UAVs Meet Agentic AI: A Multidomain Survey of Autonomous Aerial Intelligence and Agentic UAVs

Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis; Manoj Karkee; Ranjan Sapkota

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

UAVs Meet Agentic AI: A Multidomain Survey of Autonomous Aerial Intelligence and Agentic UAVs

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a coherent class of agentic UAVs is emerging, defined by four tightly coupled layers—perception, cognition, control, and communication—and surveyed across seven major application domains.

desk verdict Broad, useful taxonomy of agentic UAVs undermined by unsupported deployment claims and visible copy-editing failures; worth reviewing after major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08045 v1 pith:VMWYHYMT submitted 2025-06-08 cs.RO cs.AI

Ranjan Sapkota , Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis , Manoj Karkee This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ROcs.AI

keywords agenticUAVsaerialintelligenceautonomousAIagentintegrationcommunicationsunmannedsystemsmulti-domainsurvey

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey tries to establish that drone technology has crossed a line: a new class of "agentic UAVs" is emerging that does not simply execute preprogrammed flights but perceives, reasons, plans, and communicates to pursue goals with minimal human oversight. The authors care because this would change what designers, regulators, and users can expect from drones in high-stakes settings such as disaster response, precision agriculture, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. The paper offers a definition, a four-layer architecture, a comparison against traditional UAVs, and a cross-domain synthesis to ground the term "agentic" in engineering rather than marketing. If the framing is right, researchers and policymakers gain a shared vocabulary and a shared target for evaluation and certification.

What carries the argument

The central object is the four-layer agentic stack: perception maps raw sensor input to a semantic representation $o_t = \Phi(s_t)$; cognition selects an action $a_t = \pi(g, o_t)$; control converts it into actuation $u_t = \Gamma(a_t, x_t)$; and communication coordinates with other agents through shared maps and V2X links. The paper uses this stack as the mechanism that distinguishes agentic UAVs from scripted drones and as the lens for comparing seven application domains. Vision-language models and edge AI are the enabling technologies that make the cognition and perception layers practical onboard.

What would settle it

A reader could compile the published field-test data for the cited systems and check whether any has logged a complete mission with an unscripted route change, an onboard semantic decision, and successful task completion without operator intervention; if none has, the paper's portrait describes a target rather than a current class.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that agentic UAVs form a distinct class of autonomous aerial systems with a common architectural template: perception, cognition, control, and communication layers operating in tight feedback loops, with edge AI and vision-language models as key enablers. It argues that these systems reach context-aware autonomy with minimal human supervision, unlike traditional waypoint-following drones, and it reads seven application domains through this template to show shared patterns and transferable capabilities. The stated contribution is a foundational framework for developing, deploying, and governing these systems.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cited deployments and pilot programs are genuine demonstrations of agentic UAV capability, not simulations, lab prototypes, or concept proposals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the four-layer architecture is accepted, individual UAV systems can be evaluated layer by layer, making benchmark design and failure diagnosis more tractable.
Claims of Level 4-5 autonomy would carry a concrete standard: a UAV should be able to replan mid-mission from onboard reasoning without a human in the loop.
Vision-language interfaces would move from research novelty to a core requirement for human-UAV collaboration.
Cross-domain transfer becomes plausible: a perception or planning module validated in one sector, such as disaster search and rescue, could be reused in another, such as wildlife patrol, within the same stack.
Regulators would need new certification paths for learned and adaptive policies, since conventional airworthiness criteria are designed for deterministic systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The survey is best read as a design manifesto: much of the field evidence it cites comes from preprints, pilot programs, and concept systems, so the empirical status of "agentic UAV" remains open.
A testable extension is an autonomy scorecard that measures each of the four layers separately, such as how often replanning happens without operator input and how often vision-language instructions are grounded incorrectly, which would show whether the bottleneck is perception, reasoning, or regulation.
If the architecture is correct, the same stack could apply to ground robots and maritime vehicles, making "agentic UAV" one instance of a general embodied-agent template.
The emphasis on vision-language instruction following suggests that semantic grounding failures, rather than flight mechanics, may become the next practical bottleneck; that prediction could be checked with error logs from field trials.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague, here is my read. The paper is best treated as a broad organizing survey of "agentic UAVs," not as evidence that such systems are deployed at scale. The four-layer stack (perception, cognition, control, communication) is a clean restatement of sense-think-act with modern VLA/VLM dressing, and the comparison tables across eight domains are genuinely handy. Someone new to this area would leave with a good map of the vocabulary and the main research threads: edge AI, multimodal sensing, RL/MARL, federated learning, VLMs, and the standard regulatory and ethical barriers. The challenges section is boilerplate but covers the right ground.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test flags: the load-bearing claim that agentic UAVs are an established new class rests on deployment anecdotes without citations. Section 3.5 asserts vaccine delivery in Rwanda and India with onboard AI rerouting, with no reference. Amazon Prime Air and Zipline are invoked as proof of coordinated fleet delivery, without field results or error rates. Section 3.7 says Serengeti and Amazon deployments track elephants and primates, again uncited. Section 3.6 claims border trials in the EU and U.S. with no reference. These are exactly the claims that would make the survey more than a taxonomy, and right now they do not survive contact with the evidence. The conclusion that agentic UAVs are a paradigm shift needs to be downgraded to "a rapidly maturing research area with promising pilots," or the deployment claims need primary sources.

There are also editorial failures: the abstract says seven domains and lists eight; Section 3.6 ends mid-sentence; the text says "seven to eight" in multiple places. The equations in Section 2 are illustrative definitions, not derivations, which is fine for a survey but should be labeled as such. The lack of a search protocol and inclusion criteria makes the synthesis hard to reproduce, which matters for a survey claiming comprehensiveness. Self-citation in refs. 12 and 13 is not a problem by itself; the taxonomy does not hinge on those.

Who is this for? New researchers and practitioners who want a compact map of the field and a quick comparison across application domains. It is not a source of verified deployment evidence.

Recommendation: send it to peer review, but with a referee who will insist on fixing the unsupported deployment claims, adding a methodology statement, and copy-editing the truncated sections. With those changes it can be a useful reference. Without them, it is a well-organized but unreliable overview.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that 'agentic UAVs' constitute a new class of autonomous aerial systems, distinguished from traditional UAVs by cognitive capabilities, contextual adaptability, and goal-directed behavior. It proposes a four-layer architecture (perception, cognition, control, communication) in Section 2.1, compares traditional and agentic UAVs in Tables 1 and 2, surveys eight application domains in Section 3, discusses challenges and solutions in Sections 4 and 5, and concludes with a roadmap in Section 6. The paper is structured as a broad, cross-domain survey rather than an empirical study, and its central contribution is a taxonomy and synthesis of the emerging literature.

Significance. If its central claim were fully supported, the paper would provide a useful organizing framework for an emerging research area, bringing together architectural concepts, application domains, and open challenges in one place. It also offers a plausible four-layer architectural vocabulary and a broad domain matrix that could facilitate cross-domain comparison. However, the significance is currently conditional: the paper's load-bearing assertion that agentic UAVs are an established, fielded class rests on numerous uncited deployment anecdotes and recent arXiv preprints rather than on verifiable primary field data. The paper would be more appropriately positioned as a position/taxonomy paper or as an evidence survey with a documented methodology and verified use cases.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.5, Logistics and Smart Delivery] The subsection asserts that 'during the COVID-19 pandemic, agentic UAVs were deployed in Rwanda and India to autonomously deliver vaccines and testing kits to remote clinics, with onboard AI rerouting them around weather systems or no-fly zones,' but no citation supports this claim. The same paragraph states that 'in pilot programs by Amazon Prime Air and Zipline, UAV fleets have demonstrated coordinated package delivery to multiple addresses in a single flight window' without providing field results, error rates, or regulatory approvals. Because the paper's central conclusion that agentic UAVs are a paradigm shift rather than a research agenda depends on such real-world deployments, these assertions either need to be backed by primary sources or explicitly qualified as reported plans and pilots.
[Sections 3.6 and 3.7, Security and Wildlife Conservation] Multiple operational claims are presented as established fact without citations. Section 3.6 states that 'this capability is currently under trial in the EU and U.S. southern borders for 24/7 autonomous border security.' Section 3.7 states that 'in the Serengeti and Amazon rainforest, agentic UAVs have been used to autonomously locate and follow elephants, big cats, and primates' and that 'several African reserves' operate anti-poaching UAVs at night that relay coordinates to ranger units 'within seconds.' Section 3.4 similarly refers to pilot programs in London and Tokyo metros without references. These are central examples for the paper's multidomain claim, and they are not traceable to any cited study. The authors should either supply verifiable references for each such deployment or rewrite these passages as research directions and hypothetical scenarios.
[Sections 1.2 and 2.1, Definition and Architecture] The definition of 'agentic UAVs' in Section 1.2 relies heavily on self-cited and very recent preprints (e.g., refs. 12, 14, 17, 39), and the architectural distinction in Table 2 is qualitative, with many 'agentic' entries citing papers on RL-based resource allocation or task assignment that do not, on their face, demonstrate deployed agentic UAVs with reflective control. The paper needs an explicit operational criterion for what counts as an 'agentic' system in the surveyed literature (e.g., demonstrated closed-loop replanning, memory-based adaptation, or language-grounded mission specification), so that the classification is checkable rather than stipulated. Without such a criterion, the claim that a coherent new class exists is circular.
[Sections 1.1 and 1.3, Survey Methodology] The paper calls itself a systematic synthesis ('This review aims to fill that gap by systematically examining...') but provides no search strategy, inclusion criteria, database list, year range, or quality assessment for the surveyed works. This is a survey paper whose central value is supposed to come from its coverage and synthesis; the absence of methodology makes the coverage impossible to reproduce or independently verify. The authors should add a methodology subsection (or explicitly reposition the paper as a narrative/position survey and remove the word 'systematically').

minor comments (6)

[Abstract and Section 1.1] The abstract says the paper explores 'seven high-impact application domains' but then lists eight (precision agriculture, construction and mining, disaster response, environmental monitoring, infrastructure inspection, logistics, security, and wildlife conservation); Section 3 also contains eight subsections. The count should be fixed to eight, or the abstract domain list should be revised.
[Section 3.6] Section 3.6 ends mid-sentence with 'security officers can' and no concluding clause; the subsection is incomplete and must be finished.
[Throughout] The text uses inconsistent spacing and capitalization for 'UAVs' (e.g., 'UA Vs', 'UAV', 'UA V'), which should be normalized for readability.
[Figure 4 caption] The Figure 4 caption labels do not match the in-text references: the caption labels subfigures (a)-(e) for disaster zones, flood/wildfire, swarm coordination, environmental monitoring, and urban infrastructure, but the text in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 refers to them in a different order (e.g., 'Figure 4b' for disaster response and 'Figure 4c and (Figure 4d)' for environmental monitoring). The caption or the in-text callouts should be aligned.
[Section 5.2] There is a duplicated token in 'VLMs such as Flamingo, OpenFlamingo, or GPT-4V GPT-4V'; the duplicate 'GPT-4V' should be removed.
[Section 3.2] The citation list '[173, 173, 174]' repeats reference 173; this appears to be a typographical error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's taxonomy and architectural framework are stipulative organizing devices, and its central claims do not reduce to fitted parameters or self-citation.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation. The definition of Agentic UAVs in Section 1.2 is presented as a stipulative working definition ("Agentic UAVs represent a new class of autonomous aerial systems distinguished by their cognitive capabilities, contextual adaptability, and goal-directed behavior"), and the four-layer architecture in Section 2.1 is introduced as an organizing framework ("The architecture of an agentic UAV is fundamentally organized around a hierarchical stack composed of four core layers"). No equation in the paper is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction; the formal expressions (e.g., ot = Φ(st), at = π(g, ot), ut = Γ(at, xt)) are illustrative schematics of standard perception-control loops, not empirical claims derived from the survey's own inputs. The authors do cite their own prior taxonomy (refs. 12 and 13), and the definition of "agentic" leans on ref. 12, but the survey's substantive content—the comparison tables, application sections, challenge taxonomy, and future roadmap—is supported by a wide range of external references and does not depend on the self-cited papers for its validity. Any concern that the deployment anecdotes in Section 3 lack field evidence (e.g., Rwanda vaccine delivery, Amazon Prime Air pilots, Serengeti tracking) is an evidentiary or correctness issue about the strength of the survey's support, not a circularity: the paper does not claim to derive those deployments from its own definition. The classification of cited works under the stipulated definition is standard taxonomy-building. Therefore, no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contains no fitted parameters and no invented physical entities. Its central framework rests on a stipulated definition of agentic UAVs and on the assumption that the cited literature accurately reflects deployed or near-deployed capabilities.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption An agentic UAV can be decomposed into perception, cognition, control, and communication layers that operate in tight feedback loops.
Stipulated in Section 1.2 and Section 2.1 and used to organize the entire survey; it is a definition, not a proven property.
domain assumption The cited works, including arXiv preprints and design studies, accurately represent the state of agentic UAV capability.
The survey's conclusions about deployment and paradigm shift depend on this; the paper does not validate the maturity of the cited systems.
domain assumption Reinforcement learning and MDP formalisms are appropriate models for agentic UAV decision-making.
Used in Section 2.3 and Section 3.1 as framing; the paper does not derive or validate these models for real platforms.
domain assumption The application domains share transferable agentic patterns, so a cross-domain synthesis is meaningful.
Claimed in Section 1.1; no comparative evidence or meta-analysis is provided to establish common mechanisms.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UAVs Meet Agentic AI: A Multidomain Survey of Autonomous Aerial Intelligence and Agentic UAVs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMWYHYMT

