Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Neutrino flavor ratios measured by IceCube-Gen2 can reveal dark-matter spikes around AGNs.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 06:22 UTC pith:VNZEIAGD

load-bearing objection Solid, self-contained U(1) model that turns IceCube-Gen2 flavor ratios into a probe of asymmetric sub-GeV DM spikes; the math holds once the asymmetry premise is granted. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08833 v1 pith:VNZEIAGD submitted 2026-07-09 hep-ph

Flavorful Interactions of AGN Neutrinos with Dark Matter Spike

classification hep-ph
keywords IceCube-Gen2neutrino flavor ratiosdark-matter spikesactive galactic nucleiasymmetric dark matterheavy neutral leptonseffective neutrino massU(1) gauge model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

IceCube-Gen2 will measure the flavor composition of high-energy cosmic neutrinos with high precision. This paper builds a concrete model in which those neutrinos interact with a dense dark-matter “spike” around active galactic nuclei. Because the dark matter is taken to be asymmetric, neutrinos acquire a large effective mass while they traverse the spike; some flavors can also scatter inelastically into heavy neutral leptons that promptly decay back into neutrinos. The net result is a clean, adiabatic conversion of flavor states into mass eigenstates (plus a mild, flavor-selective attenuation). The final flavor ratios that reach Earth therefore deviate from the standard (1/3 : 1/3 : 1/3) expectation and from the pure muon-damped source prediction in ways that IceCube-Gen2 can resolve. Once terrestrial experiments fix the neutrino mass ordering and search for the new particles in tau decays, the same flavor data become a probe of both the spike density profile and the properties of the dark-matter particles that form it.

Core claim

A U(1) gauge model with asymmetric dark matter and flavor-non-universal neutrino couplings produces adiabatic flavor evolution (and optional inelastic scattering) inside AGN dark-matter spikes. The resulting Earth flavor ratios are robustly different from the standard prediction and from a pure muon-damped source; IceCube-Gen2 can discriminate them, and the combination with mass-ordering and tau-decay measurements yields information on the spike and the dark-matter particles.

What carries the argument

The dark-matter-induced effective potential V_α = ±(g_ψ g_N ρ_spike / m_ψ) |U_αN|^{2} / m_V^{2} that dominates the Hamiltonian inside the spike, together with the cascade equations that track the mild regeneration of neutrinos after inelastic scattering ν + ψ → N + ψ.

Load-bearing premise

Dark matter must be almost purely asymmetric; any sizable antiparticle component would annihilate and erase the dense inner spike that drives the effect.

What would settle it

IceCube-Gen2 measures a flavor ratio consistent with (1/3 : 1/3 : 1/3) (or the pure muon-damped expectation) after the neutrino mass ordering is known and after the new particles are either discovered or ruled out near present bounds; that would exclude the large-V_α regime for the spikes of the observed AGN sources.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • IceCube-Gen2 flavor contours will separate the four sign-and-mass-ordering cases of a pure τ coupling from the standard expectation.
  • When an electron or muon coupling is also present, the same data set bounds (or measures) the combination (g_ψ / m_ψ)[ρ_spike(R_em) − ρ̄_spike(R_em)].
  • Discovery of the light gauge boson or the heavy neutral lepton in tau-decay or unitarity-violation searches converts the flavor measurement into a direct probe of AGN spike profiles.
  • The energy spectrum remains a power law with the same index, so spectral distortion is not required for the signal.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If IceCube-Gen2 finds a statistically significant excess of electron neutrinos below 1 PeV after inverted ordering is established, the result would simultaneously favor both a dark-matter spike and an asymmetric sub-GeV dark-matter candidate.
  • The same adiabatic-conversion logic could be applied to any other dense, flavor-asymmetric medium (for example, neutron-star crusts or early-universe domains) that a high-energy neutrino flux might traverse.
  • A non-observation of the predicted deviation would set a clean upper limit on the product of dark-matter density contrast and the new gauge coupling, independent of the overall AGN luminosity normalization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a U_NEW(1) model in which an asymmetric Dirac dark-matter fermion ψ couples to a light vector mediator V that also mixes with active neutrinos via heavy neutral leptons N_τ (and optionally N_e or N_μ). Neutrinos produced near AGN black holes therefore experience both a large coherent potential V_α ∝ ho_spike |U_α4/5|^{2}/m_V^{2} and, when the relevant mixing is non-zero, inelastic scattering u+ψ o N+ψ followed by N o u u u regeneration. The authors derive the cascade equations (App. B), demonstrate adiabatic evolution through the spike (Eqs. 5.1–5.7), and map the resulting mass-eigenstate fluxes onto Earth flavor ratios for three coupling patterns (V_ au only; V_e & V_ au; V_μ & V_ au). They show that IceCube-Gen2 can distinguish most of these ratios from the standard (1/3:1/3:1/3) and muon-damped expectations, and that the combination with terrestrial mass-ordering and au-decay measurements can constrain the product (g_ψ/m_ψ)[ ho_spike(R_em)- ho-bar_spike(R_em)].

