Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 70 references

PhotoHOI synthesizes a complete 3D hand-object interaction sequence from a single RGB photograph and an open-vocabulary instruction, removing the need for pre-defined object geometry or trajectories.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 18:30 UTC pith:VNYKIIEW

load-bearing objection Genuinely new input setting with consistent grasp-stage wins, but the end-to-end claim depends on unvalidated single-image scene recovery. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.01905 v1 pith:VNYKIIEW submitted 2026-08-03 cs.CV

PhotoHOI: Synthesizing 3D Hand-Object Interactions from a Single RGB Photograph

Zhenhao Zhang , Jiajun Zhang , Wei Min , Yebin Liu This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords hand-object interaction synthesissingle-image 3D reconstructionopen-vocabulary instructioncontact priorgrasp priorlatent optimizationvision-language modelmotion planning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that 3D hand-object interaction synthesis can start from the same inputs a person naturally has—a single photo of a scene and a language instruction—instead of pre-scanned object geometry or hand-specified trajectories. PhotoHOI parses the instruction with a vision-language model, recovers a task-relevant 3D scene from the photo, plans a collision-aware object trajectory, and then synthesizes hand motion using contact and grasp priors trained on large interaction datasets. The load-bearing step is refining the hand pose in a learned latent space so that contact and penetration objectives are optimized without leaving the manifold of plausible hand configurations. If correct, users could produce animated interactions for AR/VR, digital humans, or embodied manipulation directly from everyday inputs. On GRAB and H2O benchmarks the method reports higher contact ratio and lower penetration than representative baselines, and on real photos it reports higher task-success and scene-consistency rates.

Core claim

PhotoHOI establishes that a complete 3D hand-object interaction—hand motion plus object trajectory—can be generated from a single RGB photograph and an open-vocabulary instruction, with no object CAD models and no predefined object trajectories. The paper argues this is possible by decomposing the problem into VLM task parsing, single-image 3D scene recovery and scene-constrained object trajectory planning, then using two transferable priors: a task-conditioned contact prior that predicts functional contact regions on unseen object geometry, and a contact-conditioned grasp prior that maps those regions to a latent distribution of plausible MANO hand configurations. At inference, the grasp is

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is contact-guided latent-space hand optimization. Instead of optimizing high-dimensional MANO articulation parameters directly against geometric objectives, PhotoHOI learns a conditional VAE grasp prior and optimizes the latent code z together with wrist rotation and translation, with objectives that pull the hand toward predicted contact regions and penalize interpenetration. The other key pieces are the task-conditioned contact prior and the vision-language task parser.

Load-bearing premise

Single-image 3D recovery must return object geometry and poses that are mutually consistent enough for the assembled scene to support planning and contact optimization; if reconstructed scale or pose is off, the whole pipeline—from trajectory planning to contact prediction—operates on a wrong scene.

What would settle it

Take a set of real photographs with ground-truth object geometry (for example, scanned versions of the same objects), and run PhotoHOI twice: once with the recovered geometry and once with the ground-truth geometry. If task success and contact ratio do not improve substantially with correct geometry, the reconstruction bottleneck is not the decisive factor; if they degrade sharply, the pipeline's claims depend on reconstruction being nearly correct.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Task-relevant object geometry and object trajectories can be derived from image-language inputs, so HOI synthesis becomes applicable to natural photos rather than pre-scanned datasets.
  • The contact prior, pre-trained on affordance data and fine-tuned on HOI datasets, transfers to unseen objects and real photos.
  • Latent-space grasp refinement keeps hand articulation plausible while improving contact and penetration, suggesting the latent prior is the key to stable optimization.
  • On both benchmark datasets and real photos, PhotoHOI reports better contact quality and task-level success than the compared baselines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pipeline's ceiling is set by single-image 3D recovery; if the reconstructed scene scale or pose is off, the planned trajectory and contact prior act on a wrong scene. A natural test is to feed multi-view geometry or ground-truth scans and compare TSR and SCR.
  • Although the paper reports objective grasp metrics, it does not report human perceptual ratings; a user study would test whether the generated interactions 'look right' on real photos.
  • The framework is currently limited to rigid tabletop objects; extending to articulated or deformable objects would require part-level affordances and object state changes, which the paper lists as future work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. PhotoHOI proposes a pipeline that takes a single RGB photograph and an open-vocabulary language instruction, parses the task with a VLM, recovers a task-relevant 3D scene via open-vocabulary segmentation and single-image object reconstruction, refines object placement with a support-aware optimization, plans a collision-avoiding object trajectory, and synthesizes hand motion using task-conditioned contact priors and contact-conditioned grasp priors with latent-space refinement. Experiments report improved grasp-quality metrics on GRAB and H2O against four baselines, and improved TSR/SCR scores on 30 real-world scenes with 20 objects. The paper claims the first system to synthesize 3D hand-object interaction sequences from only an RGB image and language instruction, without requiring predefined object geometry or trajectories.