@misc{pith2026250608045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UAVs Meet Agentic AI: A Multidomain Survey of Autonomous Aerial Intelligence and Agentic UAVs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMWYHYMT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08045}
}

read the original abstract

Agentic UAVs represent a new frontier in autonomous aerial intelligence, integrating perception, decision-making, memory, and collaborative planning to operate adaptively in complex, real-world environments. Driven by recent advances in Agentic AI, these systems surpass traditional UAVs by exhibiting goal-driven behavior, contextual reasoning, and interactive autonomy. We provide a comprehensive foundation for understanding the architectural components and enabling technologies that distinguish Agentic UAVs from traditional autonomous UAVs. Furthermore, a detailed comparative analysis highlights advancements in autonomy with AI agents, learning, and mission flexibility. This study explores seven high-impact application domains precision agriculture, construction & mining, disaster response, environmental monitoring, infrastructure inspection, logistics, security, and wildlife conservation, illustrating the broad societal value of agentic aerial intelligence. Furthermore, we identify key challenges in technical constraints, regulatory limitations, and data-model reliability, and we present emerging solutions across hardware innovation, learning architectures, and human-AI interaction. Finally, a future roadmap is proposed, outlining pathways toward self-evolving aerial ecosystems, system-level collaboration, and sustainable, equitable deployments. This survey establishes a foundational framework for the future development, deployment, and governance of agentic aerial systems (Agentic UAVs) across diverse societal and industrial domains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08045 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Illustration of the foundational elements of agentic UAV systems. (a) The architecture of agentic UAVs is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The diagram illustrates an agentic UAV autonomously monitoring a 100-hectare wheat field. Unlike traditional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Illustration showcasing multi-domain capabilities of agentic UAVs across real-world scenarios. (a) In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: This illustration presents agentic UAVs operating across diverse real-world applications. (a) In logistics, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: This scientific diagram illustrates ten key barriers to the adoption of agentic UAVs. On the technical side, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

LLM-Centric Agentic AI for UAV Swarms: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, and Open Problems
cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

LAUS frames LLM agents for UAV swarms and a PMA case study shows observation-level feature tampering alone can deterministically redirect scheduling and degrade packet-loss cost by 14.2×.
DAPM: UAV Monocular Depth Estimation from Any Height, Pitch, Roll and FOV
cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

DAPM jointly estimates depth and camera pose from single drone images by injecting an ideal-ground-plane depth prior and progressive per-pixel depth bins, trained on a new 42k simulated UAV dataset.
Toward Intelligent Skies: Signal Processing and AI Foundations of Low-Altitude Wireless Networks
eess.SP 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Low-altitude wireless networks are framed as a unified 3D infrastructure, with an architecture and a signal-processing-AI roadmap that the field can use as a shared reference.
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Agentic AI and Agentification: Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions
cs.NI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A survey that organizes agentic AI for 6G edge networks into four pillars, compactness, efficiency, knowledge and reasoning, and migration, and illustrates them with prior case studies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[1]

Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81(4):281–330, 2015

Gonzalo Pajares. Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81(4):281–330, 2015

2015
[2]

Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: A review of perspective of platform, control, and applications.Ieee Access, 7:105100–105115, 2019

Jeongeun Kim, Seungwon Kim, Chanyoung Ju, and Hyoung Il Son. Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: A review of perspective of platform, control, and applications.Ieee Access, 7:105100–105115, 2019

2019
[3]

An agent-based self-protective method to secure communication between uavs in unmanned aerial vehicle networks.Vehicular Communications, 26:100267, 2020

Reza Fotohi, Eslam Nazemi, and Fereidoon Shams Aliee. An agent-based self-protective method to secure communication between uavs in unmanned aerial vehicle networks.Vehicular Communications, 26:100267, 2020

2020
[4]

Multi-agent architecture for information retrieval and intelligent monitoring by uavs in known environments affected by catastrophes

David Vallejo, José Jesús Castro-Schez, Carlos Glez-Morcillo, and Javier Albusac. Multi-agent architecture for information retrieval and intelligent monitoring by uavs in known environments affected by catastrophes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87:103243, 2020

2020
[5]

Graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning for large-scale uavs swarm system control.Aerospace Science and Technology, 150:109166, 2024

Bocheng Zhao, Mingying Huo, Zheng Li, Ze Yu, and Naiming Qi. Graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning for large-scale uavs swarm system control.Aerospace Science and Technology, 150:109166, 2024

2024
[6]

Integrated cognitive architectures: a survey.Artificial Intelligence Review, 28:103–130, 2007

Hui-Qing Chong, Ah-Hwee Tan, and Gee-Wah Ng. Integrated cognitive architectures: a survey.Artificial Intelligence Review, 28:103–130, 2007

2007
[7]

Cognitive architectures and autonomy: A comparative review.Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 3(2):1, 2012

Kristinn Thórisson and Helgi Helgasson. Cognitive architectures and autonomy: A comparative review.Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 3(2):1, 2012

2012
[8]

The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence, 2018

Antonio Lieto, Mehul Bhatt, Alessandro Oltramari, and David Vernon. The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence, 2018

2018

Show all 300 references

[9]

Explainable ai and monocular vision for enhanced uav navigation in smart cities: prospects and challenges.Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7:1561404, 2025

Shumaila Javaid, Muhammad Asghar Khan, Hamza Fahim, Bin He, and Nasir Saeed. Explainable ai and monocular vision for enhanced uav navigation in smart cities: prospects and challenges.Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7:1561404, 2025

2025
[10]

Artificial intelligence algorithm models for agents of embodiment for drone applications

Sateesh Kourav, Kirti Verma, and M Sundararajan. Artificial intelligence algorithm models for agents of embodiment for drone applications. InBuilding Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains, pages 79–101. Springer, 2025

2025
[11]

Artificial intelligence (ai) algorithm and models for embodied agents (robots and drones)

P Chitra and A Saleem Raja. Artificial intelligence (ai) algorithm and models for embodied agents (robots and drones). InBuilding Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains, pages 417–441. Springer, 2025

2025
[12]

Ai agents vs

Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I Roumeliotis, and Manoj Karkee. Ai agents vs. agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10468, 2025

2025
[13]

Trism for agentic ai: A review of trust, risk, and security management in llm-based agentic multi-agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04133, 2025

Shaina Raza, Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee, and Christos Emmanouilidis. Trism for agentic ai: A review of trust, risk, and security management in llm-based agentic multi-agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04133, 2025

2025
[14]

Uav-codeagents: Scalable uav mission planning via multi-agent react and vision-language reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07236, 2025

Oleg Sautenkov, Yasheerah Yaqoot, Muhammad Ahsan Mustafa, Faryal Batool, Jeffrin Sam, Artem Lykov, Chih-Yung Wen, and Dzmitry Tsetserukou. Uav-codeagents: Scalable uav mission planning via multi-agent react and vision-language reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07236, 2025

2025 arXiv
[15]

Rule-based verification of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles.Drones, 8(1):26, 2024

Christoph Sieber, Luis Miguel Vieira da Silva, Kilian Grünhagen, and Alexander Fay. Rule-based verification of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles.Drones, 8(1):26, 2024. 26 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2024
[16]

Artificial intel- ligence algorithms and models for embodied agents: Enhancing autonomy in drones and robots

Gnanasankaran Natarajan, Elakkiya Elango, B Sundaravadivazhagan, and Sandha Rethinam. Artificial intel- ligence algorithms and models for embodied agents: Enhancing autonomy in drones and robots. InBuilding Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challeng...

2025
[17]

Uavs meet llms: Overviews and perspectives toward agentic low-altitude mobility

Yonglin Tian, Fei Lin, Yiduo Li, Tengchao Zhang, Qiyao Zhang, Xuan Fu, Jun Huang, Xingyuan Dai, Yutong Wang, Chunwei Tian, et al. Uavs meet llms: Overviews and perspectives toward agentic low-altitude mobility. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02341, 2025

2025 arXiv
[18]

A conceptual high level multi-agent system for wildfire management.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025

R Bairam Zadeh, A Elmi, V Moghaddam, and S MahmoudZadeh. A conceptual high level multi-agent system for wildfire management.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025

2025
[19]

Arresvg: Intelligent multi-uav navigation in partially observable spaces using adaptive deep reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025

Selvam Essaky, Gunasekaran Raja, Kapal Dev, and Dusit Niyato. Arresvg: Intelligent multi-uav navigation in partially observable spaces using adaptive deep reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025

2025
[20]

A review of unmanned vehicle control with adaptive dynamic programming implementations.Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 111(1):1–16, 2025

Hao Liu, Xinning Yi, Deyuan Liu, and Kimon P Valavanis. A review of unmanned vehicle control with adaptive dynamic programming implementations.Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 111(1):1–16, 2025

2025
[21]

Uav-assisted zero knowledge model proof for generative ai: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

Min Hao, Chen Shang, Siming Wang, Wenchao Jiang, and Jiangtian Nie. Uav-assisted zero knowledge model proof for generative ai: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[22]

Age of information minimization using multi-agent uavs based on ai-enhanced mean field resource allocation.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

Yousef Emami, Hao Gao, Kai Li, Luis Almeida, Eduardo Tovar, and Zhu Han. Age of information minimization using multi-agent uavs based on ai-enhanced mean field resource allocation.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

2024
[23]

Dnn task assignment in uav networks: A generative ai enhanced multi-agent reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

Xin Tang, Qian Chen, Wenjie Weng, Binhan Liao, Jiacheng Wang, Xianbin Cao, and Xiaohuan Li. Dnn task assignment in uav networks: A generative ai enhanced multi-agent reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[24]

Advances in uav path planning: A comprehensive review of methods, challenges, and future directions.Drones, 9(5):376, 2025

Meng Wenlong, Zhang Xuegang, Zhou Lvzhuoyu, Guo Hangyu, and Xin Hu. Advances in uav path planning: A comprehensive review of methods, challenges, and future directions.Drones, 9(5):376, 2025

2025
[25]

Progress in artificial intelligence-based visual servoing of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).International Journal of Thermofluids, 21:100590, 2024

Muaz Al Radi, Maryam Nooman AlMallahi, Ameena Saad Al-Sumaiti, Concetta Semeraro, Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, and Abdul Ghani Olabi. Progress in artificial intelligence-based visual servoing of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).International Journal of Thermofluids, 21:...

2024
[26]

Rgb-t crowd counting from drone: A benchmark and mmccn network

Tao Peng, Qing Li, and Pengfei Zhu. Rgb-t crowd counting from drone: A benchmark and mmccn network. In Proceedings of the Asian conference on computer vision, 2020

2020
[27]

Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: State-of-the-art in research.IEEE access, 7:138669–138682, 2019

Bilal Taha and Abdulhadi Shoufan. Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: State-of-the-art in research.IEEE access, 7:138669–138682, 2019

2019
[28]

Uav positioning based on multi-sensor fusion.IEEE Access, 8:34455–34467, 2020

Jing Peng, Ping Zhang, Lanxiang Zheng, and Jia Tan. Uav positioning based on multi-sensor fusion.IEEE Access, 8:34455–34467, 2020

2020
[29]

Optimal uav path planning in a 3d threat environment by using parallel evolutionary algorithms

Nuri Özalp and Ozgur Koray Sahingoz. Optimal uav path planning in a 3d threat environment by using parallel evolutionary algorithms. In2013 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), pages 308–317. IEEE, 2013

2013
[30]

A flexible and dynamic mission planning architecture for uav swarm coordination

Carlos Sampedro, Hriday Bavle, Jose Luis Sanchez-Lopez, Ramon A Suárez Fernández, Alejandro Rodríguez- Ramos, Martin Molina, and Pascual Campoy. A flexible and dynamic mission planning architecture for uav swarm coordination. In2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraf...

2016
[31]

US Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 2017

Michael Joseph Barnes, Jessie YC Chen, and Susan Hill.Humans and autonomy: Implications of shared decision-making for military operations. US Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 2017

2017
[32]

Uav swarms: Decision-making paradigms.Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 397, 2016

Hyo-Sang Shin and Pau Segui-Gasco. Uav swarms: Decision-making paradigms.Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 397, 2016

2016
[33]

System level test automation in uav development

Abdullah S Yildirim, Edip Berker, and Mustafa E Kayakesen. System level test automation in uav development. In2018 IEEE AUTOTESTCON, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2018

2018
[34]

Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

Kenzo Nonami, Farid Kendoul, Satoshi Suzuki, Wei Wang, and Daisuke Nakazawa.Autonomous flying robots: unmanned aerial vehicles and micro aerial vehicles. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

2010
[35]

When mobile crowd sensing meets uav: Energy-efficient task assignment and route planning.IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(11):5526–5538, 2018

Zhenyu Zhou, Junhao Feng, Bo Gu, Bo Ai, Shahid Mumtaz, Jonathan Rodriguez, and Mohsen Guizani. When mobile crowd sensing meets uav: Energy-efficient task assignment and route planning.IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(11):5526–5538, 2018. 27 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ...

