Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 75 references

Quantum measurement systems and applications to particle physics and cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new survey maps quantum-enhanced measurement systems onto particle physics and cosmology targets, arguing these technologies have reached the point where they can improve searches for dark matter, gravitational waves, and cosmic signals.

desk verdict A review that might be a useful map of quantum-enhanced detectors, but the abstract alone doesn't show coverage or critical assessment — verify before citing. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10325 v1 pith:VHFM3PNN submitted 2025-08-14 physics.ins-det astro-ph.IMhep-exquant-ph

Masashi Hazumi This is my paper
classification physics.ins-detastro-ph.IMhep-exquant-ph
keywords quantummeasurementsensorssuperconductingatominterferometryspinparticlephysicscosmologydetectorR&D
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper argues that a class of quantum-enhanced detector technologies — superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors — has matured enough to become genuinely useful for particle physics and cosmology. It surveys current and emerging devices, catalogs recent proposals, and identifies where quantum resources such as squeezing, entanglement, and superposition could give experimental gains beyond classical sensing limits. The motivating observation is that industrial investment in quantum computing and quantum communication has accelerated detector R&D, and the author contends these advances have 'excellent potential' for frontier physics experiments. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as a structured claim: the field has reached a turning point where quantum measurement systems are no longer laboratory curiosities but practical detector candidates for fundamental physics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quantum measurement system: a detector whose sensitivity is enhanced by quantum resources, usually superposition, entanglement, or squeezing. The three named families are superconducting quantum sensors (devices whose quantum states, such as qubits or Josephson-junction dynamics, transduce external signals), atom interferometry (matter-wave interference that measures accelerations, rotations, or forces), and quantum spin sensors (magnetometers and related devices that read out ensembles or single spins). What does the work: these devices are proposed as replacements or complements to classical sensors in specific experiments, with the quantum enhancement providing a

What would settle it

Build a quantum-enhanced detector (e.g., an atom interferometer for gravitational wave detection or a superconducting qubit sensor for dark matter) and run it in a realistic experimental environment; if its sensitivity is limited by classical disorder, magnetic field gradients, or technical noise rather than by quantum projection noise, the survey's core claim that quantum enhancement will deliver 'excellent potential' in these applications is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quantum measurement systems employing enhancements not previously adopted in experimental physics — in particular superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometers, and quantum spin sensors — are now being proposed for and applied to particle physics and cosmology. It frames these technologies as a coherent family: each uses controlled quantum states to beat the classical sensitivity floors of conventional detectors. The review maps specific detector concepts to specific physics targets, such as dark matter searches, neutrino physics, gravitational wave detection, and cosmological surveys, and argues that the technologies carry 'excellent potential' to i

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that quantum enhancement is the limiting factor in the target experiments — that improvements from squeezed, entangled, or superposition-based sensing are not erased by classical noise, systematic errors, or detector inefficiencies in realistic particle physics and cosmology settings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the survey is right, several next-generation experiments in dark matter, neutrino physics, and gravitational wave detection could see sensitivity improvements by adopting quantum-enhanced readout or sensing schemes.
  • The transfer of industrial quantum technology (from computing and communication) into experimental physics could become a deliberate pipeline, lowering the cost and risk of developing new detectors.
  • Superconducting quantum sensors could enable searches for low-mass dark matter candidates and single-photon-level signals that are currently invisible to conventional detectors.
  • Atom interferometry could provide new probes of gravitational waves and violations of fundamental symmetries, complementing laser interferometers with a different frequency window.
  • Quantum spin sensors could open compact, high-sensitivity magnetometers useful for measuring faint cosmological or particle-physics signals in constrained environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the review leaves implicit: the strongest near-term payoff is likely in low-frequency precision measurements (e.g., dark matter haloscopes, axion searches, gravitational-wave low band) where quantum enhancement is not erased by thermal noise or backgrounds, whereas in high-energy collider settings classical backgrounds may dominate.
  • Because the survey organizes the field, it implicitly suggests a testable roadmap: one could compare the projected sensitivity curves of quantum-enhanced detectors against classical detectors for a specific target (e.g., axion dark matter) to identify where the quantum advantage actually survives.
  • The success of these detectors may hinge on integrating quantum sensors with existing cryogenic and vacuum infrastructure, a practical concern the review acknowledges only by framing the technologies as 'emerging.'
  • If commercial quantum computing hardware reaches higher coherence times, the same qubit-based sensors could become reconfigurable detectors, a direction the paper's industrial-motivation framing points toward but does not explicitly pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The submitted manuscript, arXiv:2508.10325, is a review article intended to survey quantum measurement technologies—superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors—and their proposed applications in particle physics and cosmology. The abstract states that these technologies have 'excellent potential' and that new proposals exist to apply them to fundamental physics. The full text supplied for review is empty: no sections, equations, figures, tables, or references are present. Consequently, the paper's actual content cannot be evaluated, and all technical and coverage claims remain unverifiable.