Significance. If the full pipeline works as claimed, the paper addresses a practical and timely problem: reducing the manual inputs needed for 3D HOI synthesis, which would be useful for AR/VR, digital humans, and embodied interaction. The hand-synthesis module is thoughtfully designed: the contact prior is pre-trained on affordance data and fine-tuned on HOI data, the grasp prior is CVAE-based, and optimization in the learned latent space is a principled way to maintain plausible articulations. The GRAB/H2O results are consistent across all four metrics and show clear improvements over strong baselines. However, the central end-to-end claim currently rests on an under-validated scene-recovery stage and an under-specified real-world evaluation, which prevents the paper from being accepted without further work.

major comments (4)
  1. [§Scene Recovery, Eq. (6)] The support-aware optimization in Eq. (6) refines only the translation δ_i along the support normal; rotation R_i^(0) and scale s_i^(0) from the independent object-wise SAM 3D reconstructions (Eq. (4)) are frozen. The paper does not describe any canonicalization, global alignment, or metric rescaling step before these reconstructed meshes are fed to the contact prior (Eq. (10)) and grasp prior (Eqs. 11–13), which were trained on canonical metric meshes from GRAB, H2O, ContactPose, etc. Scale/orientation errors thus propagate directly into contact prediction and latent grasp initialization; latent refinement of fingers cannot correct a globally wrong object frame. Table 3 reports no reconstruction-error metric, and Table 4 does not vary recovered geometry. This leaves the load-bearing assumption of accurate single-image scene recovery unvalidated.
  2. [§Real-world Task Performance] TSR and SCR are defined only as one-sentence statements: TSR 'measures whether the instructed task is successfully completed' and SCR 'evaluates whether the recovered scene and generated interaction satisfy support, collision, and placement constraints.' No scoring protocol is given: no automatic check, human-annotation instructions, number of annotators, or inter-annotator agreement. Without such details, the TSR/SCR numbers in Table 3 are unverifiable. The manuscript must specify how these metrics are computed, and ideally provide per-scene breakdowns and failure cases.
  3. [§Grasp Quality (Tabs. 1–2)] The GRAB/H2O comparisons evaluate only the hand-grasp stage under direct object conditions: benchmark-specific variants are trained and evaluated on the corresponding benchmark's object geometry, not on geometry recovered from a photograph. These results validate the hand-synthesis module in an idealized setting, but they do not validate the central photo-to-motion claim, because the recovered geometry may be imperfect. The paper should either clearly delimit the benchmark results as module-level validation, or add an end-to-end evaluation (e.g., rendered images with known ground-truth object models) to isolate the error introduced by scene recovery.
  4. [§Ablation Study (Table 4)] The ablation removes the contact prior, hand-pose prior, and latent optimization, but does not ablate the scene-recovery stage or the object-trajectory planner. Consequently, the contribution of the new image-to-scene components to task success is not measured. Table 4 reports only GRAB grasp metrics; no TSR/SCR ablations are shown. An ablation that replaces recovered geometry with ground-truth geometry would directly quantify the impact of reconstruction errors and is necessary to support the end-to-end claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/intro] There are typographical spacing issues, e.g., 'withbroadapplications' and 'Y ebin Liu'. Please proofread.
  2. [Eqs. (3) and (10)] The symbol M is used for the number of instance masks in Eq. (3) and for the number of surface points in Eq. (10). Use distinct symbols to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [§VLM-based Task Parsing] No evaluation of VLM parsing accuracy is reported. Even if end-to-end TSR/SCR covers this, a separate parsing accuracy table would help diagnose failures.
  4. [§Scene-constrained Object Trajectory Planning] The 'scene-aware replanning procedure' after collision detection is not described. At least a brief algorithm or reference is needed to make the planning stage reproducible.
