthened understanding of elementary particles in quantum field theory. Usually, topological quasiparticles are mainly focused on fermions in topological semimetals. In this work, we alternatively show by first-principles calculations and symmetry analysis that ideal type-II Weyl phonons are present in zinc-blende cadmium telluride (CdTe), a well-known II-VI semiconductor. Importantly, these type-II Weyl phonons originate from the inversion between the longitudinal acoustic and transverse optical branches. Symmetry guarantees the type-II Weyl points to lie along the high-symmetry lines at the boundaries of Brillouin zone even with breaking the inversion symmetry, exhibiting the robustness of protected phonon features. The nontrivial phonon surface states and surface arcs projected on the semi-finite (001) and (111) surfaces are investigated. The phonon surface arcs connecting the Weyl points with opposite chirality, guaranteed to be very long, are clearly visible. This work not only offers a promising candidate for studying type-II Weyl phonons, but also provides a route to realize symmetry-protected nontrivial phonons and related applications in realistic materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01951 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** The cross-section of the bulk iso-frequency surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** The phonon surface states of CdTe. (a) The phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[1]

Braibant, G

S. Braibant, G. Giacomelli, and M. Spurio, Particles and Fundamental Interactions: An Introduction to Par- ticle Physics , Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Netherlands, 2011), ISBN 9789400724648

work page 2011
[2]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

2008
[3]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011
[4]

Nadj-Perge, I

S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, J. Li, H. Chen, S. Jeon, J. Seo, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yaz- dani, Science 346, 602 (2014)

2014
[5]

H. Weng, C. Fang, Z. Fang, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Dai, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015)

2015
[6]

Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, S. Kushwaha, M. Hirschberger, E. V. Chulkov, A. Ernst, N. P. Ong, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 236401 (2016)

2016
[7]

A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011)

2011
[8]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

2018

Show all 54 references

[9]

Bansil, H

A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016)

2016
[10]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

2010
[11]

Bradlyn, J

B. Bradlyn, J. Cano, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Science 353, 6299 (2016)

2016
[12]

B. Q. Lv, Z.-L. Feng, Q.-N. Xu, X. Gao, J.-Z. Ma, L.-Y. Kong, P. Richard, Y.-B. Huang, V. N. Strocov, C. Fang, et al., Nature 546, 627 (2017)

2017
[13]

Z. Zhu, G. W. Winkler, Q. Wu, J. Li, and A. A. Soluyanov, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031003 (2016)

2016
[14]

A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, and M. Troyer, Nature 527, 495 (2015)

2015
[15]

Z. Wang, D. Gresch, A. A. Soluyanov, W. Xie, S. Kush- waha, X. Dai, M. Troyer, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 056805 (2016)

2016
[16]

Aut` es, D

G. Aut` es, D. Gresch, M. Troyer, A. A. Soluyanov, and O. V. Yazyev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 066402 (2016)

2016
[17]

F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008)

2008
[18]

L. Lu, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, Nat. Photon. 7, 294 (2013)

2013
[19]

Z. Wang, Y. D. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013905 (2008)

2008
[20]

S. H. Mousavi, A. B. Khanikaev, and Z. Wang, Nat. Com- mun. 6 (2015)

2015
[21]

Suesstrunk and S

R. Suesstrunk and S. D. Huber, Science 349, 47 (2015)

2015
[22]

F. Li, X. Huang, J. Lu, J. Ma, and Z. Liu, Nat. Phys. 14, 30 (2018)

2018
[23]

Y. Liu, Y. Xu, and W. Duan, Nat. Sci. Rev.5, 314 (2018)

2018
[24]

Zhang, J

L. Zhang, J. Ren, J.-S. Wang, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 225901 (2010)

2010
[25]

M. Mori, A. Spencer-Smith, O. P. Sushkov, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 265901 (2014)

2014
[26]

Y. Liu, Y. Xu, S.-C. Zhang, and W. Duan, Phys. Rev. B 96, 064106 (2017)

2017
[27]

J. Li, Q. Xie, S. Ullah, R. Li, H. Ma, D. Li, Y. Li, and X.-Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 97, 054305 (2018)

2018
[28]

Zhang, Z

T. Zhang, Z. Song, A. Alexandradinata, H. Weng, C. Fang, L. Lu, and Z. Fang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 016401 (2018)

2018
[29]

Madelung, U

O. Madelung, U. R¨ ossler, and M. Schulz, eds., Cad- mium telluride (CdTe) crystal structure, modiﬁcations (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999), pp. 1–7, ISBN 978-3-540-31359-5

1999
[30]

J. M. Rowe, R. M. Nicklow, D. L. Price, and K. Zanio, Phys. Rev. B 10, 671 (1974)

1974
[31]

M. H. Krisch, A. Mermet, A. San Miguel, F. Sette, C. Masciovecchio, G. Ruocco, and R. Verbeni, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8691 (1997)

1997
[32]

B. D. Rajput and D. A. Browne, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9052 (1996)

1996
[33]

Dal Corso, S

A. Dal Corso, S. Baroni, R. Resta, and S. de Gironcoli, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3588 (1993)

1993
[34]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

1996
[35]

Kohn and L

W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

1965
[36]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

1996
[37]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

1997
[38]

Kresse and D

G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

1999
[39]

D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)

1980
[40]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

1976
[41]

R. M. Pick, M. H. Cohen, and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B 1, 910 (1970)

1970
[42]

Togo and I

A. Togo and I. Tanaka, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

2015
[43]

See Supplemental Material for detailed results with dif- ferent kinds of functional, which includes Refs. [44–51]
[44]

J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244 (1992)

1992
[45]

J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

2008
[46]

Armiento and A

R. Armiento and A. E. Mattsson, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085108 (2005). 6

2005
[47]

J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015)

2015
[48]

J. Sun, M. Marsman, G. I. Csonka, A. Ruzsinszky, P. Hao, Y.-S. Kim, G. Kresse, and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035117 (2011)

2011
[49]

J. Tao, J. P. Perdew, V. N. Staroverov, and G. E. Scuse- ria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 146401 (2003)

2003
[50]

Paier, M

J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. C. Gerber, and J. G. Angyan, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709 (2006)

2006
[51]

J. P. Perdew, M. Ernzerhof, and K. Burke, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982 (1996)

1996
[52]

Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405 (2018)

2018
[53]

R. Yu, X. L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075119 (2011)

2011
[54]

M. P. L. Sancho, J. M. L. Sancho, and J. Rubio, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 14, 1205 (1984)

1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Braibant, G

S. Braibant, G. Giacomelli, and M. Spurio, Particles and Fundamental Interactions: An Introduction to Par- ticle Physics , Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Netherlands, 2011), ISBN 9789400724648

work page 2011

[2] [2]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

2008

[3] [3]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011

[4] [4]

Nadj-Perge, I

S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, J. Li, H. Chen, S. Jeon, J. Seo, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yaz- dani, Science 346, 602 (2014)

2014

[5] [5]

H. Weng, C. Fang, Z. Fang, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Dai, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015)

2015

[6] [6]

Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, S. Kushwaha, M. Hirschberger, E. V. Chulkov, A. Ernst, N. P. Ong, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 236401 (2016)

2016

[7] [7]

A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011)

2011

[8] [8]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

2018