2018
[36]

An aggregate flow based scheduler in multi-task cooperated uavs network.Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(11):2989–2998, 2020

LI Xiaohuan, XIE Ziqi, YE Jin, TANG Xin, LI Chunhai, TANG Fengzhu, and YU Rong. An aggregate flow based scheduler in multi-task cooperated uavs network.Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(11):2989–2998, 2020

2020
[37]

Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on uav communications for 5g and beyond.Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(12):2327–2375, 2019

Yongs Zeng, Qingqing Wu, and Rui Zhang. Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on uav communications for 5g and beyond.Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(12):2327–2375, 2019

2019
[38]

Lorawan as secondary telemetry communication system for drone delivery

Andri Rahmadhani, Radhika Isswandhana, Andreas Giovani, Riza Alaudin Syah, et al. Lorawan as secondary telemetry communication system for drone delivery. In2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS), pages 116–122. IEEE, 2018

2018
[39]

Multi-agent embodied ai: Advances and future directions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05108, 2025

Zhaohan Feng, Ruiqi Xue, Lei Yuan, Yang Yu, Ning Ding, Meiqin Liu, Bingzhao Gao, Jian Sun, and Gang Wang. Multi-agent embodied ai: Advances and future directions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05108, 2025

2025 arXiv
[40]

Trust-based assured sensor fusion in distributed aerial autonomy

R Spencer Hallyburton and Miroslav Pajic. Trust-based assured sensor fusion in distributed aerial autonomy. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 16th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (with CPS-IoT Week 2025), pages 1–12, 2025

2025
[41]

Swarm intelligence and multi-drone coordination with edge ai

Siva Raja Sindiramutty. Swarm intelligence and multi-drone coordination with edge ai. InComputer Vision and Edge Computing Technologies for the Drone Industry, pages 271–304. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025

2025
[42]

Z. Du, C. Luo, G. Min, J. Wu, C. Luo, J. Pu, and S. Li. A survey on autonomous and intelligent swarms of uncrewed aerial vehicles (uavs).IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025

2025
[43]

A context-aware feature fusion method for multi-uav cooperative air combat.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025

Jiehong Wu, Nan Zhang, Danyang Li, Jing Bi, and Guangjie Han. A context-aware feature fusion method for multi-uav cooperative air combat.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025

2025
[44]

Contextbots: Real-time context-aware inference on aerial robots

Khizar Anjum, Vidyasagar Sadhu, and Dario Pompili. Contextbots: Real-time context-aware inference on aerial robots. In2024 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Smart Systems and the Internet of Things (DCOSS-IoT), pages 219–223. IEEE, 2024

2024
[45]

Flexifly: Interfacing the physical world with foundation models empowered by reconfigurable drone systems

Minghui Zhao, Junxi Xia, Kaiyuan Hou, Yanchen Liu, Stephen Xia, and Xiaofan Jiang. Flexifly: Interfacing the physical world with foundation models empowered by reconfigurable drone systems. InProceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 46...

2025
[46]

Multi-uav task assignment in dynamic environments: Current trends and future directions.Drones, 9(1):75, 2025

Shahad Alqefari and Mohamed El Bachir Menai. Multi-uav task assignment in dynamic environments: Current trends and future directions.Drones, 9(1):75, 2025

2025
[47]

M. M. Saad, M. A. Jamshed, M. A. Tariq, A. Nauman, and D. Kim. Knowledge-empowered distributed learning platform in internet of unmanned aerial agents to support nr-v2x communication.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[48]

S. Shahkar. Cooperative localization of multi-agent unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) networks in intelligent transportation systems.IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025

2025
[49]

Uav- enabled integrated sensing and communication: Opportunities and challenges.IEEE Wireless Communications, 2023

Kaitao Meng, Qingqing Wu, Jie Xu, Wen Chen, Zhiyong Feng, Robert Schober, and A Lee Swindlehurst. Uav- enabled integrated sensing and communication: Opportunities and challenges.IEEE Wireless Communications, 2023

2023
[50]

Sensors and measurements for unmanned systems: An overview.Sensors, 21(4):1518, 2021

Eulalia Balestrieri, Pasquale Daponte, Luca De Vito, and Francesco Lamonaca. Sensors and measurements for unmanned systems: An overview.Sensors, 21(4):1518, 2021

2021
[51]

A review of time critical decision making models and human cognitive processes

Ron Azuma, Mike Daily, and Chris Furmanski. A review of time critical decision making models and human cognitive processes. In2006 IEEE aerospace conference, pages 9–pp. IEEE, 2006

2006
[52]

The cognitive process of decision making.International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 1(2):73–85, 2007

Yingxu Wang and Guenther Ruhe. The cognitive process of decision making.International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 1(2):73–85, 2007

2007
[53]

Lida: A systems-level architecture for cognition, emotion, and learning.IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 6(1):19–41, 2013

Stan Franklin, Tamas Madl, Sidney D’mello, and Javier Snaider. Lida: A systems-level architecture for cognition, emotion, and learning.IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 6(1):19–41, 2013

2013
[54]

Modelling social action for ai agents.Artificial intelligence, 103(1-2):157–182, 1998

Cristiano Castelfranchi. Modelling social action for ai agents.Artificial intelligence, 103(1-2):157–182, 1998

1998
[55]

WIT Press, 2025

Henry Hexmoor, Johan Lammens, Guido Caicedo, and Stuart C Shapiro.Behaviour based AI, cognitive processes, and emergent behaviors in autonomous agents, volume 1. WIT Press, 2025

2025
[56]

A review of cognitive uavs: Ai-driven situation awareness for enhanced operations.AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2024

Motahareh Dehghan and Erfan Khosravian. A review of cognitive uavs: Ai-driven situation awareness for enhanced operations.AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2024

2024
[57]

Multi-agent reinforcement learning-based resource allocation for uav networks.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 19(2):729–743, 2019

Jingjing Cui, Yuanwei Liu, and Arumugam Nallanathan. Multi-agent reinforcement learning-based resource allocation for uav networks.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 19(2):729–743, 2019. 28 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2019
[58]

Aidin Ferdowsi, Mohamed A Abd-Elmagid, Walid Saad, and Harpreet S Dhillon. Neural combinatorial deep reinforcement learning for age-optimal joint trajectory and scheduling design in uav-assisted networks.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 39(5):1250–1265, 2021

2021
[59]

Multi-agent reinforcement learning for offloading cellular communications with cooperating uavs.IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2025

Abhishek Mondal, Deepak Mishra, George C Alexandropoulos, Azzam Al-Nahari, and Riku Jäntti. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for offloading cellular communications with cooperating uavs.IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2025

2025
[60]

Cognitive mapping and planning for visual navigation

Saurabh Gupta, James Davidson, Sergey Levine, Rahul Sukthankar, and Jitendra Malik. Cognitive mapping and planning for visual navigation. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2616–2625, 2017

2017
[61]

Goal-based action priors

David Abel, David Hershkowitz, Gabriel Barth-Maron, Stephen Brawner, Kevin O’Farrell, James MacGlashan, and Stefanie Tellex. Goal-based action priors. InProceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, volume 25, pages 306–314, 2015

2015
[62]

Hybrid transformer based multi-agent reinforcement learning for multiple unmanned aerial vehicle coordination in air corridors.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025

Liangkun Yu, Zhirun Li, Nirwan Ansari, and Xiang Sun. Hybrid transformer based multi-agent reinforcement learning for multiple unmanned aerial vehicle coordination in air corridors.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025

2025
[63]

Mehrdad Mohseni and Iman Mohammadzaman. Robust meta-reinforcement learning for autonomous spacecraft rendezvous with transformer networks under delayed observations.International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, pages 1–26, 2025

2025
[64]

Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning

Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Mensch, Katherine Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, et al. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23716...

2022
[65]

Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 26296–26306, 2024

2024
[66]

Edgeai drone for autonomous construction site demonstrator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09837, 2025

Emre Girgin, Arda Taha Candan, and Co¸ skun Anıl Zaman. Edgeai drone for autonomous construction site demonstrator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09837, 2025

2025 arXiv
[67]

A uav-cloud system for disaster sensing applications

Chunbo Luo, James Nightingale, Ekhorutomwen Asemota, and Christos Grecos. A uav-cloud system for disaster sensing applications. In2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2015

2015
[68]

A dual-stage processing architecture for unmanned aerial vehicle object detection and tracking using lightweight onboard and ground server computations.Technologies, 13(1):35, 2025

Odysseas Ntousis, Evangelos Makris, Panayiotis Tsanakas, and Christos Pavlatos. A dual-stage processing architecture for unmanned aerial vehicle object detection and tracking using lightweight onboard and ground server computations.Technologies, 13(1):35, 2025

2025
[69]

Over-the-air computation of large-scale nomographic functions in mapreduce over the edge cloud network.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(14):11843–11857, 2021

Fei Han, Vincent KN Lau, and Yi Gong. Over-the-air computation of large-scale nomographic functions in mapreduce over the edge cloud network.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(14):11843–11857, 2021

2021
[70]

Decentralized computation offloading with coopera- tive uavs: Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning perspective.IEEE Wireless Communications, 29(4):24–31, 2022

Sangwon Hwang, Hoon Lee, Juseong Park, and Inkyu Lee. Decentralized computation offloading with coopera- tive uavs: Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning perspective.IEEE Wireless Communications, 29(4):24–31, 2022

2022
[71]

Comparative features of unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) for border protection of libya: A review

Rema Ibrahim Hamad Abushahma, Musab AM Ali, Nur Adilah Abd Rahman, and Omar Ismael Al-Sanjary. Comparative features of unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) for border protection of libya: A review. In2019 IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSP...

2019
[72]

Drone detection sensor with continuous 2.4 ghz ism band coverage based on cost-effective sdr platform.IEEE Access, 9:114574–114586, 2021

Przemysław Flak. Drone detection sensor with continuous 2.4 ghz ism band coverage based on cost-effective sdr platform.IEEE Access, 9:114574–114586, 2021

2021
[73]

Exploring the unseen: A survey of multi-sensor fusion and the role of explainable ai (xai) in autonomous vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 25(3):856, 2025

Krishna Panduru, Joseph Walsh, et al. Exploring the unseen: A survey of multi-sensor fusion and the role of explainable ai (xai) in autonomous vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 25(3):856, 2025

2025
[74]

Uav photogrammetry of forests as a vulnerable process

Julian Frey, Kyle Kovach, Simon Stemmler, and Barbara Koch. Uav photogrammetry of forests as a vulnerable process. a sensitivity analysis for a structure from motion rgb-image pipeline.Remote Sensing, 10(6):912, 2018

2018
[75]

Detection of tomatoes using spectral-spatial methods in remotely sensed rgb images captured by uav.Biosystems engineering, 146:16–32, 2016

Jayavelu Senthilnath, Akanksha Dokania, Manasa Kandukuri, KN Ramesh, Gautham Anand, and SN Omkar. Detection of tomatoes using spectral-spatial methods in remotely sensed rgb images captured by uav.Biosystems engineering, 146:16–32, 2016

2016
[76]

Using 3d point clouds derived from uav rgb imagery to describe vineyard 3d macro-structure.Remote Sensing, 9(2):111, 2017

Marie Weiss and Frédéric Baret. Using 3d point clouds derived from uav rgb imagery to describe vineyard 3d macro-structure.Remote Sensing, 9(2):111, 2017

2017
[77]

Crop canopy volume weighted by color parameters from uav-based rgb imagery to estimate above-ground biomass of potatoes.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 227:109678, 2024

Yang Liu, Fuqin Yang, Jibo Yue, Wanxue Zhu, Yiguang Fan, Jiejie Fan, Yanpeng Ma, Mingbo Bian, Riqiang Chen, Guijun Yang, et al. Crop canopy volume weighted by color parameters from uav-based rgb imagery to estimate above-ground biomass of potatoes.Computers and Electronics in ...

2024
[78]

Segmenting vegetation from uav images via spectral reconstruction in complex field environments.Plant Phenomics, 7(1):100021, 2025

Zhixun Pei, Xingcai Wu, Xue Wu, Yuanyuan Xiao, Peijia Yu, Zhenran Gao, Qi Wang, and Wei Guo. Segmenting vegetation from uav images via spectral reconstruction in complex field environments.Plant Phenomics, 7(1):100021, 2025

2025
[79]

Mapping maize water stress based on uav multispectral remote sensing.Remote Sensing, 11(6):605, 2019

Liyuan Zhang, Huihui Zhang, Yaxiao Niu, and Wenting Han. Mapping maize water stress based on uav multispectral remote sensing.Remote Sensing, 11(6):605, 2019

2019
[80]

Jose AJ Berni, Pablo J Zarco-Tejada, Lola Suárez, and Elias Fereres. Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle.IEEE Transactions on geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(3):722–738, 2009

2009
[81]

A review on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles and imaging sensors for monitoring and assessing plant stresses.Drones, 3(2):40, 2019

Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo. A review on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles and imaging sensors for monitoring and assessing plant stresses.Drones, 3(2):40, 2019

2019
[82]

Uav multispectral imagery can complement satellite data for monitoring forest health.Remote Sensing, 10(8):1216, 2018

Jonathan P Dash, Grant D Pearse, and Michael S Watt. Uav multispectral imagery can complement satellite data for monitoring forest health.Remote Sensing, 10(8):1216, 2018

2018
[83]

Water stress estimation in vineyards from aerial swir and multispectral uav data.Remote Sensing, 12(15):2499, 2020

Zacharias Kandylakis, Alexandros Falagas, Christina Karakizi, and Konstantinos Karantzalos. Water stress estimation in vineyards from aerial swir and multispectral uav data.Remote Sensing, 12(15):2499, 2020

2020
[84]

Development of lidar-based uav system for environment reconstruction.IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(10):1790–1794, 2017

Kai-Wei Chiang, Guang-Je Tsai, Yu-Hua Li, and Naser El-Sheimy. Development of lidar-based uav system for environment reconstruction.IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(10):1790–1794, 2017

2017
[85]

Qingxiang Li, Guidong Yang, Chuanxiang Gao, Yijun Huang, Jihan Zhang, Dongyue Huang, Benyun Zhao, Xi Chen, and Ben M Chen. Single drone-based 3d reconstruction approach to improve public engagement in conservation of heritage buildings: A case of hakka tulou.Journal of Buildin...