Significance. If the completed review accurately maps the three named technology families onto concrete particle physics and cosmology targets, it could serve as a useful field-organizing reference, particularly by connecting industrial quantum-technology developments to fundamental-science applications. However, with no full text available, none of this can be assessed. There is no evidence of machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable predictions; the submission as it stands is an abstract-only statement of intent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text] The body of the manuscript is empty. There are no sections, equations, figures, tables, or references to review. This is the load-bearing issue: the paper's value depends entirely on the accuracy and completeness of its survey of superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors, and none of that content is present in the submitted version.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that the quantum measurement systems have 'excellent potential' for particle physics and cosmology and that these are 'new... not previously adopted.' No supporting evidence, comparative analysis, or citation is available. The claim that quantum enhancements will survive classical noise floors and systematics in realistic experimental settings is a physics premise that the abstract merely asserts.
  3. [Coverage claim] The abstract names three technology families as representative of 'currently available and emerging quantum technologies,' but without a reference list or a survey methodology, there is no basis to verify that this selection is representative or that the characterization of the cited literature is accurate. This coverage premise is central to a review and cannot be checked.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is clear as a statement of intent, but it should summarize the actual content of the review once the full text is present. As written, it could describe any tutorial on quantum sensors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is an abstract-level review with no derivation chain to be circular.

full rationale

The submitted full text of arXiv:2508.10325 is empty, and the only available content is the abstract, which states the intent to survey quantum-enhanced detector technologies and their proposed applications in particle physics and cosmology. There is no derivation, no fitted parameter presented as a prediction, and no formal argument that could reduce to its own inputs. A review paper is by construction external: its content is drawn from the literature it surveys, so the circularity burden is near zero. No self-citation is visible in the abstract, and no load-bearing claim is made that would need external support beyond the cited literature. The absence of technical content creates an evidence gap for checking coverage and citation fidelity, but that is a completeness limitation, not circularity. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review article: it introduces no derivations and therefore no fitted parameters, no new constructs, and no invented entities. The ledger contains only the domain-level premises that motivate the survey.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Quantum-enhanced measurement principles (squeezing, superposition, entanglement) can be engineered into detector systems with sensitivity advantages relevant to particle physics and cosmology.
    This is the motivating premise of the entire survey, appearing in the abstract as 'quantum enhancements not previously adopted' and 'excellent potential of the new quantum measurement systems'. It is asserted rather than derived, and the abstract does not quantify when quantum noise is the limiting floor.
  • domain assumption The surveyed literature is representative and accurately characterized.
    A review's value rests on the completeness and fidelity of its coverage. The abstract lists technology categories but no sources, so this premise is unverifiable from the abstract alone.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum measurement systems and applications to particle physics and cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VHFM3PNN

@misc{pith2026250810325,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum measurement systems and applications to particle physics and cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VHFM3PNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10325}
}
read the original abstract

There are new detector proposals and R&D that utilize quantum enhancements not previously adopted. Examples include superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors. They are mainly motivated by industrial applications toward quantum computing, secure quantum communication systems, and high-sensitivity sensors. Given the excellent potential of the new quantum measurement systems, there are also new proposals to apply them in particle physics and cosmology. In this review, I survey currently available and emerging quantum technologies and their applications. I then discuss future directions and new proposals for particle physics and cosmology.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  3. [3]

    Degen, C

    L. Degen, C. \, F. Reinhard, P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing , Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (3) (2017) 035002. http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02427 arXiv:1611.02427 , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy , Phys. Rev. A 50 (1) (1994) 67. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67

    doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 1994

  5. [5]

