pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30890 · v1 · pith:VMDVZPTCnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th · quant-ph

Spin-Induced Fractal Time-Crystal-Like Dynamics and Non-Markovian Memory in the Bateman Dual Oscillator

Partha Nandi , Giuseppe Vitiello This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th quant-ph
keywords Bateman oscillatortime-crystal-like dynamicsnon-Markovian memorydiscrete scaling covariancenoncommutative phase spacespin-induced deformationlogarithmic spiralsSU(1,1) structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-induced noncommutativity produces discrete scaling covariance for self-similar evolution and non-Markovian memory in the closed Bateman dual oscillator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates whether a closed quantum system can generate time-crystal-like nonequilibrium behavior, self-similar scaling structures, and non-Markovian memory without external driving or coupling to a macroscopic environment. It formulates the quantum Bateman oscillator in a nonrelativistic (2+1)-dimensional phase-space noncommutative framework arising from spin-induced spatial deformation. The doubled dynamics, governed by a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian with SU(1,1) structure, features amplified and damped collective modes that obey an exact discrete scaling covariance. This covariance produces self-similar temporal evolution. Tracing over one oscillator sector yields intrinsically non-Markovian reduced dynamics governed by a history-dependent memory kernel, with the scaling also represented geometrically by logarithmic-spiral trajectories.

Core claim

The amplified and damped modes satisfy an exact discrete scaling covariance, leading to self-similar temporal evolution without external driving. Upon tracing over one oscillator sector, the reduced dynamics becomes intrinsically non-Markovian and is governed by a history-dependent memory kernel. The same scaling structure admits a geometric representation in terms of logarithmic-spiral trajectories associated with the amplified and damped branches. The mechanism relies on nonequilibrium reduced dynamics rather than equilibrium expectation values of local observables, placing it outside the assumptions of conventional no-go theorems for equilibrium time crystals. Spin serves as the common ph

What carries the argument

The exact discrete scaling covariance satisfied by the amplified and damped collective modes under the SU(1,1) structure of the doubled quantum dynamics.

If this is right

  • The mechanism identifies spin as the common physical origin of the amplified and damped dynamics, self-similar scaling, logarithmic-spiral structures, and non-Markovian memory.
  • The results lie outside the assumptions underlying conventional no-go theorems for equilibrium time crystals because they rely on nonequilibrium reduced dynamics.
  • The scaling structure suggests a natural extension of the mechanism to relativistic anyonic systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar self-similar dynamics might appear in other quantum systems where spin induces spatial noncommutativity.
  • The logarithmic-spiral trajectories could offer a geometric test for the scaling covariance in numerical simulations of the reduced dynamics.
  • Connections to memory effects in open quantum systems could be explored by comparing the history-dependent kernel to standard non-Markovian master equations.

Load-bearing premise

The nonrelativistic (2 + 1)-dimensional phase-space noncommutative framework generated by spin-induced spatial deformation produces the Bateman dual oscillator dynamics and the claimed scaling covariance without external driving or additional couplings.

What would settle it

Measurement of self-similar scaling in the time evolution of expectation values or the explicit form of a history-dependent memory kernel in the reduced density matrix of a spin-deformed quantum oscillator system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30890 by Giuseppe Vitiello, Partha Nandi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Trajectory in the complex plane illustrating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Successive stages in the construction of the Koch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic flow of the underlying mechanism. Non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Can a closed quantum system generate time-crystal-like nonequilibrium behavior, self-similar scaling structures, and non-Markovian memory without external driving or coupling to a macroscopic environment? We address this question within the quantum Bateman oscillator formulated in a nonrelativistic (2 + 1)-dimensional phase-space noncommutative framework generated by spin-induced spatial deformation. The resulting doubled quantum dynamics is governed by a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian and exhibits an underlying SU(1, 1) structure with amplified and damped collective modes. We show that these modes satisfy an exact discrete scaling covariance, leading to self-similar temporal evolution without external driving. Upon tracing over one oscillator sector, the reduced dynamics becomes intrinsically non-Markovian and is governed by a history-dependent memory kernel. The same scaling structure admits a geometric representation in terms of logarithmic-spiral trajectories associated with the amplified and damped branches of the Bateman system. Because the mechanism relies on nonequilibrium reduced dynamics rather than equilibrium expectation values of local observables, it lies outside the assumptions underlying conventional no-go theorems for equilibrium time crystals. Our results identify spin as the common physical origin of the amplified and damped Bateman dynamics, self-similar scaling periodicity, logarithmic-spiral structures, and non-Markovian memory, also suggesting a natural extension of the mechanism to relativistic anyonic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a spin-induced noncommutative phase-space structure in (2+1) dimensions generates the quantum Bateman dual oscillator with a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting SU(1,1) structure. The amplified and damped modes satisfy exact discrete scaling covariance, leading to self-similar evolution and, upon partial trace, non-Markovian dynamics with a history-dependent memory kernel. This is presented as occurring without external driving, and the mechanism is suggested to extend to relativistic anyonic systems, bypassing conventional no-go theorems for time crystals.