  5. [Table 3] The 2,000 trials are averaged, but no variance or statistical significance is reported. Reporting standard errors or confidence intervals would make the comparison more informative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: evaluation uses held-out benchmark splits and identical recovered geometry for baselines; architectural/data self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical system, not a closed-form derivation. The interaction priors are trained and evaluated on disjoint splits: "For comparisons with SOTA methods, we additionally train benchmark-specific variants using only the training split of the corresponding benchmark, i.e., GRAB for the GRAB evaluation and H2O for the H2O evaluation. The corresponding test splits are excluded from all training stages." This explicitly prevents the standard supervised-learning circularity of evaluating on training data. On real photographs, baselines are compared under identical inputs: "Although all compared methods are provided with the same task-relevant reconstructed scene geometry, they must still synthesize an interaction that satisfies the instructed target relation." No equation defines its output in terms of the claimed prediction by construction: Eq. (6) is a support-aware placement optimization, Eq. (10) predicts contact maps from geometry and action, Eqs. (11)-(13) condition a CVAE on that prediction, and Eq. (14) optimizes contact/penetration objectives. Optimizing toward predicted contact regions is a standard objective, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper's self-citations (OpenHOI as architectural inspiration: "Inspired by (Zhang et al. 2025c), we train a conditional VAE to model task-conditioned contact distributions"; Wang et al. 2026 as an affordance data source) are precedents or resources, not unverified theorems invoked to forbid alternatives or force the result. The acknowledged limitation that "reconstruction errors may affect the generated results" is a robustness/correctness concern, not a circularity. Overall the pipeline is self-contained against external benchmarks and standard evaluation protocols.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is carried by several off-the-shelf components whose reliability is assumed rather than measured in the paper. The free parameters that tune the pipeline are not disclosed, and the transferability of the learned priors is the main empirical bet. No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Loss weights in latent hand optimization (lambda_prior, lambda_contact, lambda_pen) = not reported
    Eq. 14; these hand-chosen weights set the tradeoff between contact, penetration, and prior plausibility; the reported grasp metrics depend on them.
  • Support optimization weights (lambda_pen, lambda_reg) = not reported
    Eq. 6; they control how strongly objects are pulled to the support plane and penalized for penetration, affecting the recovered scene used for planning.
  • Bézier lift height h = not reported
    Scene-constrained Object Trajectory Planning; the object path shape, and therefore collision checking and approach motion, depends on this manually chosen scalar.
  • CVAE latent dimensionality and KL weight = not reported
    Hand Motion Synthesis; these hyperparameters determine how much finger variation the latent manifold allows and are not specified.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Single-view reconstruction (SAM 3D) produces object geometry and initial poses that are consistent in scale and frame across objects
    Object-wise 3D Recovery, Eq. 4. Each object is reconstructed independently; the pipeline does not globally align scale or frame, so a failure here propagates to trajectory planning and hand contact.
  • domain assumption The VLM parses open-vocabulary instructions into correct action, interaction object, goal, and spatial relation tuples
    VLM-based Task Parsing, Eq. 2. No parse accuracy or failure analysis is reported; every downstream module takes this tuple as ground truth.
  • domain assumption Contact and grasp priors trained on affordance and HOI datasets transfer to reconstructed real-world objects
    Hand Motion Synthesis and Experiments; the unseen-object generalization claim rests on this transfer, evaluated on only 20 common objects.
  • domain assumption MANO plus a learned latent manifold is an adequate constraint set for plausible finger articulation
    Equations 12-13; latent optimization assumes every decoded z is a plausible hand pose, and that the manifold covers the required grasps.
  • domain assumption Tabletop interactions have a single dominant support plane that can be fitted from recovered geometry
    Support-aware Scene Optimization, Eq. 5-6; the paper states this scope in Limitations (rigid objects, tabletop scenes).