    S. F. Huelga, C. Macchiavello, T. Pellizzari, A. K. Ekert, M. B. Plenio, J. I. Cirac, On the improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement , Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3865. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9707014 arXiv:quant-ph/9707014 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3865 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3865

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Sichanugrist, H

    T. Sichanugrist, H. Fukuda, T. Moroi, K. Nakayama, S. Chigusa, N. Mizuochi, M. Hazumi, Y. Matsuzaki, Entanglement-enhanced ac magnetometry in the presence of Markovian noise , Phys. Rev. A 111 (4) (2025) 042605. http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21699 arXiv:2410.21699 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.042605 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.042605

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Chou, et al., Quantum Sensors for High Energy Physics , in: Quantum Sensors for HEP workshop, 2023, pp

    A. Chou, et al., Quantum Sensors for High Energy Physics , in: Quantum Sensors for HEP workshop, 2023, pp. 1--63. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01930 arXiv:2311.01930

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Optica Quantum 2.0 , ``Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition",\ ://www.optica.org/events/topical\_meetings/quantum/

    work page

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    NVIDIA, https://www.nvidia.com/ja-jp/solutions/quantum-computing/

  2. [10]

    QURECA, https://www.qureca.com/quantum-initiatives-worldwide/

  3. [11]

    Physics World , ``The Physics World Breakthrough of the Year 2024",\\ https://physicsworld.com/a/two-advances-in-quantum-error-correction-share-the-physics-world-2024-breakthrough-of-the-year/

    2024

  4. [12]

    Bluvstein, et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays , Nature 626 (7997) (2024) 58--65

    D. Bluvstein, et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays , Nature 626 (7997) (2024) 58--65. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03982 arXiv:2312.03982 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Acharya, et al., Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold , Nature 638 (8052) (2025) 920--926

    R. Acharya, et al., Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold , Nature 638 (8052) (2025) 920--926. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13687 arXiv:2408.13687 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    QuEra, Error-corrected quantum computing roadmap, https://www.quera.com/press-releases/quera-computing-releases-a-groundbreaking-roadmap-for-advanced-error-corrected-quantum-computers-pioneering-the-next-frontier-in-quantum-innovation-0 (January 2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    J. M. Thomas, F. I. Yeh, J. H. Chen, J. J. Mambretti, S. J. Kohlert, G. S. Kanter, P. Kumar, Quantum teleportation coexisting with classical communications in optical fiber , Optica 11 (12) (2024) 1700--1707. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10738 arXiv:2404.10738 , https://doi.org/1...

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Korzh, et al., Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector , Nature Photon

    B. Korzh, et al., Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector , Nature Photon. 14 (4) (2020) 250--255. http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06839 arXiv:1804.06839 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0589-x doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0589-x

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    D. V. Reddy, D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, V. B. Verma, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.400751 doi:10.1364/OPTICA.400751

    doi

  10. [18]

    B. G. Oripov, D. S. Rampini, J. Allmaras, M. D. Shaw, S. W. Nam, B. Korzh, A. N. McCaughan, A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels , Nature 622 (7984) (2023) 730--734. http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09473 arXiv:2306.09473 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s4158...

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Craiciu, et al., High-speed detection of 1550\,\,nm single photons with superconducting nanowire detectors , Optica 10 (2) (2023) 183--190

    I. Craiciu, et al., High-speed detection of 1550\,\,nm single photons with superconducting nanowire detectors , Optica 10 (2) (2023) 183--190. http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11644 arXiv:2210.11644 , https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.478960 doi:10.1364/OPTICA.478960

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Chiles, et al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope , Phys

    J. Chiles, et al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (23) (2022) 231802. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01582 arXiv:2110.01582 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.231802 doi:10.110...

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    G. G. Taylor, A. B. Walter, B. Korzh, B. Bumble, S. R. Patel, J. P. Allmaras, A. D. Beyer, R. O'Brient, M. D. Shaw, E. E. Wollman, Low-noise single-photon counting superconducting nanowire detectors at infrared wavelengths up to 29 m, Optica 10 (12) (2023) 1672--1678

    2023

  14. [22]

    S. Lee, T. Polakovic, W. Armstrong, A. Dibos, T. Draher, N. Pastika, Z.-E. Meziani, V. Novosad, Beam tests of SNSPDs with 120 GeV protons , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1069 (2024) 169956. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13405 arXiv:2312.13405 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2024.169956 ...