2024
[86]

A review on viewpoints and path planning for uav-based 3-d reconstruction.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16:5026–5048, 2023

Mehdi Maboudi, MohammadReza Homaei, Soohwan Song, Shirin Malihi, Mohammad Saadatseresht, and Markus Gerke. A review on viewpoints and path planning for uav-based 3-d reconstruction.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16:5026–5048, 2023

2023
[87]

Giovanni Tanda and Mauro Migliazzi. Infrared thermography monitoring of solar photovoltaic systems: A comparison between uav and aircraft remote sensing platforms.Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 48:102379, 2024

2024
[88]

Uav thermal imaging for unexploded ordnance detection by using deep learning.Remote Sensing, 15(4):967, 2023

Milan Baji´c Jr and Božidar Potoˇcnik. Uav thermal imaging for unexploded ordnance detection by using deep learning.Remote Sensing, 15(4):967, 2023

2023
[89]

Solar photovoltaic hotspot inspection using unmanned aerial vehicle thermal images at a solar field in south india.Remote Sensing, 15(7):1914, 2023

Umesh Pruthviraj, Yashwant Kashyap, Effrosyni Baxevanaki, and Panagiotis Kosmopoulos. Solar photovoltaic hotspot inspection using unmanned aerial vehicle thermal images at a solar field in south india.Remote Sensing, 15(7):1914, 2023

1914
[90]

A uav-based thermal-imaging approach for the monitoring of urban landfills.Inventions, 5(4):55, 2020

Giovanni Tanda, Marco Balsi, Paolo Fallavollita, and Valter Chiarabini. A uav-based thermal-imaging approach for the monitoring of urban landfills.Inventions, 5(4):55, 2020

2020
[91]

Livestock management with unmanned aerial vehicles: A review.IEEE Access, 10:45001–45028, 2022

Mohammed A Alanezi, Mohammad Shoaib Shahriar, Md Bakhtiar Hasan, Sabbir Ahmed, Yusuf A Sha’aban, and Houssem REH Bouchekara. Livestock management with unmanned aerial vehicles: A review.IEEE Access, 10:45001–45028, 2022

2022
[92]

Mask r-cnn and centroid tracking algorithm to process uav based thermal-rgb video for drylot cattle heat stress monitoring.Drones, 8(9):491, 2024

Keshawa M Dadallage, Basavaraj R Amogi, Lav R Khot, and Francisco A Leal Yepes. Mask r-cnn and centroid tracking algorithm to process uav based thermal-rgb video for drylot cattle heat stress monitoring.Drones, 8(9):491, 2024

2024
[93]

Illumination-aware image fusion for around-the-clock human detection in adverse environments from unmanned aerial vehicle

Gelayol Golcarenarenji, Ignacio Martinez-Alpiste, Qi Wang, and Jose Maria Alcaraz-Calero. Illumination-aware image fusion for around-the-clock human detection in adverse environments from unmanned aerial vehicle. Expert Systems with Applications, 204:117413, 2022

2022
[94]

Robust-fusionnet: Deep multimodal sensor fusion for 3-d object detection under severe weather conditions

Cheng Zhang, Hai Wang, Yingfeng Cai, Long Chen, Yicheng Li, Miguel Angel Sotelo, and Zhixiong Li. Robust-fusionnet: Deep multimodal sensor fusion for 3-d object detection under severe weather conditions. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71:1–13, 2022

2022
[95]

Multi-sensor data fusion for autonomous flight of unmanned aerial vehicles in complex flight environments.Drone Systems and Applications, 12:1–12, 2024

Kun Yue. Multi-sensor data fusion for autonomous flight of unmanned aerial vehicles in complex flight environments.Drone Systems and Applications, 12:1–12, 2024

2024
[96]

Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:34892–34916, 2023

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:34892–34916, 2023

2023
[97]

Openflamingo: An open-source framework for training large autoregressive vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01390, 2023

Anas Awadalla, Irena Gao, Josh Gardner, Jack Hessel, Yusuf Hanafy, Wanrong Zhu, Kalyani Marathe, Yonatan Bitton, Samir Gadre, Shiori Sagawa, et al. Openflamingo: An open-source framework for training large autoregressive vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01390, 2023

2023 arXiv
[98]

Large language models for uavs: Current state and pathways to the future.IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2024

Shumaila Javaid, Hamza Fahim, Bin He, and Nasir Saeed. Large language models for uavs: Current state and pathways to the future.IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2024. 30 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2024
[99]

Bedi: A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating embodied agents on uavs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18229, 2025

Mingning Guo, Mengwei Wu, Jiarun He, Shaoxian Li, Haifeng Li, and Chao Tao. Bedi: A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating embodied agents on uavs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18229, 2025

2025
[100]

Cooperative motion planning and control for aerial-ground autonomous systems: Methods and applications.Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 146:101005, 2024

Runqi Chai, Yunlong Guo, Zongyu Zuo, Kaiyuan Chen, Hyo-Sang Shin, and Antonios Tsourdos. Cooperative motion planning and control for aerial-ground autonomous systems: Methods and applications.Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 146:101005, 2024

2024
[101]

Drones and autonomous robotics incorporating computational intelligence.Computational Intelligent Techniques in Mechatronics, pages 243–296, 2024

R Thangamani, RK Suguna, and GK Kamalam. Drones and autonomous robotics incorporating computational intelligence.Computational Intelligent Techniques in Mechatronics, pages 243–296, 2024

2024
[102]

Path planning for fully autonomous uavs-a taxonomic review and future perspectives.IEEE Access, 2025

Geeta Sharma, Sanjeev Jain, and Radhe Shyam Sharma. Path planning for fully autonomous uavs-a taxonomic review and future perspectives.IEEE Access, 2025

2025
[103]

Path planning for single unmanned aerial vehicle by separately evolving waypoints.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 31(5):1130–1146, 2015

Peng Yang, Ke Tang, Jose A Lozano, and Xianbin Cao. Path planning for single unmanned aerial vehicle by separately evolving waypoints.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 31(5):1130–1146, 2015

2015
[104]

Multi-uav path planning for autonomous missions in mixed gnss coverage scenarios.Sensors, 18(12):4188, 2018

Flavia Causa, Giancarmine Fasano, and Michele Grassi. Multi-uav path planning for autonomous missions in mixed gnss coverage scenarios.Sensors, 18(12):4188, 2018

2018
[105]

Uav mission planning with sar application.Sensors, 20(4):1080, 2020

Wojciech Stecz and Krzysztof Gromada. Uav mission planning with sar application.Sensors, 20(4):1080, 2020

2020
[106]

General-purpose aerial intelligent agents empowered by large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08302, 2025

Ji Zhao and Xiao Lin. General-purpose aerial intelligent agents empowered by large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08302, 2025

2025 arXiv
[107]

Robust satisficing decision making for unmanned aerial vehicle complex missions under severe uncertainty.PloS one, 11(11):e0166448, 2016

Xiaoting Ji, Yifeng Niu, and Lincheng Shen. Robust satisficing decision making for unmanned aerial vehicle complex missions under severe uncertainty.PloS one, 11(11):e0166448, 2016

2016
[108]

Modeling workload impact in multiple unmanned vehicle supervisory control.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(6):1180–1190, 2010

Birsen Donmez, Carl Nehme, and Mary L Cummings. Modeling workload impact in multiple unmanned vehicle supervisory control.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(6):1180–1190, 2010

2010
[109]

Artificial intelligence aided next-generation networks relying on uavs.IEEE Wireless Communications, 28(1):120–127, 2020

Xiao Liu, Mingzhe Chen, Yuanwei Liu, Yue Chen, Shuguang Cui, and Lajos Hanzo. Artificial intelligence aided next-generation networks relying on uavs.IEEE Wireless Communications, 28(1):120–127, 2020

2020
[110]

Multisensor fusion for autonomous uav navigation based on the unscented kalman filter with sequential measurement updates

Seung-Min Oh. Multisensor fusion for autonomous uav navigation based on the unscented kalman filter with sequential measurement updates. In2010 IEEE Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration, pages 217–222. IEEE, 2010

2010
[111]

Decentralized task allocation for multiple uavs with task execution uncertainties

Ruifan Liu, Minguk Seo, Binbin Yan, and Antonios Tsourdos. Decentralized task allocation for multiple uavs with task execution uncertainties. In2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pages 271–278. IEEE, 2020

2020
[112]

Chi Harold Liu, Zheyu Chen, Jian Tang, Jie Xu, and Chengzhe Piao. Energy-efficient uav control for effective and fair communication coverage: A deep reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 36(9):2059–2070, 2018

2018
[113]

The energy-efficient uav-based bs coverage in air-to-ground communications

Bin Li, Chao Chen, Ruonan Zhang, Hong Jiang, and Xianzhen Guo. The energy-efficient uav-based bs coverage in air-to-ground communications. In2018 IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), pages 578–581. IEEE, 2018

2018
[114]

T Archana, T Aravind, A Hema Malini, and CT Kalaivani. Energy-aware adaptive obstacle avoidance based on meta-reinforcement learning with segmentation for uav trajectory planning.International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, pages 1–21, 2025

2025
[115]

Energy aware and safe path planning for unmanned aircraft systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03271, 2025

Sebastian Gasche, Christian Kallies, Andreas Himmel, and Rolf Findeisen. Energy aware and safe path planning for unmanned aircraft systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03271, 2025

2025 arXiv
[116]

X. Hai, Q. Feng, W. Chen, C. Wen, and A. W. Khong. Capability-oriented decision-making in multi-uav deployment and task allocation: A hierarchical game-based framework.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, April 11 2025

2025
[117]

Using hands as an easy uav joystick for entertainment applications

Maria De Marsico and Alessandro Spagnoli. Using hands as an easy uav joystick for entertainment applications. InProceedings of the 13th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter: Designing the next interaction, pages 1–9, 2019

2019
[118]

Design of multi-mode uav human-computer interaction system

Liang Jie, Cao Jian, and Wang Lei. Design of multi-mode uav human-computer interaction system. In2017 IEEE international conference on unmanned systems (ICUS), pages 353–357. IEEE, 2017

2017
[119]

Jiang, C

F. Jiang, C. Pan, L. Dong, K. Wang, O. A. Dobre, and M. Debbah. From large ai models to agentic ai: A tutorial on future intelligent communications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22311, 2025

2025 arXiv
[120]

Lsar: Multi-uav collaboration for search and rescue missions.IEEE Access, 7:55817–55832, 2019

Ebtehal Turki Alotaibi, Shahad Saleh Alqefari, and Anis Koubaa. Lsar: Multi-uav collaboration for search and rescue missions.IEEE Access, 7:55817–55832, 2019. 31 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2019
[121]

Alqudsi and M

Y . Alqudsi and M. Makaraci. Uav swarms: research, challenges, and future directions.Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 72(1):12, 2025

2025
[122]

Path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: A review, solutions, and challenges.Computer communications, 149:270–299, 2020

Shubhani Aggarwal and Neeraj Kumar. Path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: A review, solutions, and challenges.Computer communications, 149:270–299, 2020

2020
[123]

Iot enabled uav: Network architecture and routing algorithm.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2):3727–3742, 2019

Qixun Zhang, Menglei Jiang, Zhiyong Feng, Wei Li, Wei Zhang, and Miao Pan. Iot enabled uav: Network architecture and routing algorithm.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2):3727–3742, 2019

2019
[124]

Anibal Sanjab, Walid Saad, and Tamer Ba¸ sar. A game of drones: Cyber-physical security of time-critical uav applications with cumulative prospect theory perceptions and valuations.IEEE Transactions on Communications, 68(11):6990–7006, 2020

2020
[125]

Autonomous net recovery of fixed-wing uav with single-frequency carrier-phase differential gnss.IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 30(5):18–27, 2015

Robert Skulstad, Christoffer Syversen, Mariann Merz, Nadezda Sokolova, Thor Fossen, and Tor Johansen. Autonomous net recovery of fixed-wing uav with single-frequency carrier-phase differential gnss.IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 30(5):18–27, 2015

2015
[126]

An experimental uav system for search and rescue challenge

David Erdos, Abraham Erdos, and Steve E Watkins. An experimental uav system for search and rescue challenge. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 28(5):32–37, 2013

2013
[127]

X. Tang, Q. Chen, W. Weng, C. Jin, Z. Liu, J. Wang, G. Sun, X. Li, and D. Niyato. Task assignment and exploration optimization for low altitude uav rescue via generative ai enhanced multi-agent reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13554, 2025

2025 arXiv
[128]

Unmanned aerial vehicle abstraction layer: An abstraction layer to operate unmanned aerial vehicles.International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 17(4):1729881420925011, 2020

Fran Real, Arturo Torres-González, Pablo Ramon-Soria, Jesús Capitán, and Anibal Ollero. Unmanned aerial vehicle abstraction layer: An abstraction layer to operate unmanned aerial vehicles.International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 17(4):1729881420925011, 2020

2020
[129]

Security, privacy and safety evaluation of dynamic and static fleets of drones

Raja Naeem Akram, Konstantinos Markantonakis, Keith Mayes, Oussama Habachi, Damien Sauveron, Andreas Steyven, and Serge Chaumette. Security, privacy and safety evaluation of dynamic and static fleets of drones. In 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC),...