Significance. If the central mapping from the noncommutative framework to the exact scaling covariance holds without additional assumptions or time-dependent terms, the result would offer a novel origin for fractal time-crystal-like behavior and non-Markovian memory rooted in spin degrees of freedom. It provides a concrete example of nonequilibrium reduced dynamics in a closed system. The geometric interpretation in logarithmic spirals is an interesting addition. The strength depends on the rigor of the derivation of the Hamiltonian and scaling relations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model construction / Hamiltonian definition] The assertion that the nonrelativistic (2+1)D noncommutative framework generated by spin-induced spatial deformation automatically produces the time-independent Hermitian Bateman Hamiltonian with exact discrete scaling covariance (without external driving or additional couplings) is load-bearing for the central claim but requires explicit verification; the abstract states the mapping as given but supplies no derivations or commutation relations showing how the deformation parameter yields the SU(1,1) generators and discrete scaling factor.
  2. [Reduced dynamics / partial trace section] The claim that the reduced dynamics after tracing over one oscillator sector is intrinsically non-Markovian and governed by a history-dependent memory kernel due to the scaling covariance needs explicit derivation of the kernel; it is unclear whether this follows rigorously from the stated Hamiltonian or reverts to a standard open-system construction if the scaling relation involves any implicit parameter tuning.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is information-dense; separating the Hamiltonian construction, scaling covariance, and memory kernel claims into distinct sentences would improve clarity.
  2. [Notation throughout] Ensure all symbols (e.g., scaling factor, deformation parameter) are defined at first use and used consistently in equations and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive recommendation of major revision. The comments correctly identify the need for more explicit derivations of the central mappings, which we will supply in the revised version. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model construction / Hamiltonian definition] The assertion that the nonrelativistic (2+1)D noncommutative framework generated by spin-induced spatial deformation automatically produces the time-independent Hermitian Bateman Hamiltonian with exact discrete scaling covariance (without external driving or additional couplings) is load-bearing for the central claim but requires explicit verification; the abstract states the mapping as given but supplies no derivations or commutation relations showing how the deformation parameter yields the SU(1,1) generators and discrete scaling factor.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation of the mapping must be made fully explicit. The manuscript states the resulting time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian and its SU(1,1) structure but does not expand the intermediate commutation relations that connect the spin-induced noncommutativity parameter to these features. In the revision we will insert a dedicated subsection that starts from the deformed phase-space algebra, derives the generators, and shows that the discrete scaling covariance emerges directly without external driving or auxiliary couplings. This addition will not alter the physical claims but will render the construction self-contained. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Reduced dynamics / partial trace section] The claim that the reduced dynamics after tracing over one oscillator sector is intrinsically non-Markovian and governed by a history-dependent memory kernel due to the scaling covariance needs explicit derivation of the kernel; it is unclear whether this follows rigorously from the stated Hamiltonian or reverts to a standard open-system construction if the scaling relation involves any implicit parameter tuning.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit derivation of the memory kernel is required. The scaling covariance of the amplified and damped modes implies that the partial trace produces a non-local-in-time equation whose kernel is fixed by the discrete scaling factor. In the revised manuscript we will compute the reduced dynamics explicitly, obtain the integro-differential form, and display the memory kernel without introducing parameter tuning. The derivation will demonstrate that the non-Markovian character is a direct consequence of the closed-system scaling structure rather than a phenomenological open-system ansatz. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no circular reductions identified

full rationale

The paper constructs the Bateman dual oscillator from the assumed nonrelativistic (2+1)D noncommutative phase-space framework due to spin-induced deformation, then derives the SU(1,1) structure, discrete scaling covariance, self-similar evolution, and non-Markovian memory kernel upon partial trace as direct consequences of that framework and the time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled. The abstract and skeptic summary present the mapping as following from the model without external tuning, qualifying as the normal self-contained case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger constructed from abstract only; full derivations unavailable.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin induces a spatial deformation that generates a noncommutative (2+1)-dimensional phase-space framework for the Bateman oscillator
    This framework is invoked to produce the doubled dynamics and SU(1,1) structure without external driving.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5770 in / 1373 out tokens · 45903 ms · 2026-07-01T01:07:59.632587+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Shapere and F