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PhotoHOI: Synthesizing 3D Hand-Object Interactions from a Single RGB Photograph." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VNYKIIEW

@misc{pith2026260801905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PhotoHOI: Synthesizing 3D Hand-Object Interactions from a Single RGB Photograph},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VNYKIIEW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01905}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Hand-object interaction (HOI) is a fundamental human behavior with broad applications in AR/VR, digital humans, and embodied interaction. Existing methods typically require predefined object geometry, object trajectories, or task-specific conditions, limiting their use with natural real-world inputs. To address this, we study a more practical problem of synthesizing 3D hand-object interaction sequences from a single RGB photograph and an open-vocabulary language instruction, and introduce PhotoHOI. PhotoHOI first uses a vision-language model to parse the input image and instruction into a structured task specification, including the interaction object, target region, and spatial relation. It then recovers a compact task-relevant 3D scene and plans a smooth collision-aware object trajectory based on the recovered object states, support relations, and surrounding scene geometry. To synthesize hand motion that generalizes to real-world photographs and unseen objects, it learns transferable task-conditioned contact and contact-conditioned grasp priors from large-scale affordance and HOI data. The grasp is further refined in a learned latent space, constraining the optimization to a plausible hand-pose manifold. Experiments on GRAB and H2O demonstrate improved contact quality and reduced penetration over representative baselines. Results on real-world photographs further demonstrate higher task success and scene consistency, together with generalization to unseen objects and open-vocabulary instructions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01905 by Jiajun Zhang, Wei Min, Yebin Liu, Zhenhao Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview: Unlike existing methods that rely on known object geometry or given trajectories, PhotoHOI starts from a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Given a single RGB photograph and an instruction, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative results on real-world photograph inputs. PhotoHOI recovers task-relevant geometry, plans the object trajectory, and synthesizes the corresponding hand motion. Yellow hands indicate the approach stage, while purple hands indicate the manipulation stage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative ablation results of key components in PhotoHOI. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 13 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Journal of neuroscience , volume=

    The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , author=. Journal of neuroscience , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  2. [2]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02444 , year=

    Svimo: Synchronized diffusion for video and motion generation in hand-object interaction scenarios , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02444 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00732 , year=

    UniHM: Unified Dexterous Hand Manipulation with Vision Language Model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00732 , year=

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Unidexgrasp: Universal robotic dexterous grasping via learning diverse proposal generation and goal-conditioned policy , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  5. [5]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Graspxl: Generating grasping motions for diverse objects at scale , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Dexgrasp anything: Towards universal robotic dexterous grasping with physics awareness , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  7. [7]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Semgrasp: Semantic grasp generation via language aligned discretization , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  8. [8]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Grasp as you say: Language-guided dexterous grasp generation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22149 , year=

    Demograsp: Universal dexterous grasping from a single demonstration , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22149 , year=

    arXiv

  10. [10]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Text2hoi: Text-guided 3d motion generation for hand-object interaction , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  11. [11]

    SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers , pages=

    Diffh2o: Diffusion-based synthesis of hand-object interactions from textual descriptions , author=. SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers , pages=

    2024

  12. [12]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Motiongpt: Human motion as a foreign language , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Hoigpt: Learning long-sequence hand-object interaction with language models , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18947 , year=

    Openhoi: Open-world hand-object interaction synthesis with multimodal large language model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18947 , year=

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14874 , year=

    TOUCH: Text-guided Controllable Generation of Free-Form Hand-Object Interactions , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14874 , year=

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

    Manidext: Hand-object manipulation synthesis via continuous correspondence embeddings and residual-guided diffusion , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28766 , year=

    HandX: Scaling Bimanual Motion and Interaction Generation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28766 , year=

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    GRAB: A dataset of whole-body human grasping of objects , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  19. [19]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    ARCTIC: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand-object manipulation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  20. [20]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Taco: Benchmarking generalizable bimanual tool-action-object understanding , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Oakink2: A dataset of bimanual hands-object manipulation in complex task completion , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  22. [22]

    Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Structure-from-motion revisited , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  23. [23]

    Communications of the ACM , volume=

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis , author=. Communications of the ACM , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  24. [24]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Vggt: Visual geometry grounded transformer , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) , pages=

    Pixel2mesh: Generating 3d mesh models from single rgb images , author=. Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) , pages=

  26. [26]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16624 , year=

    Sam 3d: 3dfy anything in images , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16624 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Motionchain: Conversational motion controllers via multimodal prompts , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  29. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18349 , year=

    Human-object interaction via automatically designed vlm-guided motion policy , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18349 , year=