2017
[130]

Calculation and identification of the aerodynamic parameters for small-scaled fixed-wing uavs.Sensors, 18(1):206, 2018

Jieliang Shen, Yan Su, Qing Liang, and Xinhua Zhu. Calculation and identification of the aerodynamic parameters for small-scaled fixed-wing uavs.Sensors, 18(1):206, 2018

2018
[131]

Ground control station embedded mission planning for uas.Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 69:241–256, 2013

Luca Damilano, Giorgio Guglieri, Fulvia Quagliotti, Ilaria Sale, and Alessio Lunghi. Ground control station embedded mission planning for uas.Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 69:241–256, 2013

2013
[132]

Extending qgroundcontrol for automated mission planning of uavs.Sensors, 18(7):2339, 2018

Cristian Ramirez-Atencia and David Camacho. Extending qgroundcontrol for automated mission planning of uavs.Sensors, 18(7):2339, 2018

2018
[133]

Uav waypoint opportunistic navigation in gnss-denied environments.IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 58(1):663–678, 2021

Yanhao Yang, Joe Khalife, Joshua J Morales, and Zaher M Kassas. Uav waypoint opportunistic navigation in gnss-denied environments.IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 58(1):663–678, 2021

2021
[134]

Vision-based navigation techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: Review and challenges.Drones, 7(2):89, 2023

Muhammad Yeasir Arafat, Muhammad Morshed Alam, and Sangman Moh. Vision-based navigation techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: Review and challenges.Drones, 7(2):89, 2023

2023
[135]

A review of gnss-independent uav navigation techniques.Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 152:104069, 2022

Nasser Gyagenda, Jasper V Hatilima, Hubert Roth, and Vadim Zhmud. A review of gnss-independent uav navigation techniques.Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 152:104069, 2022

2022
[136]

Uas, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: A review towards practical applications.International journal of remote sensing, 38(8-10):2349–2391, 2017

Luís Pádua, Jakub Vanko, Jonáš Hruška, Telmo Adão, Joaquim J Sousa, Emanuel Peres, and Raul Morais. Uas, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: A review towards practical applications.International journal of remote sensing, 38(8-10):2349–2391, 2017

2017
[137]

A comprehensive survey of research towards ai-enabled unmanned aerial systems in pre-, active-, and post-wildfire management.Information Fusion, page 102369, 2024

Sayed Pedram Haeri Boroujeni, Abolfazl Razi, Sahand Khoshdel, Fatemeh Afghah, Janice L Coen, Leo O’Neill, Peter Fule, Adam Watts, Nick-Marios T Kokolakis, and Kyriakos G Vamvoudakis. A comprehensive survey of research towards ai-enabled unmanned aerial systems in pre-, active-...

2024
[138]

Towards reducing chemical usage for weed control in agriculture using uas imagery analysis and computer vision techniques.Scientific reports, 13(1):6548, 2023

Ranjan Sapkota, John Stenger, Michael Ostlie, and Paulo Flores. Towards reducing chemical usage for weed control in agriculture using uas imagery analysis and computer vision techniques.Scientific reports, 13(1):6548, 2023

2023
[139]

Drones in plant disease assessment, efficient monitoring, and detection: A way forward to smart agriculture.Agronomy, 13(6):1524, 2023

Aqleem Abbas, Zhenhao Zhang, Hongxia Zheng, Mohammad Murtaza Alami, Abdulmajeed F Alrefaei, Qamar Abbas, Syed Atif Hasan Naqvi, Muhammad Junaid Rao, Walid FA Mosa, Qamar Abbas, et al. Drones in plant disease assessment, efficient monitoring, and detection: A way forward to sma...

2023
[140]

Recent advances in crop disease detection using uav and deep learning techniques.Remote Sensing, 15(9):2450, 2023

Tej Bahadur Shahi, Cheng-Yuan Xu, Arjun Neupane, and William Guo. Recent advances in crop disease detection using uav and deep learning techniques.Remote Sensing, 15(9):2450, 2023

2023
[141]

Emerging uav technology for disaster detection, mitigation, response, and preparedness.Journal of Field Robotics, 39(6):905–955, 2022

Amina Khan, Sumeet Gupta, and Sachin Kumar Gupta. Emerging uav technology for disaster detection, mitigation, response, and preparedness.Journal of Field Robotics, 39(6):905–955, 2022. 32 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2022
[142]

Holistic review of uav-centric situational awareness: Applications, limitations, and algorithmic challenges.Robotics, 13(8):117, 2024

Somaiyeh MahmoudZadeh, Amirmehdi Yazdani, Yashar Kalantari, Bekir Ciftler, Fathi Aidarus, and Mhd Omar Al Kadri. Holistic review of uav-centric situational awareness: Applications, limitations, and algorithmic challenges.Robotics, 13(8):117, 2024

2024
[143]

Situation awareness in ai-based technologies and multimodal systems: Architectures, challenges and applications.IEEE Access, 2024

Jieli Chen, Kah Phooi Seng, Jeremy Smith, and Li Minn Ang. Situation awareness in ai-based technologies and multimodal systems: Architectures, challenges and applications.IEEE Access, 2024

2024
[144]

Agent-based design for uav mission planning

Domenico Pascarella, Salvatore Venticinque, and Rocco Aversa. Agent-based design for uav mission planning. In2013 eighth international conference on P2P , parallel, grid, cloud and internet computing, pages 76–83. IEEE, 2013

2013
[145]

Scenario-driven evaluation of autonomous agents: Integrating large language model for uav mission reliability.Drones, 9(3):213, 2025

Anıl Sezgin. Scenario-driven evaluation of autonomous agents: Integrating large language model for uav mission reliability.Drones, 9(3):213, 2025

2025
[146]

A comprehensive survey on artificial intelligence for unmanned aerial vehicles.IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 4:713–738, 2023

Siva Sai, Akshat Garg, Kartik Jhawar, Vinay Chamola, and Biplab Sikdar. A comprehensive survey on artificial intelligence for unmanned aerial vehicles.IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 4:713–738, 2023

2023
[147]

From pid to swarms: A decade of advancements in drone control and path planning-a systematic review (2013–2023).Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 89:101626, 2024

Berk Cetinsaya, Dirk Reiners, and Carolina Cruz-Neira. From pid to swarms: A decade of advancements in drone control and path planning-a systematic review (2013–2023).Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 89:101626, 2024

2013
[148]

Mission planning of uavs and cavs based on graph neural networks transformer model.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

Ziyuan Ma, Jun Xiong, Huajun Gong, and Xinhua Wang. Mission planning of uavs and cavs based on graph neural networks transformer model.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

2024
[149]

Comprehensive review of path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).ACM Computing Surveys, 2025

Pawan Kumar, Kunwar Pal, and Mahesh Govil. Comprehensive review of path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).ACM Computing Surveys, 2025

2025
[150]

Efficient path planning in multi-agent environ- ment of uavs with payloads.IEEE Access, 2025

Annapurna Jonnalagadda, Yuva Sai, MV Bharat, and EZ Ushus. Efficient path planning in multi-agent environ- ment of uavs with payloads.IEEE Access, 2025

2025
[151]

Ai- based uav swarms for monitoring and disease identification of brassica plants using machine learning: A review

Zain Anwar Ali, Dingnan Deng, Muhammad Kashif Shaikh, Raza Hasan, and Muhammad Aamir Khan. Ai- based uav swarms for monitoring and disease identification of brassica plants using machine learning: A review. Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 48(1), 2024

2024
[152]

Recent development trends in plant protection uavs: A journey from conventional practices to cutting-edge technologies—a comprehensive review.Drones, 8(9):457, 2024

Shahzad Ali Nahiyoon, Zongjie Ren, Peng Wei, Xi Li, Xiangshuai Li, Jun Xu, Xiaojing Yan, and Huizhu Yuan. Recent development trends in plant protection uavs: A journey from conventional practices to cutting-edge technologies—a comprehensive review.Drones, 8(9):457, 2024

2024
[153]

Multi-uav air combat cooperative game based on virtual opponent and value attention decomposition policy gradient.Expert Systems with Applications, 267:126069, 2025

Xiaojie Xu, Yunfan Wang, Xian Guo, Kuihua Huang, and Xuebo Zhang. Multi-uav air combat cooperative game based on virtual opponent and value attention decomposition policy gradient.Expert Systems with Applications, 267:126069, 2025

2025
[154]

Markov decision processes.Handbooks in operations research and management science, 2:331–434, 1990

Martin L Puterman. Markov decision processes.Handbooks in operations research and management science, 2:331–434, 1990

1990
[155]

Markov decision processes in artificial intelligence.Wiley Online Library, pages 1–38, 2013

Frédérick Garcia and Emmanuel Rachelson. Markov decision processes in artificial intelligence.Wiley Online Library, pages 1–38, 2013

2013
[156]

Markov decision processes.European Journal of Operational Research, 39(1):1–16, 1989

Chelsea C White III and Douglas J White. Markov decision processes.European Journal of Operational Research, 39(1):1–16, 1989

1989
[157]

Unmanned aerial vehicles (uav) in precision agriculture: Applications and challenges

Parthasarathy Velusamy, Santhosh Rajendran, Rakesh Kumar Mahendran, Salman Naseer, Muhammad Shafiq, and Jin-Ghoo Choi. Unmanned aerial vehicles (uav) in precision agriculture: Applications and challenges. Energies, 15(1):217, 2021

2021
[158]

Review on unmanned aerial vehicles, remote sensors, imagery processing, and their applications in agriculture.Agronomy Journal, 113(2):971–992, 2021

Daniel Olson and James Anderson. Review on unmanned aerial vehicles, remote sensors, imagery processing, and their applications in agriculture.Agronomy Journal, 113(2):971–992, 2021

2021
[159]

Assessing the accuracy of mosaics from unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) imagery for precision agriculture purposes in wheat.Precision Agriculture, 15:44–56, 2014

David Gómez-Candón, AI De Castro, and Francisca López-Granados. Assessing the accuracy of mosaics from unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) imagery for precision agriculture purposes in wheat.Precision Agriculture, 15:44–56, 2014

2014
[160]

Using uas imagery and computer vision to support site-specific weed control in corn

Ranjan Sapkota. Using uas imagery and computer vision to support site-specific weed control in corn. Master’s thesis, North Dakota State University, 2021

2021
[161]

Application of drone systems for spraying pesticides in advanced agriculture: a review

Ganesh P Borikar, Chaitanya Gharat, and Sachin R Deshmukh. Application of drone systems for spraying pesticides in advanced agriculture: a review. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 1259, page 012015. IOP Publishing, 2022

2022
[162]

The economic effects of unmanned aerial vehicles in pesticide application: Evidence from chinese grain farmers.Precision Agriculture, 24(5):1965–1981, 2023

Xiuhao Quan, Qiaoling Guo, Ji Ma, and Reiner Doluschitz. The economic effects of unmanned aerial vehicles in pesticide application: Evidence from chinese grain farmers.Precision Agriculture, 24(5):1965–1981, 2023. 33 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

1965
[163]

Uav- assisted dynamic clustering of wireless sensor networks for crop health monitoring.Sensors, 18(2):555, 2018

Mohammad Ammad Uddin, Ali Mansour, Denis Le Jeune, Mohammad Ayaz, and El-Hadi M Aggoune. Uav- assisted dynamic clustering of wireless sensor networks for crop health monitoring.Sensors, 18(2):555, 2018

2018
[164]

Review on application of drones for crop health monitoring and spraying pesticides and fertilizer.J

Gayathri Devi, N Sowmiya, K Yasoda, K Muthulakshmi, and Kishore Balasubramanian. Review on application of drones for crop health monitoring and spraying pesticides and fertilizer.J. Crit. Rev, 7(6):667–672, 2020

2020
[165]

Crupi, L

L. Crupi, L. Butera, A. Ferrante, A. Giusti, and D. Palossi. An efficient ground-aerial transportation system for pest control enabled by ai-based autonomous nano-uavs.Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems, 2025

2025
[166]

Grando, J

L. Grando, J. F. G. Jaramillo, J. R. E. Leite, and E. L. Ursini. Agent-based simulation of uav battery recharg- ing for iot applications: Precision agriculture, disaster recovery, and dengue vector control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12685, 2025

2025 arXiv
[167]