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Kawasaki, Quantum sensing using cold atoms and molecules for nuclear and particle physics https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424 (2025)

    A. Kawasaki, Quantum sensing using cold atoms and molecules for nuclear and particle physics https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424 (2025). http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424 arXiv:2411.19424 . ://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424

    2025

  16. [24]

    Aeppli, K

    A. Aeppli, K. Kim, W. Warfield, M. S. Safronova, J. Ye, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401 Clock with 8 10 ^ - 19 systematic uncertainty , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 023401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401...

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Aslam, H

    N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, Quantum sensors for biomedical applications , Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (3) (2023) 157--169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Goodman, et al., ADMX Axion Dark Matter Bounds around 3.3\,\, eV with Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability , Phys

    C. Goodman, et al., ADMX Axion Dark Matter Bounds around 3.3\,\, eV with Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (11) (2025) 111002. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15227 arXiv:2408.15227 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.111002 doi:10.110...

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Sonnenschein, Next generation haloscope searches for axion dark matter with mass > 1 ev,, qUPosium2024, https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/290/ (December 2024)

    A. Sonnenschein, Next generation haloscope searches for axion dark matter with mass > 1 ev,, qUPosium2024, https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/290/ (December 2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR , Astrophys. J. 794 (2) (2014) 171, [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 848, 73 (2017)]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2369 arXiv:1403.2369 , https://do...

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Suzuki, et al., The POLARBEAR-2 and the Simons Array Experiment , J

    A. Suzuki, et al., The POLARBEAR-2 and the Simons Array Experiment , J. Low Temp. Phys. 184 (3-4) (2016) 805--810. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07299 arXiv:1512.07299 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-015-1425-4 doi:10.1007/s10909-015-1425-4

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    R. J. Thornton, et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The polarization-sensitive ACTPol instrument , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 227 (2) (2016) 21. http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06569 arXiv:1605.06569 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/21 doi:10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/21

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ade, et al., The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts , JCAP 02 (2019) 056

    P. Ade, et al., The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts , JCAP 02 (2019) 056. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.07445 arXiv:1808.07445 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Galitzki, et al., The Simons Observatory: Instrument Overview , Proc

    N. Galitzki, et al., The Simons Observatory: Instrument Overview , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 10708 (2018) 1070804. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.04493 arXiv:1808.04493 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2312985 doi:10.1117/12.2312985

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Essinger-Hileman, et al., CLASS: The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor , Proc

    T. Essinger-Hileman, et al., CLASS: The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9153 (2014) 91531I. http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4788 arXiv:1408.4788 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2056701 doi:10.1117/12.2056701

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. E. Austermann, et al., SPTpol: an instrument for CMB polarization measurements with the South Pole Telescope , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 8452 (2012) 84521E. http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4970 arXiv:1210.4970 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.927286 doi:10.1117/12.927286

    2012 arXiv

  27. [35]

    J. A. Sobrin, et al., The Design and Integrated Performance of SPT-3G , Astrophys. J. Supp. 258 (2) (2022) 42. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11202 arXiv:2106.11202 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac374f doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac374f

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Hui, et al., BICEP Array: a multi-frequency degree-scale CMB polarimeter , Proc

    H. Hui, et al., BICEP Array: a multi-frequency degree-scale CMB polarimeter , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 10708 (2018) 1070807. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00568 arXiv:1808.00568 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2311725 doi:10.1117/12.2311725

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Joint Analysis of BICEP2/ Keck Array and Planck Data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 101301. http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00612 arXiv:1502.00612 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.101301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.101301

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Bicep/KeckXV: The Bicep3 Cosmic Microwave Background Polarimeter and the First Three-year Data Set , Astrophys. J. 927 (1) (2022) 77. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00482 arXiv:2110.00482 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac4886 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4886

    2022

  31. [39]

    G\'enova-Santos, et al., QUIJOTE scientific results I

    R. G\'enova-Santos, et al., QUIJOTE scientific results I. Measurements of the intensity and polarisation of the anomalous microwave emission in the Perseus molecular complex , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452 (4) (2015) 4169--4182. http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.04491 arXiv:1501.044...