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Hosig: Full-body human-object-scene interaction generation with hierarchical scene perception , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  31. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , year=

    Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14159 , year=

    Grounded sam: Assembling open-world models for diverse visual tasks , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14159 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    GenH2R: Learning generalizable human-to-robot handover via scalable simulation demonstration and imitation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01651 , year=

    DAG: Unleash the Potential of Diffusion Model for Open-Vocabulary 3D Affordance Grounding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01651 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Seqafford: Sequential 3d affordance reasoning via multimodal large language model , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    H2o: Two hands manipulating objects for first person interaction recognition , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

  37. [37]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Human-object interaction from human-level instructions , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  38. [38]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Controllable human-object interaction synthesis , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  39. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14916 , year=

    Human motion diffusion model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14916 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02697 , year=

    Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general objects based on simulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02697 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) , pages=

    Efficient physics-based implementation for realistic hand-object interaction in virtual reality , author=. 2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  42. [42]

    Virtual Reality , volume=

    Enhancing hand-object interactions in virtual reality for precision manual tasks , author=. Virtual Reality , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  43. [43]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    CAFI-AR: Contact-aware freehand interaction with ar objects , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  44. [44]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    InteractAvatar: Modeling Hand-Face Interaction in Photorealistic Avatars with Deformable Gaussians , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  45. [45]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Interact: Advancing large-scale versatile 3d human-object interaction generation , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.03305 , year=

    HVG-3D: Bridging Real and Simulation Domains for 3D-Conditional Hand-Object Interaction Video Synthesis , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.03305 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Proceedings IEEE Conf

    Expressive Body Capture: 3D Hands, Face, and Body from a Single Image , author =. Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , year =

  48. [48]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc

    Embodied Hands: Modeling and Capturing Hands and Bodies Together , author =. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) , volume =. 2017 , month_numeric =

    2017

  49. [49]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Playerone: Egocentric world simulator , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  50. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01001 , year=

    EgoSim: Egocentric World Simulator for Embodied Interaction Generation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01001 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21571 , year=

    Scalable vision-language-action model pretraining for robotic manipulation with real-life human activity videos , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21571 , year=

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15597 , year=

    Being-h0: vision-language-action pretraining from large-scale human videos , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15597 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.22615 , year=

    GazeVLA: Learning Human Intention for Robotic Manipulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.22615 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Dexvlg: Dexterous vision-language-grasp model at scale , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  55. [55]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Evolvinggrasp: Evolutionary grasp generation via efficient preference alignment , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  56. [56]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Contactgen: Generative contact modeling for grasp generation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  57. [57]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Bimart: A unified approach for the synthesis of 3d bimanual interaction with articulated objects , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  58. [58]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=

    Synthesizing diverse and physically stable grasps with arbitrary hand structures using differentiable force closure estimator , author=. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  59. [59]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Grasp’d: Differentiable contact-rich grasp synthesis for multi-fingered hands , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  60. [60]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    ContactPose: A dataset of grasps with object contact and hand pose , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  61. [61]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Dexycb: A benchmark for capturing hand grasping of objects , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  62. [62]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Dense hand-object (ho) graspnet with full grasping taxonomy and dynamics , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  63. [63]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Oakink: A large-scale knowledge repository for understanding hand-object interaction , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  64. [64]

    2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=

    Dexterous Manipulation Based on Prior Dexterous Grasp Pose Knowledge , author=. 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  65. [65]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16420 , year=

    Anydexgrasp: General dexterous grasping for different hands with human-level learning efficiency , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16420 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Dynamic reconstruction of hand-object interaction with distributed force-aware contact representation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14441 , year=

    FBI: Learning Dexterous In-hand Manipulation with Dynamic Visuotactile Shortcut Policy , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14441 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    2022 , eprint=

    Grasp'D: Differentiable Contact-rich Grasp Synthesis for Multi-fingered Hands , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  69. [69]

    2026 , eprint=

    HarmoHOI: Harmonizing Appearance and 3D Motion for Multi-view Hand-Object Interaction Synthesis , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  70. [70]

    2026 , eprint=

    Diffusion Models are Open-World Affordance Learners: Leveraging Generative Priors for 3D Affordance Learning , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.