Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Producers Equilibria and Dynamics in Engagement-Driven Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16641 v3 pith:VICN6PE2 submitted 2024-01-30 cs.GT

Producers Equilibria and Dynamics in Engagement-Driven Recommender Systems

classification cs.GT
keywords producerscontentproducerusercontent-servingengagementequilibriumrecommender
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online platforms such as YouTube, Instagram heavily rely on recommender systems to decide what content to present to users. Producers, in turn, often create content that is likely to be recommended to users and have users engage with it. To do so, producers try to align their content with the preferences of their targeted user base. In this work, we explore the equilibrium behavior of producers who are interested in maximizing user engagement. We study two variants of the content-serving rule for the platform's recommender system, and provide a structural characterization of producer behavior at equilibrium: namely, each producer chooses to focus on a single embedded feature. We further show that specialization, defined as different producers optimizing for distinct types of content, naturally emerges from the competition among producers trying to maximize user engagement. We provide a heuristic for computing equilibria of our engagement game, and evaluate it experimentally. We highlight i) the performance and convergence of our heuristic, ii) the degree of producer specialization, and iii) the impact of the content-serving rule on producer and user utilities at equilibrium and provide guidance on how to set the content-serving rule.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.