K. Ye, G. Hu, Z. Tong, Y . Xu, and J. Zheng. Key intelligent pesticide prescription spraying technologies for the control of pests, diseases, and weeds: A review.Agriculture, 15(1):81, 2025

2025
[168]

Alzahrani, O

B. Alzahrani, O. S. Oubbati, A. Barnawi, M. Atiquzzaman, and D. Alghazzawi. Uav assistance paradigm: State-of-the-art in applications and challenges.Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 166:102706, 2020

2020
[169]

Elmokadem and A

T. Elmokadem and A. V . Savkin. Towards fully autonomous uavs: A survey.Sensors, 21(18):6223, 2021

2021
[170]

MahmoudZadeh, A

S. MahmoudZadeh, A. Yazdani, Y . Kalantari, B. Ciftler, F. Aidarus, and M. O. Al Kadri. Holistic review of uav-centric situational awareness: Applications, limitations, and algorithmic challenges.Robotics, 13(8):117, 2024

2024
[171]

Hickling, M

T. Hickling, M. Hogan, A. Tammam, and N. Aouf. Deep reinforcement learning based autonomous decision- making for cooperative uavs: A search and rescue real world application.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20326, 2025

2025
[172]

J. Gao, Y . Zhang, Z. Wu, and L. N. Yu. Optimized collaborative scheduling of unmanned aerial vehicles for emergency material distribution in flood disaster management.Mechatron. Intell Transp. Syst, 4(1):1–15, 2025

2025
[173]

A. M. Mequanenit, E. A. Nibret, P. Herrero-Martín, M. S. García-González, and R. Martínez-Béjar. A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning system for governmental interoperability.Applied Sciences, 15(6):3146, 2025

2025
[174]

M. M. Karim, D. H. Van, S. Khan, Q. Qu, and Y . Kholodov. Ai agents meet blockchain: A survey on secure and scalable collaboration for multi-agents.Future Internet, 17(2):57, 2025

2025
[175]

Manfreda, M

S. Manfreda, M. F. McCabe, P. E. Miller, R. Lucas, V . Pajuelo Madrigal, G. Mallinis, E. Ben Dor, D. Helman, L. Estes, G. Ciraolo, J. Müllerová, F. Tauro, M. I. De Lima, J. L. M. P. De Lima, F. Frances, K. Caylor, M. Kohv, A. Maltese, M. Perks, G. Ruiz-Pérez, Z. Su, G. Vico, a...

2018
[176]

S. S. Panda, M. N. Rao, P. S. Thenkabail, D. Misra, and J. P. Fitzgerald. Remote sensing systems—platforms and sensors: Aerial, satellite, uav, optical, radar, and lidar. In P. S. Thenkabail, editor,Remote Sensing Handbook, Volume I, pages 3–86. CRC Press, 2016

2016
[177]

I. M. Mehedi, M. S. Hanif, M. Bilal, M. T. Vellingiri, and T. Palaniswamy. Remote sensing and decision support system applications in precision agriculture: Challenges and possibilities.IEEE Access, 12:44786–44798, 2024

2024
[178]

F. A. Almalki, S. M. Salem, W. M. Fawzi, N. S. Alfeteis, S. A. Esaifan, A. S. Alharthi, and Q. H. Naith. Coupling an autonomous uav with a ml framework for sustainable environmental monitoring and remote sensing. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2024(1):4285475, 2024

2024
[179]

S. Hong, B. J. Morgan, M. D. Stocker, J. Smith, and Y . A. Pachepsky. Spatial patterns of water quality and remote sensing indices from uav-based multispectral imagery across an irrigation pond.Heliyon, 2025

2025
[180]

Singh, S

J. Singh, S. K. Ahirwal, K. Ramteke, G. Kantharajan, and K. Sarma. Remote sensing techniques for monitoring aquatic ecosystems. InInformation Technology in Fisheries and Aquaculture, pages 71–107. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2025

2025
[181]

M. Cui, Y . Sun, C. Huang, and M. Li. Water turbidity retrieval based on uav hyperspectral remote sensing.Water, 14(1):128, 2022

2022
[182]

H. L. Trinh, H. T. Kieu, H. Y . Pak, D. S. C. Pang, W. W. Tham, E. Khoo, and A. W. K. Law. A comparative study of multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs) with spectral sensors for real-time turbidity monitoring in the coastal environment.Drones, 8(2):52, 2024

2024
[183]

Elfarkh, K

J. Elfarkh, K. Johansen, V . Angulo, O. L. Camargo, and M. F. McCabe. Quantifying within-flight variation in land surface temperature from a uav-based thermal infrared camera.Drones, 7(10):617, 2023. 34 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2023
[184]

X. Pan, Z. Wang, H. Ullah, C. Chen, X. Wang, X. Li, and Y . Yu. Evaluation of eutrophication in jiaozhou bay via water color parameters determination with uav-borne hyperspectral imagery.Atmosphere, 14(2):387, 2023

2023
[185]

G. S. Rowan and M. Kalacska. A review of remote sensing of submerged aquatic vegetation for non-specialists. Remote Sensing, 13(4):623, 2021

2021
[186]

Doctoral dissertation, Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, 2024

Zahia Mabrek.IoT Network Dynamic Clustering and Communication for Surveillance UAV’s. Doctoral dissertation, Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, 2024

1945
[187]

Suresh, D

S. Suresh, D. Velmurugan, N. Vasudevan, D. S. R. Samundi, and R. Elayaraja. Autonomous uav swarms: Innovations and applications. InInnovations and Developments in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, pages 95–128. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025

2025
[188]

Chang, H

G. Chang, H. Shen, Y . Hui, X. Zhang, J. Lu, H. Lu, and B. Tian. Lidar-based decentralized collaborative localization and mapping for multi-uav with stable triangle descriptor.IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025

2025
[189]

X. Li, J. Zhang, S. Bu, L. Chen, K. Li, Z. Xia, and X. Jia. Cluster-aliv: Aerial lidar-inertia-visual dense reconstruction for cluster uav.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025

2025
[190]

Al Ridhawi, O

I. Al Ridhawi, O. Bouachir, M. Aloqaily, and A. Boukerche. Design guidelines for cooperative uav-supported services and applications.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(9):1–35, 2021

2021
[191]

B. Fei, W. Bao, X. Zhu, D. Liu, T. Men, and Z. Xiao. Autonomous cooperative search model for multi-uav with limited communication network.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(19):19346–19361, 2022

2022
[192]

G. E. M. Abro, Z. A. Ali, and R. J. Masood. Synergistic uav motion: A comprehensive review on advancing multi-agent coordination.IECE Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control, 1(2):72–88, 2024

2024
[193]

Mandirola, C

M. Mandirola, C. Casarotti, S. Peloso, I. Lanese, E. Brunesi, and I. Senaldi. Use of uas for damage inspection and assessment of bridge infrastructures.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72:102824, 2022

2022
[194]

Tullu, B

A. Tullu, B. Endale, A. Wondosen, and H. Y . Hwang. Machine learning approach to real-time 3d path planning for autonomous navigation of unmanned aerial vehicle.Applied Sciences, 11(10):4706, 2021

2021
[195]

M. Lawn, A. Morinaga, and I. Yamamoto. Development of an autonomous surface vessel for use as a drone base station.Sensors and Materials, 33(3):873–881, 2021

2021
[196]

Morando, C

L. Morando, C. T. Recchiuto, J. Calla, P. Scuteri, and A. Sgorbissa. Thermal and visual tracking of photovoltaic plants for autonomous uav inspection.Drones, 6(11):347, 2022

2022
[197]

K. Kuru, D. Ansell, W. Khan, and H. Yetgin. Analysis and optimization of unmanned aerial vehicle swarms in logistics: An intelligent delivery platform.IEEE Access, 7:15804–15831, 2019

2019
[198]

Betti Sorbelli

F. Betti Sorbelli. Uav-based delivery systems: A systematic review, current trends, and research challenges. Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems, 1(3):1–40, 2024

2024
[199]

Jahani, Y

H. Jahani, Y . Khosravi, B. Kargar, K. L. Ong, and S. Arisian. Exploring the role of drones and uavs in logistics and supply chain management: a novel text-based literature review.International Journal of Production Research, 63(5):1873–1897, 2025

2025
[200]

V . Garg, S. Niranjan, V . Prybutok, T. Pohlen, and D. Gligor. Drones in last-mile delivery: A systematic review on efficiency, accessibility, and sustainability.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 123:103831, 2023

2023
[201]

Jones, S

M. Jones, S. Djahel, and K. Welsh. Path-planning for unmanned aerial vehicles with environment complexity considerations: A survey.ACM Computing Surveys, 55(11):1–39, 2023

2023
[202]

Grayson, N

B. Grayson, N. T. Penna, J. P. Mills, and D. S. Grant. Gps precise point positioning for uav photogrammetry. The Photogrammetric Record, 33(164):427–447, 2018

2018
[203]

S. Z. Khan, M. Mohsin, and W. Iqbal. On gps spoofing of aerial platforms: a review of threats, challenges, methodologies, and future research directions.PeerJ Computer Science, 7:e507, 2021

2021
[204]

Verdiesen, A

I. Verdiesen, A. Aler Tubella, and V . Dignum. Integrating comprehensive human oversight in drone deployment: a conceptual framework applied to the case of military surveillance drones.Information, 12(9):385, 2021

2021
[205]

Lyu and R

C. Lyu and R. Zhan. Global analysis of active defense technologies for unmanned aerial vehicle.IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 37(1):6–31, 2022

2022
[206]

H. J. Hadi, Y . Cao, K. U. Nisa, A. M. Jamil, and Q. Ni. A comprehensive survey on security, privacy issues and emerging defence technologies for uavs.Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 213:103607, 2023. 35 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2023
[207]

A. O. Agbeyangi, J. O. Odiete, and A. B. Olorunlomerue. Review on uavs used for aerial surveillance.Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 3(10):5713–5719, 2016

2016
[208]

Zhang and Y

J. Zhang and Y . Zhang. A method for uav reconnaissance and surveillance in complex environments. In2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), pages 482–485. IEEE, 2020

2020
[209]

Rasmussen, K

S. Rasmussen, K. Kalyanam, S. Manyam, D. Casbeer, and C. Olsen. Practical considerations for implementing an autonomous, persistent, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance system. In2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pages 1847–1854. IEEE, 2017

2017
[210]

Kalyanam, P

K. Kalyanam, P. Chandler, M. Pachter, and S. Darbha. Optimization of perimeter patrol operations using unmanned aerial vehicles.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 35(2):434–441, 2012

2012
[211]

Krishnamoorthy, M

K. Krishnamoorthy, M. Pachter, P. Chandler, D. Casbeer, and S. Darbha. Uav perimeter patrol operations optimization using efficient dynamic programming. InProceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, pages 462–467. IEEE, 2011

2011
[212]

Y . Ham, K. K. Han, J. J. Lin, and M. Golparvar-Fard. Visual monitoring of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs): a review of related works.Visualization in Engineering, 4:1–8, 2016

2016
[213]

F. Yang, Z. Li, and J. Fu. Collaborative decision-making in heterogeneous uav swarms based on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. In2024 39th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), pages 2127–2134. IEEE, June 2024

2024
[214]

F. Lin, Y . Tian, T. Zhang, J. Huang, S. Guan, and F. Y . Wang. Airvista-ii: An agentic system for embodied uavs toward dynamic scene semantic understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09583, 2025

2025 arXiv
[215]

G. Liu, Y . Liu, R. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, Z. Xiong, S. Sun, and A. Jamalipour. Wireless agentic ai with retrieval-augmented multimodal semantic perception.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23275, 2025

2025 arXiv
[216]

A survey of computer vision methods for 2d object detection from unmanned aerial vehicles.Journal of Imaging, 6(8):78, 2020

Dario Cazzato, Claudio Cimarelli, Jose Luis Sanchez-Lopez, Holger V oos, and Marco Leo. A survey of computer vision methods for 2d object detection from unmanned aerial vehicles.Journal of Imaging, 6(8):78, 2020

2020
[217]

A military object detection model of uav reconnais- sance image and feature visualization.Applied Sciences, 12(23):12236, 2022

Huanhua Liu, Yonghao Yu, Shengzong Liu, and Wei Wang. A military object detection model of uav reconnais- sance image and feature visualization.Applied Sciences, 12(23):12236, 2022

2022
[218]

Unmanned aerial vehicles advances in object detection and communication security review.Cognitive Robotics, 2024

Asif Ali Laghari, Awais Khan Jumani, Rashid Ali Laghari, Hang Li, Shahid Karim, and Abudllah Ayub Khan. Unmanned aerial vehicles advances in object detection and communication security review.Cognitive Robotics, 2024

2024
[219]

Classification, military applications, and opportunities of unmanned aerial vehicles.Aviation, 28(2):115–127, 2024

Linker Criollo, Carlos Mena-Arciniega, and Shen Xing. Classification, military applications, and opportunities of unmanned aerial vehicles.Aviation, 28(2):115–127, 2024

2024
[220]

Adversarial machine learning for robust and secure uav detection in consumer applications.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2025

Ikram Ud Din, Ahmad Almogren, and Joel JPC Rodrigues. Adversarial machine learning for robust and secure uav detection in consumer applications.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2025

2025
[221]

Swarmcatcher: An ai-powered anti-drone surveillance system for public safety over 5g and beyond ecosystems

Sarantis Kalafatidis, Dimitrios Tsiktsiris, Dimitrios Trakos, Antonios Lalas, Konstantinos V otis, and Dimitrios Tzovaras. Swarmcatcher: An ai-powered anti-drone surveillance system for public safety over 5g and beyond ecosystems. In2025 28th Conference on Innovation in Clouds...