Significance. If the asymmetric-DM premise holds, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable link between IceCube-Gen2 flavor data and the microphysics of sub-GeV dark matter spikes. The adiabatic mapping (Eqs. 5.8–5.15) and the cascade solutions are parameter-free once the sign of V_ au and the mass ordering are fixed, and the benchmarks satisfy existing laboratory and cosmological bounds. The paper therefore offers a rare multi-messenger probe of both spike density profiles and the particle content of asymmetric dark matter, with clear experimental handles (unitarity violation, au-decay kinematics, mass ordering).

major comments (2)
  1. §3 and the paragraph after Eq. (3.9): the entire phenomenology rests on the assumption that the spike is composed of purely asymmetric dark matter (n_ψ ≫ n_ψ-bar). The authors correctly show that even loop- and p-wave-suppressed co-annihilation channels erase the inner spike for the densities of interest, but they do not quantify how large a residual ψ-bar fraction can be tolerated before |V_ au| drops below the 10^{-16} eV threshold used throughout §5. A short estimate of the maximum allowed n_ψ-bar/n_ψ (or equivalently the maximum symmetric component) that still yields |V_ au| ≳ 10^{-16} eV for the NGC 1068 column densities of Table 1 would make the central claim robust rather than conditional.
  2. §5, Eqs. (5.8)–(5.15) and Figs. 2–5: the flavor-ratio predictions are presented as robust once |V_ au| > 10^{-16} eV. However, the adiabaticity criterion is checked only for a single power-law index γ_SP and for E_ u ≳ 70 TeV. Because the optical depth and the potential both scale with the same combination of couplings and density (Eq. 5.6), a modest change in ho_spike(R_em) or in the lower integration limit R_em can move the system out of the “large-matter-effect” regime for part of the IceCube-Gen2 energy window. An explicit statement of the range of ho_spike(R_em) (or au_SP) over which the four discrete predictions remain valid would strengthen the discrimination claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. Table 1: the units of ho_7/3 and ho_3/2 are given as GeV cm^{-3}, but the numerical values for NGC 1068 appear to be quoted at R_em; a parenthetical reminder that these are local densities (not column densities) would avoid confusion with Σ.
  2. Eq. (2.8) and App. B: the regeneration factor b is derived under the assumption that N inherits essentially all of the parent neutrino energy. A one-sentence remark that this holds only for E_ u ≫ m_V^{2}/m_ψ would clarify the domain of validity of the power-law solution.
  3. Fig. 1 caption: the gray exclusion region is described as arising from N_eff and perturbativity; adding the explicit lower bound m_V/|g_ψ g_N| ≳ 20 MeV in the caption would make the figure self-contained.
  4. References [50–52] are cited for the upper bound m_ψ < 1 GeV; a brief parenthetical note on which observable (supernova neutrinos, UHE flux attenuation, etc.) sets that bound would help the reader.
  5. Typographical: “adiabacity” appears several times (e.g., after Eq. 5.5); the standard spelling is “adiabaticity.”