    A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160402 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    Quantum Time Crystals

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012), arXiv:1202.2539 [cond-mat.other]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Nandi, A

    P. Nandi, A. Ghose-Choudhury, and P. Guha, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.21, 2450213 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Absence of Quantum Time Crystals

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 251603 (2015), arXiv:1410.2143 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Impossibility of Spontaneously Rotating Time-Crystals: A No-Go Theorem

    P. Bruno, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 070402 (2013), arXiv:1306.6275 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016), arXiv:1603.08001 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    On the phase structure of driven quantum systems

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016), arXiv:1508.03344 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017), arXiv:1608.02589 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Zhanget al., Nature543, 217 (2017)

    J. Zhanget al., Nature543, 217 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Choiet al., Nature543, 221 (2017)

    S. Choiet al., Nature543, 221 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Matus and K

    P. Matus and K. Sacha, Phys. Rev. A99, 033626 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Dutta, P

    M. Dutta, P. Nandi, and B. R. Majhi, JHEP08, 104 (2025), arXiv:2503.19688 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Dutta, P

    M. Dutta, P. Nandi, and B. R. Majhi, (2025), arXiv:2510.11075 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Banerjee, B

    R. Banerjee, B. Dutta Roy, and S. Samanta, Phys. Rev. D74, 045015 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    A. E. Bernardini and O. Bertolami, Phys. Lett. B835, 137549 (2022), arXiv:2207.00346 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Bateman, Physical Review38, 815 (1931)

    H. Bateman, Physical Review38, 815 (1931)

    1931

  17. [17]

    S. K. Pal, P. Nandi, and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062110 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    A Novel Approach to Noncommutativity in Planar Quantum Mechanics

    R. Banerjee, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 631 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0106280

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  20. [20]

    Doplicher, K

    S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J. E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B331, 39 (1994)

    1994

  21. [21]

    M. B. Fröb, W. C. C. Lima, A. Much, and K. Pa- padopoulos, Phys. Rev. D108, 086003 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Decoherence from quantum spacetime noise: An open-systems framework with application to neutrino oscillations

    P. Nandi, T. Bhattacharyya, A. S. Majumdar, G. Plea- sance, and F. Petruccione, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023130 (2026), arXiv:2503.13061 [hep-th]. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    S. K. Pal and P. Nandi, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 312 (2024), arXiv:2401.12957 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Beetar, N

    C. Beetar, N. Gupta, S. S. Haque, J. Murugan, and H. J. R. Van Zyl, JHEP08, 156 (2024), arXiv:2312.15790 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    D. Bak, K. Lee, and J.-H. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 030402 (2001)

    2001

  26. [26]

    Path integral action and Chern-Simons quantum mechanics in noncommutative plane

    S. Gangopadhyay and F. G. Scholtz, J. Phys. A47, 235301 (2014), arXiv:1402.6156 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, and H. Schulz-Baldes, Journal of Mathematical Physics35, 5373 (1994), arXiv:cond- mat/9411052

    work page arXiv 1994

  28. [28]

    Finite Noncommutative Chern-Simons with a Wilson Line and the Quantum Hall Effect

    B. Morariu and A. P. Polychronakos, JHEP07, 006 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0106072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  29. [29]

    Quantum Hall Physics = Noncommutative Field Theory

    S. Hellerman and M. Van Raamsdonk, JHEP10, 039 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Manoj, Phys

    N. Manoj, Phys. Rev. B112, 134521 (2025), arXiv:2502.03528 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Y.-H. Du, S. Moroz, D. X. Nguyen, and D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012040 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    2D or not 2D: a "holographic dictionary" for Lowest Landau Levels

    G. Mandal, A. Mohan, and R. Suroshe, (2025), arXiv:2511.01630 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Nandi, N

    P. Nandi, N. Debnath, S. Kala, and A. S. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. A110, 032204 (2024), arXiv:2309.16895 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    A Canonical Approach to the Quantization of the Damped Harmonic Oscillator

    R. Banerjee and P. Mukherjee, J. Phys. A35, 5591 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0108055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  35. [35]

    Celeghini, M

    E. Celeghini, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, Annals Phys. 215, 156 (1992)

    1992

  36. [36]

    Feshbach and Y

    H. Feshbach and Y. Tikochinsky, Annals of Physics38, 44 (1977)

    1977

  37. [37]

    Sivasubramanian, Y

    S. Sivasubramanian, Y. N. Srivastava, G. Vitiello, and A. Widom, Phys. Lett. A311, 97 (2003)

    2003

  38. [38]

    E.RussellandO.K.Pashaev,Oscillatory Models in Gen- eral Relativity(Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Vitiello, Phys

