Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Towards Zero-Label Language Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.09193 v1 pith:VJDODCYW submitted 2021-09-19 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords datamodelslanguagelearningtrainingzero-labelapproachbetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores zero-label learning in Natural Language Processing (NLP), whereby no human-annotated data is used anywhere during training and models are trained purely on synthetic data. At the core of our framework is a novel approach for better leveraging the powerful pretrained language models. Specifically, inspired by the recent success of few-shot inference on GPT-3, we present a training data creation procedure named Unsupervised Data Generation (UDG), which leverages few-shot prompts to synthesize high-quality training data without real human annotations. Our method enables zero-label learning as we train task-specific models solely on the synthetic data, yet we achieve better or comparable results from strong baseline models trained on human-labeled data. Furthermore, when mixed with labeled data, our approach serves as a highly effective data augmentation procedure, achieving new state-of-the-art results on the SuperGLUE benchmark.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SCoRe uses multi-turn online RL with regularization on self-generated traces to improve LLM self-correction, achieving 15.6% and 9.1% gains on MATH and HumanEval for Gemini models.

  2. RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback

    cs.CL 2023-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RLAIF matches RLHF on summarization and dialogue tasks, with a direct-RLAIF variant achieving superior results by using LLM rewards directly during training.

  3. Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models

    cs.CL 2021-12 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...

  4. TabEmb: Joint Semantic-Structure Embedding for Table Annotation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    TabEmb decouples LLM-based semantic column embeddings from graph-based structural modeling to produce joint representations that improve table annotation tasks.

  5. Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model

    cs.CL 2022-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Trained the largest monolithic 530B-parameter transformer language model to date and reported new state-of-the-art zero- and few-shot results on multiple NLP benchmarks.

Pith tools