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: flavor-ratio predictions follow from the model Lagrangian, adiabatic MSW evolution, and cascade equations without fitting to IceCube data or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The central claims (IceCube-Gen2 discrimination of flavor ratios from the standard (1/3:1/3:1/3) and muon-damped cases, plus extraction of spike/DM information when combined with terrestrial mass-ordering and tau-decay results) are obtained by direct computation. The effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 5.1) with potentials (Eqs. 5.2–5.3) is diagonalized; adiabaticity is verified for the chosen |V_α| ≳ 10^{-16} eV; the resulting mapping of source flavors onto vacuum mass eigenstates yields the four cases in Eqs. 5.8–5.15 (and the analogous expressions with attenuation). Cascade equations (App. B) follow from the differential cross-section and three-body decay spectra under the power-law ansatz for Φ_ν, which is preserved. Spike column densities Σ and ρ(Rem) are taken from external astrophysical literature (Table 1, Refs. [25–31]); model parameters are constrained by external bounds (NOMAD, CHARM, BABAR, unitarity, N_eff) rather than fitted to IceCube flavor data. Benchmarks B1–B4 are illustrative points inside the allowed region that produce |V| large enough for robust adiabatic conversion; the predicted ratios are insensitive to the precise |U_α4/5|^2 once the large-V regime is entered. Self-citations (e.g., Farzan’s related works on DM-induced potentials or “work in progress”) supply only context or secondary bounds and do not force the flavor-mapping formulae. The sole external premise (asymmetric DM to preserve the inner spike) is stated explicitly and is not circular. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on a newly postulated U(1) sector (V, ϕ, ψ, two HNLs) whose charges and mixings are chosen to produce both an effective potential and an inelastic scattering channel while remaining consistent with existing bounds. Spike density profiles and the assumption of asymmetric DM are taken from the astrophysical literature but are essential for the optical depth and adiabaticity arguments. Free parameters (masses, couplings, mixings, γ_SP) are scanned rather than fitted to the flavor data themselves.

free parameters (5)
  • m_V / |g_ψ g_N|
    Sets the overall scattering cross-section and effective potential; scanned to achieve τ_SP ∼ 3–10 while remaining above the N_eff lower bound (Fig. 1).
  • |U_τ5|^2
    Controls both g_νν and g_νN; allowed up to ∼0.01 by BaBar tau-decay kinematics and used as a free range in the benchmarks.
  • |U_e4|^2 or |U_μ4|^2
    Sets the relative optical depth of the second flavor; constrained by unitarity and Kaon-decay bounds but free within those limits.
  • γ_SP
    Spike density index (7/3 or 3/2); taken from theoretical literature and varied to show robustness.
  • m_ψ
    Dark-matter mass; restricted to 50 MeV–1 GeV by N_eff and other bounds, fixed to 100 MeV in benchmarks.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Dark-matter density is asymmetric (n_ψ ≫ n_ψ-bar) so that pair annihilation does not saturate the inner spike.
    Stated in §3; without it the column density collapses and both V_α and τ_SP become negligible.
  • domain assumption Neutrino evolution through the spike is adiabatic for |V_α| ≳ 10^{-16} eV and E_ν ≳ 70 TeV.
    Derived in §5 from the standard adiabaticity criterion; used to map production flavor states onto vacuum mass eigenstates.
  • domain assumption Spike density profile ρ_spike(r) ∝ r^{-γ_SP} with γ_SP > 1 down to ∼4 R_S.
    Taken from Gondolo–Silk and subsequent literature (Eq. 2.1); enters every optical-depth and potential calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Lepton flavor is conserved; each HNL mixes with at most one active neutrino.
    Imposed in §3 to keep the cascade equations tractable and to avoid additional experimental bounds.
invented entities (3)
  • U_NEW(1) gauge boson V and scalar ϕ no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediate the ν–ψ interaction and generate the HNL masses after spontaneous breaking.
    New light vector and its Higgs; masses and couplings chosen to satisfy N_eff and laboratory bounds while producing observable optical depth.
  • Asymmetric Dirac fermion dark matter ψ no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide both the target for inelastic scattering and the source of a non-vanishing effective neutrino potential.
    Postulated to avoid annihilation destruction of the spike; no independent detection claimed.
  • Heavy neutral leptons N_τ and N_e/μ no independent evidence
    purpose: Generate the off-diagonal ν–N couplings that allow inelastic scattering and the diagonal ν–ν couplings that generate the effective potential.
    Mixings |U_α4/5|^2 are free parameters within existing bounds; their discovery would be independent evidence but is not yet available.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 29794 in / 3128 out tokens · 28406 ms · 2026-07-13T06:22:03.607503+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