2025
[222]

Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in united states protected areas

Katherine S Willis. Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in united states protected areas. Biological Conservation, 182:233–242, 2015

2015
[223]

Limitations and challenges of ai in wildlife conservation

Archna Goyal, Ruchika Bhakhar, and Surbhi Singh. Limitations and challenges of ai in wildlife conservation. In AI and Machine Learning Techniques for Wildlife Conservation, pages 363–394. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025

2025
[224]

Integration of satellite data and ai for habitat monitoring and conservation

B Santhosh. Integration of satellite data and ai for habitat monitoring and conservation. InAI and Machine Learning Techniques for Wildlife Conservation, pages 267–296. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025

2025
[225]

Afridi, L

S. Afridi, L. Laporte-Devylder, G. Maalouf, J. M. Kline, S. G. Penny, K. Hlebowicz, and U. P. S. Lundquist. Impact of drone disturbances on wildlife: A review.Drones, 9(4):311, 2025

2025
[226]

Mo and K

M. Mo and K. Bonatakis. Approaching wildlife with drones: using scientific literature to identify factors to consider for minimising disturbance.Australian Zoologist, 42(1):1–29, 2022

2022
[227]

Sellami, H

M. Sellami, H. Mezni, H. Elmannai, and R. Alkanhel. Drone-as-a-service: proximity-aware composition of uav-based delivery services.Cluster Computing, 28(5):1–27, 2025. 36 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2025
[228]

AlMarri, M

M. AlMarri, M. Al-Ali, M. Alzarooni, A. AlTeneiji, K. Al-Ali, and Z. Bahroun. Enterprise resource planning systems for health, safety, and environment management: Analyzing critical success factors.Sustainability, 17(7):2947, 2025

2025
[229]

Obosu and S

M. Obosu and S. Frimpong. Advances in automation and robotics: The state of the emerging future mining industry.Journal of Safety and Sustainability, 2025

2025
[230]

S. A. H. Mohsan, N. Q. H. Othman, Y . Li, M. H. Alsharif, and M. A. Khan. Unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs): Practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends.Intelligent Service Robotics, 16(1):109–137, 2023

2023
[231]

Replacing objects in point cloud stream with real-time meshes using semantic segmentation

Abhinav Chitta. Replacing objects in point cloud stream with real-time meshes using semantic segmentation. Master’s thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2024

2024
[232]

Mehranfar, A

M. Mehranfar, A. Braun, and A. Borrmann. From dense point clouds to semantic digital models: End-to-end ai-based automation procedure for manhattan-world structures.Automation in Construction, 162:105392, 2024

2024
[233]

Mitchell and J

J. Mitchell and J. A. Marshall. Design of a novel auto-rotating uav platform for underground mine cavity surveying. InProceedings of the 2017, 2017

2017
[234]

Jordan, J

S. Jordan, J. Moore, S. Hovet, J. Box, J. Perry, K. Kirsche, and Z. T. H. Tse. State-of-the-art technologies for uav inspections.IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 12(2):151–164, 2018

2018
[235]

Z. Li, Y . Zhang, H. Wu, S. Suzuki, A. Namiki, and W. Wang. Design and application of a uav autonomous inspection system for high-voltage power transmission lines.Remote Sensing, 15(3):865, 2023

2023
[236]

J. Wu, Y . Ye, and J. Du. Multi-objective reinforcement learning for autonomous drone navigation in urban areas with wind zones.Automation in Construction, 158:105253, 2024

2024
[237]

O. D. Pantaleon, A. B. Rahman, and E. E. Tsiropoulou. Brave: Benefit-aware data offloading in uav edge computing using multi-agent reinforcement learning.Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, page 103091, 2025

2025
[238]

Karbasishargh, M

K. Karbasishargh, M. H. Moghimi Esfandabadi, and A. Esmaeili. Innovative approaches to uav performance: Enhancing safety, reliability, and flexibility.International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, 7(2):28–39, 2024

2024
[239]

K. M. Kang, Y . S. Ko, Y . S. Lee, J. Yi, and C. Y . Won. The operation method of hybrid power supply system combining lithium polymer battery and supercapacitor for industrial drones.Energies, 16(22):7552, 2023

2023
[240]

Schacht-Rodríguez, J

R. Schacht-Rodríguez, J. C. Ponsart, C. D. García-Beltrán, C. M. Astorga-Zaragoza, D. Theilliol, and Y . Zhang. Path planning generation algorithm for a class of uav multirotor based on state of health of lithium polymer battery.Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 91:115...

2018
[241]

Caballero-Martin, J

D. Caballero-Martin, J. M. Lopez-Guede, J. Estevez, and M. Graña. Artificial intelligence applied to drone control: A state of the art.Drones, 8(7):296, 2024

2024
[242]

Roofline model for uavs: A bottleneck analysis tool for onboard compute characterization of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles

Srivatsan Krishnan, Zishen Wan, Kshitij Bhardwaj, Ninad Jadhav, Aleksandra Faust, and Vijay Janapa Reddi. Roofline model for uavs: A bottleneck analysis tool for onboard compute characterization of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. In2022 IEEE International Symposium on Per...

2022
[243]

Unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs): Practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends.Intelligent service robotics, 16(1):109–137, 2023

Syed Agha Hassnain Mohsan, Nawaf Qasem Hamood Othman, Yanlong Li, Mohammed H Alsharif, and Muhammad Asghar Khan. Unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs): Practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends.Intelligent service robotics, 16(1):109–137, 2023

2023
[244]

Advancements and challenges in uav-based communication networks: a comprehensive scholarly analysis.Results in Engineering, page 103271, 2024

FAYU WAN, MUHAMMAD BILAL YASEEN, MUHAMMAD BILAL RIAZ, ANUM SHAFIQ, ATUL THAKUR, and MD OWAHEDUR RAHMAN. Advancements and challenges in uav-based communication networks: a comprehensive scholarly analysis.Results in Engineering, page 103271, 2024

2024
[245]

Review of navigation methods for uav-based parcel delivery.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 21(1):1068–1082, 2023

Didula Dissanayaka, Thumeera R Wanasinghe, Oscar De Silva, Awantha Jayasiri, and George KI Mann. Review of navigation methods for uav-based parcel delivery.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 21(1):1068–1082, 2023

2023
[246]

Unmanned aerial vehicle integrated real time kinematic in infrared inspection of photovoltaic panels.Measurement, 188:110536, 2022

Isaac Segovia Ramírez, Jesús Rafael Parra Chaparro, and Fausto Pedro García Márquez. Unmanned aerial vehicle integrated real time kinematic in infrared inspection of photovoltaic panels.Measurement, 188:110536, 2022

2022
[247]

Enhancing data processing methods to improve uav positioning accuracy.International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, 16(3):100–110, 2024

Igor Zhukov, Bogdan Dolintse, and Sergii Balakin. Enhancing data processing methods to improve uav positioning accuracy.International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, 16(3):100–110, 2024. 37 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2024
[248]

Practices for governing agentic ai systems.Research Paper, OpenAI, 2023

Yonadav Shavit, Sandhini Agarwal, Miles Brundage, Steven Adler, Cullen O’Keefe, Rosie Campbell, Teddy Lee, Pamela Mishkin, Tyna Eloundou, Alan Hickey, et al. Practices for governing agentic ai systems.Research Paper, OpenAI, 2023

2023
[249]

Jurjen van der Sluijs, Eyal Saiet, Carolyn N Bakelaar, Andrew Wentworth, Robert H Fraser, and Steven V Kokelj. Beyond visual-line-of-sight (bvlos) drone operations for environmental and infrastructure monitoring: a case study in northwestern canada.Drone Systems and Applicatio...

2023
[250]

Bvlos unmanned aircraft operations in forest environments.Drones, 6(7):167, 2022

Robin John ap Lewis Hartley, Isaac Levi Henderson, and Chris Lewis Jackson. Bvlos unmanned aircraft operations in forest environments.Drones, 6(7):167, 2022

2022
[251]

Comparative approach of unmanned aerial vehicle restrictions in controlled airspaces.Remote Sensing, 14(4):822, 2022

Stephen John McTegg, Fayez Tarsha Kurdi, Shane Simmons, and Zahra Gharineiat. Comparative approach of unmanned aerial vehicle restrictions in controlled airspaces.Remote Sensing, 14(4):822, 2022

2022
[252]

Sairul Safie and Raudhah Khairil. Regulatory, technical, and safety considerations for uav-based inspection in chemical process plants: A systematic review of current practice and future directions.Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 30:101343, 2025

2025
[253]

Rafał Perz. The multidimensional threats of un-manned aerial systems: exploring biomechanical, technical, operational, and legal solutions for ensuring safety and security.Archives of Transport, 69(1):91–111, 2024

2024
[254]

Self-defense against robots and drones.Conn

A Michael Froomkin and P Zak Colangelo. Self-defense against robots and drones.Conn. L. Rev., 48:1, 2015

2015
[255]

Strategies to improve the social acceptability of drones.Book print, 12, 2021

Raphaela Chakravarti, Seira Iwai, and Suhara Wijewardane. Strategies to improve the social acceptability of drones.Book print, 12, 2021

2021
[256]

Enhancing uav aerial image analysis: Integrating advanced sahi techniques with real-time detection models on the visdrone dataset

M Muzammul, Abdulmohsen Algarni, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, and Muhammad Assam. Enhancing uav aerial image analysis: Integrating advanced sahi techniques with real-time detection models on the visdrone dataset. IEEE Access, 12:21621–21633, 2024

2024
[257]

Real-time aerial detection and reasoning on embedded-uavs in rural environments.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61:1–7, 2023

Tin Lai. Real-time aerial detection and reasoning on embedded-uavs in rural environments.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61:1–7, 2023

2023
[258]

Vlm-rrt: Vision language model guided rrt search for autonomous uav navigation

Jianlin Ye, Savvas Papaioannou, and Panayiotis Kolios. Vlm-rrt: Vision language model guided rrt search for autonomous uav navigation. In2025 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pages 633–640. IEEE, 2025

2025
[259]

Navblip: a visual-language model for enhancing unmanned aerial vehicles navigation and object detection.Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 18:1513354, 2025

Ye Li, Li Yang, Meifang Yang, Fei Yan, Tonghua Liu, Chensi Guo, and Rufeng Chen. Navblip: a visual-language model for enhancing unmanned aerial vehicles navigation and object detection.Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 18:1513354, 2025

2025
[260]

Flightgpt: Towards generalizable and interpretable uav vision-and- language navigation with vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12835, 2025

Hengxing Cai, Jinhan Dong, Jingjun Tan, Jingcheng Deng, Sihang Li, Zhifeng Gao, Haidong Wang, Zicheng Su, Agachai Sumalee, and Renxin Zhong. Flightgpt: Towards generalizable and interpretable uav vision-and- language navigation with vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:...

2025 arXiv
[261]

Uav-vlrr: Vision-language informed nmpc for rapid response in uav search and rescue.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02465, 2025

Yasheerah Yaqoot, Muhammad Ahsan Mustafa, Oleg Sautenkov, Artem Lykov, Valerii Serpiva, and Dzmitry Tsetserukou. Uav-vlrr: Vision-language informed nmpc for rapid response in uav search and rescue.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02465, 2025

2025 arXiv
[262]

Uav-human: A large benchmark for human behavior understanding with unmanned aerial vehicles

Tianjiao Li, Jun Liu, Wei Zhang, Yun Ni, Wenqian Wang, and Zhiheng Li. Uav-human: A large benchmark for human behavior understanding with unmanned aerial vehicles. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16266–16275, 2021

2021
[263]

A diverse knowledge perception and fusion network for detecting targets and key parts in uav images.Neurocomputing, 612:128748, 2025

Hanyu Wang, Qiang Shen, and Zilong Deng. A diverse knowledge perception and fusion network for detecting targets and key parts in uav images.Neurocomputing, 612:128748, 2025

2025
[264]

Uav (unmanned aerial vehicle): Diverse applications of uav datasets in segmentation, classification, detection, and tracking.Algorithms, 17(12):594, 2024

Md Mahfuzur Rahman, Sunzida Siddique, Marufa Kamal, Rakib Hossain Rifat, and Kishor Datta Gupta. Uav (unmanned aerial vehicle): Diverse applications of uav datasets in segmentation, classification, detection, and tracking.Algorithms, 17(12):594, 2024

2024
[265]

Development and experimental verification of a hybrid vertical take-off and landing (vtol) unmanned aerial vehicle (uav)

Haowei Gu, Ximin Lyu, Zexiang Li, Shaojie Shen, and Fu Zhang. Development and experimental verification of a hybrid vertical take-off and landing (vtol) unmanned aerial vehicle (uav). In2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pages 160–169. IEEE, 2017

2017
[266]

A review on vertical take-off and landing (vtol) tilt-rotor and tilt wing unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).Journal of Engineering, 2022(1):1803638, 2022

Akshat Misra, Sudhakaran Jayachandran, Shivam Kenche, Anirudh Katoch, Arjun Suresh, Edison Gundabattini, Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj, and Addisalem Adefris Legesse. A review on vertical take-off and landing (vtol) tilt-rotor and tilt wing unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).Journal o...

