REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Understanding the Transferability of Deep Representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards Understanding the Transferability of Deep Representations
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks trained on a wide range of datasets demonstrate impressive transferability. Deep features appear general in that they are applicable to many datasets and tasks. Such property is in prevalent use in real-world applications. A neural network pretrained on large datasets, such as ImageNet, can significantly boost generalization and accelerate training if fine-tuned to a smaller target dataset. Despite its pervasiveness, few effort has been devoted to uncovering the reason of transferability in deep feature representations. This paper tries to understand transferability from the perspectives of improved generalization, optimization and the feasibility of transferability. We demonstrate that 1) Transferred models tend to find flatter minima, since their weight matrices stay close to the original flat region of pretrained parameters when transferred to a similar target dataset; 2) Transferred representations make the loss landscape more favorable with improved Lipschitzness, which accelerates and stabilizes training substantially. The improvement largely attributes to the fact that the principal component of gradient is suppressed in the pretrained parameters, thus stabilizing the magnitude of gradient in back-propagation. 3) The feasibility of transferability is related to the similarity of both input and label. And a surprising discovery is that the feasibility is also impacted by the training stages in that the transferability first increases during training, and then declines. We further provide a theoretical analysis to verify our observations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PMF-CL: Pareto-Minimal-Forgetting Continual Learner for Conflicting Tasks
PMF-CL derives Pareto-minimal-forgetting algorithms for linear/basis-function regression and quadratic-bounded losses like logistic regression, achieving static O(d²) memory for d-parameter models.
-
PMF-CL: Pareto-Minimal-Forgetting Continual Learner for Conflicting Tasks
PMF-CL derives Pareto-optimal solutions for continual learning on conflicting tasks, yielding memory-efficient algorithms for linear regression and quadratically bounded losses with static O(d^2) memory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.