IceCube-Gen2 is going to make the dream of precise flavor ratio measurement for high energy cosmic neutrinos a reality. Motivated by this prospect, we build a model for the interaction of neutrinos with the dark matter and study the impact of the neutrino interaction with the dark matter spike around active galactic nuclei on the neutrino flavor ratio measurement. We show that the flavor measurement by IceCube-Gen2 can discriminate between this model and the standard expectation, $(\nu_e^\oplus:\nu_\mu^\oplus:\nu_\tau^\oplus)\simeq (1/3:1/3:1/3)$, as well as the prediction for a damped muon source. We discuss how we can derive information about the spike as well as about the characteristics of the dark matter particles composing it by combining the flavor ratio measurements with the results of the terrestrial experiments determining the neutrino mass ordering and a potential deviation from the standard model predictions in the measurements of the tau decay modes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk,Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 1719 [astro-ph/9906391]

  2. [2]

    Sharma, G

    M. Sharma, G. Herrera, N. Arav and S. Horiuchi,Novel method to trace the dark matter density profile around supermassive black holes with AGN reverberation mapping,Phys. Rev. D 113(2026) 043052 [2506.10122]

  3. [3]

    Vasiliev,Dark matter annihilation near a black hole: Plateau vs

    E. Vasiliev,Dark matter annihilation near a black hole: Plateau vs. weak cusp,Phys. Rev. D 76(2007) 103532 [0707.3334]

  4. [4]

    Shapiro and J

    S.L. Shapiro and J. Shelton,Weak annihilation cusp inside the dark matter spike about a black hole,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 123510 [1606.01248]

  5. [5]

    Chattopadhyay, P.S.B

    D.S. Chattopadhyay, P.S.B. Dev and Y. Porto,Ruling Out Spiky WIMP Dark Matter using Indirect Searches,2602.23348

  6. [6]

    De Marchi, A

    A.G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava and F. Sala,Diffuse astrophysical neutrinos from dark matter around blazars,Phys. Lett. B871(2025) 140015 [2506.06416]. – 23 –

  7. [7]

    De Marchi, A

    A.G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava and F. Sala,Boosted dark matter versus dark matter-induced neutrinos from single and stacked blazars,JHEP12(2025) 136 [2507.12278]

  8. [8]

    Fujiwara, G

    M. Fujiwara, G. Herrera and S. Horiuchi,Neutrino Diffusion within Dark Matter Spikes, 2412.00805

  9. [9]

    Cline, S

    J.M. Cline, S. Gao, F. Guo, Z. Lin, S. Liu, M. Puel et al.,Blazar Constraints on Neutrino-Dark Matter Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 091402 [2209.02713]

  10. [10]

    Cline and M

    J.M. Cline and M. Puel,NGC 1068 constraints on neutrino-dark matter scattering,JCAP06 (2023) 004 [2301.08756]

  11. [11]

    Zapata, J

    G.D. Zapata, J. Jones-Pérez and A.M. Gago,Bounds on neutrino-DM interactions from TXS 0506+056 neutrino outburst,JCAP07(2025) 042 [2503.03823]

  12. [12]

    Dixit, G

    K. Dixit, G. Mohlabeng and S. Razzaque,Searching for dark matter signals with high energy astrophysical neutrinos in IceCube,2602.06121

  13. [13]

    Inoue, D

    Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan and A. Doi,On the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos from NGC 1068: The Role of Nonthermal Coronal Activity,Astrophys. J. Lett.891(2020) L33 [1909.02239]

  14. [14]

    Murase, S.S

    K. Murase, S.S. Kimura and P. Meszaros,Hidden Cores of Active Galactic Nuclei as the Origin of Medium-Energy Neutrinos: Critical Tests with the MeV Gamma-Ray Connection,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 011101 [1904.04226]

  15. [15]

    Kheirandish, K

    A. Kheirandish, K. Murase and S.S. Kimura,High-energy Neutrinos from Magnetized Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei and Prospects for Identification of Seyfert Galaxies and Quasars in Neutrino Telescopes,Astrophys. J.922(2021) 45 [2102.04475]