    G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A376, 2527 (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    ’t Hooft, Class

    G. ’t Hooft, Class. Quantum Grav.16, 3263 (1999)

    1999

  41. [41]

    Dissipation and quantization

    M. Blasone, P. Jizba, and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A287, 205 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0007138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  42. [42]

    Chern-Simons States and Topologically Massive Gauge Theories

    M. Asorey, F. Falceto, and S. Carlip, Phys. Lett. B312, 477 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9304081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  43. [43]

    Dissipation and Topologically Massive Gauge Theories in Pseudoeuclidean Plane

    M. Blasone, E. Graziano, O. K. Pashaev, and G. Vitiello, Annals Phys.252, 115 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9603092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    C. A. Rodriguez-Rosario and E. C. G. Sudarshan, (2008), arXiv:0803.1183 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Is Exact Markovianity Fundamental Once Time Is Relational?

    P. Nandi and F. Petruccione, (2026), arXiv:2606.08595 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Cabot, G

    A. Cabot, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, PRX Quantum 5, 030325 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    J. M. Lévy-Leblond, inGroup Theory and Applications, edited by E. Loebl (Academic Press, New York, 1972)

    1972

  48. [48]

    Bose, Communications in Mathematical Physics169, 385 (1995)

    S. Bose, Communications in Mathematical Physics169, 385 (1995)

    1995

  49. [49]

    A Chern-Simons approach to Galilean quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions

    G. Papageorgiou and B. J. Schroers, JHEP11, 009 (2009), arXiv:0907.2880 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Anyon spin and the exotic central extension of the planar Galilei group

    R. Jackiw and V. P. Nair, Phys. Lett. B480, 237 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0003130

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Marsot, P.-M

    L. Marsot, P.-M. Zhang, and P. A. Horvathy, Phys. Rev. D106, L121503 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    R. M. Santilli,Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics I: The Inverse Problem in Newtonian Mechanics(Springer- Verlag, New York, 1984) pp. 119–137

    1984

  53. [53]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Canadian Journal of Mathematics2, 129 (1950)

    1950

  54. [54]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Physical Review114, 924 (1959)

    1959

  55. [55]

    P.A.M.Dirac,Lectures on Quantum Mechanics(Yeshiva University, New York, 1964)

    1964

  56. [56]

    C.-h. Chou, V. P. Nair, and A. P. Polychronakos, Phys. Lett. B304, 105 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9301037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  57. [57]

    Zhang, D

    W.-M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 867 (1990)

    1990

  58. [58]

    A. J. Niemi, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 230201 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    A. Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    1986

  60. [60]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

    2005

  61. [61]

    Umezawa, H

    H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki,Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States(North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1982)

    1982

  62. [62]

    H. O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe,Chaos and fractals. New Frontiers of Science(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    1986

  63. [63]

    A.A.Andronov, A.A.Vitt, andS.E.Khaikin,Theory of oscillators(Dover Publications, INC„ New York, 1966)

    1966

  64. [64]

    Time crystal platform: from quasi-crystal structures in time to systems with exotic interactions

    K. Giergiel, A. Miroszewski, and K. Sacha, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140401 (2018), arXiv:1710.10087 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Celeghini, S

    E. Celeghini, S. De Martino, S. De Siena, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, Annals. Phys.241, 50 (1995)

    1995

  66. [66]

    Giergiel, A

    K. Giergiel, A. Kosior, P. Hannaford, and K. Sacha, Phys. Rev. A98, 013613 (2018)

    2018

  67. [67]

    Celeghini, S

    E. Celeghini, S. De Martino, S. De Siena, A. Iorio, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A244, 455 (1998)

    1998

  68. [68]

    A.IorioandG.Vitiello,Mod.Phys.Lett.B8,269(1994)

    1994

  69. [69]

    Giachetti, A

    G. Giachetti, A. Solfanelli, L. Correale, and N. Defenu, Phys. Rev. B108, L140102 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Blatt and C

    R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nature Physics8, 277 (2012)

    2012

  71. [71]

    Clarke and F

    J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, Nature453, 1031 (2008)

    2008

  72. [72]

    M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science339, 1169 (2013)

    2013

  73. [73]

    Majhi, S

    J. Majhi, S. Ghosh, and S. K. Maiti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 164801 (2019), arXiv:1902.01058 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Zarei, N

    M. Zarei, N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, and A. Ricciardone, Phys. Rev. D104, 083508 (2021)

    2021

  75. [75]

    D. A. Lidar, (2019), arXiv:1902.00967 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Maity and V

    A. Maity and V. V. Sreedhar, Phys. Rev. A111, 022202 (2025), arXiv:2405.02566 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025