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Lee, et al., GroundBIRD: A CMB Polarization Experiment with MKID Arrays , J

    K. Lee, et al., GroundBIRD: A CMB Polarization Experiment with MKID Arrays , J. Low Temp. Phys. 200 (5-6) (2020) 384--391. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.07705 arXiv:2011.07705 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-020-02511-5 doi:10.1007/s10909-020-02511-5

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. C. Hamilton, et al., QUBIC I: Overview and science program , JCAP 04 (04) (2022) 034. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02213 arXiv:2011.02213 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/034 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/034

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ghosh, et al., Performance forecasts for the primordial gravitational wave detection pipelines for AliCPT-1 , JCAP 10 (2022) 063

    S. Ghosh, et al., Performance forecasts for the primordial gravitational wave detection pipelines for AliCPT-1 , JCAP 10 (2022) 063. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14804 arXiv:2205.14804 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/063 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/063

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., A Constraint on Primordial B-modes from the First Flight of the Spider Balloon-borne Telescope , Astrophys. J. 927 (2) (2022) 174. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.13334 arXiv:2103.13334 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac20df doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac20df

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Abitbol, et al., The EBEX Balloon-borne Experiment Detectors and Readout , Astrophys

    M. Abitbol, et al., The EBEX Balloon-borne Experiment Detectors and Readout , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 239 (1) (2018) 8. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01018 arXiv:1803.01018 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aae436 doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aae436

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Addamo, et al., The large scale polarization explorer (LSPE) for CMB measurements: performance forecast , JCAP 08 (2021) 008

    G. Addamo, et al., The large scale polarization explorer (LSPE) for CMB measurements: performance forecast , JCAP 08 (2021) 008. http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11049 arXiv:2008.11049 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/008 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/008

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    N. N. Gandilo, et al., The Primordial Inflation Polarization Explorer (PIPER) , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9914 (2016) 99141J. http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06172 arXiv:1607.06172 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2231109 doi:10.1117/12.2231109

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Accelerators in the Universe

    M. Hazumi , Jumping into cmb polarization measurements-a new group at kek-, in: H. Kodama , K. Ioka (Eds.), KEK CosmoPhysics Group Inaugural Conference "Accelerators in the Universe", Vol. 1040 of A.I.P. Conf. Ser., 2008, pp. 78--88. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2981556 doi:10.10...

    2008 doi

  40. [48]

    Hazumi, Future CMB polarization measurements and Japanese contributions , Prog

    M. Hazumi, Future CMB polarization measurements and Japanese contributions , Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 190 (2011) 75--89. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.190.75 doi:10.1143/PTPS.190.75

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    Hazumi, et al., LiteBIRD: a small satellite for the study of B-mode polarization and inflation from cosmic background radiation detection , Proc

    M. Hazumi, et al., LiteBIRD: a small satellite for the study of B-mode polarization and inflation from cosmic background radiation detection , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 8442 (2012) 844219. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926743 doi:10.1117/12.926743

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    Matsumura , et al., Mission Design of LiteBIRD , J

    T. Matsumura , et al., Mission Design of LiteBIRD , J. Low Temp. Phys. 176 (5-6) (2014) 733--740. http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2847 arXiv:1311.2847 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-013-0996-1 doi:10.1007/s10909-013-0996-1

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    litebird: mission overview and design tradeoffs

    T. Matsumura , et al., "litebird: mission overview and design tradeoffs", in: J. Oschmann , Jacobus M., M. Clampin , G. G. Fazio , H. A. MacEwen (Eds.), Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, Vol. 9143 of Society of Photo-Optical Ins...

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    Allys, et al., Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey , PTEP 2023 (4) (2023) 042F01

    E. Allys, et al., Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey , PTEP 2023 (4) (2023) 042F01. http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02773 arXiv:2202.02773 , https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac150 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac150

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Abazajian, et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , , (7 2019)

    K. Abazajian, et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , , (7 2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04473 arXiv:1907.04473

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Seljak, M

    U. Seljak, M. Zaldarriaga, Signature of gravity waves in polarization of the microwave background , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2054--2057. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609169 arXiv:astro-ph/9609169 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054

    1997 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, A. Stebbins, A Probe of primordial gravity waves and vorticity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2058--2061. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609132 arXiv:astro-ph/9609132 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058

    1997 arXiv

  48. [56]

    W. Hu , M. White , CMB anisotropies: Total angular momentum method , Phys. Rev. D56 (2) (1997) 596--615. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9702170 arXiv:astro-ph/9702170 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.596 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.596

    1997 arXiv

  49. [57]

    F. L. Bezrukov, M. Shaposhnikov, The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton , Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703--706. http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3755 arXiv:0710.3755 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072

    2008 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, C. Tamarit, Standard Model axion seesaw Higgs portal inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke , JCAP 08 (2017) 001. http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01639 arXiv:1610.01639 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7...