  16. [16]

    Murase,Hidden Hearts of Neutrino Active Galaxies,Astrophys

    K. Murase,Hidden Hearts of Neutrino Active Galaxies,Astrophys. J. Lett.941(2022) L17 [2211.04460]

  17. [17]

    Eichmann, F

    B. Eichmann, F. Oikonomou, S. Salvatore, R.-J. Dettmar and J. Becker Tjus,Solving the Multimessenger Puzzle of the AGN-starburst Composite Galaxy NGC 1068,Astrophys. J.939 (2022) 43 [2207.00102]

  18. [18]

    Inoue, M

    S. Inoue, M. Cerruti, K. Murase and R.-Y. Liu,Multimessenger emission from winds and tori in active galactic nuclei,PoSICRC2023(2023) 1161 [2207.02097]

  19. [19]

    Yoast-Hull, J.S.G

    T.M. Yoast-Hull, J.S.G. III, E.G. Zweibel and J.E. Everett,Active Galactic Nuclei, Neutrinos, and Interacting Cosmic Rays in NGC 253 and NGC 1068,Astrophys. J.780(2014) 137 [1311.5586]

  20. [20]

    Ullio, H

    P. Ullio, H. Zhao and M. Kamionkowski,A Dark matter spike at the galactic center?,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 043504 [astro-ph/0101481]

  21. [21]

    Balaji, D

    S. Balaji, D. Sachdeva, F. Sala and J. Silk,Dark matter spikes around Sgr A* inγ-rays,JCAP 08(2023) 063 [2303.12107]

  22. [22]

    Gnedin and J.R

    O.Y. Gnedin and J.R. Primack,Dark Matter Profile in the Galactic Center,Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(2004) 061302 [astro-ph/0308385]

  23. [23]

    Shapiro and D.C

    S.L. Shapiro and D.C. Heggie,Effect of stars on the dark matter spike around a black hole: A tale of two treatments,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043018 [2209.08105]

  24. [24]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Merritt,Time-dependent models for dark matter at the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 103502 [astro-ph/0501555]. [25]IceCubecollaboration,Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068,Science378(2022) 538 [2211.09972]. [26]IceCubecollaboration,Search for Neutrino Emission from Hard X-Ray AGN with IceCube, Ast...

  25. [25]

    Greenhill, C.R

    L.J. Greenhill, C.R. Gwinn, R. Antonucci and R. Barvainis,Vlbi imaging of water maser emission from the nuclear torus of ngc 1068,Astrophys. J. Lett.472(1996) L21 [astro-ph/9609082]

  26. [26]

    Bentz, P.R

    M.C. Bentz, P.R. Williams and T. Treu,The broad line region and black hole mass of ngc 4151, The Astrophysical Journal934(2022) 168

  27. [27]

    Padovani, F

    P. Padovani, F. Oikonomou, M. Petropoulou, P. Giommi and E. Resconi,TXS 0506+056, the first cosmic neutrino source, is not a BL Lac,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.484(2019) L104 [1901.06998]

  28. [28]

    Cerruti, W

    M. Cerruti, W. Benbow, X. Chen, J.P. Dumm, L.F. Fortson and K. Shahinyan,Luminous and high-frequency peaked blazars: the origin of theγ-ray emission from PKS 1424+240,Astron. Astrophys.606(2017) A68 [1707.00804]

  29. [29]

    FarzanWork in progress

    Y. FarzanWork in progress

  30. [30]

    Barillier, L

    E. Barillier, L. Manenti, K. Mora, P. Padovani, I. Sarnoff, Y. Xu et al.,Setting limits on blazar-boosted dark matter with xenon-based detectors,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 023005 [2509.07265]. [34]NOMADcollaboration,Search for heavy neutrinos mixing with tau neutrinos,Phys. Lett. B 506(2001) 27 [hep-ex/0101041]

  31. [31]

    Orloff, A.N

    J. Orloff, A.N. Rozanov and C. Santoni,Limits on the mixing of tau neutrino to heavy neutrinos,Phys. Lett. B550(2002) 8 [hep-ph/0208075]. [36]DELPHIcollaboration,Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays,Z. Phys. C74 (1997) 57. [37]ArgoNeuTcollaboration,New Constraints on Tau-Coupled Heavy Neutral Leptons with Masses mN=280–970 MeV,Phys. Rev. ...