2022
[267]

Model compensation control of composite vertical take-off and landing uav.The Aeronautical Journal, 129(1331):224–239, 2025

GY Qi, XR Zhang, and L Xu. Model compensation control of composite vertical take-off and landing uav.The Aeronautical Journal, 129(1331):224–239, 2025

2025
[268]

Embedded payload solutions in uavs for medium and small package delivery.Machines, 10(9):737, 2022

Matteo Saponi, Alberto Borboni, Riccardo Adamini, Rodolfo Faglia, and Cinzia Amici. Embedded payload solutions in uavs for medium and small package delivery.Machines, 10(9):737, 2022. 38 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISAPKOTA ET AL. 2025

2022
[269]

A modular multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle design approach for development of an engineering education platform.Sensors, 21(8):2737, 2021

Denis Kotarski, Petar Piljek, Marko Pranji´c, Carlo Giorgio Grlj, and Josip Kasa´c. A modular multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle design approach for development of an engineering education platform.Sensors, 21(8):2737, 2021

2021
[270]

Plug-and-play adaptation in autopilot architectures for unmanned aerial vehicles

Peng Li, Di Liu, and Simone Baldi. Plug-and-play adaptation in autopilot architectures for unmanned aerial vehicles. InIECON 2021–47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2021

2021
[271]

Fastsim: A modular and plug-and-play simulator for aerial robots.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

Can Cui, Xiaobin Zhou, Miao Wang, Fei Gao, and Chao Xu. Fastsim: A modular and plug-and-play simulator for aerial robots.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

2024
[272]

Drone delivery systems and energy management: a review and future trends.Handbook of smart energy systems, pages 1–19, 2023

Mohammad Sadra Rajabi, Pedram Beigi, and Sina Aghakhani. Drone delivery systems and energy management: a review and future trends.Handbook of smart energy systems, pages 1–19, 2023

2023
[273]

The development of a novel terrestrial/aerial robot: autonomous quadrotor tilting hybrid robot.Robotica, 42(1):118– 138, 2024

Daoxun Zhang, Ming Xu, Pengming Zhu, Ce Guo, Zhengyu Zhong, Huimin Lu, and Zhiqiang Zheng. The development of a novel terrestrial/aerial robot: autonomous quadrotor tilting hybrid robot.Robotica, 42(1):118– 138, 2024

2024
[274]

Duawlfin: A drone with unified actuation for wheeled locomotion and flight operation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13836, 2025

Jerry Tang, Ruiqi Zhang, Kaan Beyduz, Yiwei Jiang, Cody Wiebe, Haoyu Zhang, Osaruese Asoro, and Mark W Mueller. Duawlfin: A drone with unified actuation for wheeled locomotion and flight operation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13836, 2025

2025 arXiv
[275]

Design and demonstration of a tandem dual-rotor aerial–aquatic vehicle.Drones, 8(3):100, 2024

Sihuan Wu, Maosen Shao, Sifan Wu, Zhilin He, Hui Wang, Jinxiu Zhang, and Yue You. Design and demonstration of a tandem dual-rotor aerial–aquatic vehicle.Drones, 8(3):100, 2024

2024
[276]

Guocai Yao, Yanze Li, Hanyi Zhang, Yaotong Jiang, Tianmiao Wang, Fuchun Sun, and Xingbang Yang. Review of hybrid aquatic-aerial vehicle (haav): Classifications, current status, applications, challenges and technology perspectives.Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 139:100902, 2023

2023
[277]

Review of designs and flight control techniques of hybrid and convertible vtol uavs.Aerospace Science and Technology, 118:107035, 2021

Guillaume JJ Ducard and Mike Allenspach. Review of designs and flight control techniques of hybrid and convertible vtol uavs.Aerospace Science and Technology, 118:107035, 2021

2021
[278]

Methods to mitigate the impact of work environment on the measurement of building surface temperature by unmanned aerial vehicle onboard thermal imaging system

Bo Yang, Decai Wang, and Runjia Zhang. Methods to mitigate the impact of work environment on the measurement of building surface temperature by unmanned aerial vehicle onboard thermal imaging system. Energy and Buildings, 324:114872, 2024

2024
[279]

Study on the environmental adaptability of lithium-ion battery powered uav under extreme temperature conditions.Energy, 219:119481, 2021

Niansi Li, Xiaoyong Liu, Bendong Yu, Liang Li, Jianqiang Xu, and Qiong Tan. Study on the environmental adaptability of lithium-ion battery powered uav under extreme temperature conditions.Energy, 219:119481, 2021

2021
[280]

Toward autonomous multi-uav wireless network: A survey of reinforcement learning-based approaches.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(4):3038–3067, 2023

Yu Bai, Hui Zhao, Xin Zhang, Zheng Chang, Riku Jäntti, and Kun Yang. Toward autonomous multi-uav wireless network: A survey of reinforcement learning-based approaches.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(4):3038–3067, 2023

2023
[281]

Flora: Enhancing vision-language models with parameter-efficient federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15182, 2024

Duy Phuong Nguyen, J Pablo Munoz, and Ali Jannesari. Flora: Enhancing vision-language models with parameter-efficient federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15182, 2024

2024 arXiv
[282]

Abhik Singla, Sindhu Padakandla, and Shalabh Bhatnagar. Memory-based deep reinforcement learning for obstacle avoidance in uav with limited environment knowledge.IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 22(1):107–118, 2019

2019
[283]

Boquan Zhang, Tao Wang, Mingxuan Li, Yanru Cui, Xiang Lin, and Zhi Zhu. Multiple unmanned aerial vehicle (multi-uav) reconnaissance and search with limited communication range using semantic episodic memory in reinforcement learning.Drones (2504-446X), 8(8), 2024

2024
[284]

Reinforcement learning for uav attitude control.ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems, 3(2):1–21, 2019

William Koch, Renato Mancuso, Richard West, and Azer Bestavros. Reinforcement learning for uav attitude control.ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems, 3(2):1–21, 2019

2019
[285]

Reinforcement learning in multiple-uav networks: Deployment and movement design.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(8):8036–8049, 2019

Xiao Liu, Yuanwei Liu, and Yue Chen. Reinforcement learning in multiple-uav networks: Deployment and movement design.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(8):8036–8049, 2019

2019
[286]

Reinforcement learning based motion planner and trajectory tracker for unmanned aerial systems

Shaswat Garg. Reinforcement learning based motion planner and trajectory tracker for unmanned aerial systems. University of Waterloo, 2025

2025
[287]

Hierarchical reinforcement learning with automatic curriculum generation for unmanned combat aerial vehicle tactical decision-making in autonomous air combat.Drones, 9(5):384, 2025

Li Yang, Dong Wenhan, Pin Zhang, Zhai Hengang, and Guangqi Li. Hierarchical reinforcement learning with automatic curriculum generation for unmanned combat aerial vehicle tactical decision-making in autonomous air combat.Drones, 9(5):384, 2025

2025
[288]

Dl-drl: A double-level deep reinforcement learning approach for large-scale task scheduling of multi-uav.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22:1028–1044, 2024

Xiao Mao, Guohua Wu, Mingfeng Fan, Zhiguang Cao, and Witold Pedrycz. Dl-drl: A double-level deep reinforcement learning approach for large-scale task scheduling of multi-uav.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22:1028–1044, 2024. 39 UA Vs Meet Agentic AISA...

2024
[289]

Latency minimization for uav-enabled federated learning: Trajectory design and resource allocation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

Xuhui Zhang, Wenchao Liu, Jinke Ren, Huijun Xing, Gui Gui, Yanyan Shen, and Shuguang Cui. Latency minimization for uav-enabled federated learning: Trajectory design and resource allocation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[290]

Privacy and security challenges in federated learning for uav systems: A systematic review.IEEE Access, 2025

Ahmed Al Farsi, Ajmal Khan, Muhammad Rizwan Mughal, and Mohammed M Bait-Suwailam. Privacy and security challenges in federated learning for uav systems: A systematic review.IEEE Access, 2025

2025
[291]

State of the art and taxonomy survey on federated learning and blockchain integration in uav applications.The Journal of Supercomputing, 81(5):655, 2025

Hela Alaya, Asma Ben Letaifa, and Abderrezak Rachedi. State of the art and taxonomy survey on federated learning and blockchain integration in uav applications.The Journal of Supercomputing, 81(5):655, 2025

2025
[292]

A contemporary survey of recent advances in federated learning: Taxonomies, applications, and challenges

Mohammed H Alsharif, Raju Kannadasan, Wei Wei, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, and Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty. A contemporary survey of recent advances in federated learning: Taxonomies, applications, and challenges. Internet of Things, page 101251, 2024

2024
[293]

Human-drone collaborative spatial crowdsourcing by memory-augmented and distributed multi-agent deep reinforcement learning

Yu Wang, Chi Harold Liu, Chengzhe Piao, Ye Yuan, Rui Han, Guoren Wang, and Jian Tang. Human-drone collaborative spatial crowdsourcing by memory-augmented and distributed multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. In2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICD...

2022
[294]

Memory-augmented deep deterministic policy gradient

Qian Qiu, Fanyu Zeng, Haigen Yang, Guanyu Xing, and Shuzhi Sam Ge. Memory-augmented deep deterministic policy gradient. InInternational Conference on Social Robotics, pages 41–52. Springer, 2024

2024
[295]

Modular reinforcement learning for autonomous uav flight control.Drones, 7(7):418, 2023

Jongkwan Choi, Hyeon Min Kim, Ha Jun Hwang, Yong-Duk Kim, and Chang Ouk Kim. Modular reinforcement learning for autonomous uav flight control.Drones, 7(7):418, 2023

2023
[296]

Collaborative spectrum sensing for multi-uav system: a u-net approach with uncertainty awareness.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025

Jie Shi, Jiaxin Wu, Jingzheng Chong, and Zhihua Yang. Collaborative spectrum sensing for multi-uav system: a u-net approach with uncertainty awareness.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025

2025
[297]

When uncertainty leads to unsafety: Empirical insights into the role of uncertainty in unmanned aerial vehicle safety.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08908, 2025

Sajad Khatiri, Fatemeh Mohammadi Amin, Sebastiano Panichella, and Paolo Tonella. When uncertainty leads to unsafety: Empirical insights into the role of uncertainty in unmanned aerial vehicle safety.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08908, 2025

2025 arXiv
[298]

Command interpretation for uav using language models

Illia Savenko. Command interpretation for uav using language models. In2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Development (APUAVD), pages 228–231. IEEE, 2024

2024
[299]

Assuring safe and efficient operation of uav using explainable machine learning.Drones, 7(5):327, 2023

Abdulrahman Alharbi, Ivan Petrunin, and Dimitrios Panagiotakopoulos. Assuring safe and efficient operation of uav using explainable machine learning.Drones, 7(5):327, 2023

2023
[300]

Explainable artificial intelligence in drones: A brief review

Omar Banimelhem and Baghdad Al-khateeb. Explainable artificial intelligence in drones: A brief review. In 2023 14th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81(4):281–330, 2015

Gonzalo Pajares. Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs).Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81(4):281–330, 2015

2015

[2] [2]

Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: A review of perspective of platform, control, and applications.Ieee Access, 7:105100–105115, 2019

Jeongeun Kim, Seungwon Kim, Chanyoung Ju, and Hyoung Il Son. Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: A review of perspective of platform, control, and applications.Ieee Access, 7:105100–105115, 2019

2019

[3] [3]

An agent-based self-protective method to secure communication between uavs in unmanned aerial vehicle networks.Vehicular Communications, 26:100267, 2020

Reza Fotohi, Eslam Nazemi, and Fereidoon Shams Aliee. An agent-based self-protective method to secure communication between uavs in unmanned aerial vehicle networks.Vehicular Communications, 26:100267, 2020

2020

[4] [4]

Multi-agent architecture for information retrieval and intelligent monitoring by uavs in known environments affected by catastrophes

David Vallejo, José Jesús Castro-Schez, Carlos Glez-Morcillo, and Javier Albusac. Multi-agent architecture for information retrieval and intelligent monitoring by uavs in known environments affected by catastrophes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87:103243, 2020

2020

[5] [5]

Graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning for large-scale uavs swarm system control.Aerospace Science and Technology, 150:109166, 2024

Bocheng Zhao, Mingying Huo, Zheng Li, Ze Yu, and Naiming Qi. Graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning for large-scale uavs swarm system control.Aerospace Science and Technology, 150:109166, 2024

2024

[6] [6]

Integrated cognitive architectures: a survey.Artificial Intelligence Review, 28:103–130, 2007

Hui-Qing Chong, Ah-Hwee Tan, and Gee-Wah Ng. Integrated cognitive architectures: a survey.Artificial Intelligence Review, 28:103–130, 2007

2007

[7] [7]

Cognitive architectures and autonomy: A comparative review.Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 3(2):1, 2012

Kristinn Thórisson and Helgi Helgasson. Cognitive architectures and autonomy: A comparative review.Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 3(2):1, 2012

2012

[8] [8]

The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence, 2018

Antonio Lieto, Mehul Bhatt, Alessandro Oltramari, and David Vernon. The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence, 2018

2018