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Adam, et al., The NIKA2 large-field-of-view millimetre continuum camera for the 30 m IRAM telescope , Astron

    R. Adam, et al., The NIKA2 large-field-of-view millimetre continuum camera for the 30 m IRAM telescope , Astron. Astrophys. 609 (2018) A115. http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00908 arXiv:1707.00908 , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731503 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731503

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Okada, et al., X-ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Atoms Isolated in Vacuum with Transition Edge Sensors , J

    S. Okada, et al., X-ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Atoms Isolated in Vacuum with Transition Edge Sensors , J. Low Temp. Phys. 200 (5-6) (2020) 445--451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-020-02476-5 doi:10.1007/s10909-020-02476-5

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    QUP , qUPosium2024,\\ https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/290/

  54. [62]

    CERN, the International Conference on Quantum Technology for High-Energy Physics (QT4HEP2025),\\ https://indico.cern.ch/event/1433194/

  55. [63]

    DRD5, dRD5/RDquantum collaboration meeting,\\ https://indico.cern.ch/event/1503433/timetable/\#20250217

  56. [64]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension a review of solutions , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (15) (2021) 153001. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01183 arXiv:2103.01183 , https://doi.org/10...

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations , JCAP 02 (2025) 021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03002 arXiv:2404.03002 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    DRD5, dRD5 / RDquantum - quantum sensor R&D for particle physics, https://drd5.web.cern.ch/index.html

  59. [67]

    Badurina, et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , JCAP 05 (2020) 011

    L. Badurina, et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , JCAP 05 (2020) 011. http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11755 arXiv:1911.11755 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/011 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/011

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Abe, et al., Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100) , Quantum Sci

    M. Abe, et al., Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100) , Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (4) (2021) 044003. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02835 arXiv:2104.02835 , https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abf719 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abf719

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    C. R. Mercer, E. N. Montbach, S. D. Christe, R. M. Connerton, D. A. Podolski, M. P. Robinson, M. R. Perez, Quantum sensing for NASA science missions , EPJ Quant. Technol. 12 (1) (2025) 56. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00360-3 doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00360-3

    2025 doi

  62. [70]

    Adachi, et al., Exploration of the polarization angle variability of the Crab Nebula with POLARBEAR and its application to the search for axionlike particles , Phys

    S. Adachi, et al., Exploration of the polarization angle variability of the Crab Nebula with POLARBEAR and its application to the search for axionlike particles , Phys. Rev. D 110 (6) (2024) 063013. http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02096 arXiv:2403.02096 , https://doi.org/10.1103/Phy...

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Chigusa, M

    S. Chigusa, M. Hazumi, E. D. Herbschleb, N. Mizuochi, K. Nakayama, Light dark matter search with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamonds , JHEP 03 (2025) 083. http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12756 arXiv:2302.12756 , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)083 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)083

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Chigusa, M

    S. Chigusa, M. Hazumi, E. D. Herbschleb, Y. Matsuzaki, N. Mizuochi, K. Nakayama, Nuclear spin metrology with nitrogen vacancy center in diamond for axion dark matter detection , Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) (2025) 075028. http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07141 arXiv:2407.07141 , https://doi....

    2025 arXiv

  65. [73]

    E. D. Herbschleb, S. Chigusa, R. Kawase, H. Kawashima, M. Hazumi, K. Nakayama, N. Mizuochi, Robust sensing via the standard deviation with a quantum sensor , APL Quantum 1 (4) (2024) 046106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0223678 doi:10.1063/5.0223678

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    , axionLimits, https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/

    O’Hare, C. , axionLimits, https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/

  67. [75]

    2015, , 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, , 579, A101

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.