  32. [32]

    Bilenky, S.M

    M.S. Bilenky, S.M. Bilenky and A. Santamaria,Invisible width of the Z boson and ’secret’ neutrino-neutrino interactions,Phys. Lett. B301(1993) 287

  33. [33]

    Berryman et al.,Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys

    J.M. Berryman et al.,Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101267 [2203.01955]

  34. [34]

    Bakhti and Y

    P. Bakhti and Y. Farzan,CP-Violation and Non-Standard Interactions at the MOMENT, JHEP07(2016) 109 [1602.07099]

  35. [35]

    Fernandez-Martinez, J

    E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia and J. Lopez-Pavon,Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing,JHEP08(2016) 033 [1605.08774]. [43]NA62collaboration,Search for heavy neutral lepton production in K+ decays to positrons, Phys. Lett. B807(2020) 135599 [2005.09575]

  36. [36]

    Nussinov,TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?,Phys

    S. Nussinov,TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?,Phys. Lett. B165(1985) 55

  37. [37]

    Barr, R.S

    S.M. Barr, R.S. Chivukula and E. Farhi,Electroweak Fermion Number Violation and the Production of Stable Particles in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B241(1990) 387

  38. [38]

    Barr,Baryogenesis, sphalerons and the cogeneration of dark matter,Phys

    S.M. Barr,Baryogenesis, sphalerons and the cogeneration of dark matter,Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 3062. – 25 –

  39. [39]

    Kaplan,A Single explanation for both the baryon and dark matter densities,Phys

    D.B. Kaplan,A Single explanation for both the baryon and dark matter densities,Phys. Rev. Lett.68(1992) 741

  40. [40]

    Davoudiasl and R.N

    H. Davoudiasl and R.N. Mohapatra,On Relating the Genesis of Cosmic Baryons and Dark Matter,New J. Phys.14(2012) 095011 [1203.1247]

  41. [41]

    Zurek,Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, Signatures, and Constraints,Phys

    K.M. Zurek,Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, Signatures, and Constraints,Phys. Rept.537 (2014) 91 [1308.0338]

  42. [42]

    Chauhan, R.A

    G. Chauhan, R.A. Gustafson, G. Herrera, T. Johnson and I.M. Shoemaker,The dark matter diffused supernova neutrino background,JCAP10(2025) 020 [2505.03882]

  43. [43]

    Esteban and A

    I. Esteban and A. Ibarra,Attenuation of the ultra-high-energy neutrino flux by dark matter scatterings,JCAP04(2026) 064 [2508.02869]

  44. [44]

    Bertólez-Martínez, G

    T. Bertólez-Martínez, G. Herrera, P. Martínez-Miravé and J. Terol Calvo,The Highest-Energy Neutrino Event Constrains Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions,2506.08993

  45. [45]

    Abbasi et al.,Characterization of the Three-Flavor Composition of Cosmic Neutrinos with IceCube,2510.24957

    R. Abbasi et al.,Characterization of the Three-Flavor Composition of Cosmic Neutrinos with IceCube,2510.24957. [54]IceCube-Gen2collaboration,IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe,J. Phys. G 48(2021) 060501 [2008.04323]. [55]IceCube-Gen2collaboration,Probing ultra-high-energy neutrinos with the IceCube-Gen2 in-ice radio array,PoSICRC2025(2025) 1...

  46. [46]

    Wen, C.A

    A.Y. Wen, C.A. Argüelles and S. Palomares-Ruiz,Visible inelasticity as a probe of tau flavor content of astrophysical neutrinos,2605.29105

  47. [47]

    Giunti and C.W

    C. Giunti and C.W. Kim,Fundamentals of neutrino physics and astrophysics, Oxford Univ Press, New York (2011)

  48. [48]

    Farzan and S

    Y. Farzan and S. Palomares-Ruiz,Flavor of cosmic neutrinos preserved by ultralight dark matter,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 051702 [1810.00892]. – 26 –