Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking the Effectiveness of Classification Algorithms and SVM Kernels for Dry Beans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07863 v1 pith:VIQHEE36 submitted 2023-07-15 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords algorithmsanalysisclassificationaccuracyalongbeandatasetdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Plant breeders and agricultural researchers can increase crop productivity by identifying desirable features, disease resistance, and nutritional content by analysing the Dry Bean dataset. This study analyses and compares different Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithms, namely linear, polynomial, and radial basis function (RBF), along with other popular classification algorithms. The analysis is performed on the Dry Bean Dataset, with PCA (Principal Component Analysis) conducted as a preprocessing step for dimensionality reduction. The primary evaluation metric used is accuracy, and the RBF SVM kernel algorithm achieves the highest Accuracy of 93.34%, Precision of 92.61%, Recall of 92.35% and F1 Score as 91.40%. Along with adept visualization and empirical analysis, this study offers valuable guidance by emphasizing the importance of considering different SVM algorithms for complex and non-linear structured datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AmCLR: Unified Augmented Learning for Cross-Modal Representations

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    AmCLR and xAmCLR combine SogCLR's global contrastive objective with image and text augmentations, reporting small accuracy gains over SogCLR on retrieval and zero-shot tasks.

Pith tools