REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking the Effectiveness of Classification Algorithms and SVM Kernels for Dry Beans
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Plant breeders and agricultural researchers can increase crop productivity by identifying desirable features, disease resistance, and nutritional content by analysing the Dry Bean dataset. This study analyses and compares different Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithms, namely linear, polynomial, and radial basis function (RBF), along with other popular classification algorithms. The analysis is performed on the Dry Bean Dataset, with PCA (Principal Component Analysis) conducted as a preprocessing step for dimensionality reduction. The primary evaluation metric used is accuracy, and the RBF SVM kernel algorithm achieves the highest Accuracy of 93.34%, Precision of 92.61%, Recall of 92.35% and F1 Score as 91.40%. Along with adept visualization and empirical analysis, this study offers valuable guidance by emphasizing the importance of considering different SVM algorithms for complex and non-linear structured datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AmCLR: Unified Augmented Learning for Cross-Modal Representations
AmCLR and xAmCLR combine SogCLR's global contrastive objective with image and text augmentations, reporting small accuracy gains over SogCLR on retrieval and zero-shot tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.